IBM Planning Analytics vs OneStream XF comparison

IBM and OneStream are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while OneStream is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0. IBM holds a 4.5% mindshare in BPM, compared to OneStream’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OneStream users who would recommend it.

IBM Planning Analytics

Read 28 IBM Planning Analytics reviews

3,062 Views
1,286 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

OneStream XF

Read 5 OneStream XF reviews

1,310 Views
996 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Planning Analytics

OneStream XF

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

IBM Planning Analytics and OneStream XF are competitive in the financial planning and analysis category. Each product holds unique strengths; however, OneStream XF has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set that supports complex financial scenarios.

Features: IBM Planning Analytics offers flexible modeling capabilities, Excel integration, and seamless scenario analysis. OneStream XF stands out with its unified platform providing robust budgeting, forecasting, and reporting. OneStream XF's extensive features cater to larger organizations needing comprehensive solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Planning Analytics supports cloud-based deployment with a streamlined setup supported by a vast service network. OneStream XF offers both on-premises and cloud options, accommodating complex deployment needs with tailored customer service, providing flexibility for businesses with specific needs.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Planning Analytics is seen as competitively priced, offering favorable ROI through efficient cost structure. OneStream XF, while higher in upfront costs, provides significant ROI due to its extensive feature set addressing diverse business demands. The distinction lies in balancing initial investment against anticipated long-term returns, making OneStream XF an attractive choice for comprehensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Planning Analytics vs. OneStream XF Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics vs. OneStream XF

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Planning Analytics

Ranking in Business Performance Management

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OneStream XF

Ranking in Business Performance Management

9th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Financial Close Software (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of IBM Planning Analytics is 4.5%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OneStream XF is 4.3%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Planning Analytics	4.5%
OneStream XF	4.3%
Other	91.2%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Gladys Njeri

Key Account Manager at DHL

Data-driven planning has transformed financial decisions and now saves major reporting time

IBM Planning Analytics helps with collaboration between teams by allowing us to gather data from various departments, analyze it, and collaborate on the data to make data-driven decisions between different departments easily. As I mentioned previously, I mainly use IBM Planning Analytics to visualize the existing data to generate meaningful report dashboards and use it during stakeholder meetings to arrive at the right decision. The best features IBM Planning Analytics offers include budgeting, forecasting, and what-if scenario analysis. The scenario modeling feature in IBM Planning Analytics is probably the most robust planning and forecasting solution we use, especially for what-if scenarios, where we are able to forecast using Watson Studio, which helps in better prediction. I really appreciate the Excel integration in IBM Planning Analytics because it keeps things familiar and adds more power.

Read full review

Andy Jorgensen

Chief Revenue Officer at MindStream Analytics

Customer satisfaction and data integration shine in multinational consolidations

The best features of OneStream XF are threefold. The first is Extensible Dimensionality, which allows for different levels of detail depending on the task. When budgeting for 2026, Extensible Dimensionality enables detailed breakdowns of supplies into specific items such as printer paper and magic markers. When actuals arrive, that level of detail isn't necessary. This flexibility in collecting and reporting data is a significant advantage. OneStream XF is advantageous because it provides one product that can do everything. Users do not have to purchase separate products for consolidation, planning, and reporting, which saves time and money in training and setup. OneStream XF shows a strong commitment to customer success. While 100% satisfaction is unrealistic, OneStream XF puts in substantial effort to ensure clients are successful, which contrasts sharply with experiences from companies such as SAP. OneStream XF's data integration capabilities with ERP and HCM systems are excellent, thanks to its history. The founders of OneStream XF were the creators of Upstream, which specialized in data integration. When they developed OneStream XF, they implemented that expertise, making it excel at data integration.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This level of stability is crucial for a product like Cognos TM1, as using an unstable platform would result in loss of time."

"The ease of use is valuable. The fact that it's plugged into Excel spreadsheets is also valuable. It provides additional functionality where you can slice and dice the information in a way that you can't do with spreadsheets"

"A lot of the platform is in-memory, so Planning Analytics can run calculations quite fast. It also offers several user interfaces. And in the newest version of Planning Analytics, there is a new one called the Planning Analytics Workspace. Maybe it could be useful for the business side."

"IBM Planning Analytics has positively impacted my organization since we started using this tool."

"We cut down on manual budgeting and forecasting work, which saved us between 50 to 70% of our time."

"The most valuable feature is that it is able to slice and dice the data."

"The flexibility of IBM Planning Analytics is a great feature of this solution. The design flexibility with data rules and defining calculations The ability to combine online and offline calculations are a benefit. Additionally, the forecasting features and predictive analytics is very good."

"The tool is flexible."

More IBM Planning Analytics pros

"OneStream XF is advantageous because it provides one product that can do everything; users do not have to purchase separate products for consolidation, planning, and reporting, which saves time and money in training and setup."

"OneStream XF's unified structure makes it easier for our financial consolidation and planning processes, though I would say we have a standardized way of using it and not that much forward-looking."

