Kong Gateway Enterprise and Gravitee are competitors in the API management category. Kunden tend to prefer Kong for pricing and support, but Gravitee seems to have the upper hand by providing a more robust feature set.
Features: Kong Gateway Enterprise offers scalability, seamless integration, and robust security. It suits enterprises needing reliable gatekeeping. Gravitee provides flexibility in API design and management with analytics and monitoring tools. It appeals to organizations focused on flexibility and customization.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Kong and Gravitee offer easy deployment models. Kong is often noted for smoother integrations with existing infrastructures. Kong emphasizes dedicated support with extensive documentation, while Gravitee offers community support and resources, though stakeholders prefer structured onboarding.
Pricing and ROI: Kong typically has a higher upfront cost but offers scalability, appealing to large enterprises for long-term growth. Gravitee's flexible pricing structure benefits businesses focused on modular deployments. While Kong's initial cost is higher, its support model can improve ROI by lowering management expenses.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Kong Gateway Enterprise | 5.9% |
| Gravitee | 1.0% |
| Other | 93.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
Kong delivers a next generation API platform built for modern architectures. With a lightnight-fast, lightweight, and flexible core, Kong delivers sub-millisecond latency across all your services. Kong's is deployment-, vendor-, and pattern-agnostic, allowing you to run your services how you want, where you want, and with who you want - from baremetal to cloud, monolith to microservices, service mesh, and beyond.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
