FlutterFlow vs Microsoft Power Apps comparison

FlutterFlow and Microsoft are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. FlutterFlow is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. FlutterFlow holds a 1.4% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Microsoft’s 8.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of FlutterFlow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

FlutterFlow

Read 3 FlutterFlow reviews

1,259 Views
869 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Power Apps

Read 96 Microsoft Power Apps reviews

10,336 Views
6,718 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

FlutterFlow

Microsoft Power Apps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Microsoft Power Apps and FlutterFlow compete in the app development category. Microsoft Power Apps may have an advantage due to its favorable pricing and support, whereas FlutterFlow is noted for its rich features.

Features: Microsoft Power Apps integrates seamlessly with Microsoft's suite, offers workflow automation and provides robust data management tools. FlutterFlow excels in intuitive design capabilities, supports Google Firebase, and allows for easy complex interface building.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Power Apps allows quick deployment within Microsoft ecosystems and offers strong support channels for enterprises. FlutterFlow provides a visual deployment process and community-driven support, appealing to independent developers and small businesses.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Power Apps requires a higher initial investment but promises strong ROI because of its comprehensive ecosystem. FlutterFlow, with its more affordable pricing models, caters to smaller teams and individual developers, potentially delivering better ROI for those focusing on creativity.

To learn more, read our detailed FlutterFlow vs. Microsoft Power Apps Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FlutterFlow vs. Microsoft Power Apps

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FlutterFlow

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Power Apps

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of FlutterFlow is 1.4%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Power Apps is 8.3%, down from 19.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Power Apps	8.3%
FlutterFlow	1.4%
Other	90.3%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Bibhu Sahu

Senior VP Technology at HDFC Bank

Simplifies integrations, accelerates development timelines, and offers a good MVP

We integrate FlutterFlow into our app development process by first developing the code using the enterprise ID. Once the code is ready, we preview it and then download it. We have built a CI process where the code, once pushed to the gate, is processed by CI actions to generate the appropriate output, whether it is an IPA or APK file. While FlutterFlow currently focuses on website development, we write the code in a way that allows us to adapt it for mobile apps as well. We maintain a unified codebase for all three platforms, ensuring consistency and efficiency in our development workflow. FlutterFlow accelerated my development timeline on a project where I needed a simple website with basic navigation and form submissions. While it lacks advanced design pattern options and some features are still maturing, it simplifies integration and speeds up development. FlutterFlow's UI design capabilities have significantly impacted my app development by allowing me to communicate marketing concepts more effectively through visual flow. Every feature in FlutterFlow, from screen design to integrations, has been valuable for my development efforts. However, having better support for multiple design patterns and ensuring compatibility with custom changes would greatly improve the development experience. Overall, I would rate FlutterFlow as an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Bhasker Sathyamurthy

Automation Enthusiast at Self employed

Low-code AI workflows have streamlined content curation and currently support rapid app creation

Microsoft Power Apps could be improved because there are still a lot of jargons and too many moving parts. For example, if you look at Copilot, the term Copilot is confusing in the sense of whether it is Copilot in M365, Copilot Studio, or Copilot in Microsoft Power Apps. There is a plan designer which uses Copilot. The whole thing how AI has been positioned is still not lucid for the end user. An end user wants to know exactly what they want and where they go to get it. I think that could also be because things are evolving so fast. From an end-user perspective, the way it has been positioned, the clarity and the boundaries between the different types of offerings and AI offerings available is confusing as of now. There should be better clarity on that. The biggest issue I have, and I have also spoken to a few of my clients about this, is the licensing model. In traditional software development, almost 95 percent of the time, the development team bears the cost of the licenses. For example, if I develop something, I may have to pay licenses for four or five different software that I use. As a user, if you use my services, you probably pay something to me as a subscription, but you do not have to bother about the licenses. All that is wrapped under the hood. Unfortunately, in Power Platform as such, and even in other low-code things like UiPath, if you use a premium feature such as Dataverse, almost everything ends up using Dataverse or SQL Server or some relational database. If you use that, then as an app builder or app maker you have to have a premium license. The end user too would need to have a premium license. That really makes the adoption prohibitive. It is too expensive. We are talking about something like around just for Microsoft Power Apps alone, approximately twenty dollars per month, which is extremely high. Another point to consider for what else can be improved in Microsoft Power Apps is that one does not know what compute power one is getting when one buys a license. If you look at the licensing model, you will get to know how much of Dataverse storage you will get in terms of log storage, database storage, and file storage. However, you do not get to know how much of compute power is being given to you. I do not think Microsoft has an SLA saying that any request of a certain amount, such as MB per second, you will get a response time of whatever, one by sixtieth of a second or some millisecond. I do not think that they have that performance SLA in place. They do have storage SLA which comes with the license, but they do not have a corresponding SLA for performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the simplicity of making panels with Flutter."

"FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful."

"It allows you to create fragments that look good and work on both mobile and web environments."

"The most valuable features of FlutterFlow are the integrations and workflows."

"The solution allows you to use data to create excellent UI and quickly deliver an app. It speeds up production time."

"It is good for using for small apps and automation on Office stuff."

"If you're using Microsoft Power Apps to connect to a SharePoint list and create a quick form for business users, it's highly effective."

"Creating a PowerApp is very easy. All I do is link and share the result with my colleagues. Deployment is very fast."

"For all no-code platforms that let you create a front end, you can click together something very quick."

"The flows are good because they can be used in a variety of situations."

"The speed of the solution is valuable."

"Microsoft Power Apps has helped us handle our fairly complex invoices, including filing and reviewing them manually. We’re working towards automating our invoice processing, labeling them according to organization accounts, and developing an entirely digital workflow. The tool uses customizable AI models for your organization's documents, so it supports AI-driven projects well."

More Microsoft Power Apps pros

Cons

"Scaling depends on project requirements."

"I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't gotten there yet."

"There is room for improvement in advanced functionality so it could cater to more complex app development needs."

"The UI components could be more standardized. Sometimes, for certain properties, I have to search more than I do with other platforms. With other platforms, once you know one, you know all. But with FlutterFlow, sometimes you have to look around for what you need."

"There is room for improvement in error handling and debugging."

"The portal and canvas apps need to be improved and brought up to speed."

"The tool's documentation can be better. The information in the documentation needs to be updated."

"This tool doesn't have an internal database. It only relies on the data layer of Microsoft Cloud."

"The flexibility of the user interface could be better."

"Integration with databases and other tools needs to be improved."

"I recommend improving Microsoft Power Apps' licensing model. I've encountered challenges related to licensing complexity, which has led some customers to opt for traditional solution development and deployment methods instead."

"The pricing structure needs to be improved, the current information is confusing."

More Microsoft Power Apps cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the licensing costs a three out of ten, with ten being expensive and one being cheap. Currently, I use the free version."

"It depends on the subscription of Office 365 that customers have. With some subscriptions, it's possible to use PowerApps."

"The price of Microsoft PowerApps is reasonable compared to other solutions."

"I pay nine dollars monthly for the subscription to this solution and the price of the is reasonable."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"This is not an expensive product and there are no licensing fees."

"For me, it was free to develop with a professional license, which is about 70 euros a month."

"Usually, the free licenses of Power Apps come to normal corporate users for free...For normal users within a corporate firm with licenses, it's totally favorable."

"Power Apps is relatively cheap compared to other low-code and no-code systems like OutSystems and Mendix."

More Microsoft Power Apps pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Media Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	17
Large Enterprise	50

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FlutterFlow?

FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FlutterFlow?

Right now, I think it's a good tool. It's easy to understand when you know Dart. It helps create applications, and I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FlutterFlow?

Currently, I am using Flutter to make a dashboard.

See all answers

How would you choose between Microsoft PowerApps and Salesforce Platform?

I think it depends on your use case. If your organization uses Microsoft Enterprise products, PowerApps will work better in your environment. Similarly, if you have a Salesforce integration in pla...

See all answers

Would you choose ServiceNow over Microsoft PowerApps?

Hi Netanya, I will choose ServiceNow because ServiceNow is a very good tool compared to Microsoft PowerApp. Because ServiceNow has a very strong module (Performance Analysis) reporting which will ...

See all answers

Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?

Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Lovable vs FlutterFlow

Compared 65% of the time

Mendix vs FlutterFlow

Compared 7% of the time

OutSystems vs FlutterFlow

Compared 5% of the time

Appery.io vs FlutterFlow

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs FlutterFlow

Compared 3% of the time

More FlutterFlow Competitors

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Microsoft Power Apps

Compared 15% of the time

ServiceNow vs Microsoft Power Apps

Compared 8% of the time

Lovable vs Microsoft Power Apps

Compared 8% of the time

AWS App Studio vs Microsoft Power Apps

Compared 6% of the time

QuickBase vs Microsoft Power Apps

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Power Apps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

January 2026

Download FlutterFlow product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Power Apps

January 2026

Download Microsoft Power Apps product report

Also Known As

No data available

PowerApps, MS PowerApps

Overview

FlutterFlow is used for developing mobile applications quickly and efficiently, ideal for building prototypes, MVPs, and full-fledged applications without extensive coding experience. It supports cross-platform development, enabling simultaneous deployment on Android and iOS.

FlutterFlow's visual development tools and integrations streamline the app creation process, making it perfect for startups and developers looking to launch their apps faster. Its comprehensive drag-and-drop interface, pre-built components, and templates facilitate rapid app development. Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections, and the robust documentation and tutorials support quick learning. Real-time collaboration features improve teamwork, enhancing the development experience.

