BMC TrueSight and Splunk AppDynamics are competitors in the enterprise monitoring and management software category. Splunk AppDynamics has a slight edge with its in-depth monitoring and tracing capabilities, which are crucial for complex environments.
Features: BMC TrueSight provides an integrated platform to manage diverse assets globally. Its event management capabilities and root cause analysis through Knowledge Modules are key strengths, facilitating seamless integration with various monitoring tools. Splunk AppDynamics specializes in deep dive monitoring and line-level tracing. Its features include detailed transaction tracking, intuitive dashboards, and performance insights that are particularly beneficial in complex environments.
Room for Improvement: BMC TrueSight has challenges with deployment, cloud monitoring stability, and flexible reporting. It requires significant hardware resources and complex integrations. Splunk AppDynamics could improve licensing transparency and agent management. There's also a need for better integration with emerging technologies and more intuitive predictive analytics.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC TrueSight is generally deployed on-premises, needing considerable manpower and resources. While technical support is mostly satisfactory, response times need improvement. Splunk AppDynamics offers flexible deployment options, including public and hybrid clouds, but setup can be complex. Customer service is rated as good, though efficiency and support depth need enhancement.
Pricing and ROI: BMC TrueSight is priced high but valued for its robust features, especially for large enterprises, despite significant initial and maintenance costs. Splunk AppDynamics also has a complex and expensive licensing structure, adding value through extensive monitoring. Both solutions generally offer a good ROI by reducing IT operations costs, though the exact savings depend on the organization's scale and implementation specifics.
Overall, as a production gatekeeper, we achieve at least 50% efficiency immediately, with potential savings ranging from 60 to 70% as well, reinforcing why it is a popular tool in the banking industry.
According to errors, exceptions, and code-level details related to their application performance on a daily basis, the application development team tries to help with Splunk AppDynamics to reduce errors and exceptions, which helps the end users get application availability and feel more confident.
To understand the magnitude of it, when the company asked to replace Splunk AppDynamics with another tool, I indicated that for the proposed tool, we would need five people to do the analysis that Splunk AppDynamics enables me to do.
I would rate their technical support a nine out of ten.
AppDynamics is much more helpful.
We got a contact, an account manager, to work directly with for technical support.
They help us resolve any issues raised by our team relating to operations, application instrumentation, or any other issues.
We have reached maximum capacity in our tier, and extending capacity has not been cost-effective from Splunk's perspective.
I would rate the scalability of Splunk AppDynamics as a nine out of ten.
I assess how Splunk AppDynamics scales with the growing needs of my organization as good, since we are growing and adding more servers.
It is necessary to conduct appropriate testing before deploying them in production to prevent potential outages.
There are no issues or bugs with the 20.4 version; it is very stable with no functionality or operational issues.
Splunk AppDynamics is superior to any alternative, including Dynatrace.
There are some complexities with deployment that could be improved in BMC TrueSight.
Splunk AppDynamics does not support the complete MELT framework, which includes metrics, events, logging, and tracing for the entire stack.
If AppDynamics could develop a means to monitor without an agent, it could significantly improve application performance and reduce potential problems.
A good integration with Splunk would be very interesting, as Splunk is a good product for logs, and that part is currently missing in Splunk AppDynamics.
BMC TrueSight licensing costs are on the more expensive side.
We completed a three-year deal for Splunk and for AppDynamics, which costs millions of dollars.
Overall, I consider Splunk AppDynamics an expensive product; it's very expensive.
Customers have to pay a premium price, however, they receive considerable value from the product.
Automated root cause analysis and predictive capabilities are powerful features that assist in resource utilization and capacity planning.
We have multiple tools, but end users prefer to use Splunk AppDynamics because their portal navigation is very simple and clear.
The real user monitoring and digital experience monitoring effectively track actual user experience with the applications, including page loading, interaction time for both desktop and mobile applications.
This is the best feature because, although you can't monitor a whole application at once, Splunk AppDynamics gives you the option that if there is any failure—simple failure regarding anything set up as per our use cases—you will get an alert.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Splunk AppDynamics | 3.6% |
| BMC TrueSight | 1.0% |
| Other | 95.4% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 55 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 36 |
| Large Enterprise | 194 |
BMC TrueSight offers extensive event management and seamless integration, providing comprehensive monitoring across varied infrastructures through its centralized console and Knowledge Modules.
BMC TrueSight delivers robust event management capabilities with seamless integration and comprehensive monitoring of diverse infrastructures. Its single console simplifies management, offering automated triage for standardized alerts, enhancing efficiency. Knowledge Modules support services from hardware to cloud, while proactive monitoring and capacity optimization enhance customization. It efficiently supports mixed environments by providing detailed insights and intelligently routing alerts to reduce noise. While improvements are needed in deployment, integration, AI, automation, reporting, and complexity reduction, it still meets diverse operational needs effectively.
What are BMC TrueSight's key features?
What benefits and ROI should users seek in BMC TrueSight?
BMC TrueSight is widely used in performance and availability monitoring for infrastructure and applications, supporting the monitoring of servers, databases, networks, and IT environments. It is implemented to improve management and reduce downtime, serving needs in data centers and cloud services. Organizations leverage it for event management, comprehensive data center monitoring, and cloud services, using its capabilities for alerting, ticket creation, troubleshooting, and compliance, enhancing operational efficiency globally.
Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance monitoring with advanced diagnostics and real-time insights, offering seamless end-to-end transaction tracking and infrastructure visibility.
AppDynamics provides critical tools for businesses to analyze application behavior and performance. Through innovative features like transaction snapshot analysis and adaptable dashboards, users can quickly identify and address issues, ensuring high levels of system uptime and efficiency. It is designed to support complex environments including Kubernetes and AWS, enhancing user experience by detecting performance issues early. Despite needing improvements in network monitoring and integration, it remains a robust option for tracking application health.
What are the key features of AppDynamics?In industries like financial services and e-commerce, AppDynamics facilitates performance tracking across distributed systems, optimizing infrastructure to meet consumer demands. It excels in environments needing precise transaction monitoring and is pivotal in delivering high value and satisfaction.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
