HPE Data Fabric vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced comparison

The compared Hewlett Packard Enterprise and MongoDB solutions aren't in the same category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #4 in H , and holds a 14.3% mindshare in the category. MongoDB is ranked #1 in ND , with an average rating of 8.4, and holds a 13.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of MongoDB users who would recommend it.

HPE Data Fabric

Read 12 HPE Data Fabric reviews

1,233 Views
986 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Read 82 MongoDB Enterprise Advanced reviews

5,473 Views
3,065 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

HPE Data Fabric

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE Data Fabric and MongoDB Enterprise Advanced based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop.

To learn more, read our detailed Hadoop Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Hadoop

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Data Fabric

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Hadoop (4th)

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (6th), NoSQL Databases (1st), Managed NoSQL Databases (4th)

Mindshare comparison

HPE Data Fabric and MongoDB Enterprise Advanced aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. HPE Data Fabric is designed for Hadoop and holds a mindshare of 14.3%, down 14.6% compared to last year.
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, on the other hand, focuses on NoSQL Databases, holds 13.9% mindshare, down 20.6% since last year.

Hadoop Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE Data Fabric	14.3%
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop	14.0%
Apache Spark	13.4%
Other	58.3%

Hadoop

NoSQL Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced	13.9%
Redis	9.1%
Couchbase Enterprise	8.0%
Other	69.0%

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Hamid M. Hamid

Data architect at Banking Sector

A stable and scalable tool that serves as a great database

The initial setup of HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is easy. I am not sure how long it took to deploy HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, but I haven't heard about any disadvantages when it comes to the time taken for the deployment. I remember that one of our company's clients who had purchased the product never mentioned the product's setup phase being complex. One of the drawbacks with HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric stems from the fact that the product's upgrade was not straightforward, and it was a complex process since one of the teams in my company who deals with the tool found the upgrade part to be tough. The solution is deployed on an on-premises model. My company has two dedicated staff members to look after the deployment and maintenance phases of HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric.

Read full review

Fabien GOUINEAU

Architecte Cloud at Visiativ SA

Offers reliable engine for legacy needs but requires enhanced cost management and AI features

While MongoDB is a good product, it is also an expensive product for support, and its scalability is acceptable, but the big problem with MongoDB is the cost. For security in MongoDB, we work with encrypted databases by default, but we have not contracted the security options in our contract because it is too expensive, so we only implement encrypted databases without the security pack, which is very expensive for us; in security, we are at the first steps, just using encrypted databases. I think additional features needed in MongoDB include perhaps vector databases, as I think they are not supported right now.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The model creation was very interesting, especially with the libraries provided by the platform."

"My customers find the product cheaper compared to other solutions. The previous solution that we used did not have unified analytics like the runtime or the analog."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"I like the administration part."

"HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric can be accessed from any namespace globally as you would access it from a machine using an NFS."

"The most valuable features of MongoDB are the variety of translations available and the ability to deploy it on the cloud is useful. The cloud users can access the data, work on the data, and if they want to import or manipulate some data they can."

"MongoDB's approach to handling data in documents rather than traditional tables has been particularly beneficial."

"Scalability seems good. I've never been even close to finding the limits. I've run a couple of notes of redundancy but I've never had any problems with scalability."

"I found that MongoDB is most valuable for storing school-related queries. It's also user-friendly, and I found no difficulty accessing it. Setting it up is easy too."

"One of the most valuable features is the ability to Text Search can be used anywhere and anytime."

"The reports are useful for controlling the load of our whole architecture."

"It can handle a lot of files quickly."

"MongoDB is highly stable, and I would rate its stability at nine out of ten."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced pros

Cons

"The product is not user-friendly."

"The deployment could be faster. I want more support for the data lake in the next release."

"HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is not compatible with third-party tools."

"Having the ability to extend the services provided by the platform to an API architecture, a micro-services architecture, could be very helpful."

"Upgrading Ezmeral to a new version is a pain. They're trying to make the solution more container-friendly, so I think they're going in the right direction. The only problem we've had in the past was the upgrades. The process isn't smooth due to how the Red Hat operating system upgrades currently work."

"More stable indexes would be helpful in a future release. That's been an issue for some time. I don't know if it's been fixed now but we transitioned to it because we needed a search index to be able to search for things and if that goes or starts disappearing, we have to move away from that solution. I don't know if they fixed it, last time I had this issue was three years ago so they might have solved it."

