GitGuardian Platform vs Legit Security comparison

GitGuardian and Legit Security are both solutions in the Software Supply Chain Security category. GitGuardian is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.8, while Legit Security is ranked #12. GitGuardian holds a 3.3% mindshare in SSCS, compared to Legit Security’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitGuardian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Legit Security users who would recommend it.

GitGuardian Platform

Read 32 GitGuardian Platform reviews

6,392 Views
767 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Legit Security

Read 4 Legit Security reviews

883 Views
592 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitGuardian Platform

Legit Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

GitGuardian Platform and Legit Security both provide security solutions, with GitGuardian being favored for its pricing and customer support, and Legit Security for its extensive features despite a higher cost.

Features: GitGuardian Platform offers real-time secrets detection, alerting, and comprehensive security scanning, focusing on immediate threat detection. Legit Security is known for supply chain security, application lifecycle protection, and enhancing security controls, offering broad coverage across development processes.

Room for Improvement: GitGuardian could enhance its false positive rate, speed of detection, and integration depth with development environments. Legit Security might improve its secret detection, user interface intuitiveness, and integration with additional third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitGuardian provides a simple deployment process with dedicated support services. Legit Security offers a more integrated deployment, necessitating more time but ensuring comprehensive workflow integration supported by substantial customer service.

Pricing and ROI: GitGuardian Platform is praised for its cost-effectiveness and positive ROI, making it accessible and valuable. Legit Security has a higher initial cost but promises significant ROI with its extensive feature set and security coverage.

To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Platform vs. Legit Security Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform vs. Legit Security

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (8th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (4th), DevSecOps (4th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Legit Security

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

12th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Software Supply Chain Security category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 3.3%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Legit Security is 4.4%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Supply Chain Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitGuardian Platform	3.3%
Legit Security	4.4%
Other	92.3%

Software Supply Chain Security

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman

DevOps Engineer at Deuna App

Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes

Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.

Read full review

Tim Crothers

CISO at Mandiant / FireEye

Provides strong visibility, straightforward integration, and reduces the risk of attacks

Legit Security is a product that hyper-focuses on the various aspects of the software development pipeline. For example, if an engineer spins off a new project and stands up a new Git project, Legit automatically detects it, connects Snyk and other tools, and ensures the engineering team doesn't have to think about it. This way, we stay on top of security from the beginning. On the other hand, Legit provides a clear view of the controls around repositories. We have standards requiring code reviews and similar practices, and Legit shows us whether these are being followed. Additionally, Legit helps us identify unmaintained repositories, which often arise when engineering teams try something and leave it behind. This knowledge allows us to determine the appropriate action for these neglected projects. One area where Legit falls short is secret detection. While it functions well overall, the feature has a 10-20 percent false positive rate, requiring some manual intervention. Almost everything else works flawlessly. The true value proposition of Legit lies not in its features but in its ability to support our product security program's focus on creating guardrails instead of toll gates. Unlike traditional programs that require security reviews at specific stages, hindering development flow, we strive to partner with the product engineering team to ship secure code seamlessly within their existing workflows. Legit plays a crucial role in this by automatically notifying us of new projects, eliminating the need for manual communication. This partnership approach, enabled by Legit, allows us to work much closer with our engineering teams than ever before.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Some of our teams have hundreds of repositories, so filtering by team saves a lot of time and effort."

"We have definitely seen a return on investment when it finds things that are real. We have caught a couple things before they made it to production, and had they made it to production, that would have been dangerous."

"I like GitGuardian's instant response. When you have an incident, it's reported immediately. The interface gives you a great overview of your current leaked secrets."

"GitGuardian has pretty broad detection capabilities. It covers all of the types of secrets that we've been interested in... [Yet] The "detector" concept, which identifies particular categories or types of secrets, allows an organization to tweak and tailor the configuration for things that are specific to its environment. This is highly useful if you're particularly worried about a certain type of secret and it can help focus attention, as part of early remediation efforts."

"The newest addition that we appreciate about GitGuardian Platform is the ability to create a custom detector, which we built and worked with the team, and that works very effectively."

"One thing I really like about it is the fact that we can add search words or specific payloads inside the tool, and GitGuardian will look into GitHub and alert us if any of these words is found in a repository... With this capability in the tool, we have good surveillance over our potential blind spots."

"The secrets detection and alerting is the most important feature. We get alerted almost immediately after someone commits a secret. It has been very accurate, allowing us to jump on it right away, then figure out if we have something substantial that has been leaked or whether it is something that we don't have to worry about. This general main feature of the app is great."

"The most valuable feature of GitGuardian is that it finds tokens and passwords. That's why we need this tool. It minimizes the possibility of security violations that we cannot find on our own."

More GitGuardian Platform pros

"Legit has increased my security posture to a level I couldn't achieve before. I don't need to worry as much about what's happening within my developer environments. I can rest assured that my vulnerabilities are being detected."

"We implemented Legit Security to gain visibility into all development teams and ensure that consistent controls are in place and accounted for on every route."

"Legit has had a positive effect on our overall security posture."

"The true value proposition of Legit lies not in its features but in its ability to support our product security program's focus on creating guardrails instead of toll gates."

Cons

"Other solutions have a live chat feature that provides instant results. Waiting for an agent to reply to an email is less ideal than an instant conversation with a support employee. That's a complaint so minor I almost hesitate to mention it."

"I would like to see more fine-grained access controls when tickets are assigned for incidents. I would like the ability to provide more controls to the team leads or the product managers so that they can drive what we, the AppSec team, are doing."

