Amazon ECR vs JFrog Container Registry comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and JFrog are both solutions in the Container Registry category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while JFrog is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.4. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 17.1% mindshare in CR, compared to JFrog’s 25.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

Amazon ECR

Read 23 Amazon ECR reviews

3,203 Views
3,203 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

JFrog Container Registry

Read 6 JFrog Container Registry reviews

4,534 Views
4,534 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Amazon ECR

JFrog Container Registry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Amazon ECR and JFrog Container Registry are competing products offering container registry services with unique capabilities. JFrog Container Registry has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, despite higher costs.

Features: Amazon ECR offers seamless integration with AWS services, robust security measures, and scalability options. JFrog Container Registry is noted for its extensive integration capabilities beyond AWS, strong DevOps support, and enhanced security features.

Room for Improvement: Amazon ECR could improve by extending integration beyond AWS, providing a more intuitive interface, and reducing AWS dependency. JFrog Container Registry could benefit from more cost-effective pricing options, simplified deployment processes, and enhanced user interface design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon ECR simplifies deployment within AWS environments and is praised for effective responsiveness. JFrog Container Registry supports complex but flexible deployment options across environments and offers personalized assistance across multiple platforms.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon ECR's pricing model is cost-effective for AWS-centric operations with substantial ROI. JFrog Container Registry involves higher initial costs but offers enhanced features and multi-cloud versatility, appealing to companies seeking broad infrastructure solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon ECR

Ranking in Container Registry

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JFrog Container Registry

Ranking in Container Registry

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Amazon ECR is 17.1%, up from 17.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog Container Registry is 25.3%, down from 30.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Registry Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon ECR	17.1%
JFrog Container Registry	25.3%
Other	57.599999999999994%

Container Registry

Featured Reviews

PrashantaPaudel

Wordpress Trainer at SpeedZone.fi

Has supported container workflows through fast image handling and seamless service integrations

The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is that we can push and pull faster than other similar products. It means saving and retrieving more efficiently. This is not manual dragging and dropping, but rather programmatic taking and saving. I have used Amazon ECR with Lambda, EC2, and EFS. These are integrable services where you can call Amazon ECR from anywhere in AWS. If my product is not always dependent totally on Amazon ECR only, but if the product is dependent on Amazon ECR only, then having a low time to load, low time to save, and a faster containerizing process time would affect the software's response time. This is important.

Read full review

Sharath SK

Senior Consultant at Mettler-Toledo International Inc.

Eases artifact management and boosts SDLC efficiency with robust vulnerability scanning

When managing Docker images, I find that JFrog Container Registry has very low latency when pushing or pulling images, which is a significant reason we are using JFrog, along with easily configurable endpoints to the application. We don't use the replication capabilities of JFrog Container Registry because we tag different sets of containers for every release. Over the years, I have seen nice improvements to the user interface of JFrog Container Registry, and I hope that more additional capabilities come in the future so that we can keep using this tool. Currently, JFrog Container Registry does not support my AI-driven workloads as we haven't explored that direction yet, but it's a consideration for future purposes. We have plans to increase the usage of JFrog Container Registry in the future as we have other products in the pipeline, and once they complete the MVP phase, we will take the next initiatives. Currently, we only have two endpoints for JFrog, one from AWS and one from Azure. Overall, I would rate JFrog Container Registry an eight.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon ECR has a native integration with all AWS services, making it convenient for use within the AWS ecosystem."

"The Docker compatibility that ECR offers is probably the most beneficial aspect of the solution."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the scanning of images for vulnerabilities."

"What I like most about Amazon ECR is that it's swift."

"The main feature I value is the ability to deposit and retrieve images."

"The integration with AWS services is very easy, and the deployment and initial setup are pretty straightforward."

"The autoscaling functionality is the main beneficial feature of Amazon ECR. It simplifies management, but some configurations can complicate things a bit."

"There are no issues. The service is remarkably stable."

More Amazon ECR pros

"I have built an end-to-end CI/CD pipeline with JFrog and the registry on Kubernetes, utilizing Jenkins, JFrog X-ray, and more."

"It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP."

"The most valuable feature of JFrog Container Registry for me has been the X-ray scans because when we ship the product, we need to ensure that there are no vulnerabilities in our application, and X-ray helps us find vulnerabilities in our containers or Helm charts."

"It was a good experience with JFrog Container Registry."

"We have integrated JFrog Xray, and we use it for storage purposes."

"We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system."

Cons

"The Amazon ECR interface could benefit from improvements to enhance user experience."

"Amazon ECR needs to improve its downtime."

"Its support for system architecture needs improvement."

"Amazon ECR should include integration with Docker Hub."

"Providing more ways to scan the image integrated with ECR would enhance security in the software development life cycle."

"Amazon ECR should improve the integration with Amazon CloudWatch. For example, allowing us to monitor the queues better. Additionally, some of the features could be made more accessible."

"Deeper integration with other security tools would enhance usability."

"The UI for managing ECR and other services could be improved. It could be user-friendly compared to other cloud services."

More Amazon ECR cons

"Pricing, purge of data or historical data, ease of usage, pricing model, setting the current pricing, changes in the configuration so that the pricing can be brought down, and better utilization of JFrog Container Registry are the issues I face."

"The solution's documentation available over the internet is not straightforward and customer-friendly."

"One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline."

"In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Amazon ECR does not have a high cost."

"The solution's prices are high in India as compared to the US."

"The solution's price is reasonable compared to its competitors"

"The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective."

"My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money."

"The product is expensive."

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing is somewhat expensive compared to its competitors. We use the Pro version."

"JFrog Container Registry is a very expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon ECR?

One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utili...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon ECR?

When it comes to pricing for Amazon ECR, that is the only area AWS has to look into. Services like IoT services or SageMaker are very high, and many times customers complain that while the initial ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon ECR?

For potential areas of improvement in Amazon ECR, I need to check if AWS has features similar to Azure Defender for scanning, getting vulnerabilities, and patching recommendations. Regarding additi...

See all answers

What do you like most about JFrog Container Registry?

It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JFrog Container Registry?

JFrog pricing includes self-hosted and cloud options, with costs based on licenses, subscriptions, number of nodes, and repository limits. Licensing costs are $3 per year, which I feel is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JFrog Container Registry?

Pricing, purge of data or historical data, ease of usage, pricing model, setting the current pricing, changes in the configuration so that the pricing can be brought down, and better utilization of...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 28% of the time

Harbor vs Amazon ECR

Compared 15% of the time

Google Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 6% of the time

DigitalOcean Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 5% of the time

Red Hat Quay vs Amazon ECR

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon ECR Competitors

Harbor vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 56% of the time

Azure Container Registry vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 14% of the time

Red Hat Quay vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 2% of the time

VMware Harbor Registry vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 1% of the time

More JFrog Container Registry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR

March 2026

Download Amazon ECR product report

Buyer's Guide

JFrog Container Registry

March 2026

Download JFrog Container Registry product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Container Registry

No data available

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) is a fully-managed Docker container registry that makes it easy for developers to store, manage, and deploy Docker container images. Amazon ECR is integrated with Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS), simplifying your development to production workflow.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

The JFrog Container Registry is a repository manager, which supports Docker and Helm registries and Generic repositories, allowing you to build, deploy and manage your container images while providing powerful features with fine-grained permission control behind a sleek and easy-to-use UI.

JFrog

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Facebook, Airbus, Dell, Slack, Volvo, Netflix, Spotify, T-Systems, Mastercard

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry

March 2026

Free Report: Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry report.

See our list of best Container Registry vendors.

We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.