FileAudit vs IBM Security QRadar comparison

IS Decisions and IBM are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. IS Decisions is ranked #57, while IBM is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9. IS Decisions holds a 0.7% mindshare in SIEM, compared to IBM’s 5.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IS Decisions users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of IBM users who would recommend it.

FileAudit

Read 3 FileAudit reviews

2,634 Views
1,765 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Security QRadar

Read 218 IBM Security QRadar reviews

30,244 Views
18,449 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

FileAudit

IBM Security QRadar

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

IBM Security QRadar and FileAudit compete in IT security and management. QRadar takes the lead in advanced threat detection while FileAudit excels in file-access auditing.

Features: IBM Security QRadar offers advanced analytics, comprehensive threat detection capabilities, and data correlation across various security aspects. FileAudit provides user-friendly file access monitoring, compliance reporting, and easy monitoring of file access.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QRadar requires a robust but complex deployment process due to its extensive analytics capability. However, FileAudit features a straightforward deployment with rapid setup, integrating seamlessly with existing systems. Both systems offer valuable customer service, but FileAudit provides straightforward support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security QRadar involves a substantial initial investment with significant ROI through its extensive security capabilities. FileAudit offers lower setup costs and quicker ROI, especially for businesses focused on file-access monitoring and compliance. In contrast, QRadar requires a more significant initial financial commitment.

To learn more, read our detailed FileAudit vs. IBM Security QRadar Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

FileAudit vs. IBM Security QRadar

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FileAudit

Ranking in Log Management

53rd

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

57th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Security QRadar

Ranking in Log Management

5th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

218

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (3rd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (12th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (5th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (7th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of FileAudit is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security QRadar is 5.5%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Security QRadar	5.5%
FileAudit	0.7%
Other	93.8%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

AntoSebastin

Cyber Security Consultant - APAC at Logon Software

A scalable SIEM solution for monitoring a user's activity in the file server

The most valuable features of the solution are its quick and simple features related to advanced permissions for files, allowing for what permission needs to be granted to the users when it comes to the monitoring folder in the solution. If someone who has been denied permission to use a particular folder tries to go to that folder, then the administrator gets a notification. In general, the administrator can easily gather and maintain records if a person who has been denied permission to a particular confidential folder tries to access it.

Read full review

HarshBhardiya

SOC Engineer at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Have managed daily asset and alert monitoring effectively but have encountered limitations with manual processes and interface usability

It's still very manual and doesn't work on its own. It's still in an early stage and not on par where we can consider it a really successful detection system. The accuracy is not there. The UI could be better when compared to Sentinels where we can use flags and tagging. It could be much more user-friendly. IBM Security QRadar has all features and is fully competitive with other SIEM tools, but when it comes to user-friendliness, a new user takes time to get used to it. More intuitive, user-friendly interfaces and more helpful documentation would be beneficial. The query searching and data fetching could be faster. In large to very large organizations with around 5,000 or 6,000 assets or beyond, even with proper configurations and RAM and hardware backing up, the query is fairly slow.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Alerting upon file changes is the most valuable aspect of the product."

"Our customer acquires the complete report which is kept for future auditing purposes."

"FileAudit has helped our client to bring order to the day-to-day management of these folders, through the use of information triggers that inform department managers of both file obsolescence and changes made by employees."

"It is a good and stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"IBM QRadar is great help from its security event monitoring to data center and NOC troubleshooting of issues hard for other departments to spot."

"It is really helpful to us from the compliance point of view."

"It is a very good SIEM."

"With QRadar, we are getting better outputs such as the reports and other outputs."

"The most valuable feature that we found, especially this year, was the ability to build apps over it, as the platform has opened up and we can now customize it as per our needs and requirements and build interactive dashboards and other interesting things around it."

"It's a complete platform."

"It pretty much does the monitoring of our network, so just having the tool secures the environment itself."

"It is a very optimized engine."

More IBM Security QRadar pros

Cons

"Whenever someone cuts and paste, it shows as "file is deleted"."

"The DLP function, including installation of the agent on the workstation and controlling the DLP restrictions, are areas where the product lacks."

"The updates management and central management console could be improved."

"There is one problem with QRadar in regards to the add-on apps. The apps can be frustrating. For example, when I add a big app like one of the add-ons for resiliency, add-on applications for QRadar, these applications require different hardware to implement and to deploy. The resiliency connector because there's a considerable amount of data scanning, operates for these apps correctly."

"If you are searching for three to four months back it takes and there is a time delay. If I compare it to Splunk, it is a little bit delayed."

"The user interface is a bit difficult to get used to."

"QRadar needs a lot of fine tuning"

"There was some complexity in the initial setup due to bandwidth issues."

"Do your research before implementing it, because it is tough to implement."

"The vulnerability scanner is not accurate."

"The whole process for support is something that needs to be improved."

More IBM Security QRadar cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FileAudit provides a trial license for 30 days, and after that, customers can choose between perpetual licensing or the annual-based licensing option offered by FileAudit."

"Only enterprise businesses can afford the tool."

"There is a license to use this solution, which is paid annually. However, there are subscription options available."

"IBM has subscriptions plans that run for one year."

"The maintenance costs are high."

"Customers have to purchase a license based on the number of users, devices, and applications they want to protect. It allows you to take a license on a subscription basis for three years or five years."

