FortiCNAPP vs Sysdig Monitor comparison

The compared Fortinet and Sysdig solutions aren't in the same category. Fortinet is ranked #35 in VM , with an average rating of 7.3, and holds a 1.8% mindshare in the category. Sysdig is ranked #9 in DCM , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Sysdig users who would recommend it.

FortiCNAPP

Read 13 FortiCNAPP reviews

5,179 Views
2,331 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Sysdig Monitor

Read 4 Sysdig Monitor reviews

885 Views
221 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

FortiCNAPP

Sysdig Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 4, 2026

Sysdig Monitor and FortiCNAPP are products competing in cloud security and monitoring. Sysdig Monitor has an advantage in support and pricing, while FortiCNAPP is favored for its features, offering good value for those willing to invest.

Features: Sysdig Monitor provides real-time monitoring, incident management, and performance analytics. FortiCNAPP focuses on comprehensive threat detection, risk management, and robust threat response capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Sysdig Monitor could enhance its threat detection capabilities, expand feature sets beyond current monitoring solutions, and improve its integration with third-party solutions. FortiCNAPP can work on simplifying its setup process, reducing resource intensity, and enhancing documentation for easier feature implementation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sysdig Monitor offers streamlined deployment with extensive support, making it easier for newcomers. FortiCNAPP, though complex to set up, compensates with effective customer service to manage the setup's complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Sysdig Monitor provides a cost-effective setup, favorable ROI through simplified processes, and remains budget-friendly initially. FortiCNAPP requires a higher upfront investment but offers long-term ROI through an extensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed FortiCNAPP vs. Sysdig Monitor Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FortiCNAPP vs. Sysdig Monitor

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 885,286 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FortiCNAPP

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (35th), Container Security (28th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (17th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (22nd), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (16th), Compliance Management (10th)

Sysdig Monitor

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Monitoring (9th)

Mindshare comparison

FortiCNAPP and Sysdig Monitor aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. FortiCNAPP is designed for Vulnerability Management and holds a mindshare of 1.8%, up 1.3% compared to last year.
Sysdig Monitor, on the other hand, focuses on Container Monitoring, holds 2.1% mindshare, up 0.4% since last year.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
FortiCNAPP	1.8%
Wiz	6.4%
Tenable Nessus	5.0%
Other	86.8%

Vulnerability Management

Container Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Sysdig Monitor	2.1%
Dynatrace	28.5%
Datadog	24.6%
Other	44.8%

Container Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Mark Freeborough

Client Manager at MLL Telecom Ltd

Network segmentation has strengthened access control and now streamlines automated threat response

The most valuable features in FortiCNAPP include robust network segmentation and restricting access to network assets. It also supports security measures by leveraging security fabrics for better enforcement and policy enforcement. FortiCNAPP integrates with SIEM solutions, and we offer different SIEM options that work with Fortinet and AlienVault, among others, providing multiple scenarios.FortiCNAPP's automated policy recommendations significantly help improve security measures as part of an overall service wrap. When deploying a Fortinet SD-WAN or network, these tools provide greater visibility to vulnerabilities and enhanced security on the network. It functions as a proactive tool, enabling me to identify threats quickly and automate responses.

Read full review

Bharath Nadar

Senior Staff Site Reliability Engineer at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Centralized host monitoring has reduced operational overhead and provides trusted dashboards

Sysdig Monitor could be improved, particularly regarding application monitoring. There are specific areas or features where improvement is needed, specifically in application-level monitoring. While other monitoring solutions provide APM capabilities, Sysdig Monitor does not and targets only host-based monitoring. Many applications require APM support, and we want to introduce OpenTelemetry into some applications to gain more insights, but with Sysdig Monitor, we could not implement this functionality, so we have to opt for solutions from other vendors for those applications. Beyond the APM and OpenTelemetry support limitations, I would appreciate seeing Sysdig Monitor offer a unified solution for all monitoring needs, including logging as well, eventually bringing whole observability under one roof. That would be ideal.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the cloud configuration compliance scanning mature. It generates a lot of data and supports major frameworks like ISO 27001 or SOC 2, providing reports and datasets. Another feature I appreciate is setting custom alerts for specific events. Additionally, I value the agent-based monitoring and scanning for compute nodes. It gives us deeper insights into our workloads and helps identify vulnerabilities across our deployed assets."

