Fiorano ESB vs webMethods.io comparison

Fiorano and IBM are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. Fiorano is ranked #12, while IBM is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.7. Fiorano holds a 2.9% mindshare in E, compared to IBM’s 9.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fiorano users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Fiorano ESB

Read 5 Fiorano ESB reviews

410 Views
410 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 94 webMethods.io reviews

8,762 Views
1,402 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Fiorano ESB

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

Fiorano ESB and webMethods.io compete in the enterprise integration space. Fiorano ESB is more flexible and faster in integration, while webMethods.io is favored for its wide-ranging features despite its higher cost.

Features: Fiorano ESB includes strong microservices capabilities, real-time data integration, and scalability. webMethods.io stands out with its extensive connectors, enhanced analytics, and cloud-native architecture, providing a range of pre-built applications for greater functionality.

Room for Improvement: Fiorano ESB could enhance its analytics and expand its range of pre-built connectors. Further documentation support would be beneficial. webMethods.io could simplify its deployment process, lower its pricing model, and enhance user interface intuitiveness to make it more accessible to new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fiorano ESB offers an agile deployment process with less initial complexity. webMethods.io provides a more intricate deployment but is backed by comprehensive support and extensive documentation, helping to mitigate any deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Fiorano ESB offers competitive pricing with lower upfront costs, making it attractive for small to mid-sized enterprises. webMethods.io requires a higher initial investment but justifies this through its advanced features, appealing to larger organizations with more complex integration needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Fiorano ESB vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fiorano ESB vs. webMethods.io

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fiorano ESB

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

12th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), API Management (10th), Cloud Data Integration (8th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of Fiorano ESB is 2.9%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 9.7%, down from 11.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	9.7%
Fiorano ESB	2.9%
Other	87.4%

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

reviewer987933

Sr.Manager - Programming and software development at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Scalable and easy to maintain

One of the most valuable features is the scalability. Whenever it's required, we can add more servers and scale. We can actually use specific servers for specific stuff. Unlike in other solutions, now we can implement one server purely dedicated to core-banking-related API. This is very important when it comes to the PCI DSS certification.

Read full review

Yashraj Makwana

Developer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Offers strong integration capabilities and reliable features but needs pricing and scaling improvements

Many things are evolving with the AI buzz in the market. What I would like to see improved or enhanced in webMethods.io in the future is that since webMethods.io is already under IBM, I think IBM will introduce and integrate AI into it. Additionally, regarding what webMethods.io can improve is the license cost. Other cloud players are also providing the same kind of functionality, such as AWS and Azure. webMethods.io is being installed on-premises, but AWS is providing it directly in the cloud. When comparing the license cost and request per minute cost, webMethods.io needs to address that. There are many competitors in the market for this.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most valuable features is the scalability. Whenever it's required, we can add more servers and scale. We can actually use specific servers for specific stuff. Unlike in other solutions, now we can implement one server purely dedicated to core-banking-related API. This is very important when it comes to the PCI DSS certification."

"The ability to compliment out-of-the-box integration components with small custom code."

"The platform's most valuable feature is data transformation."

"The most valuable feature of webMethods Integration Server is all the capabilities it provides. We leverage most of the features, that they have offered to us. Our vendor has made some additional features on top of the webMethods Integration Server and we use all the features together."

"Clients choose webMethods.io API for its intuitive interface, promoting seamless interaction and quick communication between systems."

"Ease of implementation and flexibility to hold the business logic are the most valuable features."

"The tool supports gRPC."

"Operationally, I consider the solution to be quite good."

"It frankly fills the gap between IT and business by having approval and policy enforcement on each state and cycle of the asset from the moment it gets created until it is retired."

"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine)."

"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Error logging is not very user-friendly. It requires the error logging to be configured in many different places."

"Fiorano ESB's logging feature and data availability need improvement."

"Fiorano ESB could be improved by becoming more user-friendly. Most of the pages and generated reports on API usage are already there, but they could be more user-friendly. There could be more selections added to generate reports. Overall, though, Fiorano suits all our needs and has good functionality."

"The learning curve is a little steep at first."

"Understanding the overall architecture is difficult."

"The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution."

"The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so."

"It is difficult to maintain."

"I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance."

"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."

"webMethods.io lacks advanced monitoring and analytics capabilities, so my customers need to use something additional."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"webMethods Integration Server is expensive, and there's no fixed price on it because it has a point pricing model. You can negotiate, which makes it interesting."

"Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials."

"The price is high and I give it a five out of ten."

"The product is very expensive."

"The pricing is a yearly license."

"Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client."

"There is a license needed to use the webMethods Integration Server."

"I don’t have much idea about prices, but webMethods API Portal is not something cheaper."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Mule ESB vs Fiorano ESB

Compared 44% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs Fiorano ESB

Compared 19% of the time

Kovair Omnibus vs Fiorano ESB

Compared 19% of the time

More Fiorano ESB Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

December 2025

Download Fiorano ESB product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

January 2026

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

The Fiorano ESB implements a brokered, peer-to-peer (often referred to as super peer) system architecture, which combines the management benefits of centralized hub-and-spoke systems with the performance benefits of fully distributed peer-to-peer systems, while avoiding the particular disadvantages of both of these individual approaches.

Fiorano

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Polaris Transport, Harris Exelis, Aboitiz Power, Dyckerhoff AG, Gamma-Dynacare, DHL, Bajaj Finserv, Ecole hételire de Lausanne, Northern California Power Agency, Federal Bank, Commercial Bank of Africa, EasyPay, SSP, General American Corporation, Forex, Beijing Shubei Software Technology, City of Canton, Kent County Council, SJS District, County of Tulare, US Coast Guard, ZUNYI, Fraikin, Nilkamal, Posco, Toyota, UB Group

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Fiorano ESB vs. webMethods.io

December 2025

Free Report: Fiorano ESB vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Fiorano ESB vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fiorano ESB vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.