FileAudit vs IBM Security QRadar comparison

IS Decisions and IBM are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. IS Decisions is ranked #60, while IBM is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0. IS Decisions holds a 0.7% mindshare in SIEM, compared to IBM’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IS Decisions users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

FileAudit

Read 3 FileAudit reviews

1,868 Views
1,214 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Security QRadar

Read 217 IBM Security QRadar reviews

23,366 Views
14,721 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

FileAudit

IBM Security QRadar

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

IBM Security QRadar and FileAudit are competing products within network security and monitoring. QRadar has the upper hand with its comprehensive threat detection, while FileAudit excels in ease of file monitoring.

Features: IBM Security QRadar offers real-time alerts, advanced threat analytics, and extensive threat detection and response. FileAudit provides real-time monitoring, access auditing of files and folders, and a straightforward solution for file-related activities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FileAudit is known for its quick deployment process, appealing to organizations seeking immediate solutions. QRadar, offering robust security measures, may require a more detailed setup. Both solutions offer strong customer service, but FileAudit's simple installation gives it an advantage for rapid deployment.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security QRadar involves higher initial setup costs with a comprehensive suite of features, potentially resulting in better ROI over time through reduced threat management costs. FileAudit has lower upfront costs and offers better ROI for organizations focused on file access monitoring with less complex security requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed FileAudit vs. IBM Security QRadar Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

FileAudit vs. IBM Security QRadar

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FileAudit

Ranking in Log Management

55th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

60th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Security QRadar

Ranking in Log Management

6th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

217

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (2nd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (12th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (5th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (7th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of FileAudit is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security QRadar is 5.2%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Security QRadar	5.2%
FileAudit	0.7%
Other	94.1%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

AntoSebastin

Cyber Security Consultant - APAC at Logon Software

A scalable SIEM solution for monitoring a user's activity in the file server

The most valuable features of the solution are its quick and simple features related to advanced permissions for files, allowing for what permission needs to be granted to the users when it comes to the monitoring folder in the solution. If someone who has been denied permission to use a particular folder tries to go to that folder, then the administrator gets a notification. In general, the administrator can easily gather and maintain records if a person who has been denied permission to a particular confidential folder tries to access it.

Read full review

HarshBhardiya

SOC Engineer at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Have managed daily asset and alert monitoring effectively but have encountered limitations with manual processes and interface usability

It's still very manual and doesn't work on its own. It's still in an early stage and not on par where we can consider it a really successful detection system. The accuracy is not there. The UI could be better when compared to Sentinels where we can use flags and tagging. It could be much more user-friendly. IBM Security QRadar has all features and is fully competitive with other SIEM tools, but when it comes to user-friendliness, a new user takes time to get used to it. More intuitive, user-friendly interfaces and more helpful documentation would be beneficial. The query searching and data fetching could be faster. In large to very large organizations with around 5,000 or 6,000 assets or beyond, even with proper configurations and RAM and hardware backing up, the query is fairly slow.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Our customer acquires the complete report which is kept for future auditing purposes."

"It is a good and stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"Alerting upon file changes is the most valuable aspect of the product."

"FileAudit has helped our client to bring order to the day-to-day management of these folders, through the use of information triggers that inform department managers of both file obsolescence and changes made by employees."

"The most valuable feature is user behavior analytics (UBA)."

"Instead of logging in to multiple devices and checking the logs, QRadar gives us one centralized point for comparing data against each other and rules to make sure that you don't miss anything."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is its artificial intelligence component, Watson. Its contribution is pretty good from a machine-learning artificial intelligence perspective. This compliments the orchestration automation component, as well."

"I find that the dashboards are the most helpful to get an overview of traffic flow and issues."

"It has a good integration with the artificial intelligence engine of Watson."

"The simple user access model, or the user interface, is something that is very helpful."

"What I like about IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is that it uses machine learning algorithms to generate risk scoring for the user activity. I also like that it syncs with our Active Directory users, so it really has full coverage for all users in our environment."

"Overall a great solution."

More IBM Security QRadar pros

Cons

"The updates management and central management console could be improved."

"Whenever someone cuts and paste, it shows as "file is deleted"."

"The DLP function, including installation of the agent on the workstation and controlling the DLP restrictions, are areas where the product lacks."

"Whenever someone cuts and paste, it shows as "file is deleted"."

"The solution is highly used here in Pakistan and in many sectors, they could improve it by having more SIEM connectors."

"We experienced some memory usage issues with a user behavior app."

"GUI needs to be improved."

"The product is good, but one feature they should have is an Elasticsearch. Currently, in QRadar, there are no Elasticsearch criteria."

"The GUI of QRadar should be improved."

"Sometimes the system gets hung and then we have to restart everything from scratch."

"QRadar needs to be improved on the storage side, particularly when the disc exceeded the maximum threshold."

"It would probably be better to get more access to the APIs."

More IBM Security QRadar cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FileAudit provides a trial license for 30 days, and after that, customers can choose between perpetual licensing or the annual-based licensing option offered by FileAudit."

