Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Qlik Compose vs WhereScape RED comparison

Qlik and WhereScape are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #38 with an average rating of 7.0, while WhereScape is ranked #46. Qlik holds a 1.0% mindshare in DI, compared to WhereScape’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of WhereScape users who would recommend it.
Qlik Compose
Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews
  • 1,345 Views
  • 1,157 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
WhereScape RED
Read 15 WhereScape RED reviews
  • 1,490 Views
  • 1,177 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

WhereScape RED and Qlik Compose compete in the data integration tools category. WhereScape RED excels in pricing and support, while Qlik Compose stands out for its robust features.

Features: WhereScape RED automates tasks with capabilities like impact analysis and metadata-driven development, along with ease of documentation supporting methodologies such as Data Vault. Qlik Compose offers robust functionality with real-time replication, advanced data modeling, and efficient integration, making it suitable for diverse needs.

Room for Improvement: WhereScape RED could enhance performance, simplify integrations with NoSQL databases, and improve customization. Users desire better scheduler features and more comprehensive support for target databases. Qlik Compose needs stronger scheduler reliability and better automation for issue tracking, with improvements in performance for large volumes and usability for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WhereScape RED supports flexible deployment across on-premises and hybrid cloud, receiving praise for its responsive customer service and product knowledge. Qlik Compose supports deployments mainly in on-premises and public cloud setups, with generally good customer service, though some users report mixed experiences post-sales.

Pricing and ROI: WhereScape RED offers a cost-effective licensing model based on developer seats, achieving significant ROI through rapid development and savings in large-scale environments. Users report quick payback periods and extensive development cycle savings. Qlik Compose, while more expensive, provides value through comprehensive features with pricing influenced by data usage and enterprise requirements.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose
Ranking in Data Integration
38th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
WhereScape RED
Ranking in Data Integration
46th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 1.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WhereScape RED is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Qlik Compose1.0%
WhereScape RED1.0%
Other98.0%
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Sahil Taneja - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy matching and reconciliation of data
The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.
Read full review
reviewer1618884 - PeerSpot reviewer
Quick to set up, flexible, and stable
The scheduling part I don't like due to the fact that it allows you to schedule as a parent and child and other things, however, the error trackability has to be a little more user-friendly. It's also not user-friendly in the sense that it loads all the jobs and there are not enough filters so that it doesn't need to load everything. If the job fails, you don't get any type of alert or email. It would be ideal if there was some sort of automated alert message. Technical support isn't the best. It would be ideal if we understood how to do it in a card exception regarding exclusion, where the card is captured separately rather than filling the whole process on the data inbound side. Certain workloads like this are organized in such a way where you seem to be doubling the work as opposed to streamlining the process.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."
"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."
"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."
"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."
"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."
"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."
"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."
"It can scale."
More Qlik Compose pros
"WhereScape RED has improved our business's ability to generate needed reporting without requiring a large team of developers to manually code all of the necessary plumbing."
"Naturally produces a way to easily debug your DW data solutions."
"The tool supports multiple target update methods."
"Quickly develops a data warehouse for our organization with documentation and can track back/forward features."
"RED generates comprehensive documentation and regenerates it as quickly as things changes, but it also provides impact documentation."
"RED has provided us the ability to integrate, stage, and transform data from diverse sources into an enterprise-grade data warehouse which meets the needs of my organization, but it also enables us to easily and quickly make ETL or DW changes."
"Support is absolutely excellent, efficient, and timely."
"WhereScape's deployment package is a fantastic feature. The application allows for selecting specific objects that you would like to deploy from one environment to another rather than deploying the entire database."
More WhereScape RED pros
 

Cons

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."
"Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better."
"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."
"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."
"There could be more customization options."
"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."
"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."
"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."
More Qlik Compose cons
"Project-based searching of data objects in the data warehouse browser needs to be improved."
"The ability to execute SSIS projects within WhereScape would be nice because we have a lot of packages that are too cumbersome to recreate."
"Technical support isn't the best."
"Improve the object renaming ability (it works, but it could be more automated)."
"The solution can be a little more user-friendly on enterprise-level where people use it."
"No support for change data capture or delta detection - that must be custom coded ."
"The scheduled jobs which are run by the WhereScape scheduler seem to be a strangely separate animal. Unlike all other WhereScape objects, jobs cannot be added to WhereScape projects. Also, unlike all other objects, jobs also cannot be deleted using a WhereScape deployment application."
"Jobs cannot be deleted via the deployment package. When deploying from dev to QA or production, a job has to be retired. The job has to be manually removed from the target environment."
More WhereScape RED cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."
"The price of the solution is expensive."
"Our company purchased a corporate unlimited license."
"Speed to market of a warehouse solution at a relatively inexpensive price point."
"ROI is at least 10 times."
"Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Healthcare Company
10%
Insurance Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?
There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...
See all answers
What do you like most about Qlik Compose?
The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qlik Compose?
While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose Logo
Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose
Compared 34% of the time
Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose Logo
Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose
Compared 13% of the time
Talend Open Studio vs Qlik Compose Logo
Talend Open Studio vs Qlik Compose
Compared 13% of the time
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose
Compared 10% of the time
Denodo vs Qlik Compose Logo
Denodo vs Qlik Compose
Compared 6% of the time
More Qlik Compose Competitors
dbt vs WhereScape RED Logo
dbt vs WhereScape RED
Compared 15% of the time
SSIS vs WhereScape RED Logo
SSIS vs WhereScape RED
Compared 13% of the time
erwin Data Catalog vs WhereScape RED Logo
erwin Data Catalog vs WhereScape RED
Compared 12% of the time
Informatica PowerCenter vs WhereScape RED Logo
Informatica PowerCenter vs WhereScape RED
Compared 11% of the time
Azure Data Factory vs WhereScape RED Logo
Azure Data Factory vs WhereScape RED
Compared 9% of the time
More WhereScape RED Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Qlik Compose
September 2025
Qlik Compose reportDownload Qlik Compose product report
Buyer's Guide
WhereScape RED
September 2025
WhereScape RED reportDownload WhereScape RED product report
 

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose
No data available
 

Overview

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility. 

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

WhereScape is data warehouse software that automates the Data Warehouse lifecycle. From implementation to maintenance, WhereScape will ensure your data warehouse projects are completed up to 5x faster than manual coding.

WhereScape
 

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood
British American Tobacco, Cornell University, Allianz Benelux, Finnair, Solarwinds and many more.
Buyer's Guide
Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED
September 2025
Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED
Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.