GLPI by Teclib vs ServiceNow comparison

Read 228 ServiceNow reviews

30,705 Views
11,975 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

GLPI by Teclib

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

ServiceNow and GLPI by Teclib are competing products in the IT service management space, each with unique strengths. Data indicates ServiceNow excels in robust integration capabilities, while GLPI stands out with a cost-effective approach.

Features: ServiceNow's valuable features include automation tools, broad integration options, and detailed analytics capabilities. Contrastingly, GLPI is recognized for its modular design, efficient asset management, and open-source flexibility.

Room for Improvement: ServiceNow could improve by reducing its setup complexity, enhancing user interface intuitiveness, and lowering costs for small businesses. GLPI could benefit from refining its integration processes, expanding customer support channels, and offering more comprehensive analytics tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ServiceNow is acknowledged for its extensive support structure and a cloud-based deployment model, which provides comprehensive customer support. GLPI's open-source deployment model is noted for easy implementation and active community support.

Pricing and ROI: ServiceNow is associated with higher initial setup costs but offers a substantial ROI through scalability and advanced features. GLPI provides a lower-cost entry with significant ROI potential through its free open-source offering and economical premium options.

To learn more, read our detailed GLPI by Teclib vs. ServiceNow Report (Updated: April 2026).

GLPI by Teclib vs. ServiceNow

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GLPI by Teclib

Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ServiceNow

Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

228

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (1st), IT Asset Management (1st), Rapid Application Development Software (2nd), No-Code Development Platforms (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category, the mindshare of GLPI by Teclib is 1.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow is 14.2%, down from 23.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Service Management (ITSM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ServiceNow	14.2%
GLPI by Teclib	1.3%
Other	84.5%

IT Service Management (ITSM)

Featured Reviews

Dexter De Torres

ITSM Manager at Stratpoint Global Outsourcing, Inc.

Simple to use and very easy to deploy

For the free version, the tool should improve the graphics as it is kind of old school. The graphics are very flat compared to Google Workspace and Office 365. If you are not concerned about aesthetics, it is a fine tool. It is a good tool if you are more focused on the functionality. There are some bugs in the tool because it has a lot of features. Correlating all of the features can sometimes cause the tool to fail. If you create a ticket and then link it to an asset, there can arise some issues, but with support, one can customize and fix the issues in the product. The cost of the tool is an area of concern since it is 19 Euros per agent for a month. If your help desk team is of ten people, then you can multiply 19 Euros by ten people. The updates will be automatic if you get the tool's cloud version, but for the free version, you need to learn how to manage or administer Linux, PHP, and Apache because you will be updating the system manually. The updates are available, but you need to ensure that you have a test environment first before you apply it to the production environment because sometimes the updates mess up the data. I need to have a test environment first before loading it, but aside from the system, you also need to update the OS, PHP, and the web server itself. A lot of administrative tasks are needed if it is the free version, but for the cloud, you just use the product.

Read full review

Hemanthreddy Vakiti

Data engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Structured workflows have improved SLA compliance and now support prioritized incident handling

I think the licensing and pricing of ServiceNow is quite expensive compared to other tools. For large organizations, it is acceptable, but specifically for small and medium organizations to track incidents or change requests, ServiceNow is quite expensive. Sometimes performance can be slow when workflows and integrations are configured for complex tasks. For advanced customizations or advanced features which we rarely use, the documentation is not up to standard. The documentation needs to be improved for advanced customization features. However, the platform is stable overall and the features are quite good. The user experience and performance concerns I mentioned are areas I want to be improved. When many workflows and interactions are configured, performance is slow. For the features it is providing, it is quite expensive. If these performance features are improved, we can easily pay that price and get the return on investment.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is user-friendly."

"The tool's most valuable features include UI, visualization, and data scraping."

"GLPI helps with tracking device assets. For example, when I assign a laptop to an employee, the GLPI agent installed on the client device gathers detailed information about it."

"The most valuable features of GLPI are asset management, asset tracking, asset reporting, and ticket management. We use it as a configuration management database (CMDB), which is very useful for impact assessment and change management. The license management feature is also beneficial because it is bundled with asset management. When an agent reports a certain set into the database, all the software running on that host or server is assessed, collected, and reported. This makes license management very useful. Since implementing GLPI, we've noticed that our IT operations are more stable. The tool allows us to manage changes in the environment more effectively by creating change requests for assets. GLPI supports our processes, allowing us to organize IT operations with custom forms and workflows, making it quite flexible. Although the deployment is still in progress, we see significant benefits in organizing our IT processes with this tool."

"The best feature for me is the power of customization, allowing us to add extensions from each place of GLPI."

"The most valuable features of GLPI are its ITSM capabilities, including ticketing, automatic tasks, plugins, and notification systems."

"The product is very easy to deploy."

"The impact of ServiceNow's self-service portal on IT staff dependency levels has shown a dramatic improvement."

