ITRS Geneos vs Icinga comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Icinga and ITRS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Icinga is ranked #43, while ITRS is ranked #37 with an average rating of 9.0. Icinga holds a 1.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to ITRS’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Icinga users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

7,834 Views
5,719 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Read 58 ITRS Geneos reviews

9,166 Views
3,850 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Icinga

ITRS Geneos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ITRS Geneos and Icinga are key players in monitoring solutions. Icinga seems to have the upper hand in pricing and flexibility due to its open-source nature.

Features: ITRS Geneos offers robust real-time monitoring, adaptability, and a comprehensive feature set. Icinga provides competitive pricing, a wide range of plugins, and the flexibility of being open-source.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos is considered expensive and may require pricing negotiation; there's a perception of high costs. Icinga may have indirect costs related to customization and maintenance, and lacks some premium features found in enterprise solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos offers strong support, crucial for regulated industries like finance, ensuring seamless deployment and reliable service. Icinga benefits from a large community, aiding in open-source deployment with the ability for peer support but may lack structured customer service compared to premium offerings.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos is costly but users find value in the return on investment due to its extensive feature set that helps reduce severe incidents. Icinga’s pricing is more budget-friendly with its largely free nature, appealing for cost-effective implementations.

To learn more, read our detailed ITRS Geneos vs. Icinga Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Icinga

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 919,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Icinga

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

43rd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

51st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (17th), Cloud Monitoring Software (34th)

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

37th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (33rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Icinga is 1.1%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ITRS Geneos	0.7%
Icinga	1.1%
Other	98.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2292201

Innovation Service Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have but average multi-tenancy aspect

It's supported by the community. We use Icinga, which is not part of the Open-Source platform but is wrapped into a commercial solution from another provider, a local provider in Italy. Icinga is an open-source platform, so it is supported by the community. It's quite easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have. So it's not expensive, and it's quite a general purpose. We can easily monitor any kind of infrastructure we encounter. The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated. The alerting is the same as any other monitoring platform. It's not a "wow" feature that has changed our lives, but it's perfectly adequate.

Read full review

Ravi ShankarSundarasan

Senior Enterprise Cloud Architect at Blue Yonder

Real-time monitoring has improved incident response and supports proactive anomaly detection

The advantages and strong points of ITRS Geneos for me personally are seamless integration with existing systems as well as upcoming modern systems. The user interface is really good. From a management point of view, these are the key aspects with respect to the user interface and seamless integration. We get very good community support for this product. ITRS Geneos has impacted my organization positively, and I would rate it 4.5 out of 5.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"People should know that it is simple and advanced."

"Icinga has multiple automation and integration features. There is an API for everything and a web UI for configurations. The APIs enable you to automate tasks in Icinga. We can also use plugins to talk to the API. The Icinga Director talks to a database in the background, and you can import settings from the CMDB to all systems in Icinga."

"An affordable solution for small organizations to do basic network monitoring."

"It is really easy in Icinga to create your own plugin and integrate it without any fuss. And it works just perfectly fine."

"Macros and the ability to connect it to Google Maps are valuable features."

"We have found the solution to be stable."

"If you have a small infrastructure or a small number of devices that you want to monitor, then I think it's a good solution."

"The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated."

More Icinga pros

"It's a very effective and productive tool, and avoids any major incidents."

"One of the best aspects of Geneos is that it has a broad scope and can cover a lot of use cases. You can write your own scripts to monitor really specific things. And the rules that you can put in place can be quite complex for the alerts."

"Once set-up, Geneos proved to be a very powerful and versatile tool to real-time monitor our IT infrastructure and - most important for us - our critical applications and business processes."

"It's also easy to implement. The implementation of Geneos is very easy and interesting. It's not complicated. It's very quick to implement. The installation is very easy. There are many topics about ITRS Geneos that explain more about the features of the function of Geneos."

"The good thing is you get something out of it day one, you don't need years of training, and then you can build on that."

"The ability to completely tailor and customize what it's monitoring is one of its strongest points. A lot of other monitoring tools are good at certain things, but one of my colleagues described it as the “Swiss Army Knife” of monitoring tools. It can do anything you want."

"The ability to build integrations to tools that are not monitored out of the box is the most valuable feature."

"Customer Service: Very good. Technical Support: Very good."

More ITRS Geneos pros

Cons

"One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine."

"Icinga’s automation could be improved."

"It needs Trap SNMP. I saw the documentation for Zabbix, that it has its own built-in product which handles SNMP traps, and there's nothing similar in Icinga or Nagios. I think this feature is most important for me."

"The tool currently fails to provide notifications to users."

"The user interface should be improved."

"Network Discovery capabilities would be extremely helpful."

"The installation and configuration are very complex."

"In general, the product does not look good. However, it does what it is supposed to do. So, the improvements should focus on usability and UI."

More Icinga cons

"There is are issues with the compatibility of plugins with AIX servers."

