IBM Security Verify Access vs Imprivata OneSign comparison

IBM and Imprivata are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. IBM is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0, while Imprivata is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0. IBM holds a 2.4% mindshare in SSO, compared to Imprivata’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Imprivata users who would recommend it.

IBM Security Verify Access

Read 8 IBM Security Verify Access reviews

3,093 Views
1,299 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Imprivata OneSign

Read 4 Imprivata OneSign reviews

2,236 Views
1,901 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Security Verify Access

Imprivata OneSign

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Imprivata OneSign and IBM Security Verify Access are both leading solutions in identity management and security. Imprivata OneSign offers superior pricing and support, while IBM Security Verify Access stands out for its feature set, making it worth the higher price based on user reviews.

Features: Imprivata OneSign is praised for its seamless integration, strong authentication options, and user-friendly interface. IBM Security Verify Access is noted for its extensive security policies, adaptive access control, and comprehensive protection features, providing a broader feature set for enhanced security.

Room for Improvement: Imprivata OneSign faces challenges with scalability, occasional system slowdowns, and a need for better reporting features. IBM Security Verify Access could improve on enhancing its reporting features, achieving a more intuitive design, and offering greater customizability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imprivata OneSign is known for its quick deployment and responsive customer service. IBM Security Verify Access has a more complex deployment process but provides extensive customization options, making it adaptable for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: Imprivata OneSign users find the pricing structure competitive with a quicker ROI due to lower initial setup costs. IBM Security Verify Access has higher setup costs, but users feel the investment is justified by its features and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Security Verify Access vs. Imprivata OneSign Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Verify Access vs. Imprivata OneSign

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Security Verify Access

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (17th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (16th), Access Management (13th)

Imprivata OneSign

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

12th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of IBM Security Verify Access is 2.4%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Imprivata OneSign is 2.7%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Imprivata OneSign	2.7%
IBM Security Verify Access	2.4%
Other	94.9%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Ateeq Rehman

Unit Head System Implementor at Allied Bank Limited

Has improved secure user access while managing development through multiple technologies

I have already explained this in my previous call; I don't handle financial terms and commercials. Pricing is generally managed by functional teams and management looking after licensing matters. In Pakistan, vendors such as Oracle and IBM manage account relationships with clients and have tailored pricing models, so I do not have sufficient insights into that aspect.IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based. The complexity and scalability of the architecture necessitate in-depth technical knowledge and understanding of the system. Thus, installation is not as simple as clicking through; it requires extensive configuration of the underlying application servers, such as IBM WebSphere, where these products are deployed and configured.

Read full review

Rohit Yamsani

Senior Consultant at HCLSoftware

Single sign-on saves time by seamlessly managing passwords and improving workflow efficiency

What I appreciate best about Imprivata OneSign are the single sign-on and the Confirm ID features. The single sign-on works seamlessly for all the nurses or the end users out there. You just have to log in to the application once and the single sign-on clicks in and works for everyone. Users don't have to manually remember all their passwords. Imprivata OneSign helps by remembering and storing all passwords. The integration capabilities of Imprivata OneSign offer many possibilities, and there are numerous upgrades Imprivata has been implementing. At this point, they are growing rapidly. There are new tools coming out for reporting and generating real-time analysis. Imprivata E-PAM is a new feature that I've been reading about in articles, which is going to help administrator people and enterprise administrator personnel to view real-time records and views for all end customers. Reporting and looking at logs for the users will be seamlessly efficient. I use the reporting tools available in Imprivata OneSign. The admin console itself has a reporting feature, which gives us a list of pre-built templates of reports where you can see how many users have been added, the user policy, the users who have last logged in in specific amounts of days, and the reporting for the EPCS users. There are numerous reporting options available which help with troubleshooting issues. I have seen many benefits from using Imprivata OneSign. It saves substantial time for nurses. As a nurse or doctor, you don't have to spend time remembering passwords or signing into computers. You just need to grab the nearest machine and tap in. You can use the machine anytime if you want. It saves time when dealing with patients. For doctors who might not be tech-savvy, Imprivata OneSign helps them sign in seamlessly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a good solution for identification and access management."

"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth."

"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security."

"IBM Security Verify Access is providing a secure way of handling the user login journey, and secure user authentication is fully managed by ISAM or ISVA."

"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization and offers a good way to increase security."

"IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."

"IBM Security Verify Access, formerly known as ISAM, IBM Security Access Manager, now renamed to ISVA, integrates with central directory services for our organization and provides user management functionality."

More IBM Security Verify Access pros

"Imprivata supports single sign-on, providing a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using, and the deployment is very quick and not difficult to deploy."

"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack."

"Imprivata OneSign helps customers minimize their work in remembering passwords and enhances their security."

"It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."

"I have seen many benefits from using Imprivata OneSign. It saves substantial time for nurses."

Cons

"The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial."

"The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."

"They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area."

"For small or medium-sized businesses they cannot afford this solution."

"There are a lot of areas that can be improved, but the main area is the lack of customization. You cannot easily customize anything in the product."

"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding. We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium. As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain."

"The solution could be classified as a hilt system. There are a lot of resources being used and it is suitable for very large enterprises or the public sector."

More IBM Security Verify Access cons

"They should have a landing page."

"Imprivata OneSign should have a landing page because most customers prefer this feature, which is currently a strong point for competitors."

"Fast user switching and Citrix integration in Imprivata OneSign could improve. There are many options available for VDI connectivity, but I've seen issues with VDI connectivity and Citrix storefront connectivity."

"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."

"The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."