"Pricing is good."

"I feel that the price is reasonable but compared to other products that are on the market, such as an offering by Microsoft, it is more expensive."

"The pricing is always fine."

"The solution comes with a high price tag, while some of the competitors provide identical functionality in their offerings at no extra cost."

"There are different types of subscriptions available. We were on an annual subscription, but our customers typically choose the two years subscription option."

"The cost of this product is expensive."

"The tool is priced in a competitive manner. The tool's price is dependent on the installation and the product size, but it is competitive in the marketplace."

"It is expensive. It is not a product that I can provide for SMBs. It is a program that I can only provide for really large enterprises."

More IBM Security QRadar pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 28, 2015

Qradar vs. ArcSight

Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	91
Midsize Enterprise	39
Large Enterprise	105

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...

See all answers

What SOC product do you recommend?

For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Security QRadar?

Pricing and the license of EPS were managed by the governance team. I was not responsible for managing those. I was supposed to put up the requirement of the license needed to integrate that amount...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs FileAudit

Compared 18% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs FileAudit

Compared 11% of the time

ManageEngine File Audit Plus vs FileAudit

Compared 6% of the time

Power Admin PA File Sight vs FileAudit

Compared 5% of the time

More FileAudit Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 11% of the time

Elastic Security vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 4% of the time

Sentinel vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 3% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM Security QRadar Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

April 2026

Download FileAudit product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security QRadar

May 2026

Download IBM Security QRadar product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM QRadar, QRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson

Overview

FileAudit provides powerful file monitoring and auditing capabilities, enabling organizations to secure sensitive data and ensure compliance. It offers real-time alerts and detailed reporting, making it a reliable choice for safeguarding data integrity.

FileAudit delivers comprehensive monitoring solutions, allowing IT departments to keep track of file access and modifications effortlessly. It empowers businesses to identify suspicious activity and unauthorized file access in real-time. With an intuitive setup process, FileAudit seamlessly integrates into existing infrastructure, enhancing security measures without causing disruptions. Its focus on user activity monitoring provides deep insights into all file interactions, supporting compliance and internal security policies effectively.

What are the most important features?

Real-Time Alerts: Notifies administrators immediately of any suspicious file activity.
Comprehensive Reporting: Generates detailed reports about file access for compliance.
Access Detection: Identifies unauthorized file access and usage patterns promptly.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with current IT environments without disruption.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Keeps sensitive data protected with constant monitoring.
Regulatory Compliance: Supports adherence to data protection regulations with audit trails.
Efficient Management: Saves time with automated audit processes and alerts.
Informed Decision Making: Provides insights to make strategic security improvements.

FileAudit is widely used in sectors where data integrity and access control are paramount, such as healthcare, finance, and legal industries. In these industries, it ensures compliance with strict data protection regulations and helps prevent data breaches by providing a clear view of file activity.

IS Decisions

IBM Security QRadar offers real-time threat detection, data correlation, and integration with third-party solutions, providing a user-friendly interface, scalability, and extensive reporting capabilities for SIEM needs.

IBM Security QRadar is designed for comprehensive security monitoring in diverse environments, aiding sectors like telecom and finance with advanced threat detection and breach management. It aggregates data and analyzes user behavior, while its customizable and out-of-the-box rules deliver robust security insights and vulnerability management. The platform seeks enhancements in integration, performance, and user interface, with a focus on AI and cloud service compatibility.

What are the most important features of IBM Security QRadar?

Real-time Threat Detection: Monitors and alerts on security incidents as they happen.
Data Correlation: Aggregates and connects disparate data sources for cohesive analysis.
Third-party Integration: Supports seamless interaction with other security tools.
Scalability: Grows with organizational needs without sacrificing performance.
Customizable Rules: Allows tailored security settings for specific requirements.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Enhanced Security Insights: Offers comprehensive coverage across environments.
Reduced False Positives: Minimizes unnecessary alerts, improving efficiency.
User-friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and analysis tasks.
Extensive Reporting Capabilities: Provides detailed insights for informed decision-making.
Compliance Focus: Assists in meeting regulatory standards effectively.

Telecom, finance, and cloud-based industries implement IBM Security QRadar for threat detection, compliance, and security monitoring. It is deployed for log collection and correlation, user behavior analytics, and ensuring secure data transfer and incident management, focusing on compliance and anomaly detection.

IBM

Sample Customers

CommuniCare Health Centre, DP World, BAE Systems, Moet Hennessy, Ernst & Young, Honda, Volswagon, VTech, GlakoSmithKline, Lockheed Martin, US Navy, University of Alabama, Ministry of Interior Saudi Arabia, Total

Clients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.

Buyer's Guide

FileAudit vs. IBM Security QRadar

April 2026

Free Report: FileAudit vs. IBM Security QRadar

Find out what your peers are saying about FileAudit vs. IBM Security QRadar and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FileAudit vs. IBM Security QRadar report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors and best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.