Fivetran vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

Fivetran and Salesforce are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.8, while Salesforce is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1. Fivetran holds a 5.7% mindshare in CDI, compared to Salesforce’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 25 Fivetran reviews

1,822 Views
1,315 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 57 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

2,956 Views
1,925 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Fivetran

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Fivetran are both key players in the integration space. With its comprehensive features, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform seems to have the upper hand for complex integrations, while Fivetran's simplicity suits quick data synchronization.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is recognized for API management, scalability, and ease of integration with platforms like Salesforce and SAP. It offers over 200 standard connectors and a unified API management platform. Fivetran excels in data replication, pipeline management, and minimizing coding requirements, providing easy platform integration.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft faces issues with pricing, runtime management, and technical support. Users report difficulties in initial setups and inadequate documentation. Fivetran needs enhanced observability, detailed logs, and better real-time data processing flexibility, along with more connector and transformation customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform supports diverse deployments, including on-premises, private, and hybrid clouds, with varied customer service dependent on community support. Fivetran is cloud-centric, emphasizing rapid implementation and boasts responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: Both platforms are costly, but MuleSoft's pricing model is complex and based on processing volumes. Fivetran operates on a usage-based model, offering scalability benefits but can become expensive with increased data rows. MuleSoft is often seen as high cost with significant ROI for complex integrations, while Fivetran shows strong ROI through efficient scaling.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (12th), Data Replication (3rd)

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th), Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Workload Automation (8th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 5.7%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 6.7%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Erik Jones

Head of BI and Analytics at HyperScience

Solution reduces time-to-value; high ROI

Fivetran has room for improvement in data pipeline observability. The Fivetran logs are fairly basic, compared to, for example, the insight Fivetran gives into helping users understanding the performance of data pipelines. So I think their observability into the pipeline itself could be improved. In addition, Fivetran is in the very early stages of allowing other companies to access its metadata API, but that's something that could use improvement, and I know that they're working on right now. We use a separate tool for "reverse ETL", which is the opposite of what Fivetran does; it pushes data from your data warehouse back out to business applications. If Fivetran pulls data from those same applications, they should also enable users to push it back. I would love to do both ETL and reverse ETL in the same tool. It would be nice if Fivetran offered both their regular offering plus the reverse ETL option as well.

Read full review

Vijay Subramanyam

Delivery Head at cblsolutions

Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Fivetran is remarkably easy to use; I haven't encountered any other data integration tool that is as user-friendly."

"Fivetran's most valuable feature is replication."

"Fivetran can perform data migration incredibly fast, depending on the source and target."

"The simplicity of the solution is its valuable feature."

"The portal is very intuitive and easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of Fivetran is that it only synchronizes what needs to be synchronized."

"The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it."

"The user interface is mostly UI-based, eliminating the need for a lot of coding."

More Fivetran pros

"The integration potential is excellent."

"Initially, we faced challenges managing numerous scheduled jobs and duplicate entries in our SAP system. To address this, we developed a reusable component in Mule that all applications could use to interact with SAP."

"Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."

"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."

"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."

"It's easy to use and comes as a bundle package with the Anypoint Platform, removing the need for any complex setup."

"MuleSoft's integration with Salesforce products makes it a preferred choice for those setups."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

Cons

"The documentation is decent, but it's hard to find information online about Fivetran. For example, if you try to search for an error code, you won't find much information about it in forums."

"The customization could improve because Fivetran gives more thought to people who don't want to manage analytics workflows rather than engineers who want to be able to customize pipelines more thoroughly."

"I would like Fivetran to implement additional resource monitoring and restriction policies."

"HVR Software's technical support could be improved. Whenever we log a case, the response that we get from the support is a bit delayed."

"The documentation can be laid out better to make it easier to find things, and I really wish there was built-in support for changing passwords. Some features don't work as advertised for the platform/repository database, and HVR is not always the fastest at getting results."

"The solution is very expensive. I would like to have a better integration of the solution with Azure."

"Fivetran could improve in the area of customization, especially in how they socialize their tools."

"Fivetran would be improved by adding the ability to integrate the data from third-party APIs."

More Fivetran cons

"The customer service is not good enough"

"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."

"Mule Anypoint Platform should improve its pricing. In my experience, a customer using the sandbox version couldn't upgrade to the final version because it exceeded their budget. Another area for improvement is the login mechanism. We need to integrate with third-party products for strong authentication, but it would be better if MuleSoft had its own robust login mechanism."

"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."

"Over the years, Mule Anypoint Platform has undergone significant improvements. When I first started using it, the API gateway capabilities were fairly basic."

"I would like to see some data integration and automation."

"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."

"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."

"The solution is affordable."

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"Regarding pricing, I believe there could be room for improvement to align with user expectations."

"The solution has a high price."

"The product is still very expensive."

"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform really needs to work on its pricing model because it's very complicated."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten."

"The product comes complete at one set price including support."

"The product's price seems to be competent in comparison to other products in the market."

"The tool is heavily bundle-priced. I rate the solution’s pricing five on a scale of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

27%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

23%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 14% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Fivetran

Compared 7% of the time

Workato vs Fivetran

Compared 2% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 18% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

March 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

March 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

March 2025

Free Report: Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.