HPE Ethernet Switches and Fortinet FortiSwitch - Data Center are both prominent competitors in the network switch market. HPE Ethernet Switches hold the advantage in terms of cost-effectiveness and ease of use, while Fortinet stands out for its superior security features and integration capabilities, which are crucial in large data center settings.
Features: HPE Ethernet Switches offer reliability, scalability, and a lifetime warranty. They provide features such as Power over Ethernet (PoE), VLAN, and integration with existing systems, which benefits established infrastructures. On the other hand, Fortinet FortiSwitch - Data Center excels in network visibility and security, largely due to its seamless integration with FortiGate using FortiLink, which supports centralized management.
Room for Improvement: Users of HPE Ethernet Switches point out areas for improvement like the command interface, better routing protocol support, and enhanced integration with other HP products. Meanwhile, users of Fortinet FortiSwitch - Data Center desire better routing security, a more user-friendly management interface, and greater modularity.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Ethernet Switches are well-regarded for straightforward on-premises deployments and reliable customer service, despite mixed reviews on technical support. In contrast, Fortinet FortiSwitch - Data Center offers hybrid cloud deployment capabilities and is praised for its integration with FortiGate, which simplifies centralized management and receives slightly better reviews for support responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: HPE Ethernet Switches are perceived as cost-effective, especially for small enterprises, due to their competitive pricing and lifetime warranty leading to a significant ROI. Fortinet FortiSwitch - Data Center, though sometimes deemed expensive, justifies its cost through robust security features and integration, offering good value for money. Both solutions ensure a positive ROI; HPE is favored for initial affordability, while Fortinet is chosen for comprehensive security benefits.
The integration of Fortinet infrastructure, including FortiSwitches, is cost-effective compared to Cisco, especially when paired with Fortinet wireless solutions.
Technical partners provide responses within a day for any technical queries.
Customer support needs improvement in terms of speed and reliability.
On a scale from one to 10, I would rate the technical support of Fortinet an eight.
We attach SKUs that offer an advanced replacement of the hardware in the worst-case scenario.
Their customer service and support are quite good.
When used in a dedicated Fortinet infrastructure, FortiSwitch scalability is better than some other switches, like Cisco, Meraki, or Arista.
Scalability is generally good, with transitions from gigabit to ten giga, twenty-five giga, and forty giga.
HPE Ethernet Switches are highly scalable.
There is room for improvement as it sometimes takes over an hour to push configurations onto the devices from the management tool.
We had one incident where an electric overload occurred, and it still managed to stay operational.
HPE Ethernet Switches are very reliable and have high stability.
Sometimes, customer support does not provide prompt assistance, leaving projects hanging.
The commercial aspect presents challenges, particularly with pricing, as customers often ask for Juniper or Cisco, brands they are more aware of, which makes awareness about Fortinet FortiSwitch - Data Center another weak point.
There is room to improve the integration between FortiSwitch and other third-party solutions, as challenges arise when integrating with different vendors.
Incorporating them into an existing infrastructure with competitor products is a challenging task which could be better streamlined.
The price should be reduced in comparison to Cisco, as sometimes we cannot use the HPE one at the core level, where generally public users are using Cisco.
The Fortinet switches come with no additional cost as they are open source, with only hardware warranties applicable.
Pricing is competitive, although it's not the cheapest option.
The price of HPE Ethernet Switches is reasonable and less than other OEM brands.
Huawei would be even cheaper than Aruba.
The main actual benefit that Fortinet FortiSwitch - Data Center brought to my customer's environment is secure connectivity while minimizing downtime from unexpected traffic or broadcasting.
This feature allows the switch's ports to be used as firewall ports, enhancing network security by enabling IPS and network profiling directly on the ports.
It allows me to create VLANs, implement security measures, and push configurations using a single tool.
They are highly scalable and stable, which is vital for large enterprises that require reliable performance.
The security features of the HPE Ethernet Switches are good.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
HPE Ethernet Switches | 2.9% |
Fortinet FortiSwitch - Data Center | 2.0% |
Other | 95.1% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 16 |
Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
Large Enterprise | 4 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 62 |
Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
Large Enterprise | 31 |
With 10 or 40 GE access ports and a high-throughput backbone, FortiSwitch Data Center Switches are ideal for the top-of-rack (ToR) server or firewall-aggregation applications. The high-speed switching fabric is also well suited for enterprise network core or backbone network installations.
HP has created the most open, integrated and software-defined networking portfolio and ecosystem of its kind – driving simplification with networks that understand, adapt to and protect your business applications in real-time. Only HP extends the momentum of software-defined networking everywhere–from the mobile edge to the heart of data centers.
We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.