Graylog Enterprise vs ManageEngine Log360 comparison

Graylog and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Log Management category. Graylog is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while ManageEngine is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.8. Graylog holds a 3.1% mindshare in Log Management, compared to ManageEngine’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Graylog users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Graylog Enterprise

Read 25 Graylog Enterprise reviews

8,432 Views
8,348 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Log360

Read 19 ManageEngine Log360 reviews

4,726 Views
2,741 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Graylog Enterprise

ManageEngine Log360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

ManageEngine Log360 and Graylog Enterprise compete in the log management and security information event management domain. ManageEngine Log360 seems to have the upper hand due to its compliance management and modular architecture, though Graylog Enterprise excels in real-time logging and integrations.

Features: ManageEngine Log360 offers robust compliance management, a modular architecture for customization, and threat response capabilities suited for high-security industries like aerospace. It simplifies customization to avoid feature bloat and remains cost-effective. Graylog Enterprise is notable for its real-time logging, open-source flexibility, and efficient log searching and alerting, making it accessible to both technical and non-technical teams.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine Log360 could improve its user interface and expand support for diverse network equipment. Additionally, the alert system and PostgreSQL integration require enhancement. Graylog Enterprise could benefit from UI enhancements, more extensive integrations, and improved documentation. Both platforms need enhanced customization and visualization features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both ManageEngine Log360 and Graylog Enterprise primarily support on-premises deployments, with ManageEngine also offering hybrid capabilities. User feedback favors ManageEngine Log360 for its customer support and easy installation, while Graylog Enterprise is noted for needing improvements in response time and resolving specific configurations.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Log360 is perceived as expensive with significant ROI, often recovering costs within two years. Graylog Enterprise's community edition makes it cost-effective for smaller businesses, though the enterprise version is considered pricey, offering substantial utility for full-scale capabilities. Both solutions demonstrate cost-effectiveness, with ManageEngine having a more defined ROI model.

To learn more, read our detailed Graylog Enterprise vs. ManageEngine Log360 Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Graylog Enterprise vs. ManageEngine Log360

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Graylog Enterprise

Ranking in Log Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine Log360

Ranking in Log Management

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (24th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Graylog Enterprise is 3.1%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Log360 is 1.4%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Graylog Enterprise	3.1%
ManageEngine Log360	1.4%
Other	95.5%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

NicolaeCIornii

Security Officer at JSC "Moldtelecom" S.A.

Log analysis has become clearer and faster but visualization and extensibility still need work

The problem was with the complexity and the cost to add extensions. We found this very expensive to buy another version with additional features. I think that Graylog Enterprise does not have customizable dashboards. I did not see them in Graylog Enterprise because most of the time we used the open source free version, which is limited. I think Graylog Enterprise should improve some things that they have in the paid version and perhaps provide users with a menu that gives examples of parsing logs and draws graphics so that people do not need to improve another system such as Grafana. This would be interesting. When it comes to functionalities, I found the log management in Graylog Enterprise acceptable. It is very simple to use and to collect logs. It has support for different protocols and different ports, and the sidecar is easy to use. However, in visualization, I think it needs to be much better.

Read full review

Md Abdul Hakim

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Integration capabilities impress while room for improvement exists in cloud compatibility

1. Enhanced Cloud Integration Current Gap: Log360 lacks native integration with Microsoft Intune and cloud-based Active Directory (Azure AD), limiting visibility for organizations transitioning to hybrid or fully cloud environments. Requested Improvements: Direct Intune Log Collection: Ability to ingest and correlate logs from Intune-managed devices to monitor compliance, device health, and security policies. Azure AD Deep Integration: Support for Azure AD audit logs, conditional access events, and identity protection alerts to provide end-to-end visibility. Cloud Workload Monitoring: Extend coverage to SaaS applications (e.g., Microsoft 365, AWS, GCP) for unified threat detection. Why It Matters: Many clients have migrated from on-prem AD to cloud-first setups this year. Without cloud-native log collection, critical security events (e.g., rogue Intune policies or Azure AD breaches) go unmonitored. 2. Improved Automation and Response Current Gap: Limited automated remediation (e.g., auto-isolating compromised devices) forces manual intervention. Requested Features: Playbook Automation: Pre-built workflows to auto-resolve common issues (e.g., disabling users after brute-force attacks). SOAR Integration: APIs to connect with SIEM/SOAR platforms (e.g., Splunk, Palo Alto Cortex) for escalated threat response.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Feature-wise or from the end user perspective, Graylog is just great."

