Graylog Enterprise vs ManageEngine Log360 comparison

Graylog and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Log Management category. Graylog is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while ManageEngine is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.8. Graylog holds a 4.1% mindshare in Log Management, compared to ManageEngine’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Graylog users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Graylog Enterprise

Read 25 Graylog Enterprise reviews

7,795 Views
7,795 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Log360

Read 19 ManageEngine Log360 reviews

3,550 Views
2,059 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Graylog Enterprise

ManageEngine Log360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

ManageEngine Log360 and Graylog Enterprise compete in the log management and security information event management domain. ManageEngine Log360 seems to have the upper hand due to its compliance management and modular architecture, though Graylog Enterprise excels in real-time logging and integrations.

Features: ManageEngine Log360 offers robust compliance management, a modular architecture for customization, and threat response capabilities suited for high-security industries like aerospace. It simplifies customization to avoid feature bloat and remains cost-effective. Graylog Enterprise is notable for its real-time logging, open-source flexibility, and efficient log searching and alerting, making it accessible to both technical and non-technical teams.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine Log360 could improve its user interface and expand support for diverse network equipment. Additionally, the alert system and PostgreSQL integration require enhancement. Graylog Enterprise could benefit from UI enhancements, more extensive integrations, and improved documentation. Both platforms need enhanced customization and visualization features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both ManageEngine Log360 and Graylog Enterprise primarily support on-premises deployments, with ManageEngine also offering hybrid capabilities. User feedback favors ManageEngine Log360 for its customer support and easy installation, while Graylog Enterprise is noted for needing improvements in response time and resolving specific configurations.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Log360 is perceived as expensive with significant ROI, often recovering costs within two years. Graylog Enterprise's community edition makes it cost-effective for smaller businesses, though the enterprise version is considered pricey, offering substantial utility for full-scale capabilities. Both solutions demonstrate cost-effectiveness, with ManageEngine having a more defined ROI model.

To learn more, read our detailed Graylog Enterprise vs. ManageEngine Log360 Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Graylog Enterprise vs. ManageEngine Log360

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Graylog Enterprise

Ranking in Log Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine Log360

Ranking in Log Management

25th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (22nd), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Graylog Enterprise is 4.1%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Log360 is 1.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Graylog Enterprise	4.1%
ManageEngine Log360	1.3%
Other	94.6%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

NicolaeCIornii

Security Officer at JSC "Moldtelecom" S.A.

Log analysis has become clearer and faster but visualization and extensibility still need work

The problem was with the complexity and the cost to add extensions. We found this very expensive to buy another version with additional features. I think that Graylog Enterprise does not have customizable dashboards. I did not see them in Graylog Enterprise because most of the time we used the open source free version, which is limited. I think Graylog Enterprise should improve some things that they have in the paid version and perhaps provide users with a menu that gives examples of parsing logs and draws graphics so that people do not need to improve another system such as Grafana. This would be interesting. When it comes to functionalities, I found the log management in Graylog Enterprise acceptable. It is very simple to use and to collect logs. It has support for different protocols and different ports, and the sidecar is easy to use. However, in visualization, I think it needs to be much better.

Read full review

Md Abdul Hakim

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Integration capabilities impress while room for improvement exists in cloud compatibility

1. Enhanced Cloud Integration Current Gap: Log360 lacks native integration with Microsoft Intune and cloud-based Active Directory (Azure AD), limiting visibility for organizations transitioning to hybrid or fully cloud environments. Requested Improvements: Direct Intune Log Collection: Ability to ingest and correlate logs from Intune-managed devices to monitor compliance, device health, and security policies. Azure AD Deep Integration: Support for Azure AD audit logs, conditional access events, and identity protection alerts to provide end-to-end visibility. Cloud Workload Monitoring: Extend coverage to SaaS applications (e.g., Microsoft 365, AWS, GCP) for unified threat detection. Why It Matters: Many clients have migrated from on-prem AD to cloud-first setups this year. Without cloud-native log collection, critical security events (e.g., rogue Intune policies or Azure AD breaches) go unmonitored. 2. Improved Automation and Response Current Gap: Limited automated remediation (e.g., auto-isolating compromised devices) forces manual intervention. Requested Features: Playbook Automation: Pre-built workflows to auto-resolve common issues (e.g., disabling users after brute-force attacks). SOAR Integration: APIs to connect with SIEM/SOAR platforms (e.g., Splunk, Palo Alto Cortex) for escalated threat response.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We run a containerized microservices environment. Being able to set up streams and search for errors and anomalies across hundreds of containers is why a log aggregation platform like Graylog is valuable to us."

