Qlik Compose vs Qlik Replicate comparison

Qlik Compose and Qlik Replicate are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik Compose is ranked #45, while Qlik Replicate is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0. Qlik Compose holds a 0.9% mindshare in DI, compared to Qlik Replicate’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik Compose users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qlik Replicate users who would recommend it.

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

1,513 Views
1,316 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Qlik Replicate

Read 19 Qlik Replicate reviews

3,886 Views
2,798 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

Qlik Replicate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Qlik Replicate and Qlik Compose are data integration technologies competing in the data management sector. Qlik Replicate appears to have the upper hand due to its real-time data replication abilities and ease of integration across various platforms without affecting the source system's performance.

Features: Qlik Replicate is valued for its real-time change data capture capabilities, diverse data management tasks, and user-friendly configuration. It can replicate data without impacting source databases and handles logs to capture changes efficiently. Qlik Compose excels in automating data modernization, data modeling, and ETL processes, and it can auto-generate data warehouse coding and develop functional warehouses quickly. Its automation capabilities allow for quick development and management of data warehouses.

Room for Improvement: Qlik Replicate users seek better pricing strategies, quicker technical support response times, and more detailed error messages when dealing with multiple data destinations. Qlik Compose could improve its monitoring, scheduling capabilities, and user support, while users desire easier configuration and efficient processing of larger data volumes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Replicate offers versatile deployment across public, private, and hybrid clouds but could benefit from faster support response. Qlik Compose is typically used in on-premises settings, where localized support is preferred over Qlik’s centralized system. Improvements in customer support are needed across both solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Replicate is a premium solution with pricing based on data cores. It offers significant ROI through improved data management and reduced database usage. Qlik Compose pricing varies by data volume and scale, but its transparency is often questioned. Both products are seen as delivering cost savings through process automation and efficient data management.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. Qlik Replicate Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. Qlik Replicate

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

45th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qlik Replicate

Ranking in Data Integration

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Replicate is 1.7%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Qlik Replicate	1.7%
Qlik Compose	0.9%
Other	97.4%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

Shraddha Waghulde

Solution Architect at Predoole Analytics

Real-time data synchronization faces challenges with monitoring and affordability

The user-friendly interface in Qlik Replicate simplifies configuration and management of replication tasks because it is based on GUI, and users don't have to write any scripts. It is entirely drag and drop functionality. Even with zero knowledge of scripting, users can effectively use Qlik Replicate. The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature. As soon as data is entered into the source, it gets captured at target locations. This occurs in near real-time, with replication happening within seconds at the target location. Additionally, whatever operations are performed at the source, whether adding data, deleting data, or updating anything, it gets replicated at target locations. It functions as data injection from source to target, ensuring all operations performed on the source system are replicated on target systems.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"It's a stable solution."

"It can scale."

More Qlik Compose pros

"Great with replicating and updating records."

"It enables us to transform data at the latest stage rather than in ETL loads, so it's more ELT which is one of the advantages. It is also in near real-time, which brings significant advantage for our embedded analytics approach."

"The system is basically user-driven, mostly operating as a local platform."

"The most valuable features of Qlik Replicate are its CDC performance and trigger functions. CDC feature is important to the financial industry."

"A valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is that you do not need ETL. It's easy to use—you choose two systems and it automatically replicates them. Even if there is no CDC available, if you insert it and update it, and there is nothing to find out, then you can use Qlik Replicate. It's a good product."

"From a technical perspective, this is an excellent product."

"The CDC and the flexibility to use QVD as a source are the most valuable features of Qlik Replicate."

"Low-priced reporting and analytics solution, with good scalability and stability. It has on-premises and cloud versions that are cohesive and can integrate well."

More Qlik Replicate pros

Cons

"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

More Qlik Compose cons

"Support response times could be improved as there are sometimes delays in receiving replies to support cases."

"This product could be improved by providing more insight regarding errors. One of our customers that uses Qlik Replicate has had an issue. We tried to debug it, but we could not trace the error message. The infrastructure site should give us more insight about errors. Qlik Replicate is not a business solution, it's an IT solution. The reporting tools and bug site should be improved."

"The UI and data version control can be improved."

"The solution's flexibility to work with APIs should also be improved since it is very weak in working with APIs."

"We would like to see more details in messages about errors with the system."

"When you remote into it the Qlik Replicate UI a lot of times it just freezes. We set up the EC2, to allow them to go to the server and click on the Replicate icon, it just opens up and just sits there. At that point, we have to go into the EC2 and then reboot the server. This should be fixed, it is frustrating."

"Support for this product is not great. It needs to be improved."

"Some features can also be overly dependent on each other. So, there is room for improvement."

More Qlik Replicate cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."

"Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."

"Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."

"Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."

"Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Insurance Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Qlik Replicate?

The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data appli...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?

Qlik Replicate could be improved in the next release by incorporating more monitoring options to monitor the logs. Currently, log monitoring is not easily accessible, so there should be improvement...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?

My customer's main use case for Qlik Replicate is with one of the payment banks in India. We have implemented this Replicate project for their source data migration to cloud solutions. They wanted ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 13% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 11% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 14% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 13% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 7% of the time

Fivetran vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 5% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 4% of the time

More Qlik Replicate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

January 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate

January 2026

Download Qlik Replicate product report

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose

Replicate, Qlik Replicate

Overview

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility.

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support.

Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood

American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. Qlik Replicate

January 2026

Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. Qlik Replicate

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. Qlik Replicate and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Compose vs. Qlik Replicate report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.