HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack comparison

The compared HP and Kaspersky solutions aren't in the same category. HP is ranked #17 in EPP , and holds a 3.6% mindshare in the category. Kaspersky is ranked #24 in NTA , and holds a 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 9, 2026

HP Wolf Security and Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform are leading cybersecurity solutions, each with distinct strengths. HP Wolf shines due to its user-friendly nature and comprehensive support, while Kaspersky is noted for superior threat detection.

Features: HP Wolf Security offers seamless integration with existing IT environments, proactive malware protection, and a secure browser for isolating high-risk web activities. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform emphasizes in-depth threat analysis, real-time monitoring tools, and advanced analytics for targeted attack prevention.

Room for Improvement: HP Wolf could enhance its threat detection capabilities, refine its reporting features for better insights, and expand cloud security functionalities. Kaspersky can simplify its setup process, improve interface intuitiveness, and offer more flexible pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security enables straightforward deployment, suited for rapid protection needs, with efficient customer service noted for speed and responsiveness. Kaspersky, though requiring technical expertise for setup, provides specialized deployment support, addressing complex installation issues.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security presents cost-effective pricing, ensuring a quick return on investment due to its efficient setup and support. Kaspersky demands a higher initial investment but justifies it through cutting-edge features, targeting organizations seeking long-term threat detection and analysis benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 904,748 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HP Wolf Security	3.6%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	6.8%
CrowdStrike Falcon	5.9%
Other	83.7%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack	1.3%
Darktrace	15.6%
Cisco Secure Network Analytics	8.8%
Other	74.3%

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

FarkhundAbbas

Security Engineer at adcb

The tool provides excellent sandboxing and email security features, but the backup and recovery features are not good

If my primary solution is down, no backup solution is available to restore it. It is one of the biggest weaknesses of the platform. If I need to update the solution, there is no option to pick the events and the logs from it and deploy it in another solution. The backup and recovery features of the product are not good. I need backup. If the tool is down for some time, I cannot get the logs at that particular time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cortex XDR's most valuable feature is its intelligence-based dashboards."

"If you are looking for security, mainly for advanced threat prevention from ransomware and malware attacks, I would recommend Cortex."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription."

"Once you become familiar with it, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a more powerful tool and I would say that I prefer it over MDE because it is a stronger tool for me."

"The protection offered by this product is good, as is the endpoint reporting."

"My advice for others looking into using Cortex is that it is very easy to use and very useful for the customer environment, whether it's a public or private one."

"After deploying Traps, we saw the performance of the network improve by 65 to 70 percent."

"They did what they said, and this solution could apply to any scenario."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"It has reduced the number of virus and malware incidents and calls we have received compared to prior to deploying this product, and our overall security posture has improved."

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"Our security posture has improved; it has definitely contained and prevented some malicious attacks from happening."

More HP Wolf Security pros

"The solution is very easy to use. Its interface is very simple, and you can build IOC's indicators. You can use your rules to detect these attacks because you can leverage threat intelligence. Y"

"The Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform provides visibility into telemetry data, enabling comprehensive monitoring of environmental activities."

"The product's deployment phase is easy."

"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is stable and runs all the time."

"I feel the anti-ransomware update is one of the tool's valuable features."

"The most valuable use is detailing metadata collection from the endpoint and network."

"The email security feature is really good."

Cons

"We have found that there are times Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks does not detect some of the viruses, we have to use another protection solution called Kaspersky."

"I have faced some issues with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks; there is room for improvement in the sense that certain options prevent us from seeing and segregating data."

"It is an enterprise-level solution. Its price could be less expensive."

"Cortex XDR should have a lightweight agent, and the agent size should not be heavy."

"In reporting they should have a customizable dashboard due to the fact that C-level people don't like reporting to the IT department. They prefer to have a real-time dashboard. That kind of dashboard needs to have various customizations."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is not only pricey; it is extremely expensive."

"There are some false positives."

"In an upcoming release, the solution could improve by proving hard disk encryption. If it could support this it would be a complete solution."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."

"Room for improvement would be keeping up with the rate of change, specifically on Windows platforms. There are a lot of updates that come out for Microsoft Windows operating systems and the Bromium product needs to be able to keep up quickly with those updates and all the browser updates that are coming out. It's hard to do, but that's really where they need to be more responsive because we end up with problems and then we have to call support to get patches, etc."

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability."

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. We do mine the data that's in there from a forensics perspective... It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data. Reporting is absolutely the biggest shortcoming."