"Graylog is valuable because it bridges technical knowledge to non-technical teams, presenting complex backend processes in a simple timeline."

"UDP is a fast and lightweight protocol, perfect for sending large volumes of logs with minimal overhead."

"Graylog Enterprise has positively impacted my organization by significantly minimizing our workload and making it easier to identify any issues in a service."

"Troubleshooting is straightforward with Graylog Enterprise."

"I am very proud of how very stable the solution is."

"Message forwarding through the in-built module."

"One of the most valuable features is that you are able to do a very detailed search through the log messages in the overview."

More Graylog Enterprise pros

"The support provided is fantastic, and ManageEngine Log360 provides the same capabilities that were being enjoyed with AlienVault while suiting the budget and providing what is needed."

"It basically helps us. We have to stay in compliance with certain issues with some of our customers. We have to have these types of tools in place for protecting our network and our data. We're in the aerospace industry, so we have a lot of defense contracts. So, all those guys will make sure that we're protecting their information, and it does a good job in that aspect."

"The most valuable feature is that this solution is more secure than others, and there are more applications and features as well."

"The deployment is quite simple and pretty straightforward."

"You can have all of the logs from servers to network and it gets sent out to the correct owners. This is very helpful."

"My main objective for using ManageEngine Log360 is its powerful and real-time capabilities for managing security and other tasks efficiently."

"ManageEngine Log360 is a comprehensive solution, including event log analysis for Microsoft 365."

"The Sharecon feature is the most valuable."

More ManageEngine Log360 pros

Cons

"Dashboards, stream alerts and parsing could be improved."

"I would like to see a default dashboard widget that shows the topology of the clusters defined for the graylog install."

"Its scalability gets complicated when we have to update or edit multiple nodes."

"More customization is always useful."

"The problem was with the complexity and the cost to add extensions."

"I would like to see some kind of visualization included in Graylog."

"Over six months, I had two similar issues where searches were performed on field "messages". It exhausted all the memory of the ES node causing an ES crash and a Graylog halt."

"I hope to see improvements in Graylog for more interactivity, user-friendliness, and creating alerts. The initial setup is complex."

More Graylog Enterprise cons

"The support needs improvement."

"It takes a little bit of time for Log360 to actually learn your environment."

"It's difficult to find which conditions have been applied to a report because they are provided by default by ManageEngine. However, with other SIEMs if you want to create a report, they provide details, like which conditions are triggering certain reports. This needs to be there in ManageEngine. It would be good to know which parameter has been applied to the report that is updating the system."

"The graphical interface could be made easier to use when you are connecting to different network equipment."

"The matter of the data retention needs to be addressed."

"While ManageEngine Log360 is a significant improvement, there could be enhancements in terms of integrating more user-friendly training materials and better deployment documentation."

"There is room for improvement, especially in the reporting aspect. The reports are not as good as those in Splunk."

"The integration with SharePoint and Teams should be improved."

More ManageEngine Log360 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's open source and free. They have a paid version, but we never looked into that because we never needed the features of the paid version."

"We're using the Community edition."

"I use the free version of Graylog."

"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"We are using the free version of the product. However, the paid version is expensive."

"Graylog is a free open-source solution. The free version has a capacity limitation of 2 GB daily, if you want to go above this you have to purchase a license."

"Consider Enterprise support if you have atypical needs or setup requirements."

