Amazon ECR vs JFrog Container Registry comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and JFrog are both solutions in the Container Registry category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while JFrog is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 17.5% mindshare in CR, compared to JFrog’s 30.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

Amazon ECR

Read 21 Amazon ECR reviews

4,106 Views
3,475 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

JFrog Container Registry

Read 5 JFrog Container Registry reviews

6,209 Views
5,890 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Amazon ECR

JFrog Container Registry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Amazon ECR and JFrog Container Registry are competitive solutions in the container management space. Amazon ECR seems to have the upper hand in integration within AWS, while JFrog provides greater multi-cloud flexibility.

Features: Amazon ECR offers integration with AWS services, strong security protocols, and automated image replication. JFrog Container Registry provides a universal artifact management system, extensive artifact support, and on-premise deployment options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon ECR is streamlined for AWS users with straightforward setup and robust support. JFrog Container Registry supports multi-cloud deployments and diverse environments but requires more effort in setup.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon ECR's pricing model benefits organizations heavily invested in AWS with good ROI through integration. JFrog Container Registry's costs align with its diverse features, offering good ROI for multi-cloud environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,491 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon ECR

Ranking in Container Registry

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JFrog Container Registry

Ranking in Container Registry

3rd

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Amazon ECR is 17.5%, up from 17.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog Container Registry is 30.5%, up from 26.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Registry

Featured Reviews

Rikin Parekh

Backend Engineer at Northeastern University

Helps to store Docker containers and images but deployment can be complex

If there were a way to use containers as tasks directly, that would simplify things. Currently, when we use EC2 instances, scaling horizontally means increasing the instance count by five times, which might not be cost-effective. Maybe using containers directly for tasks could be a better option. Setting up this product initially does take quite a bit of time, and maintaining it also requires effort. Doing it via command line would be challenging, so I find it easier to manage through the interface.

Read full review

Sai Balaji Bonagiri

DevOps Engineer at Infosys

Self-hosted and works well in hybrid SaaS environments and automation is fast without any breakdowns

In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started. However, once you gain some experience, working with JFrog becomes much easier. Overall, it's manageable for beginners, but there might be a bit of a learning curve. I'd call myself an intermediate user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to use compared to other container registries."

"The main feature I value is the ability to deposit and retrieve images."

"What I like most about Amazon ECR is that it's swift."

"The technical support services are excellent."

"In the case of Amazon ECR, there are various valuable features we can see. Currently, there are image-scanning capabilities that we use."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the scanning of images for vulnerabilities."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is how it organizes the code and the infrastructure."

"The Docker compatibility that ECR offers is probably the most beneficial aspect of the solution."

More Amazon ECR pros

"It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP."

"We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system."

"We have integrated JFrog Xray, and we use it for storage purposes."

Cons

"There is no room for improvement mentioned; it's good as is."

"Amazon ECR should improve the integration with Amazon CloudWatch. For example, allowing us to monitor the queues better. Additionally, some of the features could be made more accessible."

"There could be improvements to the interface of AWS concerning ECR."

"It would be great if they could also provide a reference to fix the errors or vulnerabilities in the images rather than just notifying us about them."

"Improving the documentation for easy understanding will help bring in more clients to use Amazon ECR."

"Amazon ECR needs to improve its downtime."

"The UI for managing ECR and other services could be improved. It could be user-friendly compared to other cloud services."

"I suggest making it more aligned with the Docker registry version two API specification."

More Amazon ECR cons

"In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started."

"The solution's documentation available over the internet is not straightforward and customer-friendly."

"One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is reasonable compared to its competitors"

"The solution's prices are high in India as compared to the US."

"Amazon ECR does not have a high cost."

"The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective."

"My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money."

"The product is expensive."

"The pricing is somewhat expensive compared to its competitors. We use the Pro version."

"JFrog Container Registry is a very expensive solution."

"The solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon ECR?

One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utili...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon ECR?

In the ECR setup, we use a container registry per region. All accounts are within a shared account, which we call a shared account. We share the container registry across various accounts within ou...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon ECR?

I suggest making it more aligned with the Docker registry version two API specification. If they achieve this, it would be excellent. Eli is an example of such an implementation.

See all answers

What do you like most about JFrog Container Registry?

It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JFrog Container Registry?

JFrog pricing includes self-hosted and cloud options, with costs based on licenses, subscriptions, number of nodes, and repository limits. Licensing costs are $3 per year, which I feel is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JFrog Container Registry?

Areas of improvement include advanced security integration that should go beyond basic vulnerability scanning. More documentation about policies, X-rays, and download triggers, along with integrati...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 31% of the time

Harbor vs Amazon ECR

Compared 14% of the time

DigitalOcean Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Amazon ECR

Compared 3% of the time

Red Hat Quay vs Amazon ECR

Compared 2% of the time

More Amazon ECR Competitors

Harbor vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 54% of the time

Azure Container Registry vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 11% of the time

Red Hat Quay vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Harbor Registry vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 2% of the time

More JFrog Container Registry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Container Registry

May 2025

Download Amazon ECR product report

Buyer's Guide

JFrog Container Registry

May 2025

Download JFrog Container Registry product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Container Registry

No data available

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) is a fully-managed Docker container registry that makes it easy for developers to store, manage, and deploy Docker container images. Amazon ECR is integrated with Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS), simplifying your development to production workflow.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

The JFrog Container Registry is a repository manager, which supports Docker and Helm registries and Generic repositories, allowing you to build, deploy and manage your container images while providing powerful features with fine-grained permission control behind a sleek and easy-to-use UI.

JFrog

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Facebook, Airbus, Dell, Slack, Volvo, Netflix, Spotify, T-Systems, Mastercard

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry

April 2025

Free Report: Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry report.

See our list of best Container Registry vendors.

We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.