"They have always struggled with usability. The protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer. It's gotten a lot better now with Win 10. But sometimes, when you open up a website, it's going to take longer than it would without Bromium, and it's the same with documents."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"The blind spot or gap in the platform is network analysis functionality."

"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is not a good product. We had problems with endpoints and the solution did not detect it. We didn't get any alerts about the attack."

"I think the tool is still not really good enough for integration compared to other products."

"The solution lacks cloud integrations."

"The backup and recovery features of the product are not good."

"In some of the places I have come across, even though they use Kaspersky, the ransomware enters their system."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is on the higher side, but it's okay."

"This is an expensive solution."

"Compared to CrowdStrike, Cortex XDR is an expensive solution."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

"If one wishes to work with another team or large number of users at a future point, he must purchase a license for them."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"The pricing is a little high. It is per user per year."

"It's the most expensive solution, but features-wise, it's quite strong. It's very good for protection, so the results are very good in the case of protection. I would rate it a two out of ten in terms of pricing."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Pricing is reasonable."

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is cheap."

"The solution has competitive pricing."

"Kaspersky is one of the cheaper solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	53

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 10% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 5% of the time

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 5% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

TrendAI Vision One vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Compared 9% of the time

SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Compared 6% of the time

MaxPatrol EDR vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Compared 5% of the time

ESET Inspect vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Compared 4% of the time

More Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

July 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

July 2026

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

July 2026

Download Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Bromium vSentry

Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

HP Wolf Security provides robust protection against malware and security threats by isolating untrusted content and offering a secure browsing experience. It combines high-performance protection with user-friendly operations, aiming to keep devices secure without hindering productivity.

HP Wolf Security focuses on preventing malware infections through content isolation. Its virtualized browser ensures high-risk activities do not lead to incidents by removing malware upon session closure. Features like LAVA alerts offer in-depth analysis, making management reporting more efficient. While adjustments are required for better Windows adaptation and broader browser support, it continues to offer significant security advantages. Compatibility challenges and resource usage during browsing and document tasks highlight areas for improvement.

What key features define HP Wolf Security?

Isolation Feature: Prevents malware infection by isolating untrusted content.
Secure Browser: Manages high-risk activities safely and removes threats post-session.
LAVA Alerts: Provides detailed analysis for enhanced management reporting.
Micro VM Protection: Office and PDF files are safely handled with reduced vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Seamless Usability: Combines security with user-friendly operations.
Enhanced Protection: Reduces vulnerabilities across different file types.
Cost-effective Solution: Offers significant security features at a competitive price.
Management Efficiency: Improved reporting and analysis for better decision-making.

In the healthcare sector, HP Wolf Security assists in processing large imaging files efficiently, important for radiology departments. It offers an additional safety layer for laptops in dynamic environments and is pre-installed on many devices, functioning comparably to Norton 360 for comprehensive endpoint protection.

Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform offers comprehensive capabilities for EDR and targeted attack prevention, focusing on detecting advanced threats and protecting endpoints, email, and networks with features like sandbox analysis.

This platform integrates user-friendly interfaces for creating detection rules and performing IOC sweeps to identify potential compromises. It includes metadata collection from endpoints and networks, anti-ransomware updates, and email security via sandbox analysis. Organizations employ it for monitoring system and network activities, enhancing threat detection across IT infrastructures without relying on signatures. Despite its strengths, improvements are needed in network analysis and integration within its ecosystem and with third-party solutions. Pricing adjustments could benefit smaller companies, and enhancements in endpoint detection and package deal options could optimize its effectiveness.

What are the most important features of Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform?

Metadata Collection: Gathers valuable details from endpoints and networks
Anti-Ransomware Update: Regular updates enhance protection against ransomware attacks
Email Security: Sandbox analysis detects malicious code effectively
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies rule creation and IOC sweeps
Threat Intelligence: Assists in developing detection rules based on IOCs

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Advanced Threat Detection: Identifies threats without relying on signatures
Comprehensive Email Protection: Detects and mitigates malicious content
Ease of Deployment: Offers easy setup in on-premise models
Enhanced Monitoring: Provides rigorous monitoring of system and network activities

In industries like finance and healthcare, Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is implemented to protect sensitive data and maintain compliance with regulatory standards. Its combination of email, web, and endpoint protection supports organizations by preventing data breaches and ensuring robust security across IT systems.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Valspar

Republic of Serbia, Goods.ru, Tael, Insolar

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP). Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.