IBM Planning Analytics vs Oracle Hyperion comparison

IBM and Oracle are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. IBM is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.6. IBM holds a 4.9% mindshare in BPM, compared to Oracle’s 5.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

IBM Planning Analytics

Read 26 IBM Planning Analytics reviews

2,959 Views
1,213 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Oracle Hyperion

Read 58 Oracle Hyperion reviews

3,001 Views
1,981 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

IBM Planning Analytics

Oracle Hyperion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

IBM Planning Analytics and Oracle Hyperion compete in the enterprise planning solutions market. IBM Planning Analytics is favored for its user-friendly interface and cost-effectiveness, while Oracle Hyperion is preferred for its comprehensive analytics capabilities and extensive features.

Features: IBM Planning Analytics offers intuitive planning tools, predictive analytics, and flexibility in handling complex data sets. Oracle Hyperion provides an extensive suite of integrated applications, robust data management, and supports complex financial processes and reporting.

Room for Improvement: IBM Planning Analytics could enhance its data integration capabilities, improve its customer support responsiveness in complex cases, and expand its feature set for larger enterprises. Oracle Hyperion may benefit from simplifying its setup process, improving performance under heavy workload conditions, and updating its user interface for better user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Planning Analytics offers a cloud-based solution that simplifies deployment and lowers infrastructure demands, providing quick resolution times in customer support. Oracle Hyperion's deployment involves both on-premise and hybrid cloud options, leading to a more complex setup but it compensates with a comprehensive support network for handling complex queries.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Planning Analytics is generally more cost-effective, with competitive pricing and a clear cost structure, leading to quicker ROI due to streamlined deployment. Oracle Hyperion, although requiring higher initial setup costs due to its complex infrastructure, offers significant long-term ROI for organizations leveraging its advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Planning Analytics vs. Oracle Hyperion Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics vs. Oracle Hyperion

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.6

IBM Planning Analytics improves budgeting efficiency and decision-making, reducing costs and manual entry while enhancing employee motivation.

Sentiment score

6.0

Users report varying ROI with Oracle Hyperion, highlighting process improvements, accuracy, reduced task time, and enhanced decision-making.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Planning Analytics report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Hyperion report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.4

IBM Planning Analytics' support is generally satisfactory, with timely resolutions; improvement needed in speed, responsiveness, and root issue resolution.

Sentiment score

5.4

Oracle's customer service feedback is mixed, citing delays and coordination issues, though high-priority issues get faster responses.

We have a multi-level support system, with the initial level handled by the company we bought the license from and subsequent support from IBM.

reviewer1517922

Responsable B.I at a retailer with 51-200 employees

Instead, we rely on third-party partners recognized by IBM, who provide cost-effective support.

Ayman Alshabani

Financial Performance Manager at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

They have been very dedicated and provided top-notch solutions.

Bhavna Aarna

Senior Software Engineer at J.P Morgan

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Planning Analytics report

Support is generally fast for Sev1 or Sev2 tickets but slower for lower-severity tickets.

reviewer1739631

Associate Consultant at a construction company with 10,001+ employees

I rate Oracle's technical support as very good, giving it a score of 8 to 9 out of 10.

Srinivas Chappidi

Product Support Engineer at JSW

They can improve their process.

Pranit Chhajed

Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Hyperion report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.7

IBM Planning Analytics offers scalability and real-time processing, favored by large enterprises for its adaptability and efficient growth accommodation.

Sentiment score

7.0

Oracle Hyperion is scalable and suitable for large organizations, though some users face performance challenges during expansion.

Scalability is quite hard to implement in TM1, largely since the on-premise installation chosen back in 2014.

reviewer1517922

Responsable B.I at a retailer with 51-200 employees

Scalability is straightforward but it is pricey since it's a SaaS model priced per user.

Ayman Alshabani

Financial Performance Manager at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Planning Analytics report

I rate the scalability of Oracle Hyperion as an 8 out of 10 because it remains a top choice in the market.

Srinivas Chappidi

Product Support Engineer at JSW

For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Hyperion report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.7

IBM Planning Analytics is praised for its stability, robustness, and reliability in handling large data volumes across various sectors.

