Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM PowerVM vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization comparison

IBM and Nutanix are both solutions in the Server Virtualization Software category. IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5, while Nutanix is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7. IBM holds a 1.3% mindshare in SVS, compared to Nutanix’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.
IBM PowerVM
Read 36 IBM PowerVM reviews
  • 1,834 Views
  • 1,548 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Read 55 Nutanix AHV Virtualization reviews
  • 13,051 Views
  • 8,924 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

IBM PowerVM and Nutanix AHV are competitors in the virtualization technology market. IBM PowerVM appears to have a strong advantage in stability and performance, while Nutanix AHV shines in affordability and manageability.

Features: IBM PowerVM offers robust stability, performance, and security features, particularly beneficial for Oracle workloads, through shared processor pools and active memory sharing for dynamic resource allocation. Nutanix AHV stands out for its simplicity and manageability, providing comprehensive virtualization capabilities, an intuitive management console, Prism, and cost-effectiveness as an open-source solution.

Room for Improvement: IBM PowerVM could benefit from improving its interface, enhancing cloud integration, and offering more flexible pricing. Users also desire better support for non-AIX/Linus systems. Nutanix AHV should expand system compatibility, improve automation and technical support, and develop a broader software ecosystem.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions are typically used in on-premises settings, with Nutanix AHV also supporting hybrid environments. IBM PowerVM is known for excellent technical support, vital for enterprise applications, whereas Nutanix AHV's support is of average quality but offers flexible deployment options.

Pricing and ROI: IBM PowerVM involves higher initial costs due to hardware dependency but provides a good ROI for Oracle users by billing for allocated rather than total core usage. Nutanix AHV offers savings through inclusive licensing, making it an appealing low-cost alternative despite some initial expense concerns at larger scales.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM PowerVM vs. Nutanix AHV Virtualization Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM PowerVM vs. Nutanix AHV Virtualization
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.7
IBM PowerVM offers higher ROI and cost savings, especially for Oracle users, with scalability, easy administration, and enhanced efficiency.
Sentiment score
6.3
Nutanix AHV Virtualization reduces costs by 45%, enhances performance, and improves agility with 30% less downtime in three years.
The return on investment is substantial, though other platforms may offer a better ROI, primarily due to lower costs involved in setup and maintenance.
If calculated over a five-year period, IBM PowerVM is 30 to 40% more cost-effective than physical servers despite initial costs seeming high.
For more quotes and insights, download the IBM PowerVM report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix AHV Virtualization report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.5
IBM PowerVM is praised for strong support, though TSM support and hardware support subscription issues need improvement.
Sentiment score
8.8
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is acclaimed for its responsive, knowledgeable 24/7 support, with generally positive feedback despite occasional response delays.
IBM provides strong support.
IBM offers excellent customer support.
IBM has an established technical support team and partners who provide extended support to end customers.
For more quotes and insights, download the IBM PowerVM report
Their engineers are excellent and provide great supportability.
They provide prompt and quality responses.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix AHV Virtualization report
MB
AS
MR
Zack Baraci - PeerSpot reviewerJames Vailloo - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
IBM PowerVM excels in scalability and flexibility, supporting large enterprises with superior performance and integration capabilities despite pricing concerns.
Sentiment score
8.4
Nutanix AHV Virtualization offers efficient scalability, easily expanding resources for diverse environments, making it ideal for growing businesses.
An IBM server can handle up to sixty-four terabytes of RAM.
I think IBM PowerVM uses a 'pay as you grow' model, allowing customers to scale their resources as needed.
For more quotes and insights, download the IBM PowerVM report
We can scale our systems easily without any downtime, making it a highly effective solution for dynamic environments.
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is very scalable; however, I might be underutilizing its capabilities.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix AHV Virtualization report
AS
MR
Mithun Nidiyenga - PeerSpot reviewerZack Baraci - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
IBM PowerVM offers superior stability and security with excellent uptime, efficiency, and resilience, outperforming alternatives like Nutanix and VMware.
Sentiment score
8.5
Nutanix AHV is praised for stability, reliability, seamless virtual management, proactive support, and integration with Nutanix infrastructure.
The stability of IBM PowerVM is exceptional, as industry reports have named IBM Power and Z as the most stable platforms globally for 15 consecutive years.
Our clients in India using Power Servers have been running their servers for the last four to five years without any reboot.
For more quotes and insights, download the IBM PowerVM report
Issues such as patch delays and the OVF format challenge affect its stability rating.
The solution is very stable.
I would give the stability a seven out of ten at the moment, primarily due to the issues I've had with updates.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix AHV Virtualization report
AS
MR
Mithun Nidiyenga - PeerSpot reviewerJames Vailloo - PeerSpot reviewerZack Baraci - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Room For Improvement

