IBM Rational Test Workbench vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

IBM and Parasoft are both solutions in the API Testing Tools category. IBM is ranked #14, while Parasoft is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7. IBM holds a 1.8% mindshare in APIT, compared to Parasoft’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Read 4 IBM Rational Test Workbench reviews

732 Views
278 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

2,343 Views
656 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and IBM Rational Test Workbench are prominent tools in the software testing landscape. Parasoft SOAtest is favored for its broad range of testing capabilities and ease of integration, giving it an upper hand in versatility and user-friendliness.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers automated testing capabilities for API and web services, easy integration with various testing environments, and a wide range of testing tools. IBM Rational Test Workbench includes extensive support for multiple testing types, powerful scripting options, and robust performance features.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could improve its reporting functionalities, reduce the learning curve for new users, and enhance documentation. IBM Rational Test Workbench could focus on optimizing performance, improving usability in complex scenarios, and refining the user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest offers a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. IBM Rational Test Workbench requires more effort in deployment and has mixed feedback regarding customer service responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is cost-effective with a clear ROI. IBM Rational Test Workbench is more expensive, and users feel the high price is justified by its extensive features and capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Parasoft SOAtest

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Ranking in API Testing Tools

14th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

31st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (18th)

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in API Testing Tools

10th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), Functional Testing Tools (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the API Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Test Workbench is 1.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 3.4%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Parasoft SOAtest	3.4%
IBM Rational Test Workbench	1.8%
Other	94.8%

API Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1513668

IT Specialist, ITE at a government with 10,001+ employees

Good reporting and interface, but supports limited types of protocols and requires low-level script editing

It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script.

Read full review

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Reporting is pretty good. Its interface is also good. I'm overall pretty happy with the functionality and use of IBM Rational Test Workbench."

"This solution provides for API testing, functional UI testing, performance testing, and service virtualization."

"The solution is scalable."

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"Technical support is helpful."

"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."

"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."

"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."

"We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios."

"They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

Cons

"It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script."

"There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation."

"Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements."

"There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes."

"UI testing should be more in-depth."

"Enabling/disabling an optional element of an XML request is only possible if a data source (e.g., Excel sheet) is connected to the test. Otherwise, the option is not available at all in the drop-down menu."

"During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time."

"The summary reports could be improved."

"The performance could be a bit better."

"The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good."

"It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Non Profit

University

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 12% of the time

Perfecto vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 12% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 10% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 9% of the time

Katalon Studio vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 9% of the time

More IBM Rational Test Workbench Competitors

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 13% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 12% of the time

Coverity Static vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 7% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

January 2026

Download IBM Rational Test Workbench product report

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

January 2026

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Also Known As

Rational Test Workbench, IBM Rational Performance Tester, IBM Functional Tester, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server

SOAtest

Overview

IBM Rational Test Workbench provides a comprehensive test automation solution for mobile applications, regression testing, integration technologies and performance and scalability testing. It helps you build intelligent and interconnected enterprise applications that can be deployed on traditional and cloud infrastructures. With Rational Test Workbench, you can significantly reduce test cycle times, moving integration testing earlier in the development lifecycle.

IBM

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Sample Customers

Financial Insurance Management Corp.

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Parasoft SOAtest

January 2026

Free Report: IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Parasoft SOAtest and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Parasoft SOAtest report.

See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.