HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Small Office Security comparison

HP and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. HP is ranked #17, while Kaspersky is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.4. HP holds a 4.0% mindshare in EPP, compared to Kaspersky’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 9, 2026

HP Wolf Security and Kaspersky Total Security are competing products in the cybersecurity market, aiming to provide comprehensive protection for businesses and consumers. Based on data, HP Wolf Security shows stronger performance in pricing and support, but Kaspersky Total Security is preferred for its rich features, making it a worthwhile investment.

Features: HP Wolf Security offers endpoint security, advanced threat containment, and detailed analytics. Kaspersky Total Security provides antivirus, anti-phishing, and a secure password manager. Kaspersky's wider array of features gives it an overall edge in capabilities.

Room for Improvement: HP Wolf Security could enhance its feature set, improve integration with third-party applications, and offer more flexible scalability options. Kaspersky Total Security may benefit from reducing resource consumption, offering more competitive pricing, and enhancing its customer support responsiveness outside of peak hours.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security is known for its straightforward deployment and robust support, facilitating integration into existing systems. Kaspersky Total Security also has an efficient deployment process and provides detailed setup instructions with a responsive support team. HP's ease of deployment offers a slight advantage.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security is an economical option with competitive pricing and a high return on investment due to low setup costs. Kaspersky Total Security, while slightly more expensive, delivers significant value through extensive features and reliability, contributing to long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Small Office Security Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Small Office Security

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,034 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.6%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 4.0%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Small Office Security is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.6%
HP Wolf Security	4.0%
Kaspersky Small Office Security	1.2%
Other	91.2%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

Alessandro Spiandore

Proprietario at IL COMPUTER snc

Long-term licensing has provided reliable lightweight protection for commercial customers and maintains strong performance without disrupting existing security tools

Kaspersky Total Security is a lightweight solution that does not slow down Windows. In many years of use for my customers, I have not had any broken software or other problems. Safe Money technology is available in the product, but I do not use it because my customers have other security solutions that intercept malware before Kaspersky on the firewall and networking firewall of LAN. I sell the various solutions of next generation, Optimum, and Advanced through MCP licensing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability of this product is very good."

"The stability of the solution is very good. We have about 100 users on it right now, and we use it twice a week."

"They have a new GUI which is just fantastic."

"We have a complete overview of all our PCs and it's very easy to handle and to use the interface. It has a lot of benefits for us."

"Palo Alto Networks Traps improves our security posture and lowers risk by providing next-gen methods to combat against modern threats on all the major platforms."

"Threat identification and detection are the most valuable features of this solution."

"The protection offered by this product is good, as is the endpoint reporting."

"Palo Alto is constantly adding new features."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"Looking at it in the big picture of the risk that you're mitigating and the protection that you're getting, it's phenomenal."

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack."

"It has reduced the number of virus and malware incidents and calls we have received compared to prior to deploying this product, and our overall security posture has improved."

More HP Wolf Security pros

"It is a stable product."

"The solution is efficient."

"The protection has been top-notch, according to our use case and ISP."

"Kaspersky is reliable because it checks everything before I want to log in."

"The solution is useful for protecting laptops."

"It automatically identifies potential threats in emails, websites, and documents, swiftly blocking or quarantining anything harmful to prevent any damage or infection to my system."

"I am satisfied with the solution's security features because we have been using it for years."

"Kaspersky Total Security has valuable reporting features regarding visibility for trusted sites and safe browsing."

More Kaspersky Small Office Security pros

Cons

"The negative aspect I see is the economic model used by Palo Alto."

"I have run into some detection issues with Cortex XDR. It needs to be better at detection of internal attacks."

"I think sometimes Cortex XDR agent automatically stops event capturing from the device, and then even the dashboard does not get any notifications from the agent."

"Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth."

"This product has not improved my organization - in fact, we are in the process of moving back to another product as a result of Cortex's horrible impact on system performance."

"Technology evolves every day, so it would be nice if it gets more secure. It can also have more integration with other platforms."

"I feel that it should not be a licensed activity because a feature should allow us to see applications running on end devices."

"It would be good to have a better way to search for a file within the UI."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."

"They have always struggled with usability. The endpoint protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer."

"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."

"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data."

"They have always struggled with usability. The protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer. It's gotten a lot better now with Win 10. But sometimes, when you open up a website, it's going to take longer than it would without Bromium, and it's the same with documents."

"Room for improvement would be keeping up with the rate of change, specifically on Windows platforms."

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"Kaspersky Total Security's configuration part is complex."

"There is room for improving security."

"Kaspersky Total Security should be easier to manage and improve user interaction. Resetting often requires some experience, which can be a problem for generic users. Web users also encounter some issues that should be improved."

"The solution’s security could be improved."

"Enhancing the encryption code, particularly in relation to ransomware would be a great addition for future use."

"The solution’s email protection area should be improved."

