GitGuardian Platform vs Legit Security comparison

GitGuardian and Legit Security are both solutions in the Software Supply Chain Security category. GitGuardian is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.8, while Legit Security is ranked #11. GitGuardian holds a 2.9% mindshare in SSCS, compared to Legit Security’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitGuardian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Legit Security users who would recommend it.

GitGuardian Platform

Read 32 GitGuardian Platform reviews

5,822 Views
699 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Legit Security

Read 4 Legit Security reviews

825 Views
561 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitGuardian Platform

Legit Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

GitGuardian Platform and Legit Security both provide security solutions, with GitGuardian being favored for its pricing and customer support, and Legit Security for its extensive features despite a higher cost.

Features: GitGuardian Platform offers real-time secrets detection, alerting, and comprehensive security scanning, focusing on immediate threat detection. Legit Security is known for supply chain security, application lifecycle protection, and enhancing security controls, offering broad coverage across development processes.

Room for Improvement: GitGuardian could enhance its false positive rate, speed of detection, and integration depth with development environments. Legit Security might improve its secret detection, user interface intuitiveness, and integration with additional third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitGuardian provides a simple deployment process with dedicated support services. Legit Security offers a more integrated deployment, necessitating more time but ensuring comprehensive workflow integration supported by substantial customer service.

Pricing and ROI: GitGuardian Platform is praised for its cost-effectiveness and positive ROI, making it accessible and valuable. Legit Security has a higher initial cost but promises significant ROI with its extensive feature set and security coverage.

To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Platform vs. Legit Security Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform vs. Legit Security

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (8th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (8th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (5th), DevSecOps (4th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Legit Security

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

11th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Software Supply Chain Security category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 2.9%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Legit Security is 4.5%, up from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Supply Chain Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitGuardian Platform	2.9%
Legit Security	4.5%
Other	92.6%

Software Supply Chain Security

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman

DevOps Engineer at Deuna App

Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes

Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.

Read full review

Tim Crothers

CISO at Mandiant / FireEye

Provides strong visibility, straightforward integration, and reduces the risk of attacks

Legit Security is a product that hyper-focuses on the various aspects of the software development pipeline. For example, if an engineer spins off a new project and stands up a new Git project, Legit automatically detects it, connects Snyk and other tools, and ensures the engineering team doesn't have to think about it. This way, we stay on top of security from the beginning. On the other hand, Legit provides a clear view of the controls around repositories. We have standards requiring code reviews and similar practices, and Legit shows us whether these are being followed. Additionally, Legit helps us identify unmaintained repositories, which often arise when engineering teams try something and leave it behind. This knowledge allows us to determine the appropriate action for these neglected projects. One area where Legit falls short is secret detection. While it functions well overall, the feature has a 10-20 percent false positive rate, requiring some manual intervention. Almost everything else works flawlessly. The true value proposition of Legit lies not in its features but in its ability to support our product security program's focus on creating guardrails instead of toll gates. Unlike traditional programs that require security reviews at specific stages, hindering development flow, we strive to partner with the product engineering team to ship secure code seamlessly within their existing workflows. Legit plays a crucial role in this by automatically notifying us of new projects, eliminating the need for manual communication. This partnership approach, enabled by Legit, allows us to work much closer with our engineering teams than ever before.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It actually creates an incident ticket for us. We can now go end-to-end after a secret has been identified, to track down who owns the repository and who is responsible for cleaning it up."

"I like GitGuardian's instant response. When you have an incident, it's reported immediately. The interface gives you a great overview of your current leaked secrets."

"Some of our teams have hundreds of repositories, so filtering by team saves a lot of time and effort."

"The majority of our incidents for critical detectors and important secret types are remediated automatically or proactively by developers through GitGuardian's notification system, without security team involvement."

"What I appreciate the most about GitGuardian Platform is its efficiency when triggering our pipeline and notifying us if secrets have been exposed, such as APIs, variables, our database, or anything being exposed."

"The most valuable feature is the general incident reporting system."

"You can also assign tasks to specific teams or people to complete, such as assigning something to the "blue team" or saying that this person needs to do this, and that person needs to do that. That is a great feature because you can actually manage your team internally in GitGuardian."

"GitGuardian has many features that fit our use cases. We have our internal policies on secret exposure, and our code is hosted on GitLab, so we need to prevent secrets from reaching GitLab because our customers worry that GitLab is exposed. One of the great features is the pre-receive hook. It prevents commits from being pushed to the repository by activating the hook on the remotes, which stops the developers from pushing to the remote. The secrets don't reach GitLab, and it isn't exposed."

More GitGuardian Platform pros

"Legit has increased my security posture to a level I couldn't achieve before. I don't need to worry as much about what's happening within my developer environments. I can rest assured that my vulnerabilities are being detected."

"We implemented Legit Security to gain visibility into all development teams and ensure that consistent controls are in place and accounted for on every route."

"The true value proposition of Legit lies not in its features but in its ability to support our product security program's focus on creating guardrails instead of toll gates."

"Legit has had a positive effect on our overall security posture."

Cons

"There has been a little bit of downtime of late, and it has been reasonably impactful when it's not been scanning."

"Automated Jira tickets would be fantastic. At the moment, I believe we have to go in and click to create a Jira ticket. It would be nice to automate."

