F-Secure Total vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint comparison

F-Secure and Microsoft are both solutions in the Anti-Malware Tools category. F-Secure is ranked #21, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. F-Secure holds a 2.0% mindshare in Anti-Malware Tools, compared to Microsoft’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of F-Secure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

F-Secure Total

Read 1 F-Secure Total review

3,795 Views
3,491 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Defender for Endp...

Read 212 Microsoft Defender for Endpoint reviews

45,049 Views
11,713 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

F-Secure Total

Microsoft Defender for Endp...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between F-Secure Total and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Anti-Malware Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Anti-Malware Tools Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Anti-Malware Tools

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F-Secure Total

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

21st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Office 365 Protection (9th)

Microsoft Defender for Endp...

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

212

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (1st), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (5th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (3rd), Microsoft Security Suite (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of F-Secure Total is 2.0%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is 6.3%, down from 15.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Anti-Malware Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	6.3%
F-Secure Total	2.0%
Other	91.7%

Anti-Malware Tools

Featured Reviews

Mauro Spinazzè

Computer Scientist at Comune di Eraclea

Easy to setup and stable solution

It's a good product for us. The reports and notifications are very good for us. There is room for improvement in pricing. In future releases, I would like to see improvements in EDR protection. So, the only thing that I would like to see in the future is EDR protection and a lower price for…

Read full review

Robert Arbuckle

Security Analyst III at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Automatically isolates threats and integrates with logging to reduce response time

Overall, I would evaluate the Microsoft support level that I receive at probably about a seven, but that depends on the day. It has been spotty. We have had issues where the urgency level of the Microsoft support is not as high as ours, especially during a data breach or potential data breach situation. We have had issues with some of the offshore support being lackluster. One specific thing that comes to mind is we were on a support call with our CISO on the call, and the Microsoft agent, who did not actually work for Microsoft, is one of the vendors that Microsoft uses for support, said, "Just to set expectations, my lunch break is in an hour and I am going to go away then." For us, it was already ten o'clock at night and we had been working on this for a couple of hours, trying to get a security engineer on with us. For him to tell us that he was going to go away and have lunch, it was, "Okay, but go find somebody else if you need to." It was just the lackluster approach, and it seemed like he did not really care. We seem to get a lot of this when we get non-Microsoft support. I can identify areas for improvement with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, as it is kind of a convoluted mess to try to take care of false positives. Especially when they have been identified as false positives but they keep going off over and over again. It is great for my pocketbook because it generates a lot of on-call action, but I would really prefer more sleep at two o'clock in the morning than dealing with false positives. I would say that the unified portal for managing Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is suitable for both teams as they are all in there. It would be great if they would stop moving things around and renaming things, which makes sense. The new XDR portal is pretty nice. Being able to have it central again inside of the regular Security Center without having to open up two windows is helpful. Overall, I think it is pretty good. There is always going to be something that could be improved, such as alerting and the ability to modify alerts would be a little bit helpful to have. Being able to add more data into the alerts and turn off alerts that are not as useful would be beneficial. It is hard to say what the quantitative impact the security exposure management feature has had on our company's security, because a lot of it is kind of subjective. I think we are sitting at around a fifty percent score still, and a lot of it is just kind of unusual circumstances that we cannot really implement without breaking the organization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a good product for us. The reports and notifications are very good for us."

"The scalability is good."

"We have very good visibility on our endpoints. The level of information it throws back is helpful."

"The feature I appreciate most about Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is the portal, being able to see everything rolling up into the portal for a total overview of how the organization looks for all the managed endpoints."

"Defender is stable enough and is competitive with the other products in the market."

"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is quite good. We haven't really experienced any issues with it."

"I would highly recommend Microsoft Defender Antivirus for an individual looking to protect their endpoints."

"The threat hunting service is very useful for a security professional."

"We are able to productively integrate with existing on-prem, hybrid, or cloud applications."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pros

Cons

"I would like to see in the future is EDR protection and a lower price for F-Secure Total."

"Defender's cloud integration could be improved."

"It is inexpensive but could be cheaper like anything else."

"We would like to see more tools for managing on-premises security... Sometimes, we have the tools, like Defender, to manage security in the cloud, but because we are so focused on the cloud, we forget the fact that we need to be sure about the security of the on-premises environment, specifically Active Directory."

"My main issue with the tool is that there are too many menus. This causes a steep learning curve for those without training or unfamiliar with Defender for Endpoint. From an end-user perspective, the solution is there on the machine and does its job; it works seamlessly. However, as a security professional dealing with it behind the scenes, the learning curve can be steep, but not too steep. Still, it has taken some of my analysts up to a month to get familiar with the product."

"With increase of cyber threats and cybersecurity issues, I would recommend that the product be developed like an AI product with more features which can counter any threat in the coming eras."

"Cortex... has good investigation capabilities, out-of-the-box, in case there is an event that you'd like to investigate. It's quite convenient. Microsoft has those capabilities as well, but you need a bit more training on the product to get the basic information that you can get out-of-the-box with Cortex."

"I miss having an executive dashboard or a simple view for viewing things. Everything is extensive in this solution. Everything is configurable and manageable, but the environment of Microsoft 365 has about 13 administrative dashboards, and in each of the dashboards, there are a gazillion things to set up. It is good for a large enterprise, but for a 200-seat client, you need to see 5% of that."