"The performance could be faster."

"I have found the solution difficult to operate as an administrator."

"I think it would be good to have more search options such as an index resource. This will provide more options and resources to do advance searches."

"Our program developer finds it to be a little unstable, development-wise."

"People coming from RDBMS should have the flexibility to write queries in SQL that can be converted into JSON queries."

"They could provide more documentation and examples for adding pipeline stages."

"MongoDB could improve by not having so many updates and different versions."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is cheap and based on a usage basis. The solution's licensing costs are yearly and there are no extra costs."

"HPE is flexible with you if you are an existing customer. They offer different models that might be beneficial for your organization. It all depends on how you negotiate."

"There is a need for my company to pay for the licensing costs of the solution."

"MongoDB has a free version. You can also buy the enterprise edition, which is cheaper than Oracle."

"I chose MongoDB because it is cost-effective compared to Oracle, which can be expensive. In addition, MongoDB has good performance and has not caused any issues while working with it. It has been a good choice for me."

"The product is affordable."

"The solution is open source, so it is free."

"We are using the Community Edition of MongoDB."

"Our customers pay for yearly licenses for MongoDB."

"MongoDB is an open-source solution."

"MongoDB is a free solution. We wanted to have high availability and the subscription cost was quite expensive because the basic one is free and then when you want to have some other replications or other features you will need to pay money. Overall the solution is expensive."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about MongoDB?

MongoDB's approach to handling data in documents rather than traditional tables has been particularly beneficial.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB?

For a small company, the cost of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is reasonable, but for heavy data usage, we see a little bit of cost pressure but it's acceptable. I will not be able to elaborate on th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with MongoDB?

The integration between data warehouse could be improved. Nowadays, a lot of data is getting generated, so certain ETL flexible scripts with backend database integrations would be an improvement I ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs HPE Data Fabric

Compared 21% of the time

Cloudera Data Platform vs HPE Data Fabric

Compared 16% of the time

Apache Spark vs HPE Data Fabric

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon EMR vs HPE Data Fabric

Compared 9% of the time

More HPE Data Fabric Competitors

InfluxDB vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

Couchbase Enterprise vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

Cassandra vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE Data Fabric

January 2026

Download HPE Data Fabric product report

Buyer's Guide

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

January 2026

Download MongoDB Enterprise Advanced product report

Also Known As

MapR, MapR Data Platform

No data available

Overview

Forward-leaning companies win market share because they leverage data more effectively than their competitors. Unlock the potential of your data assets with HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric (formerly MapR Data Platform). Empower your data science, analytics, and business teams by simplifying data management on a globally distributed scale. All with enterprise-grade reliability, security, and performance.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is a comprehensive platform renowned for its scalability, user-friendliness, and high performance, underpinned by its flexible document-based storage and open-source model. JSON compatibility, clustering, and security elevate its standing among professionals.

The platform facilitates efficient data management through developer-friendly tools and a strong aggregation framework. MongoDB’s no-schema requirement, supported by community expertise, underlines its adaptability. While its sharding capabilities and affordably support large data volumes, there are aspects such as security enhancement and enterprise tool integration that need attention. Indexing and query optimization pose challenges, alongside high costs. Improvements in analytics and UI could advance its infrastructure further.

What are the key features of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced?

Scalability: Dynamic adjustments to workloads with ease.
JSON Compatibility: Seamless data structuring with JSON support.
Clustering: Enhanced data management through robust clustering.
Security Integration: Built-in security measures for data protection.
Sharding: Efficient distribution of large datasets.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Document-Based Storage: Flexibility in managing varied data types.
Open-Source: Access to a broad community and resources.
Low-Cost Implementation: Economic efficiency in deployment.
Scalability: Supports the growth of data without sacrificing performance.

Industries leverage MongoDB Enterprise Advanced for significant roles in data storage within IoT platforms, healthcare apps, public service monitoring, and big data analytics. Companies in logistics and telecommunications find it instrumental for business process management and video content management, benefiting from its seamless integration and unstructured data support.

MongoDB

Sample Customers

Valence Health, Goodgame Studios, Pico, Terbium Labs, sovrn, Harte Hanks, Quantium, Razorsight, Novartis, Experian, Dentsu ix, Pontis Transitions, DataSong, Return Path, RAPP, HP

Facebook, MetLife, City of Chicago, Expedia, eBay, Google

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.