"We were with Oracle previously. With Oracle, you have to buy a different piece of software for every business process. If you want to do budgeting, that's a product. If you want to do consolidation, that's a product. If you want to do BI type of work, that's yet another product. So, you end up buying a lot of software from Oracle. With OneStream, it is a little different. It is a platform where you can do all those things, and you can do them with just one software purchase and then you just pay for users on it."

"The product's most valuable feature is extensibility."

"It offers great ease of use. This impacts not only the end-user experience but also the administrator's, which affects the total cost of ownership."

Cons

"IBM Planning Analytics does not work offline, which makes it difficult for me and my team to work or gather required data when we do not have an internet connection."

"Planning Analytics could be improved by adding automation features."

"The tool's transport layer could be improved when promoting development between environments."

"The tool should include features for prediction. It can also improve the scalability."

"It is a bit expensive, but it does the job."

"Extracting data is a little slow."

"The local authentication part is difficult to manage in the product, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The workspace API should be improved and documented so we know better which objects are used."

More IBM Planning Analytics cons

"It's okay for collecting information and setting it up, but for business support, we don't get much from it."

"There are longstanding challenges with OneStream XF, particularly around the technical aspects that require scripting skills, typically managed by finance departments."

"Currently, they only support one browser, and it would be good if you could use it on Chrome, Firefox, etc. It is a little frustrating that you can only use a certain Microsoft browser. They're pretty tightly aligned with Microsoft. So, I can see the reasons for it."

"We should be able to download the data in the same format we upload it."

"AI is where I see the most innovation and progress, but it's not fully developed yet."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten since it's expensive."

"IBM Planning Analytics is not the cheapest solution, but it's priced per the market standard for this type of solution. I rate the price at seven out of ten."

"IBM Planning Analytics is priced well, and licensing costs are yearly."

"Compared with the other tools in the market, IBM Planning Analytics is a bit expensive."

"Our licensing cost is approximately $50,000.00 per year."

"It is a bit expensive, but you get what you are paying for."

"The license of this solution is paid annually. Most of my customers choose a license that includes support."

"The product has a license by the user. They're on par with other competitors."

"The licensing is expensive."

"They price it by the user. Before discounting, it is 2,500 or something like that."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Planning Analytics?

The most valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics for streamlining planning processes include a unified database where all data are centralized.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Planning Analytics?

While IBM's solutions were costly before, the introduction of SaaS models has reduced prices significantly. Comparatively, IBM rates may be better than those of competitors, such as Hyperion ( /pro...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Planning Analytics?

IBM is behind competitors like Tableau ( /products/tableau-reviews ) and Power BI in terms of visualization. Their visuals are less innovative and practical with fewer varieties. IBM's visualizatio...

See all answers

Seeking lightweight open source BI software

I advise you to try OneStream. This is a very good platform focused on reporting, consolidation and budgeting & forecasting.

See all answers

What do you like most about OneStream XF?

It offers great ease of use. This impacts not only the end-user experience but also the administrator's, which affects the total cost of ownership.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OneStream XF?

My experience with the price has been okay. It's something that, when part of a larger system, we need to use, and there are also some discounts related to our multi-country usage.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 14% of the time

SAP Analytics Cloud vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 12% of the time

Anaplan vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Cognos vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 5% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM Planning Analytics Competitors

CCH Tagetik vs OneStream XF

Compared 12% of the time

Workiva Wdesk vs OneStream XF

Compared 7% of the time

Anaplan vs OneStream XF

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle HFM vs OneStream XF

Compared 6% of the time

Jedox vs OneStream XF

Compared 5% of the time

More OneStream XF Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics

January 2026

Download IBM Planning Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

OneStream XF

January 2026

Download OneStream XF product report

Also Known As

Cognos TM1, IBM Cognos TM1

No data available

Overview

IBM Planning Analytics is an integrated planning solution that uses AI to automate planning, budgeting, and forecasting and drive more intelligent workflows.

Built on TM1, IBM’s powerful calculation engine, this enterprise performance management tool allows you to transcend the limits of manual planning and become the Analytics Hero your business needs. Quickly and easily drive faster, more accurate plans for FP&A, sales, supply chain and beyond.

IBM

Financial Close, Consolidation and Reporting
Automate the financial close; reduce time waiting for data loads and refreshing of reports throughout the month. Access accurate and secure financial and operational information from any data source.

OneStream

Sample Customers

ManpowerGroup, Convergys, AIG, Orchard Brands, Citibank, InterGen, Northwestern University, EF Education First, Ironside, Bazan Group, CSOB Insurance, Macquarie Group, Charles Stanley, SATO, Government of Sint Maarten, BMW Financial Services

Fruit of the loom, Melrose, AAA, Valeo Foods

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics vs. OneStream XF

February 2026

Free Report: IBM Planning Analytics vs. OneStream XF

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Planning Analytics vs. OneStream XF and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Planning Analytics vs. OneStream XF report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.