ITRS Geneos vs Nagios Core comparison

ITRS and Nagios are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ITRS is ranked #46 with an average rating of 7.0, while Nagios is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. ITRS holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Nagios’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Nagios users who would recommend it.

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

1,162 Views
659 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Nagios Core

Read 51 Nagios Core reviews

4,253 Views
3,272 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Nagios Core

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ITRS Geneos and Nagios Core are competitors in the monitoring solutions category. ITRS Geneos seems to have the upper hand with its real-time insights and extensive integration capabilities, while Nagios Core offers flexibility with significant customization through its open-source platform.

Features: ITRS Geneos provides real-time monitoring with comprehensive integration capabilities and customizable dashboards. It offers real-time insights and issue prediction to reduce latency. Nagios Core, as an open-source solution, allows significant customization and supports various monitoring needs. It offers infrastructure monitoring and rudimentary application checks.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos needs enhanced historical data reporting and better cloud monitoring. Users seek improved middleware integration and dashboard flexibility. Nagios Core should address its steep learning curve due to the complex configuration process, and users desire a more user-friendly UI and cloud integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos mainly supports on-premises installations with recognized customer service proficiency, though faster response times are desired. Nagios Core supports on-premises and hybrid environments with a community-driven support model, fostering self-sufficiency due to limited direct vendor support.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos, noted for its higher cost, is justified by its capabilities and customizability, proving beneficial in environments where downtime is costly. Nagios Core is a free solution, avoiding licensing costs but may require significant investment in customization to match commercial offerings. It is resource-intensive due to specialized configurations for effective setup.

To learn more, read our detailed ITRS Geneos vs. Nagios Core Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Nagios Core

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

46th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (28th)

Nagios Core

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

8th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Core is 3.0%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Nishith-Vyas

Tech Lead at STL Digital Limited

Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements

The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most valuable features is that it can be configured by non-developers. It doesn't require development expertise to configure it."

"It's a very powerful application monitoring tool across the industry. Many free, open-source tools are available. There are also paid tools, but ITRS Geneos is a real-time application monitoring tool where the user can monitor, self-configure, and manage alerts through their console."

"In my experience, being able to monitor our databases is a valuable feature as we can create our own queries and aren't reliant on the in-built ones."

"ITRS uses SNMP to communicate with our devices as well as SNMP net probes installed on our servers."

"The ability to completely tailor and customize what it's monitoring is one of its strongest points. A lot of other monitoring tools are good at certain things, but one of my colleagues described it as the “Swiss Army Knife” of monitoring tools. It can do anything you want."

"This solution has helped provide relief to existing Level 2 teams, allowing them to focus efforts on in-depth problem analysis."

"Tons of default modules which are available out of the box"

"The solution is used across the entire investment banking division, covering environments such as electronic trading, algo-trading, fixed income, FX, etc. It monitors that environment and enables a bank to significantly reduce down time. Although hard to measure, since implementation, we have probably seen some increased stability because of it and we have definitely seen teams a lot more aware of their environment. Consequently, we can be more proactive in challenging and improving previously undetected weaknesses."

More ITRS Geneos pros

"Monitoring with Nagios Core is helpful because it provides immediate alerts if something goes down, such as a server, or wireless router, or if there's a cable break. This allows us to respond promptly to any issues."

"Nagios Core integrates with tools like Splunk, Datadog, or Dynatrace. It is usually used as a feed to provide more technical information about devices or hosts to another system."

"Alert calls occur anytime a service goes down or a matrix is difficult and that helps us to quickly restore service and transfer work."

"Dashboard provides monitor of total assets."

"Nagios Core is very configurable. Whatever you want, you can do it."

"The application performance monitoring feature is valuable."

"Nagios Core is stable."

"Provides timely notifications."

More Nagios Core pros

Cons

"ITRS Geneos cloud monitoring is very weak and can use improvement."

"One thing that could be improved in terms of rapid scaling would be more ability to clone aspects of an implementation. It seems like there are opportunities in this area, where we have repetitive tasks to do when it comes to implementing things on new servers or on new gateways. It would be great if there was an easy way to clone something that had already been done."

"Sometimes, if there is a lot of data coming onto the servers, we have observed a little bit of slowness on the gateway servers which are doing the ITRS dashboard monitoring."

"Data visualization – real time and historical – is a weakness."

"Their cloud monitoring solution needs to be improved. I have already given them the feedback that it's not capable of meeting the latest technology needs."

"ITRS Geneos is not on the cloud at a time when everyone is moving to the cloud."

"At the moment Geneos is excellent and handling real time monitoring, however not great at doing historical reporting."

"We all look at the same things - CPU, disk space, paging stats, service status with RAG status on each. That could be provided straight out, saving significant time."

More ITRS Geneos cons

"I would like to see a sensor that shows the traffic of a user and what they're doing on the network."

"t was a little hard to get our setup represented in the configuration."

"There is room for improvement in the graphics."

"The scalability needs improvement, it's not scalable at this time."

"The dashboard and monitoring features could be improved."

"The tool needs to improve the integrations."

"I would like to see more training videos."

"The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak."

More Nagios Core cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The market tools are on par with this solution, but if the solution included more features, then it would be well within the range for the cost."

"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."

"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."

"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."

"The organization is not just purchasing a license for the product, but also managing services and professional services from ITRS. Another factor is if the implementation is going to be in production, non-production, or both."

"Its price is reasonable. It isn't too expensive, and it isn't too cheap, but it also depends on a company's volume and negotiation."

"Given our spend and the amount of service we have in it, the pricing is quite reasonable."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

"We are using the open-source, unpaid version."

"Most the plugin features are free."

"Lessening the price point would be an improvement."

"We are using the free version of Nagios Core."

"We are using the free version."

"The solution is expensive."

"The product is cheaply priced."

"Nagios Core is an open source solution, and there are no licensing fees."

More Nagios Core pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

76%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ITRS Geneos?

I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nagios Core?

What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?

Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nagios Core?

The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 24% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 17% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Prometheus Group vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Icinga vs Nagios Core

Compared 27% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Core

Compared 19% of the time

Zabbix vs Nagios Core

Compared 15% of the time

Centreon vs Nagios Core

Compared 9% of the time

OP5 Monitor vs Nagios Core

Compared 4% of the time

More Nagios Core Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

March 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core

March 2025

Download Nagios Core product report

Also Known As

Geneos

No data available

Overview

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios

Sample Customers

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Nagios Core

February 2025

Free Report: ITRS Geneos vs. Nagios Core

Find out what your peers are saying about ITRS Geneos vs. Nagios Core and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ITRS Geneos vs. Nagios Core report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.