Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager vs ManageEngine PAM360 comparison

Idira by Palo Alto Networks and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Idira by Palo Alto Networks is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.7, while ManageEngine is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.7. Idira by Palo Alto Networks holds a 2.4% mindshare in PAM, compared to ManageEngine’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Idira by Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Idira Endpoint Privilege Ma...

Read 38 Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews

6,239 Views
1,809 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

ManageEngine PAM360

Read 6 ManageEngine PAM360 reviews

2,046 Views
2,005 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Idira Endpoint Privilege Ma...

ManageEngine PAM360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 2, 2026

Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager and ManageEngine PAM360 compete in the cybersecurity sector by enhancing privilege management. Idira is favored for its competitive pricing and superior support, while ManageEngine stands out for its advanced features and perceived value, which may justify the higher cost for feature-focused organizations.

Features: Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager simplifies privilege access, enhances security controls, and offers effective threat response. ManageEngine PAM360 shines with comprehensive access management, password management, advanced auditing, and session monitoring. The main contrast is ManageEngine’s extensive feature set, which suits complex IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Idira could enhance its advanced auditing tools and improve integration with other systems. Additionally, offering a broader set of customizable templates for policy management may add value. For ManageEngine, streamlining the user interface to match competitors and enhancing real-time threat response capabilities would be beneficial. Moreover, further simplifying integration processes could enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine PAM360 provides flexible deployments, comprehensive documentation, and reliable customer service, easing implementation. Idira emphasizes ease of use with faster setup and responsive support, focused on speed and simplicity.

Pricing and ROI: Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager features a straightforward pricing model and delivers quick ROI, thanks to lower setup costs. ManageEngine PAM360 is more costly but regarded as a valuable investment due to its extensive capabilities, offering potential long-term benefits. This reflects a balance between initial investment and feature richness, with Idira focusing on immediate cost-effectiveness and ManageEngine on broad long-term returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 906,852 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Idira Endpoint Privilege Ma...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Compliance (4th), Anti-Malware Tools (10th), Application Control (5th), Ransomware Protection (6th)

ManageEngine PAM360

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

15th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager is 2.4%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine PAM360 is 2.3%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager	2.4%
ManageEngine PAM360	2.3%
Other	95.3%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Sumit Chavan

Lead Consultant at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Helps secure the infrastructure and control users with admin rights

There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies. For instance, if we need to stop PowerShell scripting, we have to create a different policy for that. Being able to create a sub-level policy within a top-level policy would be good. Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console. We can only create computer-based policies. The database is available, but there is a drawback in not being able to create local groups on the EPM console. We only have to depend on Active Directory. This limits infrastructure security as we depend on the Active Directory team to manage user groups. If they remove any users, we lose control. If we could create groups locally and block them or set specific policies, we would have more control. Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site. Moreover, there is an issue with policies not running as expected when we make enhancements. We have to find multiple ways to whitelist applications or enhance policies.

Read full review

Md Abdul Hakim

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Remote session recording enhances server access tracking while dashboard needs improvement

PAM360 stands out due to its remote session recording capabilities, which allow us to track who accessed which server and identify any changes. The automation system is very smart, although its interface is not as sophisticated as those of Dynatrace or FortiFEM. A critical advantage is its flexibility and security, providing stability across our client interactions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Regarding the granularity of the managed controls in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, we have different levels of features to define compensations and capabilities, which help us verify configurations and access, ultimately keeping the safety of rights intact."

"You can use it to strip users of their local admin rights and, at the same time, elevate applications for them."

"We can do both server and endpoint protection."

"The password rotation and the session recording are the most valuable features."

"The solution allows me to give access and privileges to each user individually"

"The most valuable features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager are password management, session management, onboarding rules, platform customization, and safety management."

"I like that you can remove the admin rights from the user's computer and have control over the environment. That means you can delete the local admins and grant them proper privileges with the console. So, they will get proper permissions for applications they need, but we don't have to do it. In the domain where we don't have control, the user can only do specified actions, but not all of them."

"We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment."

More Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager pros

"We can use it remotely as well."

"My advice would be, if you want a cost effective solution and very competitive pricing, you should go with this product."

"Our clients use this solution for the rotation of keys and passwords. It is a part of logs."

"ManageEngine PAM360 is an easy-to-use solution with competitive pricing compared to brands like Delinea and CyberArk."

"PAM360 stands out due to its remote session recording capabilities, which allow us to track who accessed which server and identify any changes."

"Deployment is very quick, and only a one-time installation process is required for ManageEngine PAM360."

Cons

"CyberArk should consider whitelisting important applications like PowerShell and DLL that are currently not allowed due to some malicious content."

"Performance could be better. We have a couple of problems with CyberArk right now. One of the problems is performance in our environment. Support also takes a long time to respond. If the user already has local admin rights, then I can't collect any events in the console from this device. There are also some options in CyberArk that are not working properly, and are not helpful in this case. I can't collect any information to create a proper policy for the device. I have to investigate everything manually, or even disable the local admin from the device. I can collect the events only after this, and it's very time consuming. In my case, it's a waste of resources."

"My recommendation for improvement is to add functionality for when users request access to an application. There's a pop-up UI, but it's not very customizable. I suggest creating a UI where we can write scripts or use SDKs to enhance it. This could automatically create tickets in a system like ServiceNow when users request an application. If a manager approves, we could automatically push policies to those users."

"It was complex to introduction the product to the end-users and the technical team."

"One area that has room for improvement is in managing the credentials for network devices."

"While CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a great tool, I believe the functionality could be wider. If it could work not only with permissions but also involve pure EDR tasks or User and Entity Behavior Analytics, it would be great."

"Technical support is slow to respond when we run into issues."

"There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies."

More Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager cons

"I don't see any features associated with multi-factor authentication in ManageEngine PAM360."

"PAM360's dashboard needs improvement for clearer presentations, similar to ManageEngine products like AD audit plus and Password Manager Plus, which offer a clearer picture."

"There could be improvement in latency and accessing resources for the product."

"It should have better documentation about how to install, work and configure."

"I would rate the scalability at five out of ten. It's average."

"ManageEngine PAM360 could benefit from more automation activities and a user interface change."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is reasonable compared to other vendors' products."

"The product's license is easy to procure."

"It is an expensive solution."

"Although I do not deal directly with the pricing, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is costly compared to other solutions. However, it offers beneficial features."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a very high price, so it's a one out of ten for me in terms of pricing."

"The tool is priced high. I would rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"Pricing depends on how many devices you use. Right now, on-premise, it costs us a little, but it's worth it. It seems like the cloud solution is much more expensive. We got this solution one year ago, and it's like we bought the solution, and now they are not going to support it on-premise anymore. We are in the implementation phase, and we missed this, and we already paid for the licenses. This is wasted time from my perspective, and CyberArk should be more customer-friendly."

"I feel that the price of the product is nominal. It must be around 10 to 15 USD per installation. I rate the product price an eight to nine out of ten, where one is high price, and ten is low price."

More Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice

"Though I don't have the exact numbers related to the cost of the solution, I can say that it costs somewhere around INR 7,00,000 for ten licenses."

"The product is less expensive than one of its competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

906,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	19

No data available

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

While CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a great tool, I believe the functionality could be wider. If it could work not only with permissions but also involve pure EDR tasks or User and Entity ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine PAM360?

ManageEngine PAM360 could benefit from more automation activities and a user interface change. Although the support is really good, there's still room for improvement in automation.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine PAM360?

Our primary use case for ManageEngine PAM360 ( /products/manageengine-pam360-reviews ) involved securing our organization’s devices, implementing access policies, and managing privileged access eff...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ManageEngine PAM360?

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate ManageEngine PAM360 as nine. It's a really good tool.

See all answers

Comparisons

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs ManageEngine PAM360

Compared 13% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs ManageEngine PAM360

Compared 10% of the time

ARCON Privileged Access Management vs ManageEngine PAM360

Compared 7% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs ManageEngine PAM360

Compared 6% of the time

Teleport vs ManageEngine PAM360

Compared 4% of the time

More ManageEngine PAM360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager

July 2026

Download Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

July 2026

Download ManageEngine PAM360 product report

Also Known As

Viewfinity

PAM360

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager enhances security by controlling access, removing admin rights, and managing privileges. It supports diverse environments with simple integration, focusing on credential detection, threat protection, and compliance.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager secures enterprise passwords, monitors session connections, and enhances cybersecurity by controlling privileged access. It blocks unauthorized applications, monitors user activities, and secures credentials across platforms. Key areas include Just-In-Time Access, privilege separation, and local administrator password rotation. While robust, challenges exist with performance, complexity, and setup. Integration with Linux and Unix needs improvement, requiring advanced reporting tools and easier policy management. Pricing concerns and maintenance issues with Windows servers persist, as well as database issues in the on-prem version.

What are the key features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

Admin Rights Removal: Eliminates unnecessary permissions to enhance security.
Privilege Management: Offers detailed control over user access rights.
Password Rotation: Automatically updates passwords to protect sensitive data.
Threat Protection: Blocks malicious applications and threats proactively.
Audit Capabilities: Provides comprehensive security and compliance tracking.
Application Control: Confines access to authorized applications only.
Automatic Updates: Ensures security protocols and software remain current.

What benefits should organizations expect from CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

Enhanced Security: Reduces risks by controlling credential and application access.
Compliance Assurance: Meets industry standards through thorough tracking and reporting.
Scalable Integration: Adapts to different environments smoothly.
Reduced Management Efforts: Automates credential and policy management.

Organizations deploying CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology benefit from secure credential management across Unix, AWS, and GCP. By implementing privilege separation and monitoring user activities, they achieve effective risk mitigation and compliance across multiple platforms.

Idira by Palo Alto Networks

ManageEngine PAM360 offers advanced password management with access control and session recording, ensuring secure, efficient operations. It provides a user-friendly interface and effective deployment, making it a reliable option for managing access policies and privileged identities.

Designed for organizations requiring robust access control, ManageEngine PAM360 delivers a comprehensive suite of features including password vaulting, playback, and session recording. The interface, though user-friendly, could benefit from enhancements like multi-factor authentication and better integration with Linux. The tool's strength lies in its flexible, secure, and stable client interactions, automation capabilities, and notable key management functions. However, improvements in dashboard intuitiveness and resolving latency issues are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of PAM360?

Password Vault: Safely stores and manages passwords to prevent unauthorized access.
Session Recording: Monitors sessions to track user activity and maintain security.
Remote Access Management: Facilitates secure remote access while managing privileged identities.
Key Management: Enables efficient key rotation to enhance security.
Playback Feature: Replays recorded sessions for detailed reviews and audits.

What benefits can users expect from PAM360?

Improved Security: Tracks access effectively to prevent unauthorized activities.
Efficient Deployment: Offers straightforward implementation with a user-friendly design.
Cost-Effectiveness: Provides competitive pricing and value for investment.
Increased Operational Efficiency: Automates key tasks to streamline management processes.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and IT, ManageEngine PAM360 is widely utilized for monitoring and controlling user access, securing sensitive information, and managing privileged identities. By recording sessions, it helps these sectors limit unauthorized access and ensure compliance with industry regulations.

ManageEngine

Buyer's Guide

Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360

June 2026

Free Report: Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360

Find out what your peers are saying about Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

906,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.