BMC TrueSight vs ITRS Geneos comparison

BMC Helix and ITRS are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. BMC Helix is ranked #28 with an average rating of 9.0, while ITRS is ranked #33 with an average rating of 5.0. BMC Helix holds a 1.0% mindshare in APM, compared to ITRS’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of BMC Helix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

BMC TrueSight

Read 51 BMC TrueSight reviews

3,620 Views
1,810 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

4,305 Views
2,798 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

BMC TrueSight

ITRS Geneos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 7, 2025

BMC TrueSight and ITRS Geneos are prominent products in the field of IT monitoring, each offering unique solutions. TrueSight holds an advantage with its holistic integration and event management, while Geneos excels in real-time monitoring and customization, particularly for financial institutions.

Features: BMC TrueSight stands out for its integrated platform, offering seamless event management and the ability to monitor diverse infrastructures with ease. It provides robust capabilities for consolidating alerts and integrating with other tools. ITRS Geneos, on the other hand, is known for its real-time monitoring, customizable dashboards, and extensive plugin ecosystem, catering especially to the demands of the financial sector. Geneos emphasizes its ability to manage real-time data and provide modular plugins to adapt swiftly to various systems.

Room for Improvement: TrueSight can be complicated to deploy and maintain, with significant resource demands and a need for enhanced cloud monitoring support. Users have voiced concerns over its complexity and multi-component setup. Geneos could improve historical data reporting and user-friendly dashboards. Its cloud integration and mobile app support are also areas needing enhancement, as users call for more intuitive data visualization and configuration simplicity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TrueSight predominantly operates on-premises but can also function in private cloud environments. Its complexity in setup is noted, though customer service generally receives positive feedback albeit with occasional support inconsistencies. Geneos supports both on-premises and cloud deployments, noted for reliability though it may require improvements in dashboard configuration and technical support to meet user expectations.

Pricing and ROI: Both TrueSight and Geneos are considered high-priced solutions. TrueSight justifies its cost through comprehensive features and support, leading to reduced operational workload and better incident management, though at a substantial investment. Geneos’ price is offset by its customizable nature and efficiency in preventing costly incidents, providing significant value in critical environments. Both promise robust ROI by minimizing operational burdens and enhancing efficiency despite their considerable costs.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC TrueSight vs. ITRS Geneos Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC TrueSight vs. ITRS Geneos

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC TrueSight

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

28th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (8th), Cloud Monitoring Software (25th), AIOps (5th)

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

33rd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

45th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (68th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of BMC TrueSight is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BMC TrueSight	1.0%
ITRS Geneos	1.1%
Other	97.9%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

NikhilKalwint

Technical Specialist at ServiceIO

Has improved monitoring efficiency and supports fast issue resolution through responsive support and reliable automation

I work with BMC TrueSight and have been using it for eight-plus years BMC TrueSight brought a positive impact and benefits to our organization. The customization part is one of the advantages of the product, along with the monitoring capabilities. Automated root cause analysis and predictive…

Read full review

Durai CT

Head FM Monitoring at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

A stable, scalable, and flexible monitoring tool

Real-time data is one of the unique features that ITRS Geneos offers. For example, if there is an impact on a particular server and a particular application, I want to see what the impact is or what the CPU or hardware usage information is, as well as the service in the same application. I can see the real-time data and the impact by accessing ITRS Geneos and looking at the tree. I don't want a tool that tells me when something is broken. I want the tool to tell me when something is going to break. That is the difference between ITRS Geneos and other tools. I want proactive monitoring, not reactive. I don't need to be notified after the fact that something has broken. If something is broken, I get a notification by email, and some of my customers are going to call me. ITRS Geneos provides proactive monitoring. The great advantage of this tool is real-time monitoring. ITRS Geneos not only alerts us but also gives us a real-time view of the data. This is the tool's first great advantage. It is also lightweight and flexible and can adapt to monitor even low-latency systems, which is the tool's second advantage. Another great feature of this tool is its good presentation layer, which allows us to build custom dashboards to present to business stakeholders. This gives them a high-level status of what is being monitored. If we compare ITRS Geneos to other tools, we will find that each one specializes in a specific area, but the ITRS Geneos tool is more comprehensive. This is its great advantage.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Event Management is outstanding; still is the most interesting part of the product."

"It allows our operations team to have one single application to reference when investigating issues in our environment."

"The ability to pull hosts together to show what processes are running, so it can be used for change management."

"Automated root cause analysis and predictive capabilities are powerful features that assist in resource utilization and capacity planning."

