HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations comparison

HP and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. HP is ranked #44, while Kaspersky is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.3. HP holds a 1.9% mindshare in EDR, compared to Kaspersky’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 9, 2026

HP Wolf Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud are competing in the endpoint protection category. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud has the upper hand with its advanced features and adaptive security, making it worth the investment.

Features: HP Wolf Security utilizes micro-virtualization technology for threat isolation, providing robust protection. It also focuses on device-centric security with Office and PDF Micro VM protection. The secure browser isolates high-risk web activities effectively. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers comprehensive threat intelligence-driven defense, anti-phishing and anti-malware features, and a cloud-based console for ease of managing endpoints. It also includes advanced email gateway protection and seamless integration with Microsoft Office 365.

Room for Improvement: HP Wolf Security could enhance its network-wide threat management capabilities and further integrate cloud-based security measures. Expanding report customization options and improving dashboard features will add value. Moreover, enhancing its adaptive security features would be beneficial. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud can improve export data and central management post-update, optimize its Cloud Discovery feature to reduce manual input, and enhance the integration with external storage services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security provides a straightforward deployment model with strong customer support, making the installation process hassle-free for businesses. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers seamless cloud-based deployment and well-regarded customer service, setting a high standard in the industry.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security is recognized for its competitive pricing and favorable return on investment, achieved through cost-effective device-centric protection strategies. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, while potentially more expensive, offers higher ROI through its extensive security capabilities and effective threat management.

To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 904,748 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.6%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 1.9%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.6%
Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations	0.9%
HP Wolf Security	1.9%
Other	93.6%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

Hassan Mohamed

Cyber Security Manager at Greater Cairo Water Company (GCWC)

Centralized endpoint control has strengthened defense in depth across our distributed branches

When considering features or capabilities of Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations that I have found most valuable, it appears similar to other vendors, and I don't find a unique feature in it as it looks comparable to any other EDR solution. However, we purchased it because we have had Kaspersky Endpoint for 10 years, so it has fantastic integration between EDR and the endpoint. Additionally, Kaspersky is one of the famous leaders in endpoint protection in the world. The centralized management console of Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations has helped me streamline my security protocols significantly. This helps me a great deal because we are a large enterprise and we need centralization. It simplifies operations for us. We have many branches around Cairo, which is the capital of Egypt, and because we need centralization, we cannot perform our tasks without it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability is pretty good except for one or two cases, and based on the performance, it's been okay with pretty high performance, no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze."

"We use Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks for its ability to detect based on behavior rather than simple virus scan to prevent malicious activities."

"The stability of the solution is very good. We have about 100 users on it right now, and we use it twice a week."

"The ability to kind of stitch everything together and see the actual complete picture is very useful. I guess you'd call it a playbook. Some people call it the forensics analysis of what was happening on particular endpoints when they detected some malicious behavior, and what transpired before that to cause that. It is also very user friendly. The way they have done everything and integrated all the solutions that they've purchased over the years to make it a very seamless, effective product is very good. One thing about Palo Alto is that they take the products or services that they purchase and make them seamless for the end user as compared to some companies that purchase other companies and then just kind of have their products off to the side or keep different interfaces. Palo Alto doesn't do that."

"But overall, when we speak about security and protection, they are one of the top providers."

"Monitoring is most valuable."

"Cortex is the best solution for avoiding security breaches, malware attacks, and other kinds of security issues."

"I generally believe that Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is probably the best in the market right now."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"Our security posture has improved; it has definitely contained and prevented some malicious attacks from happening."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"It has reduced the number of virus and malware incidents and calls we have received compared to prior to deploying this product, and our overall security posture has improved."

More HP Wolf Security pros

"We had the cloud suite of KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud, and its monitoring was fine."

"The AI-driven threat intelligence has helped my threat management significantly, as it helps me catch many threats."

"It is a powerful tool for zero-day attack prevention."

"I find the EDR service valuable as it adds extra protection and provides a centralized view."

"Kaspersky has a Cloud Discovery feature. There is no template in Kaspersky. They provide a temporary risk assessment of the cloud services. For example, if we want to block public storage services like OneDrive or Google Drive, we need to specify each individually. The main difference is that Kaspersky's process takes more time because it requires individual input."

"All features in Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud are perfect, and I am interested in working with Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud."

"The standout features of Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud include its cloud-based console and the simplicity of managing endpoints."

"The platform's ability to update the database from my device and manage user profiles is quite effective."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations pros

Cons

"It would be better if they could educate the customers more. Some sort of seminars and roadshows will help educate the customers and show what the product can do. The price could be better. It would also help if they had a team for deployment and support."

"I recommend adding a data loss prevention (DLP) solution to Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products."

"Whenever the tool releases a new version when deploying the product across the organization, I feel like there are some disturbances in the CPU usage after upgrading the tool to the latest version."

"Cortex XDR could improve its sales support team, including better commission structures and referral programs."

"A better pricing plan would make this product more competitive."

"The installation should be easier and the Palo Alto pre-sales and sales teams should have more information on the product because they don't know what they are selling."

"The solution lacks real-time, on-demand antivirus."

