CA Unified Communications Monitor vs ITRS Geneos comparison

Broadcom and ITRS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #101, while ITRS is ranked #69 with an average rating of 5.0. Broadcom holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to ITRS’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

379 Views
250 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

4,056 Views
1,136 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

ITRS Geneos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and ITRS Geneos are competing products in the network monitoring and performance management category. ITRS Geneos appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and adaptability, which many users believe justify its higher cost.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides in-depth analysis of unified communication environments, offers real-time visibility, and includes diagnostics capabilities. ITRS Geneos offers advanced monitoring features across various infrastructure types, extensive customization options, and highly detailed data monitoring.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could benefit from enhanced compatibility with more third-party applications, increased scalability for larger organizations, and improved reporting features. ITRS Geneos could focus on simplifying its installation process, offering more intuitive user interfaces, and reducing the complexity of its integration with existing systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor is generally easier to deploy, with straightforward setup processes and good customer service support. ITRS Geneos, while initially more complex to install, provides robust functionality and dedicated technical support that helps mitigate deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers competitive pricing with a good ROI due to its lower upfront cost, appealing to small to mid-sized businesses. ITRS Geneos, with a higher setup cost, provides substantial long-term ROI through its adaptability and comprehensive features, attracting larger enterprises seeking a feature-rich monitoring solution.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

101st

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

68th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th)

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

69th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

49th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"It's also easy to implement. The implementation of Geneos is very easy and interesting. It's not complicated. It's very quick to implement. The installation is very easy. There are many topics about ITRS Geneos that explain more about the features of the function of Geneos."

"The solution's log monitoring and alerting mechanisms are very user-friendly and easy to plug and play."

"The ability to logically normalize data gathered from multiple types of sources via pre-built plugins is extremely powerful. This functionality, coupled with the ability to import custom data via the Toolkit plugin allows Geneos to be leveraged to monitor every system in the enterprise."

"The ability to completely tailor and customize what it's monitoring is one of its strongest points. A lot of other monitoring tools are good at certain things, but one of my colleagues described it as the “Swiss Army Knife” of monitoring tools. It can do anything you want."

"I always appreciate Geneos's stability and ease of use."

"It's a very powerful application monitoring tool across the industry. Many free, open-source tools are available. There are also paid tools, but ITRS Geneos is a real-time application monitoring tool where the user can monitor, self-configure, and manage alerts through their console."

"In my experience, being able to monitor our databases is a valuable feature as we can create our own queries and aren't reliant on the in-built ones."

"Ability to monitor logs for potential issues to prevent app outages before problems get a chance to arise. That's invaluable for our teams in a fast-paced trading environment."

More ITRS Geneos pros

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"The deployment method for upgrading is a bit tricky. It takes a little bit of manual effort. If that could be a bit more automated, it would help us a lot."

"A lightweight version which could host more than 100 gateways, as we can see slowness while loading all our gateways."

"One area where there is room for improvement is the log file. I would like to be able to do a pre-run on the log files. When you are testing log files for regular expressions, it would be good to be able to do a quick check up front on that side of things before you release that into production."

"One thing that could be improved in terms of rapid scaling would be more ability to clone aspects of an implementation. It seems like there are opportunities in this area, where we have repetitive tasks to do when it comes to implementing things on new servers or on new gateways. It would be great if there was an easy way to clone something that had already been done."

"At the moment Geneos is excellent and handling real time monitoring, however not great at doing historical reporting."

"Geneos' application monitoring could be improved a lot. Products like AppDynamics and Dynatrace provide the process thread-level monitoring, but Geneos lacks these capabilities."

"ITRS Geneos cloud monitoring is very weak and can use improvement."

"t needs to have better middleware integration for things such as application and Microsft SQL servers."

More ITRS Geneos cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The market tools are on par with this solution, but if the solution included more features, then it would be well within the range for the cost."

"Given our spend and the amount of service we have in it, the pricing is quite reasonable."

"You will get the best price if you get a single global deal."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

"I can say it's not that cheap because the licensing is a little bit costly"

"The product is priced quite high. There are pricing options for customers based on the size of the environment and plug-ins used by the monitoring system."

"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."

"The licensing cost may seem expensive upfront. However, the service is outstanding, the tool does things that no other tools can do, and the customizability more than makes up for the cost of licensing."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

73%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?

ITRS offers multiple products, including upgrades for synthetic monitoring and a SaaS platform. Geneos is used for infrastructure monitoring, covering KPIs such as CPU, memory, processes, network l...

See all answers

Comparisons

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 44% of the time

Precisely Network Management vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 29% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 20% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 14% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

BigPanda vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 2% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Ixia Hawkeye

August 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

August 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

Geneos

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos

August 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.