"The product does all the things it must do very well."

"Storing logs in Elasticsearch means log retrieval is extremely fast, and full text search is available by default."

"Graylog's search functionality, alerting functionality, user management, and dashboards are useful."

"The build is stable and requires little maintenance, even compared to some extremely expensive products."

"I know that there are other similar tools available, but I enjoy using Graylog the most."

"I am very proud of how very stable the solution is."

"Troubleshooting is straightforward with Graylog Enterprise."

More Graylog Enterprise pros

"My main objective for using ManageEngine Log360 is its powerful and real-time capabilities for managing security and other tasks efficiently."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the consolidating of the reports, being able to take action and send them to email several addresses."

"It is a very nice solution and the graphics interface speaks a lot to that."

"If the client does not have much knowledge regarding the SOC and cyber, then ManageEngine Log360 is good because you can get default reports."

"We have to have these types of tools in place for protecting our network and our data, and it does a good job in that aspect."

"The reports that you can run are really nice."

"The reports that you can run are really nice; they give you a lot of standard reports, which are nice, and the ability to run some custom ones, too."

"The support provided is fantastic, and ManageEngine Log360 provides the same capabilities that were being enjoyed with AlienVault while suiting the budget and providing what is needed."

More ManageEngine Log360 pros

Cons

"I would like to see a default dashboard widget that shows the topology of the clusters defined for the graylog install."

"The area in Graylog that needs to be improved or enhanced would be the integrations."

"I would like to see a date and time in the Graylog Grok patterns so that I can save time when searching for a log. I like how the streams and the search query work, but adding a date and time will allow me to pull out a log in a milli-second."

"With technical support, you are on your own without an enterprise license."

"We ran into problems with Elasticsearch throwing a circuit-breaking exception due to field data size being too large. It turned out that the heap size directly impacted this size in a high-throughput environment, causing unexplained instability in Graylog. We were able to troubleshoot on the Elasticsearch size, but we should have been able to reference some minimum requirements for Graylog to know that our settings weren't sufficient."

"The biggest problem is the collector application, as we wanted to avoid using Graylog Collector Sidecar due to its architecture."

"Graylog needs to improve their authentication. Also, the fact that Graylog displays logs from the top down is just ridiculous."

"I would rate them as a two out of 10. You are on your own without an enterprise license."

More Graylog Enterprise cons

"There are issues when we log into Log360 from the computer that is hosting the system. For example, Linux cannot connect or log into Log360 with the Active Directory user."

"It takes a little bit of time for Log360 to actually learn your environment."

"While ManageEngine Log360 is a significant improvement, there could be enhancements in terms of integrating more user-friendly training materials and better deployment documentation."

"It is not expensive compared to other solutions."

"ManageEngine Log360 is not a stable solution. It needs improvement."

"Log360 currently cannot gather information from Intune logs or cloud-integrated systems."

"On the PostgreSQL side, it was not parsing much, which required a lot of manual work."

"ManageEngine Log360 could provide more in-depth insights, particularly in reporting."

More ManageEngine Log360 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you want something that works and do not have the money for Splunk or QRadar, take Graylog."

"Graylog is a free open-source solution. The free version has a capacity limitation of 2 GB daily, if you want to go above this you have to purchase a license."

"Consider Enterprise support if you have atypical needs or setup requirements."

"I use the free version of Graylog."

"We are using the free version of the product. However, the paid version is expensive."

"I am using a community edition. I have not looked at the enterprise offering from Graylog."

"It's open source and free. They have a paid version, but we never looked into that because we never needed the features of the paid version."

"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

More Graylog Enterprise pricing and cost advice

"My client has a yearly license. I think the cost is not expensive compared to that of other SIEMs, given the service it is providing."

"Its pricing is definitely huge compared to some of the other SIEMs. Its price should be improved."

"There is a cost for each feature used."

"Affordable pricing is provided by the solution."

"ManageEngine Log360 is expensive compared to other products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

University

Government

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Graylog?

I am not sure about the pricing, setup cost, and licensing because that was dealt with by a different team that handled the licensing and procurement.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Graylog?

The documentation for Graylog Enterprise can be improved, as this has been a pain point. I think the visualization aspect of Graylog Enterprise can be made more rich, similar to what we have in Gra...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Graylog?

I remember using Graylog Enterprise in the past at a software house where we used it for logging. During that time, we were using Graylog Enterprise as a log aggregator, collecting logs from multip...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Log360?