"At the moment Geneos is excellent and handling real time monitoring, however not great at doing historical reporting."

"I think there's a very steep learning curve with the product."

"I would really like to see something from the Geneos side to set up automated reporting from ITRS."

"Much of the reporting outside of the user interface is very basic and requires much customization to be useful."

"The ITA, the post-incident analytics, could be improved."

"Their cloud monitoring solution needs to be improved. I have already given them the feedback that it's not capable of meeting the latest technology needs."

"For the solution to stay relevant in the cloud-based monitoring environment Geneos needs more plug-ins with more features. Instead of offering clients workarounds, the solution should have a cloud-based out-of-the-box version."

More ITRS Geneos cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheap."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"It's an open-source solution."

"The solution is free to use."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

"I can say it's not that cheap because the licensing is a little bit costly"

"It is expensive. They have to look at the model around when we move to cloud and how that's going to work. The licensing cost does pay off because of the improvements in support to our business."

"When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."

"The organization is not just purchasing a license for the product, but also managing services and professional services from ITRS. Another factor is if the implementation is going to be in production, non-production, or both."

"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."

"The market tools are on par with this solution, but if the solution included more features, then it would be well within the range for the cost."

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

14%

University

13%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

45%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

I do not have the pricing information because it lies with the finance team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

I do not see much room for improvement. Support for data cloud platforms could be great. Modern cloud platforms and data cloud platforms require more attention from the product.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?

I was using ITRS Geneos at HSBC. I have been using this product for more than two years. I have 20 years of experience working in IT with software in general. I am working with an on-premises deplo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 4% of the time

Zabbix vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 4% of the time

NETSCOUT Network & Application Observability vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 3% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

October 2026

Download Icinga product report

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

October 2026

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Also Known As

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

Geneos

Overview

Icinga is a robust tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, known for its distributed monitoring capabilities and seamless integration with multiple platforms. It efficiently observes servers, network devices, and environments like Linux and Windows, enabling proactive issue identification and resource management.

With a focus on task delegation and clustering, Icinga offers an intuitive interface through its GUI and Icinga Director, simplifying configuration. The extensive plugin library supports diverse technologies, while the API allows automation with tools like Terraform and Ansible. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with data display in the GUI, a need for improved dashboards, and complex configuration processes. Users benefit from its SNMP alerts, email notifications, and automated incident handling, making it essential for managed service environments and enterprises.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Task Delegation: Streamlines monitoring tasks across distributed systems.
Event Handler: Enables automatic service recovery with minimal intervention.
Plugin Library: Offers extensive support for integrating diverse technologies.
API Accessibility: Facilitates automation with popular tools like Terraform.
Custom Plugins: Allows easy creation and personalization for monitoring needs.

What benefits should you consider in Icinga reviews?

Flexibility: Tailors monitoring to specific requirements with community support.
Scalability: Successfully manages growing infrastructure demands.
Proactivity: Enhances issue identification and resource allocation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with existing IT operations platforms.

Icinga is widely adopted in IT environments for monitoring servers, networks, and applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its ability to integrate with various operating systems and automation platforms makes it a versatile choice for industries prioritizing comprehensive surveillance and proactive management of their infrastructure.

Icinga

ITRS Geneos offers a customizable platform for real-time monitoring with minimal system impact, facilitating insights across multiple platforms. Known for its scalability, it efficiently integrates with other tools, supporting industries with its proactive monitoring capabilities.

ITRS Geneos allows users to effectively manage financial services infrastructure by monitoring trading systems, treasury management, and FX operations. It provides real-time dashboards to track server uptime, application performance, and health metrics. Users benefit from its enterprise-wide data aggregation, alerting features, and script adaptability while needing improvement in cloud monitoring and AI-based predictive functionalities. The tool's setup requires some expertise, suggesting a need for more intuitive solutions.

What are the most important features of ITRS Geneos?

Customizable Dashboards: Enables real-time analytics across platforms.
Lightweight Netprobe: Facilitates efficient data aggregation with minimal impact.
Plugin Support: Ensures extensive compatibility and integration.
Proactive Monitoring: Allows for early issue detection and resolution.
Script Adaptability: Supports tailored solutions for specific requirements.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Minimized Manual Intervention: Automation features reduce manual tasks.
Scalability: Easily accommodates growing enterprise needs.
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with existing tools.
Insightful Dashboards: Provides actionable metrics for decision making.

ITRS Geneos is prominently utilized in financial sectors. Banks and financial institutions leverage its capabilities to monitor infrastructure and application performance, optimizing trading systems and FX operations. It builds comprehensive dashboards, offering valuable insights into server health, application logs, and network performance, contributing significantly to operational efficiency.

ITRS

Sample Customers

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Icinga

September 2026

Free Report: ITRS Geneos vs. Icinga

Find out what your peers are saying about ITRS Geneos vs. Icinga and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ITRS Geneos vs. Icinga report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.