IBM Sterling File Gateway and webMethods.io compete in the enterprise integration and secure file transfer market. While IBM Sterling File Gateway is favored for its secure file transfer capabilities, webMethods.io takes an upper hand due to its extensive integration capabilities and application focus.
Features: IBM Sterling File Gateway supports secure file transfer and handles large data volumes with versatile protocol compatibility, reliable monitoring, and robust security measures. It is suited for financial operations due to its resilient monitoring and error handling. Conversely, webMethods.io offers comprehensive integration features with a focus on application integration, B2B processes, and data mapping. It utilizes intuitive connectors for easy integration across systems, enhancing flexibility and scalability in various business environments.
Room for Improvement: IBM Sterling File Gateway could improve user management, workflow expansion, and cloud scalability. Enhancements in API support and reducing maintenance complexity are also necessary. webMethods.io requires better documentation, API monetization improvements, and enhanced legacy system support. Users also seek improved integration and support features alongside better cloud and microservices capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Sterling File Gateway is mainly on-premise with responsive technical support, though some users find it slow. It is commended for its documentation and vendor support. webMethods.io is known for good technical support and is available in hybrid and cloud environments. The deployment experience is favorable, especially in public cloud and hybrid environments, offering flexibility across IT settings.
Pricing and ROI: IBM Sterling File Gateway, while costly, provides justified value for its features and straightforward licensing, despite being considered more expensive than alternatives like GlobalSCAPE. webMethods.io also comes with high licensing costs; however, its rich feature set is seen as a quality investment. Confusing pricing models need alignment with the integration benefits offered to ensure perceived cost-efficiency.
Whenever more resources are needed, they become available automatically without any human interference.
Vertically, scalability is fine, however, I have not expanded horizontally with the product yet.
We provide support to our clients, and the minimum calls I receive are for webMethods.io; it's very stable.
There are some issues like the tool hanging or the need for additional jars when exposing web services.
Another enhancement would be in OCR; currently, there is a huge demand for OCR capabilities. It would be perfect if webMethods.io had a built-in component for OCR, as this would be tested and allow customers to use it better than a third-party OCR application.
A special discount of at least 50% for old customers would allow us to expand our services and request more resources.
Regarding the pricing and licensing of webMethods.io, I don't think it's expensive when compared with the features.
It facilitates the exposure of around 235 services through our platform to feed various government entities across the entire country.
I believe data transformation is exceptional in webMethods.io because they have an online database that can cache the database online.
Securely manage transfer files with authentication, encryption and audit trails while you retain administrative control of data using a library of templates.
Sterling File Gateway can help you increase secure and dependable file transfer with your trading partners. It consolidates disparate centers of file transfer activity and facilitates the security-rich exchange of file-based data over the Internet. It helps companies avoid the risk and operational issues that can result from using loosely controlled file-transfer servers.
webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.