SCOM vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

Microsoft and Zenoss are both solutions in the Event Monitoring category. Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8, while Zenoss is ranked #14. Microsoft holds a 9.6% mindshare in EM, compared to Zenoss’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.

SCOM

Read 83 SCOM reviews

10,547 Views
1,898 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Zenoss Cloud

Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews

6,167 Views
678 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SCOM

Zenoss Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Zenoss Cloud and SCOM compete in IT infrastructure monitoring and management. Zenoss Cloud stands out for its cloud flexibility, whereas SCOM has an advantage with its integration within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Features: Zenoss Cloud includes real-time analytics, hybrid IT monitoring, and advanced event management, ensuring comprehensive visibility. SCOM supports full integration with Windows servers and Microsoft products, enhancing system alignment. Zenoss Cloud focuses on scalability and cloud handling, while SCOM's strength lies in its detailed Microsoft compatibility.

Room for Improvement: Zenoss Cloud could improve by enhancing support for non-cloud environments, reducing dependency on cloud infrastructure, and expanding integration with non-cloud native tools. SCOM might benefit from streamlining its deployment process, reducing dependence on in-house resources, and extending support for non-Microsoft platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zenoss Cloud offers quick deployment due to its SaaS model and proactive support to reduce downtime. SCOM's setup is complex, leveraging Microsoft support but requiring significant technical expertise. Zenoss Cloud's deployment is suitable for cloud-focused strategies, while SCOM fits well with Microsoft-based infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud uses a subscription-based model, offering predictable costs and appealing to those seeking cloud-native ROI. SCOM involves higher initial costs but offers substantial ROI for Microsoft-aligned environments via its integrated features that may justify the upfront expense.

To learn more, read our detailed SCOM vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SCOM vs. Zenoss Cloud

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SCOM

Ranking in Event Monitoring

5th

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zenoss Cloud

Ranking in Event Monitoring

14th

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

65th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (19th), Server Monitoring (26th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (52nd), Container Monitoring (8th), Cloud Monitoring Software (41st), AIOps (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of SCOM is 9.6%, up from 9.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 4.8%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SCOM	9.6%
Zenoss Cloud	4.8%
Other	85.6%

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Akshita Kukreja

Assistant Manager at SMS group GmbH

Have integrated effective monitoring and seamless alerting with improved visualization capabilities

The most valuable feature of SCOM is its monitoring capability, and we have integrated SCOM with Grafana, which is a dashboarding tool. We have implemented and integrated this to create dashboarding of the SCOM monitoring system for the database, SQL, and the Linux servers we have configured in SCOM. We have created separate dashboarding for it, and the monitoring and creating rules and monitors in the management servers and management packs that SCOM provides are very useful for us. The alerting mechanism of SCOM has benefited our operations because we have modified the thresholds as per our internal requirements. We have configured threshold modifications for the CPU, memory, and especially for disk space. For routine disk space usage on the system, we have provided a separate threshold configuration.

Read full review

ClaudiaChen

Cloud Architect - Senior Technology Architect at Telstra

Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features

As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature I like most about SCOM is that it is easy-to-use."

"Let me first say that I would be delighted if Citrix would extend the Edgesight functionality in their product so that it really monitors all of the Citrix components."

"My customers are using SCOM to avoid business disruptions."

"The most valuable feature of SCOM is real-time alerts."

"We can easily scale-up when we have a new global site, and it is just so easy to extend this solution to other sites, which is an advantage."

"When it comes to monitoring Microsoft servers, it is very useful."

"The monitoring features are the most valuable. We have seen a major benefit from that so far."

"It can send messages to our ticketing system."

More SCOM pros

"Zenoss is more complex than LogicMonitor, but scalable and hugely customizable."

"With this solution, they can have one million users at the same time with no crashes."

"Its Docker Container concept is mind blowing. It is the first monitoring tool which comes with Docker features."

"The product offers good documentation that helps with initial training."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past."

"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."

"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."

"The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism."

More Zenoss Cloud pros

Cons

"It's not straightforward, SCOM is relatively noisy out of the box, so time is required to tailor the alerting, adjusting threshold triggers and over-riding alerts that are not required to ensure alerts captured are relevant and require action."

"They can focus more on cloud monitoring instead of on-premise monitoring. We should be able to monitor cloud-related applications."

"My advice to people who are looking for a solution like SCOM would actually be to advise them to move from licensed software to open-source."

"Application monitoring must be improved."

"System Center just provided upgrade and update features for Windows clients, and Windows systems, and did not support Linux, Android, or iOS, and other operating systems. They need to provide better integration with other operating systems if they don't already."

"The GI is difficult to work with and the reporting servers are also difficult."

"Of course, price is always an issue with Microsoft and could be improved."

"If they're looking for real-time, within-the-minute monitoring of servers from a console, then I would say that it falls short there."

More SCOM cons

"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."

"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."

"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."

"The AI aspect needs to improve."

"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."

