GitGuardian Platform vs Xygeni comparison

Read 3 Xygeni reviews

759 Views
524 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitGuardian Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

GitGuardian Platform and Xygeni are competing products in the security management space. GitGuardian Platform has an advantage with better pricing and support, while Xygeni stands out for its superior features.

Features: GitGuardian Platform provides real-time incident response, comprehensive secret detection across codebases, and simple integration. Xygeni focuses on advanced threat intelligence, robust compliance automation tools, and detailed security analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitGuardian Platform is recognized for a straightforward deployment process complemented by proactive support, ensuring smooth integration. Xygeni offers a more complex setup, but strong client engagement helps manage deployment intricacies, offering a tailored experience.

Pricing and ROI: GitGuardian Platform is known for competitive pricing and timely ROI, making it cost-effective for various business sizes. Despite higher initial costs, Xygeni provides compelling ROI through its advanced features, justifying investment for comprehensive needs.

To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Platform vs. Xygeni Report (Updated: January 2026).

GitGuardian Platform vs. Xygeni

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (8th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (4th), DevSecOps (4th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Xygeni

Ranking in Application Security Tools

21st

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

13th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (13th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Xygeni is 0.5%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitGuardian Platform	1.2%
Xygeni	0.5%
Other	98.3%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman

DevOps Engineer at Deuna App

Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes

Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.

Read full review

A Iskakov

Business development manager at RSsecurity

Unified monitoring has reduced alert noise and provides accurate, proactive application security

Xygeni was highly effective for us, but there are areas where improvements could be made. More customization options for dashboards and reports would help teams tailor the platform to their specific metrics and workflows. I also occasionally encounter DevOps tools that are not yet supported natively. Expanded coverage for niche or emerging tools would make onboarding even smoother. These points, however, are minor compared to the overall value the platform delivers, especially given the strength of its AI-driven detection, remediation, and supply chain protection capabilities. It would also be an improvement for licensing with regard to on-premise variants. Perhaps we could have an on-premise option for standard subscription.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The breadth of the solution detection capabilities is pretty good. They have good categories and a lot of different types of secrets... it gives us a great range when it comes to types of secrets, and that's good for us."

"The secrets detection and alerting is the most important feature. We get alerted almost immediately after someone commits a secret. It has been very accurate, allowing us to jump on it right away, then figure out if we have something substantial that has been leaked or whether it is something that we don't have to worry about. This general main feature of the app is great."

"The majority of our incidents for critical detectors and important secret types are remediated automatically or proactively by developers through GitGuardian's notification system, without security team involvement."

"There is quite a lot to like. Its user interface is fantastic, and being able to sort the incidents by whether they are valid or for a certain repository or a certain user has been very beneficial in helping investigate what has been found."

"The entire GitGuardian solution is valuable. The product is doing its job and showing us many things. We get many false positives, but the ability to automatically display potential leaks when developers commit is valuable. The dashboards show you recent and historical commits, and we have a full scan that shows historical leaked secrets."

"GitGuardian public leak detection significantly enhances our organization's data security by continuously monitoring public repositories."

"What is particularly helpful is that having GitGuardian show that the code failed a check enables us to automatically pass the resolution to the author. We don't have to rely on the reviewer to assign it back to him or her. Letting the authors solve their own problems before they get to the reviewer has significantly improved visibility and reduced the remediation time from multiple days to minutes or hours. Given how time-consuming code reviews can be, it saves some of our more scarce resources."

"The most valuable feature is the general incident reporting system."

More GitGuardian Platform pros

"The visibility of our open-source supply chain dependencies and real-time detection of vulnerabilities have been invaluable."

"Xygeni provides a comprehensive and developer-friendly approach to securing the entire software supply chain."

"Since using Xygeni, the time to review vulnerabilities has decreased."

Cons

"They could give a developer access to a dashboard for their team's repositories that just shows their repository secrets. I think more could be exposed to developers."

"GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives."

"The analytics in GitGuardian Platform have a significant opportunity to better reflect the value provided to security teams and demonstrate actual activity occurring."

"One improvement that I'd like to see is a cleaner for Splunk logs. It would be nice to have a middle man for anything we send or receive from Splunk forwarders. I'd love to see it get cleaned by GitGuardian or caught to make sure we don't have any secrets getting committed to Splunk logs."

"Automated Jira tickets would be fantastic. At the moment, I believe we have to go in and click to create a Jira ticket. It would be nice to automate."

"The analytics in GitGuardian Platform have a significant opportunity to better reflect the value provided to security teams and demonstrate actual activity occurring."

"I would like to see improvement in some of the user interface features... When one secret is leaked in multiple files or multiple repositories, it will appear on the dashboard. But when you click on that secret, all the occurrences will appear on the page. It would be better to have one secret per occurrence, directly, so that we don't have to click to get to the list of all the occurrences."

"GitGuardian could have more detailed information on what software engineers can do. It only provides some highly generic feedback when a secret is detected. They should have outside documentation. We send this to our software engineers, who are still doing the commits. It's the wrong way to work, but they are accustomed to doing it this way. When they go into that ticket, they see a few instructions that might be confusing. If I see a leaked secret committed two years ago, it's not enough to undo that commit. I need to go in there, change all my code to utilize GitHub secrets, and go on AWS to validate my key."