"It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."

"At the moment, I believe the price is reasonable."

"The price is reasonable, it's an affordable solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

Government

Insurance Company

Healthcare Company

25%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Security Access Manager?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Security Access Manager?

We are still using the IBM BPM platform to automate the processes for our organization.I generally use Microsoft Project for project planning and schedule management, especially in relation to Orac...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Security Access Manager?

My current domain is leading project development, overseeing both technical and functional areas in process automation and orchestration, along with the hands-on implementation of process automatio...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Imprivata OneSign?

Fast user switching and Citrix integration in Imprivata OneSign could improve. There are many options available for VDI connectivity, but I've seen issues with VDI connectivity and Citrix storefron...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Imprivata OneSign?

I have experience with Imprivata OneSign and Imprivata Confirm ID. For the past three and a half years, I've been using Imprivata OneSign 7.9 and Confirm ID 7.9 versions. The client I'm working wit...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Imprivata OneSign?

As an end user, it's easy to use Imprivata OneSign. Users don't have to rely much on knowledge to use that tool. It's basic, just an agent that sits on your machine and you shouldn't worry about an...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 9% of the time

Okta Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 8% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Cloud Identity Service vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Security Verify Access Competitors

Okta Platform vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 9% of the time

Evidian Enterprise SSO vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 7% of the time

BlueFletch vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 7% of the time

More Imprivata OneSign Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Verify Access

April 2026

Download IBM Security Verify Access product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

April 2026

Download Imprivata OneSign product report

Also Known As

IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM

OneSign, Imprivata OneSign Authentication Management

Overview

IBM Security Verify Access offers adaptable access management with multi-factor authentication, seamless protocol integration, and strong user management, suitable for cloud and on-premises environments.

IBM Security Verify Access provides multi-factor authentication, seamless integration with protocols like SAML and OAuth, and features including password vaults and single sign-on. Its adaptable nature allows for deployment both in cloud and on-premises settings. Users appreciate its quick setup, reliable authorization, and efficient user management, especially when integrated with Active Directory. The intuitive interface enhances security with mobile features like QR code enrollment, making it suitable for diverse environments. However, cloud deployment could be simpler, and the interface could use enhancements for better ease. Onboarding applications and support availability need improvements, and configuration for OIDC and OAuth should mature. More comprehensive documentation and simplified installation are also needed, along with automation to reduce resource consumption.

What are the key features of IBM Security Verify Access?

Multi-Factor Authentication: Offers robust multi-layered security.
Integration with Protocols: Works with SAML and OAuth for seamless connectivity.
Password Vaults: Secure storage for user credentials.
Single Sign-On: Streamlines access across platforms.
Active Directory Integration: Ensures efficient user management.
Mobile Features: Includes QR code enrollment for enhanced security.

What benefits or ROI can users expect to find in the reviews?

Rapid Setup: Quick deployment in cloud and on-premises environments.
Reliable Authorization: Trustworthy access control and management.
Security Enhancements: Through multi-factor authentication and mobile features.
Streamlined Processes: Simplified access management with single sign-on.

IBM Security Verify Access is widely used in the banking and educational sectors for access management, supporting activities like single sign-on and control across different user groups. Many in these industries utilize it for customer authentication and integrate it with mobile systems to enhance security. Its adaptability allows it to serve complex needs, particularly useful in environments such as universities and financial institutions.

IBM

Imprivata OneSign provides single sign-on, streamlining application access through AI-managed passwords. It supports legacy systems, enhances security, and saves time, especially valuable for healthcare. Confirm ID and reporting tools enable seamless integration and user activity tracking.

Imprivata OneSign is a comprehensive single sign-on and multi-factor authentication platform that simplifies password management and streamlines user access to over fifty applications. Designed primarily for healthcare, it integrates with both cloud and on-premises systems, offering upgraded versions like G4 23.7 with advanced security features such as MFA and Vasco tokens. Although its price point is higher and Mac OS compatibility is limited, it improves focus on patient care by reducing administrative burdens. Challenges include fast user switching, Citrix integration lag, and authentication slowness with published applications.

What are Imprivata OneSign's key features?

Single Sign-On: Access multiple applications with one ID, enhancing security and efficiency.
AI-Managed Passwords: Automates password entry, reducing manual input and errors.
Legacy System Integration: Enhances security and eases transitions with existing systems.
Confirm ID: Ensures seamless and secure end-user authentication.
E-PAM & Reporting Tools: Tracks user activity to optimize system use.

What benefits should users look for in OneSign reviews?

Enhanced Security: Combines single sign-on with MFA and Vasco tokens for improved data protection.
Time Savings: Reduces time spent on administrative tasks, focusing resource allocation on patient care.
Scalability: Supports cloud and on-premises deployments, accommodating growing IT infrastructures.
Seamless Integration: Works with existing IT systems while offering advanced security features.

Imprivata OneSign is especially impactful in healthcare settings, where quick access to applications without sacrificing security is crucial. It facilitates e-prescribing and other clinical tasks through streamlined processes and advanced authentication measures, ensuring that patient care remains the primary focus.

Imprivata

Sample Customers

POST Luxembourg

AZ Groeninge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust, Mahaska Health Partnership, Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Boulder Community Hospital, City of Marietta, Spencer Hospital, Southwest Washington Medical Center, South Shore Hospital

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Verify Access vs. Imprivata OneSign

April 2026

Free Report: IBM Security Verify Access vs. Imprivata OneSign

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Verify Access vs. Imprivata OneSign and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Security Verify Access vs. Imprivata OneSign report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.