IBM Planning Analytics vs Workiva Wdesk comparison

IBM and Workiva are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. IBM is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0, while Workiva is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.0. IBM holds a 4.9% mindshare in BPM, compared to Workiva’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Workiva users who would recommend it.

IBM Planning Analytics

Read 26 IBM Planning Analytics reviews

2,959 Views
1,213 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Workiva Wdesk

Read 7 Workiva Wdesk reviews

2,348 Views
657 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

IBM Planning Analytics

Workiva Wdesk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

IBM Planning Analytics and Workiva Wdesk are competitors in the financial planning and performance management domain. IBM Planning Analytics has the upper hand in pricing and support, while Workiva Wdesk leads with its superior features, justifying its higher cost.

Features: IBM Planning Analytics offers robust data integration, powerful analytics, and fast calculation speeds. Workiva Wdesk provides advanced reporting features, seamless collaboration tools, and strong ERP integration.

Room for Improvement: IBM Planning Analytics could improve in deployment complexity and user interface design. Workiva Wdesk may enhance its data integration capabilities, provide more flexible pricing, and offer increased customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Planning Analytics deployment can be complex, often requiring significant technical support. Workiva Wdesk offers a cloud-based solution for quicker implementation and responsive customer service, providing a more user-friendly setup experience.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Planning Analytics generally has a higher upfront setup cost but offers better long-term ROI due to its comprehensive capabilities and strong customer support. Workiva Wdesk, despite being more costly initially, justifies its expense through enhanced productivity and collaboration features.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Planning Analytics vs. Workiva Wdesk Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics vs. Workiva Wdesk

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Planning Analytics

Ranking in Business Performance Management

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Workiva Wdesk

Ranking in Business Performance Management

11th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (8th), Financial Close Software (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of IBM Planning Analytics is 4.9%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Workiva Wdesk is 3.2%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Planning Analytics	4.9%
Workiva Wdesk	3.2%
Other	91.9%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1517922

Responsable B.I at a retailer with 51-200 employees

Ensured functionality meets user needs, yet complexity remains a challenge

Since I'm using TM1 as an old version of Planning Analytics, it wouldn't be fair to specify what needs improvement because it's possible these issues have already been addressed in newer versions. If we talk only about the TM1 engine, it's quite rich and possibly too rich, making it complex to perform simple tasks. The abundance of features results in complexity, requiring strict guidelines for developers to ensure simplistic approaches are adhered to. This complexity makes it hard to maintain and evolve developments.

Read full review

reviewer2510292

Corporate ESG Analyst at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has cross-functional connectivity but improvement is needed in script encoding

The tool's deployment is quick. Once the program is set up, you're ready to collect data and connect it to your report. The deployment team's size depends on the size of the company and how many different data providers you're utilizing. Some companies have one person doing everything, while others have a huge team. We're on the latter end of it, with many people involved. One great thing about the platform is that everything is consolidated in one place, providing a single resource for everyone. This is a benefit. The maintenance of the solution depends on the experience of the person managing the company's program. The company might have a contractor handling the back end and software management if they're low-level and only analyzing the data. However, if you have someone experienced with software and script encoding, that person might be the analyst and managing the program. Generally, most people are just analysts and not managing the software. There's an opportunity for improvement in user management of their software, and I hope they address this gap before the year ends.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The scenario modeling capabilities are frequently used to create different scenarios, compare them, and see which action leads to which result."

"A lot of the platform is in-memory, so Planning Analytics can run calculations quite fast. It also offers several user interfaces. And in the newest version of Planning Analytics, there is a new one called the Planning Analytics Workspace. Maybe it could be useful for the business side."

"Its stability helps controllers win time in their planning processes."

"Navigating through the data to make analysis is really quick."

"The most valuable feature is that it is able to slice and dice the data."

"The ease of use is valuable. The fact that it's plugged into Excel spreadsheets is also valuable. It provides additional functionality where you can slice and dice the information in a way that you can't do with spreadsheets"

"The product's stability is good."

"IBM Planning Analytics can help us build scenarios through a sandbox environment, allowing us to test multiple variables and assess their impact on our budget and planning."

More IBM Planning Analytics pros

"Workiva Wdesk has a flow diagram that is standardized, making it easy for people to file documents on ECDAs, which are in HTML format."

"It makes the compliance process more efficient and more effective."

"Workiva Wdesk is pretty good in terms of getting the data from the system, automating the reporting schedules...It has a very good integration with ERP tools."

"It helps you to maintain a backup of your data, including the connectivity with the tables, which provides a user-friendly way to handle and access your files."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to easily upload and update financial results, creating a dynamic data sheet."

"The collaboration within the platform is valuable."