"The event management part of TrueSight Operations Management, in my experience, is probably the best in the market. You have endless flexibility. You can build your own rules, you have the MRL language, and you can implement any kind of logic on the alerts. It may be correlation, abstraction, or executing something as a result of the alerts. You have almost the whole range of options available for event management using the available customization."

"BMC TrueSight Operations Management is easily scalable."

"The noise reduction for ticketing works much better than we have seen in a lot of other companies."

"It is very helpful to be able to apply rule-based routing to alerts."

More BMC TrueSight pros

"The ability to completely tailor and customize what it's monitoring is one of its strongest points. A lot of other monitoring tools are good at certain things, but one of my colleagues described it as the “Swiss Army Knife” of monitoring tools. It can do anything you want."

"Ability to monitor logs for potential issues to prevent app outages before problems get a chance to arise. That's invaluable for our teams in a fast-paced trading environment."

"One thing we're utilizing in Geneos is the Gateway-SQL. That's really helpful for us. Using Gateway-SQL, we are able to merge two different views into one. Suppose we have to check something in the log and that we have to check something in the database and do a comparison before publishing a result. We can achieve that using Gateway-SQL."

"I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option."

"This tool allows one to analyse, integrate and customize as per the systems and allows you to set your own rules."

"It's a very powerful application monitoring tool across the industry. Many free, open-source tools are available. There are also paid tools, but ITRS Geneos is a real-time application monitoring tool where the user can monitor, self-configure, and manage alerts through their console."

"The flexibility of the product is most valuable. It is highly customizable. If you put your mind to it and think of something you could do, there's a good possibility you can get it integrated within the console, if it's not readily available. The simplicity or ease of customization has been valuable."

"One of the most valuable features is that it can be configured by non-developers. It doesn't require development expertise to configure it."

More ITRS Geneos pros

Cons

"More modules for less popular applications and better documentation."

"The solution is a little obsolete."

"I would like them to improve the deep-dive details, tracing, and data agents in this product. We have EUEM, an end-user experience monitoring appliance. This one's quicker than the current one, and reporting side and filtration side are very bad. There are many details we look at and explain what we receive information in the current one, but we cannot have historical data like we do with EUEM. We cannot have a powerful point to look for specific traffic from a specific application and a specific browser. We don't have it in the new one. The current BMC also needs to add the thing that control versions."

"The graphs are extremely limited. We don't have a lot of dashboard options. To make reports and dashboards more useful, we usually need to integrate some dashboard solutions."

"Specifically around application performance monitoring, BMC is definitely not the market leader. The Dynatraces, the New Relics and the like are more of the market leaders in that space. I would like to see them grow that space a little bit more aggressively. It has not really been their bread and butter."

"We have a unique use case because BMC typically sells this solution into enterprises that are deploying it within their IT, versus to a managed services provider like us where we're supporting thousands of customers. Multi-tenancy and the scalability have been challenges along the way, as we've grown... If anything could have gone better as we were ramping this up and adding a lot of volume to it, I would say it's the scalability. That would be one thing that could be improved."

"The pricing could be better."

"The solution could improve its price."

More BMC TrueSight cons

"ITRS Geneos cloud monitoring is very weak and can use improvement."

"It needs to be easier to configure, especially with the JMX plugins."

"The main feature that needs work is the Dashboard designer."

"One area where there is room for improvement is the log file. I would like to be able to do a pre-run on the log files. When you are testing log files for regular expressions, it would be good to be able to do a quick check up front on that side of things before you release that into production."

"I would like to see ITRS integrate its setup editor with a SVN to check-in setup XML after major changes."

"t needs to have better middleware integration for things such as application and Microsft SQL servers."

"For the solution to stay relevant in the cloud-based monitoring environment Geneos needs more plug-ins with more features. Instead of offering clients workarounds, the solution should have a cloud-based out-of-the-box version."

"ITRS Geneos is not on the cloud at a time when everyone is moving to the cloud."

More ITRS Geneos cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of BMC TrueSight Operations Management is very high. If there was more flexibility with the sizing of the licensing it would be helpful, especially during the pandemic. We have wanted to expend but the licensing cost is too high."

"Though I have no clue about the tool's actual price, I know that it is astronomical."

"Pricing is all volume-driven. I think we were paying between $80 and $85 per license. That's per unit, for a perpetual license. You pay it one time and then, every year, you pay 20 percent of that for annual maintenance and support. But now that we've grown, we've purchased tens of thousands of licenses and the cost per license has gone down to something like less than $30..."

"We did a five-year, multimillion dollar deal."

