HPE Ethernet Switches and Meraki MS Switches compete in the network switch category. Based on data comparisons, Meraki MS Switches appear to have the upper hand due to their advanced cloud management capabilities and ease of remote network handling.
Features: HPE Ethernet Switches offer affordability, robust feature set including PoE, and a lifetime warranty, making them highly valued. They ensure long-term stability and straightforward configuration ideal for existing infrastructures. Meraki MS Switches provide cloud management, virtual stacking, and scheduled port configurations. Their centralized dashboard offers ease of configuration and operational efficiency, making them suitable for remote network management.
Room for Improvement: HPE Ethernet Switches could enhance scalability and integration with hyper-converged solutions while improving response times for technical support. Users also point out the need for GUI improvements and more intuitive command-line interfaces. Meraki MS Switches could reconsider their licensing model to improve affordability and expand advanced routing and switching capabilities for better local environments performance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Ethernet Switches are designed for on-premises deployment with excellent customer service and dependable technical support. Meraki MS Switches, favored for hybrid and cloud deployment, enable easier global management but may face challenges in restricted network environments. Their customer service is well-rated, though technical support could improve response speed.
Pricing and ROI: HPE Ethernet Switches are known for offering a cost-effective solution with a reliable ROI due to their lifetime warranty and lack of ongoing licensing fees. They ensure predictable costs over time. Meraki MS Switches, though more expensive, justify their price with strong functionality and cloud management integration, providing long-term value to businesses investing in this space.
We attach SKUs that offer an advanced replacement of the hardware in the worst-case scenario.
Their customer service and support are quite good.
This is because their engineers have experience with and strong knowledge of Cisco products.
If the devices are licensed, the support team will assist you depending on the severity level of the case.
The support is excellent and rated ten out of ten.
HPE Ethernet Switches are highly scalable.
They're quite scalable for my environment.
We can extend MS switches and have multiple plants using the same solution.
We had one incident where an electric overload occurred, and it still managed to stay operational.
HPE Ethernet Switches are very reliable and have high stability.
If something happens to the device or hardware, Cisco will automatically change the device by the next business day.
There is zero downtime; Meraki MS Switches are reliable and stable.
We faced issues following firmware updates, which we now handle by performing updates outside of working hours.
Incorporating them into an existing infrastructure with competitor products is a challenging task which could be better streamlined.
The price should be reduced in comparison to Cisco, as sometimes we cannot use the HPE one at the core level, where generally public users are using Cisco.
Meraki should also consider improvements in stacking features, particularly in the lower-end models like NS130, where stacking isn't supported, unlike with Cisco traditional switching.
There are compatibility issues with certain Power over Ethernet (PoE) devices, which we would like to see resolved.
Most people are familiar with the Cisco commands, and it would be beneficial if the switch could be accessed by GUI configuration and by normally accessing the console.
When compared to Cisco, Aruba is about 40% cheaper.
The price of HPE Ethernet Switches is reasonable and less than other OEM brands.
Meraki MS Switches, including their licensing, are somewhat expensive, particularly when compared with competitor solutions like HP.
The cost of the support and maintenance bundle is quite costly for Cisco.
Meraki MS Switches are somewhat expensive.
They are highly scalable and stable, which is vital for large enterprises that require reliable performance.
The security features of the HPE Ethernet Switches are good.
The control plane is in the cloud, and the data plane is local, allowing manageability from anywhere.
One of the most valuable features of Meraki MS Switches is its precise traffic analytics capabilities, allowing us to query the system for any place at any time.
The most valuable feature is the ability to access devices from anywhere in the world through the cloud.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Meraki MS Switches | 2.5% |
| HPE Ethernet Switches | 3.5% |
| Other | 94.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 62 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 57 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
HPE Ethernet Switches are recognized for stability, easy configuration, robust security, and a lifetime warranty. Preferred for scalability and cost-effectiveness compared to Cisco, they are ideal for different business environments with features making deployment, latency, and integration seamless.
Boasting an intuitive GUI interface, HPE Ethernet Switches provide strong performance for network demands. They offer scalability and programmability with features like Intelligent Resilient Framework (IRF), Power over Ethernet (PoE) support, and VLAN trunking. Despite needing improvements in pricing, stability, and technical support, HPE maintains a reliable reputation in handling LAN switching, core network traffic, and integration across LAN, WAN, and SAN environments. Users seek more modern management, improved automation, and enhanced routing protocols. Though existing management tools and integration ease require refinement, their reliability, swift deployment, and low latency position them well in the market.
What features make HPE Ethernet Switches standout?HPE Ethernet Switches are widely implemented in diverse sectors like telecom, data centers, universities, and hospitality. They handle LAN switching, office network connections, and interconnecting LAN, WAN, and SAN environments effectively. Thanks to their reliability and ease of security integration, they support the varied technical requirements across industries.
Meraki MS Switches offer scalable cloud-managed networking with intuitive dashboards, security, and easy deployment. They provide reliable remote management and comprehensive analysis, ideal for enterprises seeking centralized control.
Meraki MS Switches deliver cloud-managed networking solutions, simplifying configuration and management with a user-friendly GUI. They are known for their scalability, security features, and zero-touch deployment capabilities. With remote switch management and deployment, the creative cloud interface simplifies setup and maintenance while offering comprehensive network traffic analysis and device tracking. However, there are areas for improvement, such as quoting processes and price reductions. Users often note the need for more configuration options, better third-party system integration, and concerns around cloud dependency. Stack features and security enhancements are also desirable, as well as improved performance and support.
What are the key features of Meraki MS Switches?Meraki MS Switches are widely implemented across educational institutions, government agencies, and small to mid-sized businesses. They provide a unified platform for access points and switches, facilitating remote configuration and monitoring. Users appreciate their ability to handle VLANs and LAN access points while connecting end-users with features like PoE and integration with Meraki's cloud infrastructure.
We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
