Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Maximo vs Salesforce Quote-to-Cash comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Maximo
Ranking in Billing Software
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (1st)
Salesforce Quote-to-Cash
Ranking in Billing Software
8th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Billing Software category, the mindshare of IBM Maximo is 4.5%, down from 10.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Salesforce Quote-to-Cash is 2.5%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Billing Software
 

Featured Reviews

Jose Pedro Muñoz - PeerSpot reviewer
A very strong and powerful tool in the market preferred by a variety of industries
I rate the technical support a seven out of ten. Three levels of support in IBM. The first one is a fixed level, while levels two and three are very good. Here, level one is not very good, as it takes time to go from level one to level two and from level two to level three. So, level one is of low capacity.
reviewer1873569 - PeerSpot reviewer
Solution for quoting customers, but could be faster
We use this solution internally mostly for quoting for customers. There are over 10,000 employees in my organization.  There are other modules that we use to do everything, like SteelBrick, but the UI is clunky. It could be the way the solution was implemented. The solution is a little bit slow…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"There are not many enterprise asset management systems on the market and not many that have the categories that IBM Maximo has."
"They have a real strength of tracking the asset itself along with the condition of the asset, the maintenance of the asset and who has access to the asset, etc."
"Its capabilities let us organize our work."
"We are very thankful to have IBM integrated with our own Legacy cloud-based system"
"Provides great flexibility."
"Preventive maintenance management."
"Reliable, very configurable, and it's all integrated in the same database."
"Has a powerful audit combination that helps achieve high accuracy."
"The stability is pretty solid."
 

Cons

"This solution could improve by integrating or embedding finances, charts of accounts, and invoicing."
"Could use some alignment regarding some standards and the tracking of the IT assets. Even though they have all of the information (i.e. where are the assets, who owns the asset, etc.), they were not mapping it to different cyber standards."
"The pricing model of the solution has room for improvement as well as the after-sales support."
"IBM is a big company and they have a lot of products. Level One, the first level of tech support, is the one that is used to stop the tsunami. For everyone, it's always work to get past that."
"Coding can be complex when customization is required."
"There are always ways to improve and make things better."
"It's not user-friendly. It could use shortcuts for frequently requested services."
"I feel that the interface is a little too complicated with a large number of fields to enter."
"The solution is a little bit slow sometimes."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The concurrent user license is much more effective in management and cost-wise, as it is more suitable for maintenance management."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the pricing a nine. The price is very high."
"Explore the possibility of using DB2. You will avoid the cost of SQL Server or Oracle licenses."
"​Explore internal processes in order to evaluate the correct number of users in each Maximo module, then evaluate the different offers of pricing and licensing.​"
"You pay for what you get. There are lots of options depending on how you would like to implement Maximo."
"Where available, concurrent licenses can be more cost efficient and provide more flexibility."
"$USD700 per agent user."
"I do not know about the price of the solution. However, this has been an expensive project overall."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Billing Software solutions are best for your needs.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Government
10%
Educational Organization
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Maximo
SteelBrick Billing, Salesforce QTC
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., DTE Energy, Swedish Match, Projetech, Fingrid, East Coast
Birst, Bluecat, Cloudera, Deltek, Touring, Mitsubishi Electric, Mulesoft, Telus
Find out what your peers are saying about Zuora, Intuit, NetSuite and others in Billing Software. Updated: June 2025.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.