Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Compose comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and Qlik are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Microsoft is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0, while Qlik is ranked #58. Microsoft holds a 2.2% mindshare in DI, compared to Qlik’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

Azure Data Factory

Read 97 Azure Data Factory reviews

16,078 Views
11,255 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

3,286 Views
2,563 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Azure Data Factory

Qlik Compose

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Qlik Compose and Azure Data Factory are both powerful tools in the category of data integration and transformation. Despite Qlik Compose's appealing pricing and support, Azure Data Factory often emerges as the preferred choice due to its robust features and superior scalability.

Features: Qlik Compose offers data warehouse automation, change data capture, and lifecycle management, enabling accelerated deployment of analytics-ready data. Azure Data Factory shines with its extensive data orchestration and transformation tools, seamless integration with various cloud services, and over 100 out-of-the-box connectors supporting diverse data sources. It is also recognized for its flexibility and the ability to handle complex data flows, making it ideal for large-scale enterprise applications.

Room for Improvement: Qlik Compose could enhance its real-time processing capabilities and expand its cloud integration options to better compete with Azure's flexibility. Additionally, improved scalability features could help it cater to more extensive and complex deployments. On the other hand, Azure Data Factory users desire improvements in interface speed and more advanced monitoring features. Some users also find that its pricing model can become costly, possibly limiting its appeal for smaller companies with budget constraints.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Compose's deployment is user-friendly with a focus on model-driven pipelines, beneficial for teams with limited technical expertise. It is also noted for its reliable support system. Azure Data Factory, offering detailed documentation and community support, suits intricate deployments across diverse environments. While its setup may be complex, these resources aid in troubleshooting and ensure a smooth deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Compose is praised for its straightforward and cost-effective pricing, aligning with its automated functionality. Azure Data Factory, though perceived as more expensive due to its extensive capabilities, is considered worth the investment for those needing advanced and scalable solutions, offering significant ROI for enterprises with comprehensive data strategy requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Data Factory

Ranking in Data Integration

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Warehouse (8th)

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

58th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Azure Data Factory is 2.2%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Compose is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Data Factory	2.2%
Qlik Compose	0.8%
Other	97.0%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Kunal Das

Test Engineer at Happiest Minds Technologies

Drag-and-drop pipelines have saved days of work and now automate data movement and backfilling

If the AI features were more improved so that I don't have to provide each and every detail, Azure Data Factory could be improved in a much better way by improving the AI features. For example, if I want to fetch any data from a raw source, I need to provide each and every detail. But if I am just uploading my raw data and if AI will sync with that data, it can analyze that data and give me proper suggestions on how that should be done in a proper way. Automatic suggestions could improve in a much better way. As I have mentioned, the AI features as well as more drag-and-drop activities could be improved. If I am making a pipeline, it should give me suggestions, such as which activity should be used, so that I don't have to remember each activity. If I have used one activity, I shouldn't have to remember what activity should I use next. It should give auto-suggestions. That is why I have given a nine out of 10. Currently, I don't know about its governance and security, but in view of its improvement, I think Azure Data Factory should improve in these areas. As I already mentioned, the AI features should be improved. Also, the auto-suggestion features should also improve.

Read full review

Susheel A

Director - Metrics & Analytics at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Efficient data warehouse automation with robust features, but may require enhancements in user-friendly self-service options and pricing flexibility for broader corporate appeal

It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it. When it comes to end users who may lack technical expertise, they are limited to toggling between existing developments. To empower end users to make critical changes without relying heavily on technical expertise, it would be beneficial to introduce more user-friendly features for development and modification. If it could incorporate correlation analysis capabilities into its platform, especially in a user-friendly manner, it would greatly enhance the tool's overall utility and make it an even more outstanding solution. There is a room for improvement regarding stability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like how you can create your own pipeline in your space and reuse those creations. You can collaborate with other people who want to use your code."

"What I like best about Azure Data Factory is that it allows you to create pipelines, specifically ETL pipelines. I also like that Azure Data Factory has connectors and solves most of my company's problems."

"The tool's most valuable features are its connectors. It has many out-of-the-box connectors. We use ADF for ETL processes. Our main use case involves integrating data from various databases, processing it, and loading it into the target database. ADF plays a crucial role in orchestrating these ETL workflows."

"The best part of this product is the extraction, transformation, and load."

"I value the integration capabilities with other platforms and software in Azure Data Factory the most."

"It has big potential, especially as a PaaS offering."

"The most important feature is that it can help you do the multi-threading concepts."

"It is very modular; it works well, is very flexible, and you can easily bring in outside capabilities and build any features you want."

More Azure Data Factory pros

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"It's a stable solution."

"It can scale."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

More Qlik Compose pros

Cons

"Additionally, the ability to handle the largest volumes of data is another concern; if I have to manage more than one terabyte of data every day, I am not comfortable dealing with Azure Data Factory and had to switch to Oracle Data Integrators (ODI) because it lacks performance features."