IBM PowerVM users seek better management, interface, performance, and cost-effectiveness, with enhanced automation, virtualization, and cloud integration features.
Nutanix AHV requires improved integration, interface optimization, better documentation, disaster recovery, automation, Linux support, and competitive pricing.
We have a strong relationship with IBM, which aids decision-making in transitioning clients from mainframe to other platforms.
PowerVM should integrate some capabilities of VMware vCenter to improve its management features.
For more quotes and insights, download the IBM PowerVM report
This delay in patching creates risk, especially for government projects that require timely updates.
Using Lenovo hardware seems problematic with Nutanix AHV Virtualization, which demands careful consideration during updates.
These menus often show options like host, memory, and disk, however, they fail to provide insight into what's happening.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix AHV Virtualization report
MB
AS
Mithun Nidiyenga - PeerSpot reviewerZack Baraci - PeerSpot reviewerJames Vailloo - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

IBM PowerVM offers flexible payment options, though initial high costs require negotiation but may yield long-term savings.
Nutanix AHV provides cost-effective virtualization with no hypervisor fees, though additional licenses and high initial prices may apply.
While initially costly, the ROI over five years proves IBM PowerVM is cost-effective, resulting in a 30 to 40% reduction in costs compared to a physical setup.
PowerVM itself is free with the purchase of an IBM server.
Pricing is a concern in Argentina due to the higher cost of mainframe solutions.
For more quotes and insights, download the IBM PowerVM report
This has been advantageous as it does not require additional licensing costs for the hypervisor, contributing to overall cost savings.
Other solutions like Citrix and VMware have seen a significant price increase, whereas Nutanix hasn't increased as dramatically.
The pricing was reasonable compared to other competitors, though the storage was expensive.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix AHV Virtualization report
MR
AS
MB
Mithun Nidiyenga - PeerSpot reviewerZack Baraci - PeerSpot reviewerJames Vailloo - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Valuable Features

IBM PowerVM provides flexible resource management, high availability, and smooth cloud transitions, supporting various operating systems and complex workloads.
Nutanix AHV excels in user-friendliness, cost-efficiency, scalability, flexible management, and robust data protection, enhancing virtual environment operations.
It supports specific workloads, like Oracle and SAP HANA, much better due to its shared processor pool feature which reduces licensing costs.
IBM PowerVM supports multiple operating systems such as IBM i, AIX, and Linux, allowing users to run various applications seamlessly in a cloud environment.
PowerVM excels in efficiently managing all systems and environments, including development, UI, and production.
For more quotes and insights, download the IBM PowerVM report
It is easier to manage than VMware in some ways, providing a good level of interaction.
The technology behind the backups is very efficient, enabling a reliable virtual environment.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix AHV Virtualization report
AS
MR
MB
Zack Baraci - PeerSpot reviewerJames Vailloo - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM PowerVM
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of IBM PowerVM is 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix AHV Virtualization is 8.2%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Virtualization Software
 

