ITRS Geneos vs New Relic comparison

ITRS and New Relic are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. ITRS is ranked #48, while New Relic is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. ITRS holds a 1.0% mindshare in APM, compared to New Relic’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of New Relic users who would recommend it.

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

6,273 Views
3,576 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

New Relic

Read 173 New Relic reviews

18,652 Views
13,056 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

New Relic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

ITRS Geneos and New Relic compete in the monitoring tools category. New Relic seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and perceived value.

Features: ITRS Geneos provides strong data visualization, robust alerting capabilities, and specialized features. New Relic offers comprehensive application monitoring, infrastructure monitoring, and user experience tracking. New Relic’s broader suite of tools gives it an advantage in feature richness.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos needs better documentation, improved integrations, and a more streamlined user interface. New Relic could benefit from more competitive pricing models, enhancements to custom dashboards, and better scalability options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos has a complex deployment process but offers responsive customer service. New Relic provides a relatively straightforward deployment process and extensive support resources.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos has a higher initial setup cost but provides good ROI for specialized use-cases. New Relic is more expensive, but its extensive feature set justifies the cost.

To learn more, read our detailed ITRS Geneos vs. New Relic Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. New Relic

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

48th

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

73rd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

51st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

New Relic

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

4th

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

173

Ranking in other categories

IT Operations Analytics (3rd), Mobile APM (3rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd), AIOps (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.0%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of New Relic is 3.8%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
New Relic	3.8%
ITRS Geneos	1.0%
Other	95.2%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

BasilJiji

System Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Real-time alerts have reduced server outage impact and support fast incident response

In the dashboard, if they could show a little more metrics regarding the application and related things, that would be how New Relic could be improved. Currently, there are things showing from the server level and application level, but it can be improved. That is what I felt. Regarding user interface, I do not feel much concern, but for some kind of issues when we are trying to get support from the New Relic team, their SLA seems to be long. They are taking seven to ten working days for resolving some kind of scenario or issue. That is a bit difficult for us. If they could improve the customer support by reducing their SLA within three to five days, if they could remediate everything, that will be so much helpful. When it comes to the customer support part, I felt they need to be a little more improved on that part. The support overall is good, but they can improve. That is the reason I have given it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most valuable features is that it can be configured by non-developers. It doesn't require development expertise to configure it."

"It is better than any monitoring product I've ever used in terms of providing real-time metric data."

"The 'start of day' (SOD) and 'end of day' (EOD) checks were automated by using this tool, thus reducing the amount of manual work needed by almost two hours per day."

"Switching over to using a Geneos dashboard, we completely eliminated all manual effort and it was a huge time saver."

"I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option."

"Ability to monitor logs for potential issues to prevent app outages before problems get a chance to arise. That's invaluable for our teams in a fast-paced trading environment."

"The good thing is you get something out of it day one, you don't need years of training, and then you can build on that."

"It's also easy to implement. The implementation of Geneos is very easy and interesting. It's not complicated. It's very quick to implement. The installation is very easy. There are many topics about ITRS Geneos that explain more about the features of the function of Geneos."

More ITRS Geneos pros

"It is easier to create new dashboards in the New Relic interface, and it is also easier to query if when I want to monitor a different parameter or time duration on my dashboard."

"New features are added often."

"The most important thing is that it tells us where the latency in throughput and response time are."

"This is the best tool for gaining insight into SaaS or cloud-based applications that we’ve seen."

"New Relic has positively impacted our organization by reducing errors, improving performance, and saving time."

"It enables us to fine-tune our application quicker."

"Its most valuable feature is application performance monitoring, as it gives me a complete x-ray of the application to understand where the bottlenecks are, then improve and fix issues."

"It has the ability to monitor random URLs not tied to the one pinger per application (though it costs extra)."

More New Relic pros

Cons

"Mobile phone integration is probably not as rich as it could be."

"I would really like to see something from the Geneos side to set up automated reporting from ITRS."

"ITRS have started to make some major changes that we haven't taken on board yet, in the creation of dashboards and more visibility of the metrics that we collect. At the moment, that's something that's lacking, but I know they have addressed it. Still, it’s not that easy to create stuff to help with visibility and dashboarding in Geneos."

"We need more hassle free plug-ins that offer Load and Start with minimal manual efforts."

"As far as I know, ITRS does not have integration with any version control system."

"Currently, it is difficult to monitor secure websites using SSL or with SSO enabled."

"The interface can sometimes be a little complicated."

"In some cases Netprobe can be unstable."

More ITRS Geneos cons

"In Alert History, while you can see the trending in response time by Request Queuing, .NER CLR and Database, if you had the ability to see which transaction type was the slowest during the timeframe when the critical error occurred by displaying the info within the same “tool tip” hover window which currently gives me the time per request and number of transactions, i.e., if it had the additional correlation information of “StatusCode/403” which you can get from the Events Errors hover."

"I would like an infrastructure network that provides real-time views, showing the issues."

"New Relic APM generates weekly performance reports, but they aren't really actionable."

"They should bring the pricing down to be more competitive."

"The deployment process could be improved."

"The initial setup can be made easier. Like Mixpanel, New Relic can also have a step-by-step guide for the setup process."

"New Relic does enable frontend performance monitoring by default. However, when we are troubleshooting the issue, New Relic is not able to trace back to the service where the issue is. Other solutions, such as Dynatrace are better."