Sentiment score

7.0

Oracle Hyperion is stable with occasional bugs, reliable performance on-premises, and robust cloud versions when best practices are followed.

IBM Planning Analytics is stable because the reason we switched from IBM Cognos is that IBM Planning Analytics capability allows us to connect to multiple tools, which we could not do before.

Bhavna Aarna

Senior Software Engineer at J.P Morgan

A stable platform prevents loss of time during this process.

reviewer1517922

Responsable B.I at a retailer with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Planning Analytics report

Cloud configurations have not exhibited issues like crashing or slowing down for significant data volumes.

reviewer1739631

Associate Consultant at a construction company with 10,001+ employees

We sometimes encounter bugs and need to connect with Oracle Support.

Pranit Chhajed

Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Hyperion report

Room For Improvement

IBM Planning Analytics needs improvements in integration, automation, UI design, and data visualization to enhance user experience and performance.

Oracle Hyperion requires user interface, reporting, integration, documentation, pricing, and support improvements for enhanced usability and advanced functionality.

The advanced features are somewhat complex to understand, and if the data set is very large, it takes a lot of time to process, which causes performance to become slower.

Bhavna Aarna

Senior Software Engineer at J.P Morgan

The abundance of features results in complexity, requiring strict guidelines for developers to ensure simplistic approaches are adhered to.

reviewer1517922

Responsable B.I at a retailer with 51-200 employees

IBM's visualization needs significant improvement.

Ayman Alshabani

Financial Performance Manager at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Planning Analytics report

It is user-friendly and offers several advantages in financial reporting and consolidation.

Srinivas Chappidi

Product Support Engineer at JSW

After moving to PBCS and EPBCS, the per-user license fees can be reduced, particularly for bulk users.

reviewer1739631

Associate Consultant at a construction company with 10,001+ employees

The pricing model could be more flexible as it's more expensive than its competitors.

Pranit Chhajed

Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Hyperion report

Setup Cost

IBM Planning Analytics has notable setup costs and licensing fees, offering valuable functionalities and flexible licensing options for ROI.

Oracle Hyperion's pricing includes high setup costs and complex licensing, challenging for medium-sized firms due to user-based expenses.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for IBM Planning Analytics is that the pricing and licensing cost can be somewhat on the higher side, especially for small organizations.

Bhavna Aarna

Senior Software Engineer at J.P Morgan

While IBM's solutions were costly before, the introduction of SaaS models has reduced prices significantly.

Ayman Alshabani

Financial Performance Manager at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

Given the product's old architecture and interface, they need to make it more affordable.

reviewer1517922

Responsable B.I at a retailer with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Planning Analytics report

The pricing model is on the higher side compared to its competitors.

Pranit Chhajed

Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Hyperion report

Valuable Features

IBM Planning Analytics excels in flexibility, real-time calculations, and integration, enhancing planning, budgeting, and forecasting with advanced features.

Oracle Hyperion offers intuitive interfaces, data security, and efficient planning, streamlining global finance management with comprehensive insights.

Some of the valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics are its intuitive and user-friendly interface, reporting output and scheduling, access control and security, and mobile capabilities.

Bhavna Aarna

Senior Software Engineer at J.P Morgan

Its stability helps controllers win time in their planning processes.

reviewer1517922

Responsable B.I at a retailer with 51-200 employees

It also integrates machine learning and AI engines, enabling us to use algorithms for inventory forecasting which optimizes our inventory and replenishment rates.

Ayman Alshabani

Financial Performance Manager at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Planning Analytics report

It enables me to input data directly based on my security and business lines, with an inbuilt calculation engine for data aggregation and reporting.

reviewer1739631

Associate Consultant at a construction company with 10,001+ employees

This issue has been resolved, and Oracle Hyperion data can now be updated, with data loads completed in 30 minutes.

Asim Mahmood

Divisional Head Operational & Reputational Risk at Allied Bank Limited

The feature that allows automation of the budgeting and forecasting process is extremely valuable, especially when compared to Excel.