"For the most part, out-of-the-box, it tells you right away about the things you need to work on. I like the fact that it prioritizes alerts based on severity, so that you can focus your efforts on anything that would be critical/high first, moderate second, and work your way down, trying to continue to improve your security posture."

"FortiCNAPP definitely brings time-saving benefits, and security is the main concern for the company."

"Polygraph compliance is a valuable feature. In our perspective, it delivers significant benefits. The clarity it offers, along with the ability to identify and address misconfigurations, is invaluable. When such issues arise, we promptly acknowledge and take action, effectively collaborating with our teams and the responsible parties for those assets. This enables us to promptly manage problems as soon as they arise."

"Lacework is helping a lot in reducing the noise of the alerts. Usually, whenever you have a tool in place, you have a lot of noise in terms of alerts, but the time for an engineer to look into those alerts is limited. Lacework is helping us to consolidate the information that we are getting from the agents and other sources. We are able to focus only on the things that matter, which is the most valuable thing for us. It saves time, and for investigations, we have the right context to take action."

"The best feature, in my opinion, is the ease of use, as well as some levels of machine learning anomaly detection that they have that can detect pivotal anomalies faster."

"FortiCNAPP is a competitive and robust solution, the only one in the IT sphere that addresses all quadrants in the Gartner Quadrants."

"The most valuable feature, from a compliance perspective, is the ability to use Lacework as a platform for multiple compliance standards. We have to meet multiple standards like PCI, SOC 2, CIS, and whatever else is out there. The ability to have reports generated, per security standard, is one of the best features for me."

More FortiCNAPP pros

"Sysdig Monitor impressed me with its in-depth visibility into my infrastructure."

"Docker containers are completely supported, kind of like first class citizens."

"Sysdig Monitor has positively impacted my organization by significantly reducing operational costs and improving our ability to monitor our systems effectively."

"The ability to stop/pause and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature."

"Docker containers are completely supported, kind of like "first class citizens"."

Cons

"I would like to see a remote access assistance feature. And the threat-hunting platform could be better."

"The solution lacks a cohesive data model, making extracting the necessary data from the platform challenging. It uses its own LQL query language, and each database across different layers and modules is structured differently, complicating correlation efforts. Consequently, I had to create extensive custom reports outside Lacework because their default dashboards didn't communicate risk metrics. They're addressing these issues by redesigning their tools, including introducing the dashboard, which is a step closer to actionable insights but still needs refinement."

"In general, I would not recommend Lacework right now. There are more mature solutions that would be a better fit."

"Lacework has not reduced the number of alerts we get. We've actually had to add resources as a result of using it because the application requires a lot of people to understand it to get the value out of it properly."

"Visibility is lacking, and both compliance-related metrics and IAM security control could be improved."

"Its integrations with third-party SIEMs can be better. That is one of the things that we discussed with them."

"The biggest thing I would like to see improved is for them to pursue and obtain a FedRAMP moderate authorization... I don't believe they have any immediate plans to get FedRAMP moderate authorized, which is a bit of a challenge for us because we can only use Lacework in our commercial environment."

"Policy implementation is quite complex, and the stability will take more time for the solutions."

More FortiCNAPP cons

"I had difficulty installing Sysdig Monitor on Windows."

"It is needs to automate the actions to take when an alert is triggered."

""Events" reporting (errors, crashes, etc.) is not clear at all in a Mesos environment (i.e., it's not clear what specific container is the one that went down). In a Docker Compose environment, it may be way better."

"Sysdig Monitor could be improved, particularly regarding application monitoring."

"It needs to automate the actions to take when an alert is triggered."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My smaller deployments cost around 200,000 a year, which is probably not as expensive as Wiz."

"It is slightly expensive. It depends on how big your environment is, but it is expensive. Right now, we are spending a lot of money. We have covered all of the cloud providers and most of our colocation facilities as well, so we cannot complain, but it is slightly expensive. It is not super expensive."

"The licensing fee was approximately $80,000 USD, per year."

"The pricing has gotten better. That scenario was somewhat unstable. They have a rather interesting licensing structure. I believe you get 200 resources per "Lacework unit." It was difficult, in the beginning, to figure out exactly what a "resource" was... That was a problem until about a year or so ago. They have improved it and it has stabilized quite a bit."

"Sysdig Monitor is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lacework?