"The cross-functionality between connectivity, whether through API connections between different software platforms or the connection of data collection to the actual written ESG report, is highly valuable. The connectivity of all these aspects significantly aids in data assurance, which I consider a bonus."

Cons

"It's highly competitive right now, and all the vendors are in a race to put out new versions with additional features. IBM comes out with new versions too often, and it has an impact on quality."

"It would have been better if the solution was not just a tool kit."

"Adding predefined templates could be beneficial."

"Planning Analytics could be improved by adding automation features."

"IBM is behind competitors like Tableau and Power BI in terms of visualization. Their visuals are less innovative and practical with fewer varieties."

"The local authentication part is difficult to manage in the product, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The dashboard is very poor and needs a lot of improvement."

"The tool should include features for prediction. It can also improve the scalability."

More IBM Planning Analytics cons

"At this point, I don't see a compelling reason to invest in Workiva. It may be necessary for compliance and controlling the version of SCC, but not everyone needs its high-end capabilities."

"One area where Workiva Wdesk could improve is by ensuring that its cloud-based system is fully compatible with the most current versions of PowerPoint and Excel."

"The most critical issue is the need to shift between uppercase and lowercase."

"The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandatory or voluntary reporting requirements, leading to lost linkage connections that must be manually reset each time a change is made. This aspect is not functional now, and I see it as an opportunity for improvement."

"Regarding the solution, reporting has certain areas that can be considered for improvement."

"The speed must be improved."

"With this product, it's more about the integrated data model where you can have a one-to-many/many-to-one relationship between your policies and processes, risks, and controls. They need to showcase how you can put those pieces together."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM Planning Analytics is not the cheapest solution, but it's priced per the market standard for this type of solution. I rate the price at seven out of ten."

"It is a bit expensive, but you get what you are paying for."

"I would rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten since it's expensive."

"IBM Planning Analytics is priced well, and licensing costs are yearly."

"Our licensing cost is approximately $50,000.00 per year."

"Compared with the other tools in the market, IBM Planning Analytics is a bit expensive."

"The license of this solution is paid annually. Most of my customers choose a license that includes support."

"Our clients in Asia think that the solution is too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Planning Analytics?

The most valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics for streamlining planning processes include a unified database where all data are centralized.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Planning Analytics?

While IBM's solutions were costly before, the introduction of SaaS models has reduced prices significantly. Comparatively, IBM rates may be better than those of competitors, such as Hyperion ( /pro...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Planning Analytics?

IBM is behind competitors like Tableau ( /products/tableau-reviews ) and Power BI in terms of visualization. Their visuals are less innovative and practical with fewer varieties. IBM's visualizatio...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workiva Wdesk?

The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandat...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Workiva Wdesk?

I've been working with the tool's script encoding departments and top management to address gaps in their script encoding. They are working towards closing these gaps to ensure we can continue usin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 15% of the time

SAP Analytics Cloud vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 12% of the time

Anaplan vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Cognos vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Hyperion vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Planning Analytics Competitors

AuditBoard vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 13% of the time

RSA Archer vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 5% of the time

CCH Tagetik vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 5% of the time

OneStream XF vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 4% of the time

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 4% of the time

More Workiva Wdesk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics

January 2026

Download IBM Planning Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

Workiva Wdesk

January 2026

Download Workiva Wdesk product report

Also Known As

Cognos TM1, IBM Cognos TM1

Wdesk

Overview

IBM Planning Analytics is an integrated planning solution that uses AI to automate planning, budgeting, and forecasting and drive more intelligent workflows.

Built on TM1, IBM’s powerful calculation engine, this enterprise performance management tool allows you to transcend the limits of manual planning and become the Analytics Hero your business needs. Quickly and easily drive faster, more accurate plans for FP&A, sales, supply chain and beyond.

IBM

Wdesk is used across the enterprise to support hundreds of data collaboration, reporting, and compliance processes. Use Wdesk to:

Optimize your structured and composite reports
Improve trust in your data, reports, and presentations
Transform processes to enable insight

Workiva

Sample Customers

ManpowerGroup, Convergys, AIG, Orchard Brands, Citibank, InterGen, Northwestern University, EF Education First, Ironside, Bazan Group, CSOB Insurance, Macquarie Group, Charles Stanley, SATO, Government of Sint Maarten, BMW Financial Services

Noodles Company, eBay, Winnebago, American Assets Trust, AmericanEnterprise, Calpian, Capstone Infrastructure, Cascades, Circor International, Coeur Mining, Davey, Dr Pepper Snapple

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics vs. Workiva Wdesk

December 2025

Free Report: IBM Planning Analytics vs. Workiva Wdesk

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Planning Analytics vs. Workiva Wdesk and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Planning Analytics vs. Workiva Wdesk report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.