What are the most important features of FlutterFlow?

Comprehensive drag-and-drop interface accelerates app development.
Pre-built components and templates streamline design processes.
Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections.
Robust documentation and tutorials support rapid learning.
Real-time collaboration enhances teamwork.

What benefits or ROI should be looked for when evaluating FlutterFlow?

Quick app development with a visual interface.
Reduction in development costs and timelines.
Ease of integrating backend services.
Enhanced team collaboration during development.

FlutterFlow can be particularly useful in industries that require fast app iterations, such as startups and tech companies. Its support for cross-platform development is beneficial for companies targeting both Android and iOS markets. The ease of use and comprehensive support make it an appealing choice for businesses looking to launch functional apps quickly, without extensive coding knowledge. Though improvements in stability, performance, customization, debugging, and customer support are needed, FlutterFlow's overall features present a strong front for efficient app development.

FlutterFlow

Microsoft Power Apps is a rapid application development software and low-code development platform. The solution consists of a suite of apps, services, connectors, and a data platform. It provides an environment for building custom apps which is suitable for different businesses.

Microsoft Power Apps allows users to not only build applications, but also connect them to Microsoft's other sources, including the underlying data platform Microsoft Dataverse, as well as online and on-premise sources such as SharePoint, Dynamics 365, and Microsoft 365. The applications built using Microsoft Power Apps have a responsive design that makes them suitable for work in browsers and on mobile applications on different devices.

The no-code side of the product makes it suitable for complete beginners to app building, allowing them to easily create fully functional applications with many features. The solution also has a specialized platform for developers where specialists can access data and metadata, create custom connectors, integrate with external data, and apply business logic. The solution allows users to create three types of apps: canvas, model-driven, and portal. They are made using:

Power Apps Studio: Canvas apps are designed through Power Apps Studio. This app designer is suitable for complete beginners, as the app creation process resembles the building of presentations in Microsoft PowerPoint.
App Designer: Model-driven apps are created through App Designer. The creation process allows users to define the sitemap and add components to build the application.
Power Apps Portals Studio: This is a What You See Is What You Get (WYSIWYG) design tool. It is suitable for portal applications, as it allows users to add and configure web pages, forms, components, and lists.

Microsoft Power Apps Features

The three different design tools of the solution, Power Apps Studio, App Designer, and Power Apps Portals Studio, come with various features which allow users to utilize the tools. Some of these features include:

Common Data Service (CDS): The data storage feature of the solution allows users to store and manage the data used for business applications securely. The data within the feature is stored among a set of entities, including a base set of standard entities as well as user-made custom ones, using Power Query. The data within CDS can be used to build apps.
Cloud connectivity: Microsoft Power Apps has the ability to connect with various types of cloud services. It can connect with MS CDS, as well as SQL, DropBox, and Google Drive.
Sharing feature: The tool has a feature for sharing built applications. Users can share the app they have created with users within the same organization as them.
Role-based feature: The product allows organizations to assign their employees roles within the platform. This is done to create customization based on the assigned roles, potentially eliminating issues that a completely free access can create.
AI automation: The tool has a feature that utilizes artificial intelligence (AI). It provides users with an AI builder and pre-built AI components to facilitate the application building process.
APIs feature: Microsoft Power Apps facilitates the app-building process through application program interfaces (APIs).
Collaboration support: The tool supports collaboration within the organization in the application building process. Through this feature, multiple employees can contribute to the creation of an app.

Microsoft Power Apps Benefits

The product brings various benefits to organizations and individuals who utilize it. Some of the biggest advantages of Microsoft Power Apps include:

The solution saves time for organizations by eliminating manual coding and providing ready-to-use solutions.
Applications built on the product can be made compatible with various platforms, including the web, Windows, Android, and iOS.
The premium connectors and wide integration of the platform allow developers to use data from Microsoft and from third-party services to build their applications.
The no-code capability enhances mobility and innovations within companies.
The AI feature of the product allows companies to increase their productivity through prebuilt AI scenarios.
The tool offers various ways to follow the data from the created applications, allowing companies to benefit from the reports of the performance of their apps.
Professional developers receive a platform to follow crucial metrics and access the application development in detail.
Power Apps can be connected across the entire Microsoft Power Platform, allowing organizations to utilize all features that the provider offers.

Reviews from Real Users

An IT Specialist (INFOSEC) at a government appreciates this tool because it is low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower.

Rafael T., a data engineer at NTT Security, likes Microsoft Power Apps, because it is great for making apps quickly, has helpful support, and integrates with Power BI.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

TransAlta, Rackspace, Telstra

Buyer's Guide

FlutterFlow vs. Microsoft Power Apps

December 2025

Free Report: FlutterFlow vs. Microsoft Power Apps

Find out what your peers are saying about FlutterFlow vs. Microsoft Power Apps and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FlutterFlow vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.