Pranit Chhajed

Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Hyperion report

Categories and Ranking

IBM Planning Analytics

Ranking in Business Performance Management

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Hyperion

Ranking in Business Performance Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of IBM Planning Analytics is 4.9%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Hyperion is 5.5%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Hyperion	5.5%
IBM Planning Analytics	4.9%
Other	89.6%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1517922

Responsable B.I at a retailer with 51-200 employees

Ensured functionality meets user needs, yet complexity remains a challenge

Since I'm using TM1 as an old version of Planning Analytics, it wouldn't be fair to specify what needs improvement because it's possible these issues have already been addressed in newer versions. If we talk only about the TM1 engine, it's quite rich and possibly too rich, making it complex to perform simple tasks. The abundance of features results in complexity, requiring strict guidelines for developers to ensure simplistic approaches are adhered to. This complexity makes it hard to maintain and evolve developments.

Read full review

Srinivas Chappidi

Product Support Engineer at JSW

Empower financial planning with user-friendly and robust features

The best features of Oracle Hyperion revolve around their cloud-based technology, which is gradually moving to cloud solutions such as EPMCSG, while Anaplan uses two engines for calculations, the classic engine and the Essbase engine. Anaplan allows for quick module changes, where adjustments in one module reflect throughout the user experience. In contrast, Oracle Hyperion relies on Essbase as a database with calculation scripts and business rules, and it incorporates Smart View technology for Excel connections, providing a familiar interface for users. Oracle Hyperion is fundamentally a good technology and does not require significant improvements compared to other technologies because it is user-friendly and offers several advantages in financial reporting and consolidation. However, I have observed that Anaplan has built-in UX pages for report preparation, unlike Oracle Hyperion, which often relies on third-party tools such as Hyperion Financial Reporting and Power BI for reporting.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Planning Analytics?

The most valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics for streamlining planning processes include a unified database where all data are centralized.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Planning Analytics?

While IBM's solutions were costly before, the introduction of SaaS models has reduced prices significantly. Comparatively, IBM rates may be better than those of competitors, such as Hyperion ( /pro...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Planning Analytics?

IBM is behind competitors like Tableau ( /products/tableau-reviews ) and Power BI in terms of visualization. Their visuals are less innovative and practical with fewer varieties. IBM's visualizatio...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Hyperion?

We can collect data from various sources, which is very useful for budgeting and planning.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Hyperion?

We are going to re-implement the Oracle Hyperion system due to changes in our chart of account process and some other factors. We were analyzing whether to move to a cloud system, EPM Cloud. We hav...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Hyperion?

We are using Oracle Financials and Oracle Hyperion. Oracle Hyperion is used for budget and MIS reporting, while Financials is used for financial accounting, payables, receivables, and general ledge...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 15% of the time

SAP Analytics Cloud vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 12% of the time

Anaplan vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Cognos vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 6% of the time

Jedox vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Planning Analytics Competitors

IBM Cognos vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle HFM vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 12% of the time

SAP Business Planning and Consolidation vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 8% of the time

Anaplan vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 8% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 8% of the time

More Oracle Hyperion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics

January 2026

Download IBM Planning Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion

January 2026

Download Oracle Hyperion product report

Also Known As

Cognos TM1, IBM Cognos TM1

Hyperion

Overview

IBM Planning Analytics is an integrated planning solution that uses AI to automate planning, budgeting, and forecasting and drive more intelligent workflows.

Built on TM1, IBM’s powerful calculation engine, this enterprise performance management tool allows you to transcend the limits of manual planning and become the Analytics Hero your business needs. Quickly and easily drive faster, more accurate plans for FP&A, sales, supply chain and beyond.

IBM

Oracle Business Analytics Suite.

Oracle

Sample Customers

ManpowerGroup, Convergys, AIG, Orchard Brands, Citibank, InterGen, Northwestern University, EF Education First, Ironside, Bazan Group, CSOB Insurance, Macquarie Group, Charles Stanley, SATO, Government of Sint Maarten, BMW Financial Services

ITNL, Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., Barco N.V., SITA, McGregor Fashion Group B.V., PCCW Ltd.

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics vs. Oracle Hyperion

December 2025

Free Report: IBM Planning Analytics vs. Oracle Hyperion

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Planning Analytics vs. Oracle Hyperion and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Planning Analytics vs. Oracle Hyperion report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.