Amazon ECR vs JFrog Container Registry comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and JFrog are both solutions in the Container Registry category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5, while JFrog is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 18.3% mindshare in CR, compared to JFrog’s 30.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

Amazon ECR

Read 21 Amazon ECR reviews

3,747 Views
3,747 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

JFrog Container Registry

Read 6 JFrog Container Registry reviews

5,821 Views
5,821 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Amazon ECR

JFrog Container Registry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Amazon ECR and JFrog Container Registry compete in container management. Amazon ECR gains an upper hand for AWS users with its tight integration, while JFrog caters to broader artifact management needs.

Features: Amazon ECR integrates seamlessly with AWS, provides automated image vulnerability scanning, and offers robust security features. JFrog Container Registry supports comprehensive artifact management, integrates with various ecosystems, and allows multiple repositories, showcasing its versatility.

Room for Improvement: Amazon ECR could enhance support for broader ecosystems and offer more flexibility outside AWS. It might also improve image scanning efficiency. JFrog Container Registry could benefit from more cost-effective pricing models, streamlined interfaces, and reduced complexity in setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon ECR streamlines deployment for AWS users due to its integration with AWS services, offering strong support via AWS. JFrog provides flexible deployment options across on-premises and cloud, backed by responsive customer service, beneficial for diverse environments.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon ECR follows a pay-as-you-go pricing approach, offering cost efficiency for AWS-centric deployments. JFrog Container Registry may require a larger initial investment but delivers high returns in feature richness, supporting organizations managing numerous artifacts.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon ECR

Ranking in Container Registry

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JFrog Container Registry

Ranking in Container Registry

1st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Amazon ECR is 18.3%, up from 16.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog Container Registry is 30.4%, up from 28.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Registry

Featured Reviews

Eli Chavez

Senior Project Manager at NTT DATA

Solution delivers consistent reliability and high stability

ECR is reliable, however, I don't consider it the best container registry available. The main reason is that it is not entirely based on the original Docker registry. For instance, I prefer Azure's ACR because, in ACR, there is no need to create repositories; I simply push. Logging into the repository and specifying the path automatically creates everything. This structure resembles an S3 setup with a container registry layout.

Read full review

Sai Balaji Bonagiri

DevOps Engineer at Infosys

Self-hosted and works well in hybrid SaaS environments and automation is fast without any breakdowns

In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started. However, once you gain some experience, working with JFrog becomes much easier. Overall, it's manageable for beginners, but there might be a bit of a learning curve. I'd call myself an intermediate user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ECR provides robust security features, including image scanning and vulnerability assessment, supported by AWS identity and access management for fine-grained access control."

"One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utilizing load balancers via AWS features allows us to manage all traffic."

"The solution is very stable."

"What I like most about Amazon ECR is that it's swift."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is how it organizes the code and the infrastructure."

"The ECR solution is good. It is integrated with AWS, and it's free. Everything is free, which makes it nice to use."

"Amazon ECR has a native integration with all AWS services, making it convenient for use within the AWS ecosystem."

"The most valuable feature is that Amazon ECR is very simple and useful."

More Amazon ECR pros

"We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system."

"It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP."

"It was a good experience with JFrog Container Registry."

"We have integrated JFrog Xray, and we use it for storage purposes."

Cons

"There were a few issues related to the roles, policies, and retrieval of data when trying to fetch images for deployment on Amazon ECS. This can involve permissions and configuration complexities."

"There could be improvements to the interface of AWS concerning ECR."

"One area for improvement in Amazon ECR is its complexity. It's pretty complex for newbies, particularly learning about private repositories, including how to access Amazon ECR through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM)."

"If there were a way to use containers as tasks directly, that would simplify things. Currently, when we use EC2 instances, scaling horizontally means increasing the instance count by five times, which might not be cost-effective. Maybe using containers directly for tasks could be a better option."

"It would be great if they could also provide a reference to fix the errors or vulnerabilities in the images rather than just notifying us about them."

"Amazon ECR should improve the integration with Amazon CloudWatch. For example, allowing us to monitor the queues better. Additionally, some of the features could be made more accessible."

"I suggest making it more aligned with the Docker registry version two API specification."

"The documentation could be improved."

More Amazon ECR cons

"In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started."

"One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline."

"Pricing, purge of data or historical data, ease of usage, pricing model, setting the current pricing, changes in the configuration so that the pricing can be brought down, and better utilization of JFrog Container Registry are the issues I face."

"The solution's documentation available over the internet is not straightforward and customer-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective."

"The solution's price is reasonable compared to its competitors"

"The product is expensive."

"The solution's prices are high in India as compared to the US."

"My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money."

"Amazon ECR does not have a high cost."

"JFrog Container Registry is a very expensive solution."

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing is somewhat expensive compared to its competitors. We use the Pro version."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon ECR?

One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utili...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon ECR?

I haven't observed the costs associated with Amazon ECR services in detail.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon ECR?

I would appreciate a feature in Amazon ECR that allows direct image downloads from open source into ECR, bypassing the current need to first pull the image to my server. This would streamline the p...

See all answers

What do you like most about JFrog Container Registry?

It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JFrog Container Registry?

JFrog pricing includes self-hosted and cloud options, with costs based on licenses, subscriptions, number of nodes, and repository limits. Licensing costs are $3 per year, which I feel is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JFrog Container Registry?

Pricing, purge of data or historical data, ease of usage, pricing model, setting the current pricing, changes in the configuration so that the pricing can be brought down, and better utilization of...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 32% of the time

Harbor vs Amazon ECR

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Amazon ECR

Compared 3% of the time

DigitalOcean Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 3% of the time

Red Hat Quay vs Amazon ECR

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon ECR Competitors

Harbor vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 54% of the time

Azure Container Registry vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat Quay vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 9% of the time

VMware Harbor Registry vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 2% of the time

More JFrog Container Registry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Container Registry

July 2025

Download Amazon ECR product report

Buyer's Guide

JFrog Container Registry

August 2025

Download JFrog Container Registry product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Container Registry

No data available

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) is a fully-managed Docker container registry that makes it easy for developers to store, manage, and deploy Docker container images. Amazon ECR is integrated with Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS), simplifying your development to production workflow.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

The JFrog Container Registry is a repository manager, which supports Docker and Helm registries and Generic repositories, allowing you to build, deploy and manage your container images while providing powerful features with fine-grained permission control behind a sleek and easy-to-use UI.

JFrog

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Facebook, Airbus, Dell, Slack, Volvo, Netflix, Spotify, T-Systems, Mastercard

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry

July 2025

Free Report: Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry report.

See our list of best Container Registry vendors.

We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.