"One thing that was lacking in Defender was web filtering. Its web filtering wasn't as comprehensive. Sophos was a little bit better than Defender for blocking URLs or installing programs."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We can easily scale and improve security, but the cost is high for us."

"Buying individual point products would've cost us a lot more money than one integrated solution that also capitalizes on Teams Voice and things of that nature. Given our size, buying individual products would have easily cost us a million dollars."

"We have the E5 security license, and the solution comes with that."

"The product is free of charge and comes integrated into Windows."

"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is more affordable compared to some other endpoint solutions."

"The solution comes free with Microsoft Windows 10."

"The solution comes as a part of Windows 10 and it is covered under its license."

"The base price for an E5 license, which includes Enterprise Mobility + Security E5, is $57 per user per month."

"AV solutions are pretty expensive because they are necessary, not just for protection, but many businesses need them to comply with regulatory bodies and receive accreditation. We recently purchased an E5 license, which gives us access to the entire Microsoft suite. I would say the pricing is competitive; most tools of this kind are similarly priced. There are minor differences between the competitors, but they aren't spectacularly different. Defender for Endpoint makes sense because all our solutions are in the same place, paid for with a single license. The subscription price is around £50 per user per month, though it may have increased slightly."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

27%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	82
Midsize Enterprise	45
Large Enterprise	96

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface, applies behavioral-based endpoint protection and response, and includes risk-ba...

See all answers

Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?

We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?

The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Avast One vs F-Secure Total

Compared 8% of the time

AdGuard vs F-Secure Total

Compared 6% of the time

AVG Internet Security Business Edition vs F-Secure Total

Compared 6% of the time

ESET PROTECT Enterprise vs F-Secure Total

Compared 5% of the time

Avira Antivirus vs F-Secure Total

Compared 5% of the time

More F-Secure Total Competitors

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 3% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 1% of the time

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Anti-Malware Tools

July 2026

Download F-Secure Total product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

July 2026

Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint product report

Also Known As

F-Secure Elements for Microsoft 365

Microsoft Defender ATP, Microsoft Defender Advanced Threat Protection, MS Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Defender Antivirus

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

F-Secure

Microsoft

Overview

F-Secure Total offers comprehensive security and privacy features tailored for modern digital environments. It integrates advanced protection mechanisms ensuring robust defense against cyber threats.

Designed for those who prioritize strong cybersecurity, F-Secure Total provides extensive protection through its innovative technologies. It facilitates seamless integration with various devices, delivering a unified defense strategy. Users benefit from real-time threat detection, ensuring a secure and private digital presence. This platform stands out with its adaptable security capabilities catering to specific user needs.

What are the most important features of F-Secure Total?

Antivirus Protection: Offers real-time scanning to block malware and viruses efficiently.
VPN: Ensures online privacy through secure and private internet connections.
Password Manager: Safeguards and manages credentials for enhanced digital security.
Parental Controls: Regulates internet usage and content accessibility for children.
Device Finder: Locates lost devices and ensures data protection.

What benefits and ROI should users seek in reviews of F-Secure Total?

Comprehensive Security: Users should find strong evidence of improved cybersecurity measures.
Enhanced Privacy: Look for verified privacy enhancements in user testimonials.
User-Friendly Interface: Reviews should reflect ease of use and intuitive navigation.
Cost Efficiency: Positive reviews often highlight substantial ROI in terms of reduced security costs.

F-Secure Total finds application across industries such as healthcare, finance, and education, assisting in compliance with regulatory standards while ensuring the confidentiality and integrity of sensitive data. Its adaptability allows businesses to bolster their cybersecurity frameworks effectively, tailoring solutions to fit industry-specific demands.

F-Secure

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides comprehensive threat protection that integrates well with current systems, offering proactive threat detection and automatic updates while reducing manual efforts.

The platform is designed for seamless integration with Microsoft products, facilitating efficient management and use. It offers proactive ransomware protection and valuable threat intelligence, crucial for timely response and increased visibility across devices. Users highlight its ability to secure endpoints from viruses and malware, integrating with Windows and Office 365 to enhance real-time detection capabilities in diverse environments, including hybrid and on-premises setups. However, enhancements are needed in Linux integration, detection accuracy, and policy implementations.

What are the key features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?

Seamless Integration: Works smoothly with existing systems and Microsoft products for easy management.
Proactive Threat Detection: Advanced monitoring to identify and mitigate threats swiftly.
Ransomware Protection: Built-in features to protect against ransomware attacks automatically.
Centralized Management: Unified platform for better device visibility and collaboration.
Threat Intelligence: Provides critical data for rapid threat response.

What benefits should be evaluated in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?

Cost-Effectiveness: Part of Windows bundles, offering comprehensive security at competitive pricing.
Time Efficiency: Reduces manual oversight with automatic updates and management ease.
Real-Time Detection: Enhanced security through seamless Office 365 and Windows integration.
Device Coverage: Supports hybrid and on-premises environments for varied digital infrastructures.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is implemented across industries for securing endpoints, relying on its deep integration with Windows and Office 365 to protect against malware and viruses. Organizations benefit from its real-time detection and comprehensive management capabilities, particularly in hybrid environments where diverse digital infrastructures need safeguarding.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Petrofrac, Metro CSG, Christus Health

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Anti-Malware Tools. Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.

We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.