"GitGuardian encompasses many secrets that companies might have, but we are a Microsoft-only organization, so there are some limitations there in terms of their honey tokens. I'd like for it to not be limited to Amazon-based tokens. It would be nice to see a broader set of providers that you could pick from."

"We have encountered occasional difficulties with the Single Sign-On process."

"There are some features that are lacking in GitGuardian. The more we grow and the more engineers we have, the more it will become difficult to assign an incident because the assignment is not automatic. I know they are working on that and we are waiting for it."

"GitGuardian could have more detailed information on what software engineers can do. It only provides some highly generic feedback when a secret is detected. They should have outside documentation. We send this to our software engineers, who are still doing the commits. It's the wrong way to work, but they are accustomed to doing it this way. When they go into that ticket, they see a few instructions that might be confusing. If I see a leaked secret committed two years ago, it's not enough to undo that commit. I need to go in there, change all my code to utilize GitHub secrets, and go on AWS to validate my key."

"GitGuardian's hook and dashboard scanners are the two entities. They should work together as one. We've seen several discrepancies where the hook is not being flagged on the dashboard. I still think they need to do some fine-tuning around that. We don't want to waste time."

"The main disadvantage I feel they should improve upon is that apart from flagging credential issues or secrets, they could incorporate something else to make it more dynamic."

More GitGuardian Platform cons

"One issue is that engineering teams don't always embed secrets in the same way, making it difficult for the tool to consistently identify them."

"The one we're working on right now is the ability to dynamically rerun development teams and groups."

"Legit Security could do a little better with detecting publicly exposed keys. It's not bad. The detections that they are running get to everything eventually, but it would be great if they could increase some of that awareness."

"I would like them to have their own static code scanner, and I'd like them to have their own open-source software scanners."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable. GitGuardian is one of the most recent security tools we've adopted. When it came time to renew it, there was no doubt about it. It is licensed per developer, so it scales nicely with the number of repos that we have. We can create new repositories and break up work. It isn't scaling based on the amount of data it's consuming."

"The pricing and licensing are fair. It isn't very expensive and it's good value."

"It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for."

"We have seen a return on investment. The amount of time that we would have spent manually doing this definitely outpaces the cost of GitGuardian. It is saving us about $35,000 a year, so I would say the ROI is about $20,000 a year."

"It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool."

"GitGuardian is on the pricier side."

"It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are very happy with the value we get."

"With GitGuardian, we didn't need any middlemen."

More GitGuardian Platform pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Supply Chain Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

16%

University

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 9% of the time

SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 8% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More GitGuardian Platform Competitors

Docker vs Legit Security

Compared 25% of the time

Ox Security vs Legit Security

Compared 15% of the time

Apiiro vs Legit Security

Compared 13% of the time

Ivanti Neurons for ASPM vs Legit Security

Compared 10% of the time

More Legit Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform

January 2026

Download GitGuardian Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Legit Security

January 2026

Download Legit Security product report

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring

No data available

Interactive Demo

GitGuardian

Demo not available

Legit Security

Overview

GitGuardian is a comprehensive platform focused on enhancing Non-Human Identity security by integrating Secrets Security and Secrets Observability to detect and manage secrets across development environments.

As cybersecurity threats increasingly target NHIs like service accounts and applications, GitGuardian offers a robust solution by supporting over 450 types of secrets and deploying honeytokens for additional defense. Trusted by leading organizations and developers, its monitoring and quick alert system enable effective detection and management of sensitive data, strengthening operational security across platforms.

What are the key features of GitGuardian?

Secrets Detection: Identifies various secrets types such as AWS keys and passwords.
Quick Alerts: Provides timely notifications for immediate risk management.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development tools and workflows.
Dev in the Loop: Facilitates rapid issue resolution.
Historical Scanning: Enhances security through thorough scanning practices.

What benefits and ROI should companies consider?

Efficiency: Streamlined remediation processes with minimal false positives.
Customizability: Adaptable detection features cater to specific needs.
Risk Reduction: Proactive management of sensitive data threats.
Team Integration: Improved collaboration through connected workflows.
Development Continuity: Maintains seamless operation during security processes.

In the tech industry, GitGuardian is employed to safeguard APIs and sensitive credentials across code repositories like GitHub. Companies benefit from instant alerts and integrations with tools like Slack, effectively managing risks and enhancing security policies. While popular in sectors dependent on development agility, there is room for further improvement in customization and integration to meet specific industry needs.

GitGuardian

Legit Security provides application security posture management platform that secures application delivery from code to cloud and protects an organization's software supply chain from attack. The platform’s unified application security control plane and automated SDLC discovery and analysis capabilities provide visibility and security control over rapidly changing environments and allow security issues to be prioritized based on context and business criticality to improve security team efficiency and effectiveness.

Legit Security

Sample Customers

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by over 600 thousand developers and leading companies, including Snowflake, Orange, Iress, Mirantis, Maven Wave, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom.

Google, NYSE, Kraft-Hienz, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and many other large enterprise and Fortune 500 customers. Learn more by going to: https://www.legitsecurity.com/...

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform vs. Legit Security

December 2025

Free Report: GitGuardian Platform vs. Legit Security

Find out what your peers are saying about GitGuardian Platform vs. Legit Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitGuardian Platform vs. Legit Security report.

See our list of best Software Supply Chain Security vendors.

We monitor all Software Supply Chain Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.