"The main thing for me is the customization for some of the healthcare-specific identifiers that we want to validate. There should be some ability, which is coming in the near future, to have custom identifiers. Being in healthcare, we have pretty specific patterns that we need to match for PHI or PII. Having that would add a little bit extra to it."

"The documentation could be improved because when we started working with GitGuardian, it was difficult to find specific use cases."

"It could be easier. They have a CLI tool that engineers can run on their laptops, but getting engineers to install the tool is a manual process. I would like to see them have it integrated into one of those developer tools, e.g., VS Code or JetBrains, so developers don't have to think about it."

"The purchasing process is convoluted compared to Snyk, the other tool we use. It's like night and day because you only need to punch in your credit card, and you're set. With GitGuardian, getting a quote took two or three weeks. We paid for it in December but have not settled that payment yet."

"For some repositories, there are a lot of incidents. For example, one repository says 255 occurrences, so I assume these are 255 alerts and nobody is doing anything about them. These could be false positives. However, I cannot assess it correctly, because I haven't been closing these false positives myself. From the dashboard, I can see that for some of the repositories, there have been a lot of closing of these occurrences, so I would assume there are a lot of false positives. A ballpark estimate would be 60% being false positives. One of the arguments from the developers against this tool is the number of false positives."

"The analytics in GitGuardian Platform have a significant opportunity to better reflect the value provided to security teams and demonstrate actual activity occurring."

More GitGuardian Platform cons

"I would like them to have their own static code scanner, and I'd like them to have their own open-source software scanners."

"The one we're working on right now is the ability to dynamically rerun development teams and groups."

"Legit Security could do a little better with detecting publicly exposed keys. It's not bad. The detections that they are running get to everything eventually, but it would be great if they could increase some of that awareness."

"One issue is that engineering teams don't always embed secrets in the same way, making it difficult for the tool to consistently identify them."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are very happy with the value we get."

"I am only aware of the base price. I do not know what happened with our purchasing team in discussions with GitGuardian. I was not privy to the overall contract, but in terms of the base MSRP price, I found it reasonable."

"You get what you pay for. It's one of the more expensive solutions, but it is very good, and the low false positive rate is a really appealing factor."

"It's not cheap, but it's not crazy expensive either."

"With GitGuardian, we didn't need any middlemen."

"The pricing and licensing are fair. It isn't very expensive and it's good value."

"I compared the solution to a couple of other solutions, and I think it is very competitively priced."

"GitGuardian is on the pricier side."

More GitGuardian Platform pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Supply Chain Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

12%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 6% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More GitGuardian Platform Competitors

Docker vs Legit Security

Compared 25% of the time

Ox Security vs Legit Security

Compared 13% of the time

Apiiro vs Legit Security

Compared 11% of the time

Ivanti Neurons for ASPM vs Legit Security

Compared 10% of the time

Heeler vs Legit Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Legit Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform

January 2026

Download GitGuardian Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Legit Security

January 2026

Download Legit Security product report

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring

No data available

Interactive Demo

GitGuardian

Demo not available

Legit Security

Overview

GitGuardian is a comprehensive platform focused on enhancing Non-Human Identity security by integrating Secrets Security and Secrets Observability to detect and manage secrets across development environments.

As cybersecurity threats increasingly target NHIs like service accounts and applications, GitGuardian offers a robust solution by supporting over 450 types of secrets and deploying honeytokens for additional defense. Trusted by leading organizations and developers, its monitoring and quick alert system enable effective detection and management of sensitive data, strengthening operational security across platforms.

What are the key features of GitGuardian?

Secrets Detection: Identifies various secrets types such as AWS keys and passwords.
Quick Alerts: Provides timely notifications for immediate risk management.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development tools and workflows.
Dev in the Loop: Facilitates rapid issue resolution.
Historical Scanning: Enhances security through thorough scanning practices.

What benefits and ROI should companies consider?

Efficiency: Streamlined remediation processes with minimal false positives.
Customizability: Adaptable detection features cater to specific needs.
Risk Reduction: Proactive management of sensitive data threats.
Team Integration: Improved collaboration through connected workflows.
Development Continuity: Maintains seamless operation during security processes.

In the tech industry, GitGuardian is employed to safeguard APIs and sensitive credentials across code repositories like GitHub. Companies benefit from instant alerts and integrations with tools like Slack, effectively managing risks and enhancing security policies. While popular in sectors dependent on development agility, there is room for further improvement in customization and integration to meet specific industry needs.

GitGuardian

Legit Security provides application security posture management platform that secures application delivery from code to cloud and protects an organization's software supply chain from attack. The platform’s unified application security control plane and automated SDLC discovery and analysis capabilities provide visibility and security control over rapidly changing environments and allow security issues to be prioritized based on context and business criticality to improve security team efficiency and effectiveness.

Legit Security

Sample Customers

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by over 600 thousand developers and leading companies, including Snowflake, Orange, Iress, Mirantis, Maven Wave, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom.

Google, NYSE, Kraft-Hienz, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and many other large enterprise and Fortune 500 customers. Learn more by going to: https://www.legitsecurity.com/...

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform vs. Legit Security

December 2025

Free Report: GitGuardian Platform vs. Legit Security

Find out what your peers are saying about GitGuardian Platform vs. Legit Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitGuardian Platform vs. Legit Security report.

See our list of best Software Supply Chain Security vendors.

We monitor all Software Supply Chain Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.