"There are a number of plugins that New Relic makes. It would be nice to be able to instantly integrate that with APM."

More New Relic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

"Given our spend and the amount of service we have in it, the pricing is quite reasonable."

"Based on feedback from colleagues and friends working in the financial sector, Geneos is relatively costly. Many companies have been switching from Geneos to Dynatrace, Sysdig, or other monitoring tools in the past two years because of the price."

"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."

"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."

"The licensing cost may seem expensive upfront. However, the service is outstanding, the tool does things that no other tools can do, and the customizability more than makes up for the cost of licensing."

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

"The detection piece of it brings us a big return on investment."

"The monthly cost os $1000 per server per month, but it could be even more. We pay about $250 for the server, and then New Relic wants over $1000 to give us statistics on those servers."

"Pricing is better with New Relic APM than Dynatrace."

"If I remember it correctly, the pricing was based on the core, and the monthly subscription used to cost us $1,500 or $2,000. We had pre-prod and production services. Costing was different for pre-prod and production. For pre-prod, it was 40% less than the production service cost. It was a combined package."

"Because of budget, we are not using the mobile app part of this tool."

"This is an expensive product."

"The price of New Relic APM could be less expensive. We are using the New Relic APM pro account and it is more costly. When compared to competitors the solution's pricing should be much more realistic."

"The solution is quite expensive. It costs around $5,000 a month. There aren't any additional costs above that."

More New Relic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

64%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	39

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	65
Midsize Enterprise	50
Large Enterprise	77

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What do you like most about New Relic Insights?

The product's initial setup phase was very easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with New Relic Insights?

I have noticed discrepancies between New Relic's documentation and Terraform resources. For example, there have been instances where new features launched in the New Relic UI have not been updated ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 7% of the time

Nagios XI vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 5% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 4% of the time

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 2% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Dynatrace vs New Relic

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs New Relic

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs New Relic

Compared 4% of the time

Elastic Observability vs New Relic

Compared 2% of the time

Azure Monitor vs New Relic

Compared 2% of the time

More New Relic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

May 2026

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Buyer's Guide

New Relic

April 2026

Download New Relic product report

Also Known As

Geneos

New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM

Overview

ITRS Geneos offers a customizable platform for real-time monitoring with minimal system impact, facilitating insights across multiple platforms. Known for its scalability, it efficiently integrates with other tools, supporting industries with its proactive monitoring capabilities.

ITRS Geneos allows users to effectively manage financial services infrastructure by monitoring trading systems, treasury management, and FX operations. It provides real-time dashboards to track server uptime, application performance, and health metrics. Users benefit from its enterprise-wide data aggregation, alerting features, and script adaptability while needing improvement in cloud monitoring and AI-based predictive functionalities. The tool's setup requires some expertise, suggesting a need for more intuitive solutions.

What are the most important features of ITRS Geneos?

Customizable Dashboards: Enables real-time analytics across platforms.
Lightweight Netprobe: Facilitates efficient data aggregation with minimal impact.
Plugin Support: Ensures extensive compatibility and integration.
Proactive Monitoring: Allows for early issue detection and resolution.
Script Adaptability: Supports tailored solutions for specific requirements.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Minimized Manual Intervention: Automation features reduce manual tasks.
Scalability: Easily accommodates growing enterprise needs.
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with existing tools.
Insightful Dashboards: Provides actionable metrics for decision making.

ITRS Geneos is prominently utilized in financial sectors. Banks and financial institutions leverage its capabilities to monitor infrastructure and application performance, optimizing trading systems and FX operations. It builds comprehensive dashboards, offering valuable insights into server health, application logs, and network performance, contributing significantly to operational efficiency.

ITRS

New Relic offers real-time application monitoring and insight into performance bottlenecks. Its customizable dashboards and APM integration provide efficient operational support, while server performance alerts ensure quick issue detection.

New Relic provides comprehensive monitoring of application performance, tracking bottlenecks across databases and front-end components. Users employ it for server and infrastructure monitoring, as well as analyzing key metrics such as CPU and memory usage. The solution's ability to integrate with tools like PagerDuty enhances incident management capabilities. However, users have expressed a need for improvements in query language simplicity, more detailed historical insights, and better mobile app monitoring support.

What are New Relic's most important features?

Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant visibility into application performance.
Detailed Transaction Tracing: Identifies specific transaction issues quickly.
Error Rate Tracking: Monitors and reports on error occurrences efficiently.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors dashboard views for specific needs.
APM Integration: Seamlessly integrates with application performance management tools.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Operational Efficiency: Quick issue detection reduces downtime.
Improved Debugging: Enhanced error analysis supports rapid problem resolution.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Offers a holistic view of application performance and user behavior.
Incident Management: Integration with incident tools helps streamline responses.
Efficient Alerts: Rapid alert systems ensure timely notifications of issues.

In industries like e-commerce and financial services, New Relic supports application performance monitoring to enhance user experience and system reliability. Organizations leverage its insights for optimizing performance, particularly in server operations and infrastructure management. Its ability to monitor API failures through synthetic monitoring is crucial for maintaining high service levels.

New Relic

Sample Customers

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. New Relic

April 2026

Free Report: ITRS Geneos vs. New Relic

Find out what your peers are saying about ITRS Geneos vs. New Relic and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ITRS Geneos vs. New Relic report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best Network Monitoring Software vendors, and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.