The price is suitable from a perspective of different pricing options. We already have an ongoing project where some features analytics can be escaped, and companies can manage their budgets carefu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Log360?

ManageEngine Log360 could provide more in-depth insights, particularly in reporting. Some other solutions provide deeper insights into issues, especially when generating reports. More detailed insi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Log360?

ManageEngine Log360 is being used for database monitoring and as a SIEM solution.

See all answers

Comparisons

Grafana Loki vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

Wazuh vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

syslog-ng vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

More Graylog Enterprise Competitors

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 6% of the time

SIEMStorm vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 6% of the time

Sentinel vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 3% of the time

More ManageEngine Log360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Graylog Enterprise

April 2026

Download Graylog Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Log360

April 2026

Download ManageEngine Log360 product report

Also Known As

Graylog2

No data available

Overview

Graylog Enterprise, recognized for log collection, real-time search, and enriched data handling, offers an open-source framework that integrates seamlessly with Elasticsearch. Its user-centric interface streamlines data correlation and log aggregation, supporting both backend services and comprehensive monitoring needs.

Graylog Enterprise stands out for its stability and powerful log management capabilities, facilitating efficient log aggregation, real-time updates, and data analytics. Users benefit from its plugin-based alerting, user-friendly interface, and support for microservices, including Docker integration. The ability to search in detail, flexible API integration, and data enrichment features are highly valued. Challenges include collector application issues, desired visualization enhancements, and authentication integration improvements. Users seek advancements in UI customization, backup functions, and easier rule creation.

What are Graylog Enterprise's most important features?

Log Collection: Efficiently aggregates and handles diverse logs.
Real-Time Search: Provides immediate log data access.
Custom Alerts: Plugin-based alerting for tailored notifications.
Dashboard Enhancements: Improved visualization for data insights.
Data Enrichment: Adds value through detailed log analysis.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Audit Trail Support: Essential for compliance in financial sectors.
Security Event Correlation: Enables incident analysis and response.
Faster Issue Identification: Speeds up troubleshooting with detailed visualization.
API Flexibility: Seamless integration across systems and environments.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Centralized log management enhances oversight.

In industrial use, Graylog Enterprise is crucial for audit trailing in financial sectors, facilitating security event identification and error monitoring. Backend teams leverage real-time analytics for swift issue resolution, while developers appreciate the comprehensive log visualization enabled by Docker integration for microservice management.

Graylog

ManageEngine Log360 offers comprehensive log management and security alerting, integrating advanced analytics for threat detection and compliance reporting. Scalable for on-premise and hybrid deployments, it facilitates incident response with seamless system integration and user-friendly monitoring.

ManageEngine Log360 enhances visibility across IT infrastructures by aggregating logs from Active Directory, file servers, and network devices, aiding in security incident detection with User Behavior Analytics and threat identification tools. Its modular approach supports compliance in vital sectors such as aerospace, contributing significantly to centralized monitoring and anomaly detection. By reducing manual log examination, Log360 aligns with both security and operational goals across diverse environments, though areas like integration with Active Directory and interface improvements are avenues for advancement. Streamlining data retention and expanding automation are priorities for its evolution, ensuring effective incident management with reduced administrative burdens.

What are the key features of ManageEngine Log360?

Security Monitoring: Active detection and logging of security threats across networks.
User Behavior Analytics: Identifies anomalies and potential threats in user activity.
Compliance Reporting: Facilitates adherence to industry regulations with detailed reports.
Unified Dashboard: Provides a comprehensive view for effective incident response.
Agentless Monitoring: Minimizes system overhead while maintaining oversight.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Scalability: Easily adapts to growing infrastructure needs.
Simplified Management: Reduces manual log analysis and management workload.
Integration Capabilities: Aids in cohesive operations across various environments.
Compliance Support: Ensures industry-standard regulatory adherence.

In sectors like aerospace, Log360 supports compliance demands by integrating log management for enhanced security and regulatory reporting. Its adaptability to on-premises and hybrid structures makes it valuable for technology-driven environments, where security and efficiency are paramount.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur

First Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation

Buyer's Guide

Graylog Enterprise vs. ManageEngine Log360

April 2026

Free Report: Graylog Enterprise vs. ManageEngine Log360

Find out what your peers are saying about Graylog Enterprise vs. ManageEngine Log360 and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Graylog Enterprise vs. ManageEngine Log360 report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.