More GitGuardian Platform cons

"Xygeni was highly effective for us, but there are areas where improvements could be made."

"There should be more configuration options that make it easier to target the issues that are more important in your organization's context."

"Xygeni could be improved if on-premise options were available starting from the starter packages, not only the enterprise models."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It could be cheaper. When GitHub secrets monitoring solution goes to general access and general availability, GitGuardian might be in a little bit of trouble from the competition, and maybe then they might lower their prices. The GitGuardian solution is great. I'm just concerned that they're not GitHub."

"It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool."

"The internal side is cheap per user. It is annual pricing based on the number of users."

"It's not cheap, but it's not crazy expensive either."

"We don't have a huge number of users, but its yearly rate was quite reasonable when compared to other per-seat solutions that we looked at... Having a free plan for a small number of users was really great. If you're a small team, I don't see why you wouldn't want to get started with it."

"I am only aware of the base price. I do not know what happened with our purchasing team in discussions with GitGuardian. I was not privy to the overall contract, but in terms of the base MSRP price, I found it reasonable."

"It's a little bit expensive."

"With GitGuardian, we didn't need any middlemen."

More GitGuardian Platform pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

32%

Security Firm

17%

Retailer

15%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.

What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Xygeni?

The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Xygeni was great, as it suits the requests.

What needs improvement with Xygeni?

What is your primary use case for Xygeni?

I most often use Xygeni for monitoring our applications. When monitoring our applications, I use Xygeni when I see changes in code flow and codebase, and I compare the old codebase with the current...

SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 6% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More GitGuardian Platform Competitors

Snyk vs Xygeni

Compared 47% of the time

SonarQube vs Xygeni

Compared 25% of the time

Qwiet AI vs Xygeni

Compared 13% of the time

More Xygeni Competitors

Product Reports

Download GitGuardian Platform product report

GitGuardian Platform

January 2026

Application Security Tools

February 2026

Download Xygeni product report

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring

No data available

Interactive Demo

GitGuardian

Overview

GitGuardian is a comprehensive platform focused on enhancing Non-Human Identity security by integrating Secrets Security and Secrets Observability to detect and manage secrets across development environments.

As cybersecurity threats increasingly target NHIs like service accounts and applications, GitGuardian offers a robust solution by supporting over 450 types of secrets and deploying honeytokens for additional defense. Trusted by leading organizations and developers, its monitoring and quick alert system enable effective detection and management of sensitive data, strengthening operational security across platforms.

What are the key features of GitGuardian?

Secrets Detection: Identifies various secrets types such as AWS keys and passwords.
Quick Alerts: Provides timely notifications for immediate risk management.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development tools and workflows.
Dev in the Loop: Facilitates rapid issue resolution.
Historical Scanning: Enhances security through thorough scanning practices.

What benefits and ROI should companies consider?

Efficiency: Streamlined remediation processes with minimal false positives.
Customizability: Adaptable detection features cater to specific needs.
Risk Reduction: Proactive management of sensitive data threats.
Team Integration: Improved collaboration through connected workflows.
Development Continuity: Maintains seamless operation during security processes.

In the tech industry, GitGuardian is employed to safeguard APIs and sensitive credentials across code repositories like GitHub. Companies benefit from instant alerts and integrations with tools like Slack, effectively managing risks and enhancing security policies. While popular in sectors dependent on development agility, there is room for further improvement in customization and integration to meet specific industry needs.

GitGuardian

Xygeni All-In-One AppSec Platform ensures comprehensive security across the software supply chain, utilizing deep contextual intelligence to prioritize exploitable and business-critical vulnerabilities.

With its AI-powered capabilities, Xygeni offers automatic detection and quarantine of malicious code at publication while providing context-aware auto-remediation. It integrates seamlessly across source code, dependencies, secrets, IaC, builds, containers, and CI/CD systems. Unified APPM visibility and supply-chain malware protection facilitate accelerated secure delivery without compromising speed or innovation.

What are the most important features of Xygeni?

Deep Contextual Intelligence: Prioritizes vulnerabilities based on exploitability and business impact.
Automatic Code Quarantine: Detects and isolates malicious code at the moment of publication.
Seamless Integration: Compatible across code, dependencies, secrets, IaC, and CI/CD systems.
AI-Powered Auto-Remediation: Provides intelligent solutions to rectify vulnerabilities.
Developer-First Remediation: Supports developers with IDE and AI co-pilots to enhance efficiency.

What benefits or ROI should users expect in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Comprehensive coverage from code to cloud reduces vulnerability risks.
Increased Efficiency: Automation and seamless integration streamline security processes.
Accelerated Delivery: Enables fast-paced development without compromising safety.
Developer Productivity: AI co-pilots assist developers, improving the remediation process.
Cost Savings: Efficient threat prioritization minimizes time spent on non-essential alerts.

Industries like finance, healthcare, and technology implement Xygeni to fortify their software supply chain, ensuring robust protection and compliance. By harnessing AI-driven features and integration capabilities, sectors maintain agility while enhancing their security posture against potential threats.

Sample Customers

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by over 600 thousand developers and leading companies, including Snowflake, Orange, Iress, Mirantis, Maven Wave, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom.

BKool, Onum, Napptive, Fintonic, Adaion, Metricool, Arexdata, ...