Qlik Compose vs WhereScape RED comparison

Qlik and WhereScape are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #45, while WhereScape is ranked #46. Qlik holds a 0.9% mindshare in DI, compared to WhereScape’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of WhereScape users who would recommend it.

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

1,513 Views
1,316 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

WhereScape RED

Read 15 WhereScape RED reviews

1,678 Views
1,292 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

WhereScape RED

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

WhereScape RED and Qlik Compose compete in the data integration tools category. WhereScape RED excels in pricing and support, while Qlik Compose stands out for its robust features.

Features: WhereScape RED automates tasks with capabilities like impact analysis and metadata-driven development, along with ease of documentation supporting methodologies such as Data Vault. Qlik Compose offers robust functionality with real-time replication, advanced data modeling, and efficient integration, making it suitable for diverse needs.

Room for Improvement: WhereScape RED could enhance performance, simplify integrations with NoSQL databases, and improve customization. Users desire better scheduler features and more comprehensive support for target databases. Qlik Compose needs stronger scheduler reliability and better automation for issue tracking, with improvements in performance for large volumes and usability for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WhereScape RED supports flexible deployment across on-premises and hybrid cloud, receiving praise for its responsive customer service and product knowledge. Qlik Compose supports deployments mainly in on-premises and public cloud setups, with generally good customer service, though some users report mixed experiences post-sales.

Pricing and ROI: WhereScape RED offers a cost-effective licensing model based on developer seats, achieving significant ROI through rapid development and savings in large-scale environments. Users report quick payback periods and extensive development cycle savings. Qlik Compose, while more expensive, provides value through comprehensive features with pricing influenced by data usage and enterprise requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

45th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WhereScape RED

Ranking in Data Integration

46th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WhereScape RED is 0.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Qlik Compose	0.9%
WhereScape RED	0.9%
Other	98.2%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

reviewer1618884

BI Analyst DW Architect at a mining and metals company with 10,001+ employees

Quick to set up, flexible, and stable

The scheduling part I don't like due to the fact that it allows you to schedule as a parent and child and other things, however, the error trackability has to be a little more user-friendly. It's also not user-friendly in the sense that it loads all the jobs and there are not enough filters so that it doesn't need to load everything. If the job fails, you don't get any type of alert or email. It would be ideal if there was some sort of automated alert message. Technical support isn't the best. It would be ideal if we understood how to do it in a card exception regarding exclusion, where the card is captured separately rather than filling the whole process on the data inbound side. Certain workloads like this are organized in such a way where you seem to be doubling the work as opposed to streamlining the process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"It's a stable solution."

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

"I like modeling and code generation. It has become a pretty handy tool because of its short ideation to delivery time. From the time you decide you are modeling a data warehouse, and once you finish the modeling, it generates all the code, generates all the tables. All you have to do is tick a few things, and you can produce a fully functional warehouse. I also like that they have added all the features I have asked for over four years."

"It can scale."

More Qlik Compose pros

"The tool supports multiple target update methods."

"Their support staff are very knowledgeable, courteous, and professional. I feel their support staff go above and beyond to assure their customers are satisfied."

"WhereScape RED has improved our business's ability to generate needed reporting without requiring a large team of developers to manually code all of the necessary plumbing."

"RED has provided us the ability to integrate, stage, and transform data from diverse sources into an enterprise-grade data warehouse which meets the needs of my organization, but it also enables us to easily and quickly make ETL or DW changes."

"RED generates comprehensive documentation and regenerates it as quickly as things changes, but it also provides impact documentation."

"I found the initial setup very easy."

"Support is absolutely excellent, efficient, and timely."

"WhereScape is really helpful in terms of architecture data. Everything is one of automation. Two people can do thousands of tables in one day or two. It saves a lot of time."

More WhereScape RED pros

Cons

"Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better."

"There could be more customization options."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

"It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."

More Qlik Compose cons

"The scheduled jobs which are run by the WhereScape scheduler seem to be a strangely separate animal. Unlike all other WhereScape objects, jobs cannot be added to WhereScape projects. Also, unlike all other objects, jobs also cannot be deleted using a WhereScape deployment application."

"They need a more robust support center. It has been a bit difficult to find solutions to problems that are out-of-the-box."

"Technical support isn't the best."

"No support for change data capture or delta detection - that must be custom coded ."

"The ability to execute SSIS projects within WhereScape would be nice because we have a lot of packages that are too cumbersome to recreate."

"Improve the object renaming ability (it works, but it could be more automated)."

"It could use a tool to diagnose what is missing from the environment for WhereScape to install successfully."

"Project-based searching of data objects in the data warehouse browser needs to be improved."

More WhereScape RED cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"Speed to market of a warehouse solution at a relatively inexpensive price point."

"Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive."

"Our company purchased a corporate unlimited license."

"ROI is at least 10 times."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 20% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 13% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 11% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

dbt vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Informatica PowerCenter vs WhereScape RED

Compared 12% of the time

erwin Data Catalog vs WhereScape RED

Compared 12% of the time

SSIS vs WhereScape RED

Compared 10% of the time

dbt vs WhereScape RED

Compared 10% of the time

SAP Data Services vs WhereScape RED

Compared 4% of the time

More WhereScape RED Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

January 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Buyer's Guide

WhereScape RED

January 2026

Download WhereScape RED product report

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose

No data available

Overview

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility.

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

WhereScape is data warehouse software that automates the Data Warehouse lifecycle. From implementation to maintenance, WhereScape will ensure your data warehouse projects are completed up to 5x faster than manual coding.

WhereScape

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood

British American Tobacco, Cornell University, Allianz Benelux, Finnair, Solarwinds and many more.

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED

January 2026

Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.