"There is an open source version and an enterprise version. I wouldn't recommend the enterprise version, but as an open source solution, it is solid and works really well."

More Graylog Enterprise pricing and cost advice

"There is a cost for each feature used."

"My client has a yearly license. I think the cost is not expensive compared to that of other SIEMs, given the service it is providing."

"Its pricing is definitely huge compared to some of the other SIEMs. Its price should be improved."

"ManageEngine Log360 is expensive compared to other products."

"Affordable pricing is provided by the solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

University

Government

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Graylog?

I am not sure about the pricing, setup cost, and licensing because that was dealt with by a different team that handled the licensing and procurement.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Graylog?

The documentation for Graylog Enterprise can be improved, as this has been a pain point. I think the visualization aspect of Graylog Enterprise can be made more rich, similar to what we have in Gra...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Graylog?

I remember using Graylog Enterprise in the past at a software house where we used it for logging. During that time, we were using Graylog Enterprise as a log aggregator, collecting logs from multip...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Log360?

The price is suitable from a perspective of different pricing options. We already have an ongoing project where some features analytics can be escaped, and companies can manage their budgets carefu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Log360?

ManageEngine Log360 could provide more in-depth insights, particularly in reporting. Some other solutions provide deeper insights into issues, especially when generating reports. More detailed insi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Log360?

ManageEngine Log360 is being used for database monitoring and as a SIEM solution.

See all answers

Comparisons

Grafana Loki vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 19% of the time

Wazuh vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

syslog-ng vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

Security Onion vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

More Graylog Enterprise Competitors

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 15% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 6% of the time

SIEMStorm vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 5% of the time

Sentinel vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 4% of the time

More ManageEngine Log360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Graylog Enterprise

March 2026

Download Graylog Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Log360

March 2026

Download ManageEngine Log360 product report

Also Known As

Graylog2

No data available

Overview

Graylog Enterprise, recognized for log collection, real-time search, and enriched data handling, offers an open-source framework that integrates seamlessly with Elasticsearch. Its user-centric interface streamlines data correlation and log aggregation, supporting both backend services and comprehensive monitoring needs.

Graylog Enterprise stands out for its stability and powerful log management capabilities, facilitating efficient log aggregation, real-time updates, and data analytics. Users benefit from its plugin-based alerting, user-friendly interface, and support for microservices, including Docker integration. The ability to search in detail, flexible API integration, and data enrichment features are highly valued. Challenges include collector application issues, desired visualization enhancements, and authentication integration improvements. Users seek advancements in UI customization, backup functions, and easier rule creation.

What are Graylog Enterprise's most important features?

Log Collection: Efficiently aggregates and handles diverse logs.
Real-Time Search: Provides immediate log data access.
Custom Alerts: Plugin-based alerting for tailored notifications.
Dashboard Enhancements: Improved visualization for data insights.
Data Enrichment: Adds value through detailed log analysis.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Audit Trail Support: Essential for compliance in financial sectors.
Security Event Correlation: Enables incident analysis and response.
Faster Issue Identification: Speeds up troubleshooting with detailed visualization.
API Flexibility: Seamless integration across systems and environments.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Centralized log management enhances oversight.

In industrial use, Graylog Enterprise is crucial for audit trailing in financial sectors, facilitating security event identification and error monitoring. Backend teams leverage real-time analytics for swift issue resolution, while developers appreciate the comprehensive log visualization enabled by Docker integration for microservice management.

Graylog

Log360 is your one-stop solution for all log management and network security challenges. It is an integrated solution that combines EventLog Analyzer and ADAudit Plus into a single console to help you manage your Active Directory auditing and network security easily.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur

First Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation

Buyer's Guide

Graylog Enterprise vs. ManageEngine Log360

March 2026

Free Report: Graylog Enterprise vs. ManageEngine Log360

Find out what your peers are saying about Graylog Enterprise vs. ManageEngine Log360 and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Graylog Enterprise vs. ManageEngine Log360 report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.