Splunk Observability Cloud vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

Splunk and Zenoss are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Splunk is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4, while Zenoss is ranked #76. Splunk holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Zenoss’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Splunk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 71 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

5,846 Views
1,578 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Zenoss Cloud

Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews

1,401 Views
757 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

Zenoss Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

Zenoss Cloud and Splunk Observability Cloud are solutions competing in the monitoring and analytics category. Splunk Observability Cloud is often seen as the superior option due to its comprehensive feature set and robust analytics, despite its higher costs.

Features: Zenoss Cloud provides real-time monitoring and AI-driven analytics, enabling proactive issue resolution. It also supports agentless monitoring, flexible discovery mechanisms, and customizable dashboards. Splunk Observability Cloud offers in-depth data analytics, advanced alerting, and real-time data streaming. It facilitates customized dashboards and integrates seamlessly with various platforms, providing a consolidated view of IT operations.

Room for Improvement: Zenoss Cloud can improve by expanding its feature set and refining its user interface for more intuitive navigation. It could also enhance cross-platform integrations and scalability. Splunk Observability Cloud could simplify its deployment process, improve documentation for easier setup, and offer more competitive pricing strategies to cater to smaller enterprises or startups.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zenoss Cloud boasts a simpler deployment process with responsive customer service, ensuring a seamless transition for users. In contrast, Splunk Observability Cloud requires expert guidance due to its complexity but compensates with extensive customer support that aids in maximizing its capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud is favorable for its lower upfront costs and quick return on investment, making it an attractive option for small to medium-sized enterprises. Although more expensive initially, Splunk Observability Cloud offers a higher ROI through its advanced features and scalability, appealing to larger enterprises seeking long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Zenoss Cloud

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,832 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

6th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

7th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (8th), Container Management (6th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)

Zenoss Cloud

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

76th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

51st

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

39th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (33rd), Event Monitoring (14th), Server Monitoring (27th), Container Monitoring (9th), AIOps (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Splunk Observability Cloud	1.2%
Zenoss Cloud	0.6%
Other	98.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Taiwo Ige

IT Operations Engineer at ABC Supply Co. Inc.

Alerting improves incident response across teams and enables faster awareness before customer impact

Splunk Observability Cloud could be improved in terms of integrations with more technical add-ons, such as Zoom. Although they have one with Zoom, it's not available in the cloud, so having that feature would be beneficial. Essentially, Splunk should continue expanding to create easier ways to ingest logs from different products. The out-of-the-box customizable dashboards in Splunk Observability Cloud are very effective in showcasing IT performance to business leaders. However, there are aspects that could be improved, such as linking dashboards to one another. While IT leaders may not drill down, it's crucial to create levels of dashboards for technical users to find root causes, making it effective for stakeholders.

Read full review

ClaudiaChen

Cloud Architect - Senior Technology Architect at Telstra

Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features

As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the fact that Splunk APM makes it easy to connect to the application database and run queries against the data."

"Splunk APM has helped us to standardize logging and monitoring procedures."

"I have primarily used it to go back into the past and understand why something happened. It provides enough information to do research and figure things out."

"The product retains a lot of log data for subsequent analysis."

"The features are pretty much ready out of the box."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"What I appreciate most about Splunk Observability Cloud is the correlation feature, specifically the ease of correlating logs and issues to those traces to see where within the path of the business function is failing."

"The maintenance of Splunk Observability Cloud is very easy; it's manageable."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."

"The product offers good documentation that helps with initial training."

"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."

"The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism."

"Its Docker Container concept is mind blowing. It is the first monitoring tool which comes with Docker features."

"It's easy to use."

"What I like most about Zenoss Service Dynamics is that it monitors the devices and gives close to real-time alerts. For example, in case the device is not available, Zenoss Service Dynamics generates an alert so my team can resolve the issue."

Cons

"The cardinality is pretty low."

"We currently lack log analysis capabilities in Splunk APM."

"The out-of-the-box customizable dashboards in Splunk Observability Cloud are very effective in showcasing IT performance to business leaders. However, there are aspects that could be improved, such as linking dashboards to one another."

"Primarily, the logs in Splunk APM can be challenging to navigate and comprehend, making it difficult to understand the details within each log. Compared to other tools like LogDNA, which are more intuitive in this aspect, the logs in Splunk APM can require more effort to understand."

"Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and process terms. These categories of dashboards would be very helpful for customers."

"In Splunk Observability Cloud, I notice room for improvement in synthetic monitoring. It does not provide output based on server names."

"The solution's stability is an area that has room for improvement. It needs to provide constant stability to its users."

"Support from Splunk is not very helpful because Splunk doesn't have a dedicated APM; they only have one APM engineer in Korea."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."

"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."

"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."

"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"

"The AI aspect needs to improve."

"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."

"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Splunk APM is a very cost-efficient solution."

"It is expensive."

"Splunk's infrastructure monitoring costs can be high because our billing is based on data volume measured in terabytes, rather than the number of devices being monitored."

"The solution's pricing is costly."

"Licensing cost is the biggest argument I get from those divesting from Splunk. There are those within our organization who say we are going to go to other tools since Splunk is too expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The price of Splunk APM is less than some of its competitors."

"Splunk APM is expensive."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."

"It depends on the customer, what he wants."

"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,832 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	43

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Cribl vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

SigNoz vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Honeycomb Enterprise vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 23% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 21% of the time

Nagios Core vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

SCOM vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

More Zenoss Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

September 2025

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Zenoss Cloud

September 2025

Download Zenoss Cloud product report

Also Known As

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics

Overview

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?

Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.

Why consider this for ROI?

Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk

Zenoss Cloud revolutionizes IT infrastructure monitoring with a service-centric approach, prioritizing the overall health of services and applications. Harnessing the power of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AIOps), Zenoss Cloud offers end-to-end visibility across servers, networks, storage, and applications. Real-time monitoring, event correlation, and automated remediation ensure immediate insights and efficient issue resolution. The customizable dashboards empower users to tailor visualizations to their needs, while scalability accommodates diverse infrastructures. Zenoss Cloud guarantees improved application performance, reduced downtime, and enhanced IT efficiency, making it an ideal choice for businesses of all sizes, from small enterprises seeking simplicity to large corporations requiring advanced scalability. Experience unified monitoring and proactive management with Zenoss Cloud, a comprehensive solution that transforms IT infrastructure optimization in today's complex environments.

Zenoss

Sample Customers

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Zenoss Cloud

September 2025

Free Report: Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Zenoss Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,832 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Zenoss Cloud report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors, best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.