HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert comparison

HP and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. HP is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.0, while Kaspersky is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.2. HP holds a 2.8% mindshare in EDR, compared to Kaspersky’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

HP Wolf Security

Read 8 HP Wolf Security reviews

12,654 Views
3,417 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...

Read 47 Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert reviews

2,395 Views
2,299 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

HP Wolf Security

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

HP Wolf Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert compete in the comprehensive security solutions market. Kaspersky tends to edge out HP Wolf Security in several key areas based on user reviews.

Features: User reviews highlight that Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers more advanced threat detection and response capabilities, effective in mitigating complex security threats, and robust data protection features. HP Wolf Security is appreciated for its robust isolation features, strong malware protection, and integration with existing HP devices and software.

Room for Improvement: HP Wolf Security users often mention issues related to system performance, the need for better integration with other security tools, and user interface enhancements. Kaspersky users point out that there is room for improvement in terms of ease of use, complexity of configuration, and more streamlined updates and patches.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: User feedback indicates that HP Wolf Security is relatively straightforward to deploy but may require more ongoing support. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has a steeper learning curve during deployment but generally receives better marks for customer service.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security is often seen as more cost-effective upfront. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert, despite higher initial costs, offers better ROI due to its advanced feature set and effectiveness in mitigating threats.

To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HP Wolf Security

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

30th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (20th)

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

22nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 2.8%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is 1.5%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

Rodrigo Censi

Technical Support Analyst at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Patch management and integration capabilities drive effective endpoint response management

We work with Kaspersky and two modalities: the Censi final and Censi license. Most of our clients work in financial areas and industry. Our regular enterprise business relies on these solutions Kaspersky is viable with ADR; the Endpoint Detection response feature and the BitLocker management…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."

"Kaspersky is easy to use, and it performs well."

"The solution is scalable."

"The most valuable features are the reports."

"My impression of the stability of this solution is good. We have not had any issues with stability."

"The most valuable feature of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is security. It has better security than other solutions, such as Symantec."

"Has great behavior detection and a very good firmware scanner."

"We particularly appreciate how scalable this solution is, as we often need to increase our end-user numbers."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert pros

Cons

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."

"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. We do mine the data that's in there from a forensics perspective... It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data. Reporting is absolutely the biggest shortcoming."

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"After a major release, there's always a lot of "dust settling." You have to work through all those issues and then you're fine for a while. The problem is, it's stable, it's fine, until the next major release comes out. Then you go back into the cycle again of uncertainty, instability, working through issues until they have patched and remediated all the problems that you're having. It's not unlike any other vendor though"

"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

"They have always struggled with usability. The protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer. It's gotten a lot better now with Win 10. But sometimes, when you open up a website, it's going to take longer than it would without Bromium, and it's the same with documents."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"They should include XDR features in the solution."

"Documentation needs to be simplified and improved so that it provides good product awareness for end users."

"I am not happy with Kaspersky's support since basic support is very cool unless you pay for some advanced support, in which you get better responses and feedback from Kaspersky's team."

"The solution does not offer much support to its users in Spanish, so I would like to see them offer more support in Spanish."

"It does not cover all of our security issues."

"I would like to integrate Kaspersky with my Log Collector SIEM. Right now that's not possible."

"It's not a simple implementation."

"The issue with Kaspersky EDR is the sandbox. I'd like to have the ability to manage it on the cloud as well."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"The solution isn't the cheapest considering what you get. I would rate the pricing as seven out of ten."

"The solution is expensive in comparison to CheckPoint and Fortinet."

"If one is cheap, ten is expensive, I rate the product’s price as a seven out of ten, especially if I compare it with CrowdStrike."

"The license for EDR costs about 1,000 pesos per user. I would rate the pricing as four out of five."

"Kaspersky is licensed on a yearly basis."

"The product has a valuable pricing model. We need to purchase its monthly subscription."

"There is an annual license to use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. The price overall is a bit expensive when compared to other solutions. There are not any additional fees other than the license."

"The pricing is reasonable. Not too cheap, not too expensive."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

16%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Wolf Security?

The product came as a bundle with the machine.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HP Wolf Security?

The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HP Wolf Security?

I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments.

See all answers

What do you like most about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

The integration with our hypervisor is quite smooth, especially within the Kaspersky Enterprise environment. We have many virtual machines, and the integration is helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

If one is cheap, ten is expensive, I rate the product’s price as a seven out of ten, especially if I compare it with CrowdStrike.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

The Kaspersky console could be easier to navigate and generate reports from. We've got Stripe in the method of deployment, which makes it easier and requires lower integration from my team. Deploym...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 15% of the time

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 12% of the time

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 6% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Compared 32% of the time

Trend Vision One vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Compared 16% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Compared 9% of the time

Cynet vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Compared 7% of the time

OPTIMUS EDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Compared 2% of the time

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

August 2025

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

August 2025

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert report

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert product report

Also Known As

Bromium vSentry

Kaspersky EDR

Overview

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to detect and respond to advanced threats in real time. It combines advanced threat intelligence, machine learning algorithms, and behavioral analysis to provide proactive protection against sophisticated attacks.

With its centralized management console, security teams can easily monitor and investigate incidents, while automated response capabilities enable quick remediation. This solution offers deep visibility into endpoint activities, allowing organizations to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is a powerful tool for enhancing the overall security posture of businesses, ensuring the protection of critical assets and sensitive data.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

Valspar

Ferrari, Insolar, Tael, Republic of Serbia

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

July 2025

Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.