

JFrog Container Registry and Harbor are both container registry platforms. Harbor has an upper hand in enterprise-focused features and security, while JFrog stands out in ease of integration with CI/CD pipelines.
Features: JFrog Container Registry offers robust integrations with CI/CD tools, a rich API ecosystem, and seamless tool integration. Harbor emphasizes security with advanced vulnerability scanning, role-based access control, and scalability suitable for large-scale deployments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Harbor provides a straightforward deployment model with extensive documentation and strong professional support. JFrog is known for its intuitive setup and broader tool compatibility with quicker deployment.
Pricing and ROI: JFrog Container Registry has an initial setup cost with a competitive ROI due to efficient workflow integration. Harbor, as an open-source solution, offers lower initial costs and attractive ROI for large organizations thanks to minimized upfront costs and enhanced security.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| JFrog Container Registry | 26.2% |
| Harbor | 25.3% |
| Other | 48.5% |
Harbor is an open source container image registry that secures images with role-based access control, scans images for vulnerabilities, and signs images as trusted. A CNCF Incubating project, Harbor delivers compliance, performance, and interoperability to help you consistently and securely manage images across cloud native compute platforms like Kubernetes and Docker.
The JFrog Container Registry is a repository manager, which supports Docker and Helm registries and Generic repositories, allowing you to build, deploy and manage your container images while providing powerful features with fine-grained permission control behind a sleek and easy-to-use UI.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.