"The main improvement is the integration of several business processes."

"We are very happy with the product."

"Change management is most valuable."

"Will give us better control over asset management and technical debt once we can centralize all contract information."

"In my experience, the solution is very stable."

"It just enabled us to see the whole organization as a single organization, which, especially for higher ed and places like that, just doesn't happen."

"You can have it installed and up and running within hours if you know what you're doing."

More ServiceNow pros

Cons

"A stringent plugin management would benefit GLPI. You can extend GLPI with many plugins, but plugin development is handled by individuals worldwide. Since it's an open-source solution, plugins are developed independently, and you never know which plugin is compatible with your version of GLPI. I would suggest that the developers focus more on plugin management to ensure plugins are more consistent and compatible with most versions of GLPI. Currently, you always have to check if a plugin works with your GLPI install, which can be inconvenient."

"One area for improvement is the occasional issues we encounter, which are not directly related to GLPI but are due to network providers. These include network errors like 502 and 504, indicating some failure in network communication with the server."

"I've encountered some issues with GLPI. The official documentation on the GLPI website recommends using PHP version 8.3, but it used to recommend PHP version 8.2."

"The solution must be more flexible."

"The solution has occasional lags and glitches."

"For the free version, the tool should improve the graphics as it is kind of old school. The graphics are very flat compared to Google Workspace and Office 365."

"The stability of Windows OS could be enhanced."

"We don't have a huge amount of password reset requests, but the minimum package of resets that ServiceNow offers is much more than we need."

"I would say database or data visibility. In fact, I think for me, I'm going for the physical side, most of the people like to access data without any constraints."

"An area for improvement would be the accessibility of downloaded and compressed files."

"It should enhance its offerings by providing the chance to obtain course certifications at an affordable fee."

"HR Service Management is one module that needs a lot of improvement because it's a pretty new module. It was introduced in the last two years. It's becoming more mature day by day, but there is a lot of scope for improvement in that module."

"I would say there is a lot of room for improvement when it comes to technical support."

"The level of complexity and the level of discovery are the two areas that can be improved. Its UI needs to evolve. They focus a lot on cool colors and other little things, which don't bring value in terms of functionality. They need to focus less on presentation and more on the functionality within the UI. Its discovery mechanism should be improved. There is a component in ServiceNow that discovers the assets, but it doesn't do an immediate discovery, and there is a lag. If I want to open a ticket for a laptop or an asset, that asset needs to exist within ServiceNow for me to be able to say that I need to have its disk space or memory increased. It is referred to as a CI or configuration item in ServiceNow. Sometimes, ServiceNow doesn't discover these items, and as a result, I cannot open a ticket and tag that system or asset. If a system was introduced to the environment last week and it is still not listed, it becomes a problem. I will either have to wait or manually enter that system or asset. So, if I have a laptop with only 8 GB of memory and I want to request 16 GB of memory, I won't be able to do that in ServiceNow because my system or asset hasn't been discovered yet. Discovery is not immediate, and there is a lag."

"When it comes to reference fields, there are some limitations where you aren't able to use them, like in relationship queries. In Remedy, when you click a menu, you get options directly, whereas here, if you use a reference field, it points you to a different form. So the UI experience totally changes for the end user."

More ServiceNow cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I have used the tool's open-source version...GLPI Network Cloud is 19 Euros per month. It comes with one agent only, but if you use the IT asset management part, it is unlimited."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable."

"The licenses are expensive."

"ServiceNow is an expensive solution."

"The pricing is on the high side, but if you look at the stability and option to work, it's kind of justified."

"I know that it's not too bad because people continue to use it and they are happy to renew up their contract."

"The solution is expensive."

"The cost is quite high."

"ServiceNow is a leader and its pricing is quite good, quite competitive... Sometimes some plugins are not priced reasonably but, generally, the platform itself, its modules, are priced reasonably."

"In Tunisia, the companies find the licensing costs to be expensive."

More ServiceNow pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	55
Midsize Enterprise	35
Large Enterprise	171

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with GLPI by Teclib?

One area for improvement is the occasional issues we encounter, which are not directly related to GLPI but are due to network providers. These include network errors like 502 and 504, indicating so...

What is your primary use case for GLPI by Teclib?

I work directly with some customers, and, in general, consumers. We attend to some people, however I mostly attend directly to the employees of my company. We started using the product in 2018 and ...

What advice do you have for others considering GLPI by Teclib?

Each company should start by exploring GLPI, understanding its features and extras they can use.

Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?

The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...

Would you choose ServiceNow over Microsoft PowerApps?

Hi Netanya, I will choose ServiceNow because ServiceNow is a very good tool compared to Microsoft PowerApp. Because ServiceNow has a very strong module (Performance Analysis) reporting which will ...

What do you like most about ServiceNow?

The solution has a user-friendly interface.