"When you get the license number, there isn't a clear section in the program's interface that leads you to renew your license. You have to look and search a lot about it."

"The authorization process could be faster."

More Kaspersky Small Office Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is $55 to $90 USD per endpoint per month."

"Our license will require renewal in August, after which the maintenance will continue as usual."

"It's about $55 per license on a yearly basis."

"It is "expensive" and flexible."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"The pricing is a little bit on the expensive side."

"I feel it is fairly priced."

"Our customers have expressed that the price is high."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Pricing is reasonable."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"The solution's pricing is cheap and better than that of Sophos."

"The pricing of the solution is good."

"Users need to pay a licensing fee for the solution, which is neither cheap nor expensive."

"I like this solution due to its cost-free nature"

"Kaspersky Total Security is not an expensive solution."

"We purchase the product’s yearly license."

"We pay around $30 to $35 for the solution yearly."

"We have a yearly license, and it's not expensive."

More Kaspersky Small Office Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,034 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	51

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Total Security?

The pricing for Kaspersky Total Security is quite affordable, rated at eight out of ten, and all necessary licensing ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Total Security?

Kaspersky Total Security is perfect. The only area for improvement is the price, which is slightly high.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaspersky Total Security?

Kaspersky Total Security is used by my commercial customers for security purposes. I do not use parental control beca...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 11% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 9% of the time

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 2% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Small Office Security

Compared 11% of the time

AVG Internet Security Business Edition vs Kaspersky Small Office Security

Compared 7% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Kaspersky Small Office Security

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Small Office Security

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs Kaspersky Small Office Security

Compared 3% of the time

More Kaspersky Small Office Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

May 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

May 2026

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

May 2026

Download Kaspersky Small Office Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Bromium vSentry

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

HP Wolf Security provides robust protection against malware and security threats by isolating untrusted content and offering a secure browsing experience. It combines high-performance protection with user-friendly operations, aiming to keep devices secure without hindering productivity.

HP Wolf Security focuses on preventing malware infections through content isolation. Its virtualized browser ensures high-risk activities do not lead to incidents by removing malware upon session closure. Features like LAVA alerts offer in-depth analysis, making management reporting more efficient. While adjustments are required for better Windows adaptation and broader browser support, it continues to offer significant security advantages. Compatibility challenges and resource usage during browsing and document tasks highlight areas for improvement.

What key features define HP Wolf Security?

Isolation Feature: Prevents malware infection by isolating untrusted content.
Secure Browser: Manages high-risk activities safely and removes threats post-session.
LAVA Alerts: Provides detailed analysis for enhanced management reporting.
Micro VM Protection: Office and PDF files are safely handled with reduced vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Seamless Usability: Combines security with user-friendly operations.
Enhanced Protection: Reduces vulnerabilities across different file types.
Cost-effective Solution: Offers significant security features at a competitive price.
Management Efficiency: Improved reporting and analysis for better decision-making.

In the healthcare sector, HP Wolf Security assists in processing large imaging files efficiently, important for radiology departments. It offers an additional safety layer for laptops in dynamic environments and is pre-installed on many devices, functioning comparably to Norton 360 for comprehensive endpoint protection.

Kaspersky Total Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity suite offering robust protection through real-time monitoring, vulnerability fixing, and streamlined operations with centralized management.

Known for its lightweight performance and intuitive setup, Kaspersky Total Security effectively blocks threats across emails, websites, and documents. Continuous updates provide strong defenses against malware. Users find value in features like centralized management, which reduces manual workload, and a user-friendly interface. Adjustments can improve encryption, license renewal, anti-malware capabilities, and system stability while minimizing performance impact. Users recommend strengthened email protection, quicker responses to incidents, and enhanced configuration clarity, with flexibility in license upgrades and cost-effectiveness.

What are Kaspersky Total Security’s Key Features?

Vulnerability Fixing: Identifies and patches security gaps.
Real-time Monitoring: Continuous scanning for threats.
Endpoint Protection: Secures all connected devices.
Centralized Management: Simplifies cybersecurity operations.
Intrusion Prevention System: Blocks unauthorized network access.
Antispam and Firewall: Provides robust network safety.

What Benefits Can Users Expect?

Lightweight Performance: Does not slow down devices.
Pricing Efficiency: Offers good value for the cost.
User-Friendly Installation: Easy to deploy across systems.
Reduced Manual Tasks: Streamlines cybersecurity management.
Robust Malware Defense: Continuous updates enhance protection.

Kaspersky Total Security is used in banking systems, where securing internal data systems and enhancing endpoint protection are critical. Businesses leverage its encryption, firewall, and VPN services for comprehensive cybersecurity management. Its versatility supports protection across multiple devices, optimizing internal networks and processes for enhanced security and performance.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Valspar

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Small Office Security

April 2026

Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Small Office Security

Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Small Office Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,034 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Small Office Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.