"Technical support is 3/10, poor: Incomplete and poor documentation Undocumented processes Inconsistent solutions to problems depending on source"

"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"

"This solution is complex for beginners so it takes some time to learn."

More Zenoss Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Two customers bought the enterprise agreement with Microsoft and paid for Software Assurance. But few customers don't buy it for Software Assurance. They just buy it and deploy it, and they think that we will be using it for the next five years."

"SCOM's pricing is average."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is paid annually."

"SCOM is part of the System Center suite and I am satisfied with the pricing."

"SCOM is very cheap because it's included in the license for the System Center suite, which is around $8,400 per CAL."

"The pricing is good, and it's part of their system center suite."

"Our licensing fees are approximately $30 per user, per month."

"It is the cheapest product available in the market."

More SCOM pricing and cost advice

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."

"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."

"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."

"It depends on the customer, what he wants."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	54

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCOM?

I am not aware of the exact pricing as it is managed by my supervisor. As an academic institution, we receive substantial discounts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SCOM?

We believe that the dashboarding in SCOM needs to be improved or enhanced because it is not too expressive in reporting. We can work on deploying new ways of viewing things and modifying visualizat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SCOM?

My usual use case for SCOM is as an administrator role where I create reports and provide system configuration for Linux and installation of the SCOM agent. I handle deploying and upgrading the age...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs SCOM

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

LogicMonitor vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs SCOM

Compared 2% of the time

More SCOM Competitors

Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

Dynatrace vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft System Center vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Nagios Fusion vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

More Zenoss Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SCOM

July 2026

Download SCOM product report

Buyer's Guide

Zenoss Cloud

July 2026

Download Zenoss Cloud product report

Also Known As

System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012

Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics

Overview

SCOM monitors Microsoft environments with a focus on Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint. It offers integration with Active Directory and Azure, along with customizable dashboards, management packs, and robust alert mechanisms, aiding efficient management and control.

SCOM provides a comprehensive monitoring solution for Microsoft technologies, helping organizations track performance and availability of applications, services, and infrastructure. It integrates with Active Directory and Azure, offering capabilities for monitoring Windows and Linux environments. Extensive management packs, customizable dashboards, and automated alerts offer a refined monitoring experience. Users benefit from detailed performance data, network monitoring, and auto-discovery features, enhancing operational insights and server management efficiency.

What are key features of SCOM?

Microsoft Environment Monitoring: Specialized for Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless integration with Active Directory and Azure for streamlined operations.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor visual data displays to enhance monitoring and decision-making.
Extensive Management Packs: Broad range of management packs for enhanced resource and application control.
Robust Alert Mechanisms: Comprehensive alerting to maintain service stability and address potential issues promptly.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced management of server applications and infrastructure.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Detailed insights into performance and service availability.
Proactive Issue Notification: Timely alerts for quick issue resolution.
Improved Control: More efficient server management through automation and visibility.

In technology sectors, SCOM is widely implemented for its ability to monitor server applications and infrastructure components. Healthcare and finance utilize its monitoring and alert systems for compliance and uptime. Enterprises integrate SCOM for managing complex systems like Exchange, SharePoint, and Active Directory, enabling comprehensive analytics and reporting.

Microsoft

Zenoss Cloud provides a comprehensive overview of IT environments, supporting cross-cloud functionality, scalability, and robust integrations. It offers dynamic monitoring through its intuitive dashboard and supports hybrid deployments across cloud and on-premises infrastructures.

Zenoss Cloud enables users to monitor network infrastructure and operator platforms efficiently. With features like agentless monitoring and real-time alerts, Zenoss Cloud integrates seamlessly with external systems such as ITSM tools. Its flexible functionality allows for the management of both on-premises and cloud infrastructures like AWS and Azure. Users benefit from easy setup and strong technical support, although they seek enhancements in AI capabilities and simpler installation. The pricing model and complexity for beginners and storage monitoring are areas for improvement.

What are the key features of Zenoss Cloud?

Dynamic Monitoring: Enhances user experience with real-time insights.
Cross-Cloud Functionality: Supports hybrid deployments across AWS and Azure.
Agentless Monitoring: Simplifies deployment with minimal overhead.
Scalability: Grows with your network's demands.
Custom Integration: Supports notifications and alerts tailored to user requirements.

What benefits should users expect from Zenoss Cloud?

Time Efficiency: Quick setup and operation save resources.
Comprehensive Support: Extensive documentation streamlines troubleshooting.
Cost-effective Monitoring: Prevents multiple charges in server monitoring.
Enhanced User Experience: Offers seamless integration with existing IT infrastructures.

Zenoss Cloud is widely used in monitoring solutions for industries including technology and data centers. It supports direct monitoring of systems like vSphere and NetApp, making it ideal for IT operations and managed services. Integration with tools such as ServiceNow and SolarWinds aligns it with diverse IT environments.

Zenoss

Sample Customers

Dialog Telekom

2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation

Buyer's Guide

SCOM vs. Zenoss Cloud

August 2026

Free Report: SCOM vs. Zenoss Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about SCOM vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SCOM vs. Zenoss Cloud report.

See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.