The pricing is a mediator compared to other products; it is not that much higher and not much lower than other products, making it a very affordable price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lacework?

Policy implementation is quite complex, and the stability will take more time for the solutions. There is definitely room for improvement in policy implementation.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lacework?

FortiCNAPP is mainly used from a security point of view. Some VPNs charge for their solutions, but Fortinet provides a free-of-cost VPN solution, making it more reliable and cost-effective for clie...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sysdig Monitor?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good. Before moving forward with Sysdig Monitor, we analyzed many other tools, and the costing was more transparent and significantly bette...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sysdig Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sysdig Monitor?

Sysdig Monitor has become essential for overseeing a vast array of hosts and EC2 instances across our environment. We initially tried Grafana, but it fell short in operational capabilities. Managin...

See all answers

Comparisons

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs FortiCNAPP

Compared 6% of the time

Wiz vs FortiCNAPP

Compared 5% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs FortiCNAPP

Compared 5% of the time

Native vs FortiCNAPP

Compared 3% of the time

Tenable Cloud Security vs FortiCNAPP

Compared 3% of the time

More FortiCNAPP Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 18% of the time

Sysdig Secure vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 12% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

More Sysdig Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FortiCNAPP

March 2026

Download FortiCNAPP product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Monitoring

March 2026

Download Sysdig Monitor product report

Also Known As

Polygraph, FortiCNP, Lacework

No data available

Overview

FortiCNAPP is a comprehensive cloud security platform focusing on ease of use and machine learning-driven anomaly detection. It offers robust compliance reporting, seamless integration, and continuous monitoring, making it an essential tool for organizations managing multi-cloud environments and security configurations.

FortiCNAPP provides significant capabilities in cloud security, compliance, and vulnerability management. Designed for organizations needing efficient monitoring, it enables detection of anomalies across cloud infrastructures while optimizing security posture and ensuring compliance with environments like AWS and GCP. The platform offers in-depth insights through scanning of IAC scripts, host systems, and cloud configurations. Recognized for effectively managing security posture, it safeguards Kubernetes and container environments, providing comprehensive threat detection and response. However, some areas like visibility, IAM security controls, and compliance metrics need improvement. Users face challenges with alert setup and lack intuitive design, alongside issues like FedRAMP authorization absence and complexity in the data model.

What are the key features of FortiCNAPP?

Ease of Use: FortiCNAPP simplifies security management for cloud environments.
Machine Learning Anomaly Detection: Automatically identifies and prioritizes threats.
Compliance Reporting: Streamlines compliance procedures and reporting.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth operation across multi-cloud environments.
Continuous Monitoring: Provides ongoing oversight of security vulnerabilities.
Multi-Cloud Integration: Enables swift response to misconfigurations and vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating FortiCNAPP?

Time Efficiency: Reduces time spent on compliance and threat management.
Improved Security Posture: Enhances protection for cloud and container environments.
Valuable Security Insights: Provides in-depth analysis for proactive threat response.
Noise Reduction: Distills security logs to minimize alert fatigue.
Operational Effectiveness: Facilitates seamless multi-cloud security management.

FortiCNAPP is implemented extensively by industries needing reliable cloud security, such as finance, healthcare, and technology sectors. It supports organizations in enhancing cloud infrastructure protection, ensuring compliance, and strengthening vulnerability management. By integrating with platforms like AWS and GCP, businesses can optimize security posture in their cloud deployments.

Fortinet

Sysdig Monitor allows you to maximize the performance and availability of your cloud infrastructure, services, and applications. Built on open source, it provides immediate, deep visibility into rapidly changing container environments. You can resolve issues faster by using granular data derived from actual system calls enriched with cloud and Kubernetes context along with Prometheus metrics. Remove silos by unifying data across teams for hybrid and multi-cloud monitoring.

Sysdig

Sample Customers

J.Crew, AdRoll, Snowflake, VMWare, Iterable, Pure Storage, TrueCar, NerdWallet, and more.

SAP Concur, Goldman Sachs, Worldpay by FIS, Cisco, Experian, Home Office, Societe Generale, Sunrun. More here: https://sysdig.com/customers/

Buyer's Guide

FortiCNAPP vs. Sysdig Monitor

July 2025

Free Report: FortiCNAPP vs. Sysdig Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about FortiCNAPP vs. Sysdig Monitor and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FortiCNAPP vs. Sysdig Monitor report.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.