Featured Reviews

Atif Najam - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable system for high-end data processing with a great support structure
The only problem with the IBM system is improving its hardware licensing model. For example, when you procure a server with 40 physical codes, you must also procure licenses to activate the codes. In Dell or any system, you procure the hardware and have the full right to use the hardware. For IBM, it's different because when you procure a 40-code processor and have 40 physical codes, you only have a license to use 20. As a result, the 20 alert codes will always be in activated mode. Hence, the hardware licensing model could be improved because the licensing model is a bit different from the standard hardware procured.
Read full review
Mithun Nidiyenga - PeerSpot reviewer
Achieves seamless upgrades and cost efficiency while managing virtualization
One issue we encountered is with third-party vendors who provide customized images in OVF format, a VMware virtualization format. When we customize these images for Nutanix AHV, some vendors refuse to support them, stating they've been altered. Another area for improvement is in the patching process. Nutanix releases product patches every three months, while the underlying systems like the backend operating system receive weekly updates, causing a gap. This delay in patching creates risk, especially for government projects that require timely updates.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
Educational Organization
28%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM PowerVM?
Managing other operating systems is also straightforward with IBM PowerVM.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM PowerVM?
PowerVM itself is free with the purchase of an IBM server. However, I find that the overall cost is higher, however, the total cost of ownership is cheaper for larger workloads.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM PowerVM?
PowerVM should integrate some capabilities of VMware vCenter to improve its management features. IBM should consider models that combine x86 and Power processors for versatility in running Windows ...
See all answers
How does Nutanix AHV compare with VMware vSphere?
To understand which is better - Nutanix AHV or VMware vSphere - you need to do a product comparison. Both products support hypervisors. However, Nutanix supports some of the most popular ones and m...
See all answers
What do you like most about Nutanix AHV Virtualization?
Integration is the most valuable feature of the product.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix AHV Virtualization?
Nutanix offers a lower price compared to other solutions. This has been advantageous as it does not require additional licensing costs for the hypervisor, contributing to overall cost savings.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

VMware vSphere vs IBM PowerVM Logo
VMware vSphere vs IBM PowerVM
Compared 66% of the time
KVM vs IBM PowerVM Logo
KVM vs IBM PowerVM
Compared 11% of the time
Hyper-V vs IBM PowerVM Logo
Hyper-V vs IBM PowerVM
Compared 9% of the time
Proxmox VE vs IBM PowerVM Logo
Proxmox VE vs IBM PowerVM
Compared 8% of the time
More IBM PowerVM Competitors
Hyper-V vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization Logo
Hyper-V vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Compared 32% of the time
Proxmox VE vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization Logo
Proxmox VE vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Compared 24% of the time
KVM vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization Logo
KVM vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Compared 20% of the time
VMware vSphere vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization Logo
VMware vSphere vs Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Compared 6% of the time
More Nutanix AHV Virtualization Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IBM PowerVM
March 2025
IBM PowerVM reportDownload IBM PowerVM product report
Buyer's Guide
Nutanix AHV Virtualization
March 2025
Nutanix AHV Virtualization reportDownload Nutanix AHV Virtualization product report
 

Also Known As

PowerVM
No data available
 

Overview

Power is server virtualization without limits. Businesses are turning to PowerVM server virtualization to consolidate multiple workloads onto fewer systems, increasing server utilization and reducing cost. PowerVM provides a secure and scalable server virtualization environment for AIX, IBM i and Linux applications built upon the advanced RAS features and leading performance of the Power Systems platform.
IBM
Nutanix AHV is a secure, enterprise-grade solution for intuitive virtualization and container management. It streamlines operations and simplifies management for all your workloads and environments.
Nutanix
 

Sample Customers

Sto, Soitec, SNO, Bundesrechenzentrum GmbH, Al Mansour Holding, Baptist Health of Northeast Florida, Huhtamaki, ELK Group, IT-Informatik, Arkansas Tech University, Pneuhage
JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen
Buyer's Guide
IBM PowerVM vs. Nutanix AHV Virtualization
March 2025
Free Report: IBM PowerVM vs. Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM PowerVM vs. Nutanix AHV Virtualization and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM PowerVM vs. Nutanix AHV Virtualization report.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.