CA Unified Communications Monitor vs ITRS Geneos comparison

Broadcom and ITRS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #95, while ITRS is ranked #67 with an average rating of 5.0. Broadcom holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to ITRS’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

436 Views
310 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

3,901 Views
1,053 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

ITRS Geneos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and ITRS Geneos are competing products in the network monitoring and performance management category. ITRS Geneos appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and adaptability, which many users believe justify its higher cost.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides in-depth analysis of unified communication environments, offers real-time visibility, and includes diagnostics capabilities. ITRS Geneos offers advanced monitoring features across various infrastructure types, extensive customization options, and highly detailed data monitoring.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could benefit from enhanced compatibility with more third-party applications, increased scalability for larger organizations, and improved reporting features. ITRS Geneos could focus on simplifying its installation process, offering more intuitive user interfaces, and reducing the complexity of its integration with existing systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor is generally easier to deploy, with straightforward setup processes and good customer service support. ITRS Geneos, while initially more complex to install, provides robust functionality and dedicated technical support that helps mitigate deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers competitive pricing with a good ROI due to its lower upfront cost, appealing to small to mid-sized businesses. ITRS Geneos, with a higher setup cost, provides substantial long-term ROI through its adaptability and comprehensive features, attracting larger enterprises seeking a feature-rich monitoring solution.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

95th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

69th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th)

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

67th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

46th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (33rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ITRS Geneos	0.5%
CA Unified Communications Monitor	0.3%
Other	99.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"One of the most valuable features of ITRS Geneos is the active time feature that helps with the trading applications that I support."

"The biggest benefit of Geneos is the fact that we can clearly see, if we have an alert, where that alert has come from. We can see the data around that alert and anything that might be relevant is also shown. We can very easily right-click and see why we've received that alert. That's the best part about it, that you've got all the data there with the alerting."

"The ability to build integrations to tools that are not monitored out of the box is the most valuable feature."

"I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option."

"The clean and colorful UI and easy to use options like snooze and active times."

"The NetProbe carries over 100 samplers which are capable of monitoring hardware, OS, and the application layer."

"The ability to logically normalize data gathered from multiple types of sources via pre-built plugins is extremely powerful. This functionality, coupled with the ability to import custom data via the Toolkit plugin allows Geneos to be leveraged to monitor every system in the enterprise."

"In my experience, being able to monitor our databases is a valuable feature as we can create our own queries and aren't reliant on the in-built ones."

More ITRS Geneos pros

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"Sometimes, if there is a lot of data coming onto the servers, we have observed a little bit of slowness on the gateway servers which are doing the ITRS dashboard monitoring."

"t needs to have better middleware integration for things such as application and Microsft SQL servers."

"Geneos' application monitoring could be improved a lot. Products like AppDynamics and Dynatrace provide the process thread-level monitoring, but Geneos lacks these capabilities."

"At the moment Geneos is excellent and handling real time monitoring, however not great at doing historical reporting."

"There is one drawback to using lightweight data collection: we lack the feature of observability based on time series, such as historical model data. This makes it difficult to view data in ITRS. ITRS needs to improve this feature."

"Much of the reporting outside of the user interface is very basic and requires much customization to be useful."

"Mobile phone integration is probably not as rich as it could be."

"It needs to be easier to configure, especially with the JMX plugins."

More ITRS Geneos cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."

"The licensing cost may seem expensive upfront. However, the service is outstanding, the tool does things that no other tools can do, and the customizability more than makes up for the cost of licensing."

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."

"Based on feedback from colleagues and friends working in the financial sector, Geneos is relatively costly. Many companies have been switching from Geneos to Dynatrace, Sysdig, or other monitoring tools in the past two years because of the price."

"You will get the best price if you get a single global deal."

"The organization is not just purchasing a license for the product, but also managing services and professional services from ITRS. Another factor is if the implementation is going to be in production, non-production, or both."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

73%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?

ITRS offers multiple products, including upgrades for synthetic monitoring and a SaaS platform. Geneos is used for infrastructure monitoring, covering KPIs such as CPU, memory, processes, network l...

See all answers

Comparisons

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 43% of the time

Precisely Network Management vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 31% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 23% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 14% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

Scout APM vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 2% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Ixia Hawkeye

September 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

September 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

Geneos

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos

September 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.