Splunk Observability Cloud and Sentry compete in the observability and monitoring market, each offering distinct advantages. Splunk appears to have the upper hand in infrastructure visibility and integration with cloud services, while Sentry leads in real-time error tracking with great developer tool integration.
Features: Splunk Observability Cloud stands out with infrastructure monitoring, fast log searching, and custom dashboards that enable a comprehensive view of system performance. Its ability to integrate with various cloud services enhances its enterprise utility. Sentry, in contrast, excels in real-time error tracking, offers comprehensive application performance metrics, and has robust integrations with developer tools like Slack and Jira. Users value its context-rich error logs, facilitating quick and accurate issue tracking.
Room for Improvement: Splunk Observability Cloud could improve its automation capabilities, pricing, scalability, stability, and database connectivity. Enhancements in these areas could strengthen its overall offering. Sentry would benefit from more seamless integrations, improved user metric tracking, and greater customization options for events and dashboards. Both products would gain from more intuitive interfaces and streamlined setup processes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Observability Cloud provides flexible deployment options for on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud environments, catering to diverse organizational needs. Sentry focuses on public cloud solutions, simplifying deployment for cloud-native companies. Both companies offer satisfactory customer service, with Sentry noted for more consistently responsive support, while Splunk's support could improve in response consistency and resolution times.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk Observability Cloud is often viewed as expensive, with a pricing structure based on data volume. Despite costs, users acknowledge its value in infrastructure insights and monitoring. Sentry is more affordable, offering customization flexibility and an open-source version that can be attractive for small teams. Though its license can be costly, its features and integrations provide worthwhile value. Both solutions achieve ROI, with Sentry's affordability making it particularly appealing for early-stage projects.
Using Splunk has saved my organization about 30% of our budget compared to using multiple different monitoring products.
Anyone working in front-end management should recognize the market price to see the true value of end-user monitoring.
They often require multiple questions, with five or six emails to get a response.
Support from Splunk is not very helpful because Splunk doesn't have a dedicated APM; they only have one APM engineer in Korea.
They did respond to us, but they did not explicitly inform us about the feature's absence.
It has been easy to use and configure across multiple systems, each having several environments.
We've used the solution across more than 250 people, including engineers.
I would rate its scalability a nine out of ten.
The issue is mainly about pricing because if they want to monitor more, it costs money.
I would rate its stability a nine out of ten.
We rarely have problems accessing the dashboard or the page.
Unlike NetScout or regular agents for APM, RUM has many problems during the POC phase because customer environments vary widely.
Integrations or single sign-on capability with Microsoft would be beneficial for securing all assets.
There is room for improvement in the alerting system, which is complicated and has less documentation available.
Improvements in dashboard configuration, customization, and artificial intelligence functionalities are desired.
Customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and process terms.
Compared to New Relic, it provides the necessary features at a cheaper cost, especially since we moved infrastructure monitoring to Azure.
Splunk is a bit expensive since it charges based on the indexing rate of data.
It appears to be expensive compared to competitors.
Splunk is a little expensive, however, it is in line with the current market pricing.
Real-time error tracking helps our Quality Assurance team easily identify the root causes of problems or bugs and promptly inform the developers about specific issues.
At this time, I focus on finding and fixing bugs.
Splunk provides advanced notifications of roadblocks in the application, which helps us to improve and avoid impacts during high-volume days.
For troubleshooting, we can detect problems in seconds, which is particularly helpful for digital teams.
It offers unified visibility for logs, metrics, and traces.
Sentry is a tool for monitoring web and application performance, tracking errors, processing request times, and managing user data access.
Developers integrate Sentry with web and application environments to capture front-end and back-end errors, utilize error logs, trace requests, and observe metrics without real-time production access. Sentry's use extends to monitoring internal applications, leveraging CyberArk PAM integration, deploying notifications, and detecting silent failures. Users benefit from detailed error and performance reports, contextual cause-stack information, and real-time breakdowns. There is room for improvement, as users desire refined integration and administrative settings, enhanced alert policies, and more customization in event metrics.
What are Sentry's most important features?Sentry is implemented across industries ranging from tech startups to large enterprises. These organizations use Sentry to enhance application reliability, track performance, and secure user data within protected environments. Integration with CyberArk PAM ensures secure deployment. Organizations find Sentry useful for monitoring internal applications, efficiently processing request times, and tracing changes in production without direct access.
Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.
Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.
What are the key features?In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