NinjaOne vs GLPI by Teclib

Comparisons

OTRS vs GLPI by Teclib

Compared 15% of the time

Compared 14% of the time

TOPdesk vs GLPI by Teclib

Compared 12% of the time

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus vs GLPI by Teclib

Compared 11% of the time

Ivanti Neurons for ITSM vs GLPI by Teclib

Compared 7% of the time

More GLPI by Teclib Competitors

IBM Maximo vs ServiceNow

Compared 5% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs ServiceNow

Compared 5% of the time

Zendesk vs ServiceNow

Compared 4% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs ServiceNow

Compared 4% of the time

Freshservice vs ServiceNow

Compared 3% of the time

More ServiceNow Competitors

Product Reports

Download GLPI by Teclib product report

GLPI by Teclib

May 2026

Download ServiceNow product report

April 2026

Overview

GLPI by Teclib focuses on asset management and ticketing, utilizing agent-based asset tracking and offering integration with systems like Active Directory. It also serves as a CMDB, supporting functions such as financial and contract management alongside project tools and network monitoring.

GLPI by Teclib is leveraged for its comprehensive ITSM capabilities, allowing organizations to manage assets and support tickets effectively. It offers integration with LDAP and Active Directory for seamless asset tracking and ticket management. Financial tracking, contract management, and project tools bolster its functionality, while network monitoring and software inventory provide additional insights. Customization through plugins enhances its adaptability, operating efficiently across Linux servers. Despite challenges like plugin management and PHP issues, improvements in features such as communication error handling and permission flexibility can enhance its IT operations further.

What are the key features of GLPI by Teclib?

Asset Management: Tracks and manages company hardware and software assets efficiently.
Ticket Management: Streamlines user support through well-structured ticket handling.
CMDB: Offers a centralized configuration management database for IT infrastructures.
Financial Tracking: Monitors expenditures related to assets and IT services.
Contract Management: Simplifies tracking and managing vendor contracts and SLAs.
Project Tools: Assists in managing IT projects with integrated tools.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Customization: Adapts to team needs with extensive plugin support.
User Experience: Provides a comprehensive interface, enhancing ease of use.
ITSM Flexibility: Automation and notification features streamline workflow.
Stability: Promotes organized IT operations with robust tracking.
Data Visualization: Offers insightful data presentation for informed decision-making.

GLPI by Teclib finds application across industries for its extensive ITSM functionalities. IT departments in healthcare, education, and finance sectors rely on it for efficient asset management and support ticket handling. Its role as a CMDB aids organizations in maintaining detailed records of their IT environments, while financial tracking and contract management functionalities cater to stringent compliance and regulatory needs. Educational institutions leverage GLPI's project management and network monitoring capabilities to oversee IT services and infrastructure effectively.

Teclib'

ServiceNow offers customizability and cloud-based integration that sustains operational efficiency. Enabling change and incident management, it accelerates workflow automation and project management without downtime issues, serving deployment needs for IT service and productivity enhancements.

ServiceNow stands out with its adaptable workflows and cloud-native infrastructure, boosting IT service, project, and asset management. Known for its robust incident and change management, the platform addresses business needs through its user-centric design and extensive integration options. By facilitating seamless IT operations and automation, ServiceNow empowers businesses to enhance productivity and efficiency. Regular updates ensure users benefit from the latest features without service interruptions, although pricing and licensing complexities demand attention. Users seek improved reporting tools and a more intuitive design while expressing interest in refined mobile functionality and better documentation.

What are the key features of ServiceNow?

Customizability: Enables tailored workflows to align with business processes.
Cloud-Based Integration: Allows seamless updates and operational sustainability.
Incident and Change Management: Supports efficient handling of IT-related issues.
Automation Capabilities: Automates repetitive tasks, enhancing productivity.
User-Friendly Design: Simplifies navigation and improves user interaction.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides detailed insights for better decision-making.

What benefits and ROI should users anticipate from ServiceNow?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines processes and reduces manual efforts.
Enhanced Productivity: Automates tasks, enabling focus on strategic initiatives.
Seamless Operations: Integrates across departments for unified management.
Effective IT Management: Smooth incident, change, and problem resolution.
Cost and Time Savings: Reduces operational costs through efficient workflow management.

ServiceNow finds implementation across industries like IT, HR, asset management, and help desks, addressing ticketing and configuration needs. Businesses use its dashboard for tracking performance metrics, enhancing decision-making in departments like HR service delivery. Its adaptability also makes it suitable for industries requiring robust operational management and process automation, driving efficiency and growth.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

AAA, AstraZeneca, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Broadcom, Christus Health, Epicor, Equinix, GE Capital, Intuit, KPMG, Loyola Marymount University, OshKosh, Quantas, RedHat, Royal Bank of Scotland, Swiss Re, U.S. Department of Energy, Safeway, Yale University, and Zillow