"There is a big upfront cost when you buy the license, then there is annual maintenance. We look at, if I bought a license and paid for maintenance for five years, then average it out, what would be my monthly cost. We have had some of the competing tools come in around four dollars. This is coming in as a premium, which is why I don't have it deployed as I would like it. Therefore, we're in negotiations right now. If I can get it down to the four dollar range, I will triple my deployment in a year and a half."

"The cost depends on the usage."

"It is a large, complex product. So, there is a commitment of manpower to deploy it, as it is not a cheap product."

"We're end-of-lifeing it now. Overall, the licensing costs of BMC are a challenge for us in that they're hard costs, whereas open-source monitoring has soft costs, where it's harder to line-item."

More BMC TrueSight pricing and cost advice

"It is expensive. They have to look at the model around when we move to cloud and how that's going to work. The licensing cost does pay off because of the improvements in support to our business."

"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."

"Based on feedback from colleagues and friends working in the financial sector, Geneos is relatively costly. Many companies have been switching from Geneos to Dynatrace, Sysdig, or other monitoring tools in the past two years because of the price."

"When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

"You will get the best price if you get a single global deal."

"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."

"The organization is not just purchasing a license for the product, but also managing services and professional services from ITRS. Another factor is if the implementation is going to be in production, non-production, or both."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

70%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	24

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BMC TrueSight Operations Management?

The solution provides visibility to our infrastructure, how it is, the resources we are monitoring, and quick updates when it has any problems. We have integrated it with ServiceNow to open instances.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC TrueSight Operations Management?

BMC TrueSight licensing costs are on the more expensive side.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC TrueSight Operations Management?

There are some complexities with deployment that could be improved in BMC TrueSight.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?

ITRS offers multiple products, including upgrades for synthetic monitoring and a SaaS platform. Geneos is used for infrastructure monitoring, covering KPIs such as CPU, memory, processes, network l...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs BMC TrueSight

Compared 8% of the time

BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps vs BMC TrueSight

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs BMC TrueSight

Compared 4% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs BMC TrueSight

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs BMC TrueSight

Compared 4% of the time

More BMC TrueSight Competitors

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 15% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Prometheus-AI Platform vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 2% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC TrueSight

January 2026

Download BMC TrueSight product report

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

January 2026

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Also Known As

ProactiveNet, TrueSight Operations Management

Geneos

Overview

BMC TrueSight offers extensive event management and seamless integration, providing comprehensive monitoring across varied infrastructures through its centralized console and Knowledge Modules.

BMC TrueSight delivers robust event management capabilities with seamless integration and comprehensive monitoring of diverse infrastructures. Its single console simplifies management, offering automated triage for standardized alerts, enhancing efficiency. Knowledge Modules support services from hardware to cloud, while proactive monitoring and capacity optimization enhance customization. It efficiently supports mixed environments by providing detailed insights and intelligently routing alerts to reduce noise. While improvements are needed in deployment, integration, AI, automation, reporting, and complexity reduction, it still meets diverse operational needs effectively.

What are BMC TrueSight's key features?

Robust Event Management: Offers efficient handling of events.
Seamless Integration: Integrates easily with existing systems.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Supports hardware to cloud infrastructure.
Centralized Console: Simplifies management processes.
Automated Triage: Standardizes alerts for better efficiency.
Proactive Monitoring: Improves forecasting and issue prevention.
Capacity Optimization: Efficiently manages resources.
Customizability: Tailors to specific service needs.

What benefits and ROI should users seek in BMC TrueSight?

Enhanced Proactive Management: Reduces downtime through efficient monitoring.
Improved Troubleshooting: Provides visibility into systems for quick issue resolution.
Effective Integration: Blends well with other tools and platforms.
Resource Efficiency: Optimizes use of infrastructure and servers.
Global Support: Facilitates operations across sectors worldwide.

BMC TrueSight is widely used in performance and availability monitoring for infrastructure and applications, supporting the monitoring of servers, databases, networks, and IT environments. It is implemented to improve management and reduce downtime, serving needs in data centers and cloud services. Organizations leverage it for event management, comprehensive data center monitoring, and cloud services, using its capabilities for alerting, ticket creation, troubleshooting, and compliance, enhancing operational efficiency globally.

BMC Helix

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Sample Customers

Ensono, Transamerica, Boston Scientific, Park Place Technologies, inContact, TD Ameritrade, PNC Bank

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Buyer's Guide

BMC TrueSight vs. ITRS Geneos

December 2025

Free Report: BMC TrueSight vs. ITRS Geneos

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC TrueSight vs. ITRS Geneos and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC TrueSight vs. ITRS Geneos report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.