"For some of the data, there were some issues with data mapping. Some of the error messages were a little bit foggy. There could be more of a quick start guide or some inline examples. The documentation could be better."

"There are limitations when processing more than one GD file."

"Azure Data Factory didn't bring a lot of good when we were also using Alteryx."

"Data Factory could be improved in terms of data transformations by adding more metadata extractions."

"The need to work more on developing out-of-the-box connectors for other products like Oracle, AWS, and others."

"It would be better if it had machine learning capabilities."

"The solution should offer better integration with Azure machine learning. We should be able to embed the cognitive services from Microsoft, for example as a web API. It should allow us to embed Azure machine learning in a more user-friendly way."

More Azure Data Factory cons

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"I don't think Qlik can be used in a high-volume scenario. It didn't work for us."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

"Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better."

More Qlik Compose cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Understanding the pricing model for Data Factory is quite complex."

"It's not particularly expensive."

"The solution's fees are based on a pay-per-minute use plus the amount of data required to process."

"Data Factory is expensive."

"The cost is based on the amount of data sets that we are ingesting."

"I would not say that this product is overly expensive."

"My company is on a monthly subscription for Azure Data Factory, but it's more of a pay-as-you-go model where your monthly invoice depends on how many resources you use. On a scale of one to five, pricing for Azure Data Factory is a four. It's just the usage fees my company pays monthly."

"Our licensing fees are approximately 15,000 ($150 USD) per month."

More Azure Data Factory pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	64

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

How do you select the right cloud ETL tool?

AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.

See all answers

How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica PowerCenter?

Azure Data Factory is flexible, modular, and works well. In terms of cost, it is not too pricey. It offers the stability and reliability I am looking for, good scalability, and is easy to set up an...

See all answers

How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica Cloud Data Integration?

Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power Q...

See all answers

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Snowflake vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 4% of the time

Databricks vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 4% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 3% of the time

SnapLogic vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 3% of the time

More Azure Data Factory Competitors

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 5% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory

October 2026

Download Azure Data Factory product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

October 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Also Known As

No data available

Compose, Attunity Compose

Overview

Azure Data Factory efficiently manages and integrates data from various sources, enabling seamless movement and transformation across platforms. Its valuable features include seamless integration with Azure services, handling large data volumes, flexible transformation, user-friendly interface, extensive connectors, and scalability. Users have experienced improved team performance, workflow simplification, enhanced collaboration, streamlined processes, and boosted productivity.

Microsoft

Qlik Compose enhances data management with ETL capabilities, data integration with CDC, and real-time replication. Its intuitive interface enables easy data modeling and automation, supporting various database integrations.

Qlik Compose is designed for efficient data preparation, migration, and warehouse generation. It incorporates ETL functionalities and data integration with CDC, allowing users to effortlessly create data marts without code. Its automation features facilitate warehouse design while graphical representations and connectivity options increase versatility across multiple sources. Users value its stability, scalability, and the support provided, although improvements in ETL functionalities, performance for large datasets, and NoSQL integration are needed. The solution is widely used in business intelligence with tools like Qlik Replicate for real-time data replication and requires direct SQL for complex transformations.

What are the key features of Qlik Compose?

ETL Capabilities: Simplifies data extraction, transformation, and loading
Data Integration with CDC: Enables real-time data replication
Intuitive Interface: Facilitates easy data modeling and automation
Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Streamlines data task management
Auto-Mapping: Enhances integration of multiple data sources
No-Code Data Marts Creation: Reduces dependency on technical skills

What benefits should users consider in the reviews?

Stability and Scalability: Reliable functioning for growing data needs
Technical Support: Availability of assistance for troubleshooting
Real-Time Replication Capabilities: Efficient data processing and analytics
Low-Code Development: Simplifies complex data handling processes

In industries, Qlik Compose is implemented for enhancing data preparation, migration, and warehousing. It is used in small projects or straightforward data integration tasks and supports business intelligence efforts by offering low-code capabilities, enabling companies to deliver tailored analytics solutions efficiently.

Qlik

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. BMW 3. Coca-Cola 4. General Electric 5. Johnson & Johnson 6. LinkedIn 7. Mastercard 8. Nestle 9. Pfizer 10. Samsung 11. Siemens 12. Toyota 13. Unilever 14. Verizon 15. Walmart 16. Accenture 17. American Express 18. AT&T 19. Bank of America 20. Cisco 21. Deloitte 22. ExxonMobil 23. Ford 24. General Motors 25. IBM 26. JPMorgan Chase 27. Microsoft (Azure Data Factory is developed by Microsoft) 28. Oracle 29. Procter & Gamble 30. Salesforce 31. Shell 32. Visa

Poly-Wood

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose

November 2026

Free Report: Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.