"You have a one-time payment, and you also can purchase it for one year as a subscription. We have it on-premise, and we have a permanent license for it. We have to pay for the support on a yearly basis. If you compare its cost with Sentinel for one year, QRadar would seem more expensive, but if you compare its cost over five or ten years, Azure Sentinel will be more expensive than QRadar. If you compare its cost with Sentinel for one year, QRadar would seem more expensive, but if you compare its cost over five or 10 years, Azure Sentinel can be more expensive than QRadar."

"It is overly expensive and overly complex in terms of licensing. They have many different appliances, which makes it extremely difficult to choose the technology. It is very difficult to choose the technology or QRadar components that you should be deploying. They have improved some of it in the last few years. They have made it slightly easy with the fact that you can now buy virtual versions of all the appliances, which is good, but it is still very fragmented. For instance, on some of the smaller appliances, there is no upgrade path. So, if you exceed the capacity of the appliance, you have to buy a bigger appliance, which is not helpful because it is quite a major cost. If you want to add more disks to the system, they'll say that you can't."

"There are different types of subscriptions available. We were on an annual subscription, but our customers typically choose the two years subscription option."

More IBM Security QRadar pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 28, 2015

Qradar vs. ArcSight

Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

22%

Comms Service Provider

20%

Educational Organization

12%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	92
Midsize Enterprise	39
Large Enterprise	107

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...

See all answers

What SOC product do you recommend?

For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Security QRadar?

I am overall satisfied with the licensing cost for IBM Security QRadar.

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs FileAudit

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs FileAudit

Compared 13% of the time

EventSentry vs FileAudit

Compared 6% of the time

ManageEngine File Audit Plus vs FileAudit

Compared 6% of the time

Power Admin PA File Sight vs FileAudit

Compared 6% of the time

More FileAudit Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 11% of the time

Elastic Security vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 3% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 3% of the time

Sentinel vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 2% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 2% of the time

More IBM Security QRadar Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

August 2026

Download FileAudit product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security QRadar

August 2026

Download IBM Security QRadar product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM QRadar, QRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson

Overview

FileAudit provides powerful file monitoring and auditing capabilities, enabling organizations to secure sensitive data and ensure compliance. It offers real-time alerts and detailed reporting, making it a reliable choice for safeguarding data integrity.

FileAudit delivers comprehensive monitoring solutions, allowing IT departments to keep track of file access and modifications effortlessly. It empowers businesses to identify suspicious activity and unauthorized file access in real-time. With an intuitive setup process, FileAudit seamlessly integrates into existing infrastructure, enhancing security measures without causing disruptions. Its focus on user activity monitoring provides deep insights into all file interactions, supporting compliance and internal security policies effectively.

What are the most important features?

Real-Time Alerts: Notifies administrators immediately of any suspicious file activity.
Comprehensive Reporting: Generates detailed reports about file access for compliance.
Access Detection: Identifies unauthorized file access and usage patterns promptly.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with current IT environments without disruption.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Keeps sensitive data protected with constant monitoring.
Regulatory Compliance: Supports adherence to data protection regulations with audit trails.
Efficient Management: Saves time with automated audit processes and alerts.
Informed Decision Making: Provides insights to make strategic security improvements.

FileAudit is widely used in sectors where data integrity and access control are paramount, such as healthcare, finance, and legal industries. In these industries, it ensures compliance with strict data protection regulations and helps prevent data breaches by providing a clear view of file activity.

IS Decisions

IBM Security QRadar offers real-time threat detection, data correlation, and integration with third-party solutions, providing a user-friendly interface, scalability, and extensive reporting capabilities for SIEM needs.

IBM Security QRadar is designed for comprehensive security monitoring in diverse environments, aiding sectors like telecom and finance with advanced threat detection and breach management. It aggregates data and analyzes user behavior, while its customizable and out-of-the-box rules deliver robust security insights and vulnerability management. The platform seeks enhancements in integration, performance, and user interface, with a focus on AI and cloud service compatibility.

What are the most important features of IBM Security QRadar?

Real-time Threat Detection: Monitors and alerts on security incidents as they happen.
Data Correlation: Aggregates and connects disparate data sources for cohesive analysis.
Third-party Integration: Supports seamless interaction with other security tools.
Scalability: Grows with organizational needs without sacrificing performance.
Customizable Rules: Allows tailored security settings for specific requirements.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Enhanced Security Insights: Offers comprehensive coverage across environments.
Reduced False Positives: Minimizes unnecessary alerts, improving efficiency.
User-friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and analysis tasks.
Extensive Reporting Capabilities: Provides detailed insights for informed decision-making.
Compliance Focus: Assists in meeting regulatory standards effectively.

Telecom, finance, and cloud-based industries implement IBM Security QRadar for threat detection, compliance, and security monitoring. It is deployed for log collection and correlation, user behavior analytics, and ensuring secure data transfer and incident management, focusing on compliance and anomaly detection.

IBM

Sample Customers

CommuniCare Health Centre, DP World, BAE Systems, Moet Hennessy, Ernst & Young, Honda, Volswagon, VTech, GlakoSmithKline, Lockheed Martin, US Navy, University of Alabama, Ministry of Interior Saudi Arabia, Total

Clients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.

Buyer's Guide

FileAudit vs. IBM Security QRadar

June 2026

Free Report: FileAudit vs. IBM Security QRadar

Find out what your peers are saying about FileAudit vs. IBM Security QRadar and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FileAudit vs. IBM Security QRadar report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors and best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.