"It takes time to scan the servers and devices."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"They have always struggled with usability. The protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer. It's gotten a lot better now with Win 10. But sometimes, when you open up a website, it's going to take longer than it would without Bromium, and it's the same with documents."

"After a major release, there's always a lot of "dust settling." You have to work through all those issues and then you're fine for a while. The problem is, it's stable, it's fine, until the next major release comes out. Then you go back into the cycle again of uncertainty, instability, working through issues until they have patched and remediated all the problems that you're having. It's not unlike any other vendor though"

"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"Its high CPU usage also slows down devices, particularly those with lower specifications like Core i3."

"Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations could be improved if it depended more on artificial intelligence, as other vendors such as CrowdStrike do."

"The tool's update management can be better. In future releases, the addition of a DLP module would be valuable."

"While the product provides a good level of protection, we need better support, especially in terms of being kept informed about new threats and specific configurations needed."

"Sometimes, the tool consumes a lot of resources from the endpoints, making it an area of concern where improvements are required since it currently consumes a little bit of RAM."

"Kaspersky doesn't provide local support."

"It requires specific expertise or certified professionals to deploy the product. There is a need to expand the offerings to various industries covering different-sized businesses."

"Recently, there was a company which was attacked by phishing emails, and out of 10, it was only blocking three emails."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is a little bit on the expensive side."

"The tool's price is moderate."

"The price is on the higher side, but it's okay."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

"I feel it is fairly priced."

"This is an expensive solution."

"The pricing is okay, although direct support can be expensive."

"This is an expensive solution."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The product’s price is flexible."

"We had to pay an annual licensing fee for KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud."

"The platform is expensive."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is a cost-effective solution."

"The solution is moderately priced and cannot be considered an expensive or cheap tool."

"The pricing is favorable, and there are no additional expenses associated with using the product."

"I find Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud more accessible in terms of pricing."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	53

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

No advise, its pretty simple

See all answers

What needs improvement with KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations could be improved if it depended more on artificial intelligence, as other vendors suc...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

I use Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations for endpoint detection and response.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 10% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 5% of the time

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 5% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 8% of the time

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 5% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 4% of the time

More Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

July 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

July 2026

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

July 2026

Download Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Bromium vSentry

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

HP Wolf Security provides robust protection against malware and security threats by isolating untrusted content and offering a secure browsing experience. It combines high-performance protection with user-friendly operations, aiming to keep devices secure without hindering productivity.

HP Wolf Security focuses on preventing malware infections through content isolation. Its virtualized browser ensures high-risk activities do not lead to incidents by removing malware upon session closure. Features like LAVA alerts offer in-depth analysis, making management reporting more efficient. While adjustments are required for better Windows adaptation and broader browser support, it continues to offer significant security advantages. Compatibility challenges and resource usage during browsing and document tasks highlight areas for improvement.

What key features define HP Wolf Security?

Isolation Feature: Prevents malware infection by isolating untrusted content.
Secure Browser: Manages high-risk activities safely and removes threats post-session.
LAVA Alerts: Provides detailed analysis for enhanced management reporting.
Micro VM Protection: Office and PDF files are safely handled with reduced vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Seamless Usability: Combines security with user-friendly operations.
Enhanced Protection: Reduces vulnerabilities across different file types.
Cost-effective Solution: Offers significant security features at a competitive price.
Management Efficiency: Improved reporting and analysis for better decision-making.

In the healthcare sector, HP Wolf Security assists in processing large imaging files efficiently, important for radiology departments. It offers an additional safety layer for laptops in dynamic environments and is pre-installed on many devices, functioning comparably to Norton 360 for comprehensive endpoint protection.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers robust cybersecurity with features like malware detection and cloud-based endpoint management, suitable for businesses requiring advanced protection.

This solution provides comprehensive endpoint security, including a self-protection mechanism, EDR service, and integration with Microsoft Office 365. It supports multiple operating systems with components like Web Control, Device Control, and BitLocker encryption. Anti-phishing and anti-malware features, alongside detailed vulnerability assessments, enhance its security capabilities. Despite its strengths, users note areas for improvement in deployment, update management, and resource usage. Challenges include high CPU usage, installation delays, and stability issues. Companies benefit from features like ransomware protection and cloud platform integration, ensuring protection against threats.

What are the most important features of Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud?

Self-Protection Mechanism: Defends against unauthorized changes and ensure operation stability.
Malware Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats with high accuracy.
Cloud-Based Endpoint Management: Simplifies management across devices with a centralized console.
Microsoft Office 365 Integration: Enhances security and productivity in collaborative environments.
Vulnerability Assessments: Provides insights into potential security weaknesses.
Anti-Phishing & Anti-Malware: Protects against harmful emails and web content.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Performance: Consistent security measures against complex threats.
Detailed Reporting: Offers in-depth analysis of vulnerabilities and threats.
Comprehensive Protection: Covers a wide range of threats including malware and phishing.
Integration Capability: Easily integrates with other security solutions and platforms.

Companies in sectors such as automation and insurance implement Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud for its advanced cybersecurity features. They rely on its capabilities for application blocking, web and email threat defense, and compliance with data protection standards. By leveraging endpoint management and behavior analysis, organizations integrate this tool with cloud platforms to secure servers, workstations, and mobile devices.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Valspar

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

June 2026

Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.