

Qlik Replicate and IBM Cloud Pak for Data both compete in the data integration and management space. Qlik Replicate seems to have the upper hand due to its strong real-time data capture and replication capabilities.
Features: Qlik Replicate is noted for its real-time change data capture, seamless data replication without impacting source databases, and strong data manipulation capabilities. It also offers easy data integration across various endpoints with robust logging functionalities. IBM Cloud Pak for Data stands out with advanced data preparation, AI integration through Watson Studio, and strong data governance via Knowledge Catalog. Its data virtualization feature enables efficient data analysis and connection to multiple data sources.
Room for Improvement: Qlik Replicate could enhance error message clarity, user interface, and connectivity with multiple data destinations. It also requires improvements in support services and API handling. IBM Cloud Pak for Data needs a more streamlined setup and deployment process, expanded connector availability, and better handling of heavy infrastructure demands. Enhancements in performance and support for diverse connectors are also necessary.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Replicate functions well across public and on-premises environments and is generally praised for proactive support, though response times can improve. IBM Cloud Pak for Data primarily supports public and hybrid clouds but faces challenges with its user interface and infrastructure needs. Its customer service requires quick and decisive improvement.
Pricing and ROI: Qlik Replicate is viewed as costly for small businesses, with a core-based licensing model favoring large data sets but discouraging smaller deployments. Despite high costs, it offers ROI through reduced database usage and maintenance. IBM Cloud Pak for Data targets larger enterprises with high costs linked to advanced functionalities like AI, and is regarded as complex in pricing, yet it promises ROI via time-saving and operational efficiency.
We have been able to drive responsible, transparent, and explainable AI workflow to operationalize AI and mitigate risk and regulatory compliance easily.
I conducted a cost comparison with the AWS service provider, and this option is much cheaper than the Kinesis service offered by AWS.
Customers have seen ROI with Qlik Replicate because they get their data for analysis faster, enabling quicker decision-making compared to traditional data sourcing methods.
Cloud Pak is a complicated system, and it's often difficult to find the right resource in IBM to help with specific issues.
Customer support should be more responsive and reach and respond on time.
IBM support is very supportive, and I would rate them an eight out of ten based on our long relationship with them.
Even priority tickets, which should be resolved in minutes, can take days.
Having a technical account manager coordinate with us proved beneficial during these interactions.
Support response times could be improved as there are sometimes delays in receiving replies to support cases.
I have not noticed any downtime or lagging, especially when dealing with large data, so it is relatively very scalable.
The system could be scaled to include more sources and functions.
We successfully scaled several of our Oracle RDBMS systems simultaneously, including PeopleSoft HR and our network access request systems.
We have tracked INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE operations effectively, capturing pre-update and post-update images, maintaining real-time replicas of information without needing to reprocess requests or datasets.
Setting up the hybrid and multi-cloud environments is a long job and it takes time.
I would love Cloud Pak to come with a demo database that illustrates the different components of data management in a logical way, so I can see the whole picture instead of just the area I'm specializing in.
I do not know if Cognos has all the features that users are looking for since we provide it as our standard and do not maintain infrastructure for other tools.
I believe that having updated documentation is crucial as we encountered a scenario while going through documentation that had not been updated since 2024, which introduced risks since we rely on accurate documentation for task imports and endpoint re-credentialing considerations before reaching out to customer support.
It is a core-based licensing, which, especially in the banking industry, results in the system capacity being utilized up to a maximum of 60%.
Currently, there are limited transformations available in Qlik Replicate which could be expanded.
The setup cost is very expensive.
Regarding my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing, for a small organization, the price might be relatively high, but for huge enterprises such as ours, the price is relatively affordable.
For Qlik Replicate, the setup cost includes the requirement of a server, which represents the hardware cost that must be covered.
Licensing is calculated based on the machine's total capacity rather than actual usage.
We have been able to save approximately 80 percent of our time. We are not doing data analysis manually, so this relieves our data department of dealing with data.
The benefits of choosing IBM Cognos, in addition to saving on cost, include having institutional knowledge about maintaining this infrastructure and enough people who have developed on Cognos in the past, which creates comfort in its use.
From there, I can work my way into a more granular level, applying all of that information on top of my actual data to understand what my data looks like, where it came from, and where it went wrong, managing it throughout the cycle.
The log-based CDC engine of Qlik Replicate is the most valuable feature for us. It reads our source changes directly from the database log, providing a lightweight approach that ensures our databases, such as Oracle databases, are not burdened with additional queries.
This occurs in near real-time, with replication happening within seconds at the target location.
Data retrieved from the system can be pushed to multiple places, supporting various divisions such as marketing, loans, and others.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Qlik Replicate | 1.7% |
| IBM Cloud Pak for Data | 1.3% |
| Other | 97.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
IBM Cloud Pak® for Data is a fully-integrated data and AI platform that modernizes how businesses collect, organize and analyze data to infuse AI throughout their organizations. Cloud-native by design, the platform unifies market-leading services spanning the entire analytics lifecycle. From data management, DataOps, governance, business analytics and automated AI, IBM Cloud Pak for Data helps eliminate the need for costly, and often competing, point solutions while providing the information architecture you need to implement AI successfully.
Building on the streamlined hybrid-cloud foundation of Red Hat® OpenShift®, IBM Cloud Pak for Data takes advantage of the underlying resource and infrastructure optimization and management. The solution fully supports multicloud environments such as Amazon Web Services (AWS), Azure, Google Cloud, IBM Cloud™ and private cloud deployments. Find out how IBM Cloud Pak for Data can lower your total cost of ownership and accelerate innovation.
Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support.
Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.