Infobright DB vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

Why PeerSpot?

IgniteTech and Broadcom are both solutions in the Data Warehouse category. IgniteTech is ranked #20, while Broadcom is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.0. IgniteTech holds a 2.2% mindshare in Data Warehouse, compared to Broadcom’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of IgniteTech users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Infobright DB

Read 10 Infobright DB reviews

3,000 Views
1,500 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 89 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

13,001 Views
4,420 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Infobright DB

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and Infobright DB compete in the data management space. VMware Tanzu seems to have the upper hand with its extensive support and flexible pricing compared to Infobright DB.

Features: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions offers container management, scalability, and integration across cloud platforms. Infobright DB provides advanced analytic capabilities with superior query performance due to its columnar architecture.

Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu can improve its query optimizer to better handle diverse business logics. Infobright DB could enhance its customer engagement for better support and expand compatibility with more data types.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions allows seamless deployment in complex environments with robust support services. Infobright DB offers straightforward deployment, often requiring fewer resources but with a streamlined support service.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions has competitive pricing with a broad feature set while offering significant ROI for enterprises. Infobright DB provides a lower initial setup cost and quicker ROI for specific analytic tasks.

To learn more, read our detailed Infobright DB vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infobright DB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

38th

Ranking in Data Warehouse

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

14th

Ranking in Data Warehouse

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (6th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Infobright DB is 2.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 5.1%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Warehouse Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions	5.1%
Infobright DB	2.2%
Other	92.7%

Data Warehouse

Featured Reviews

it_user708987

MySQL DBA at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Excellent reporting server that is compatible with MySQL

We ran into some quirks that Infobright had. We interacted with Infobright's support and were able to resolve them. There still are issues with data replication - Infobright is currently for one server (unless you buy the Infobright appliance). This would mean that redundancy is something you need to implement yourself.

Read full review

Karthik Shivaram

Technical Director at STI INFOTECH PVT LTD

Improved multi-cloud data management has simplified operations and supports seamless Kubernetes

From my perspective, the biggest challenge with VMware right now is the pricing. To be very honest, in many cases I find myself recommending alternative solutions instead of VMware. Even if those alternatives come with a bit more complexity, customers are often more willing to accept that than the current VMware pricing model. In the past, VMware used a socket-based licensing model, which was easier for customers to understand and budget for. Now the shift to a core-based licensing model has significantly increased costs for many environments, especially for organizations running modern high-core CPUs. One positive aspect of the new model is that VMware has bundled several components together. For example, earlier when deploying vSphere, customers also had to purchase vCenter separately for management. Now multiple components are packaged into a single SKU, which simplifies some aspects of procurement and deployment. While this consolidation has its benefits, the overall licensing and commercial costs remain very high. Pricing is not the only issue. I believe Broadcom also needs to reconsider its strategy in light of the current market conditions. The approach they are taking may be strategic from a business perspective, but from what I see in the field, it is leading to lost opportunities. Many customers who previously relied on VMware are now actively exploring alternative virtualization platforms. I’m not sure where this direction will ultimately lead, but based on my experience, it is already affecting adoption. Since you’ve been trying to reach me for some time—and we also had a discussion a couple of years ago—I hope this feedback helps Broadcom understand the current sentiment in the market and potentially make adjustments. Another important concern is the way features are bundled. In many cases, customers only need basic virtualization and high availability capabilities. However, the current packaging often includes additional features that they may not need. A good analogy is that if a customer only needs an entry-level car, we shouldn’t be forced to sell them a Rolls-Royce. VMware could benefit from adopting a more modular or à la carte licensing model, where customers can choose only the components they truly require. For example, if a customer only needs core virtualization functionality, they should be able to purchase just that. This would allow partners and solution providers to better align solutions with customer requirements and position VMware more competitively in the market. Another challenge I want to highlight is the pricing model based on U.S. dollars and the way multi-year licensing is handled. In many enterprise and government projects, customers prefer to commit to three-year or five-year licenses and pay the full amount upfront. However, in approximately 20% of the deals I work on, we lose opportunities because VMware only provides dollar-based pricing for the first year. When it comes to the following years, the contract requires renewals annually rather than allowing a fixed multi-year upfront payment. This approach is particularly problematic for government and public sector customers. Many of them are ready and willing to pay for three or five years in advance, but the current VMware model does not support that structure effectively. Because pricing is tied to the U.S. dollar and subject to yearly adjustments, VMware does not lock in pricing for the full term. From a customer’s perspective, this introduces uncertainty and makes procurement more complicated. Ideally, if a price is quoted—for example, $100 per year—it should remain consistent across a multi-year agreement. Customers would be comfortable committing to a five-year term if the price were fixed and predictable. Unfortunately, that flexibility is currently not available across VMware products, whether it is vSphere, VMware Tanzu solutions, or other offerings. For large enterprise environments, one-year commitments are usually not practical. Many enterprise customers prefer longer-term agreements for budgeting and procurement reasons. Even when they are willing to accept the higher cost associated with the core-based licensing model, the lack of a clear multi-year upfront option often becomes a deal-breaker.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A valuable feature was the use of a columnar database for large, ever-growing, big datasets."

"The performance of ad hoc aggregation queries is superior to any RDBMS that I have used and I have used them all."

"It is very straightforward and easy to work with."

"Infobright gave us the ability to avoid significant changes in our data structure and just use Infobright like BigDataMySql."

"ICE helped us improve the speed for the “group-by” query by 10x."

"We now have multiple times faster queries in comparison to MS SQL."

"The high compression and the relatively fast load for a free product."

"Infobright allowed us to reduce the number of moving parts and complexity that we had while providing good performance to produce our reports."

More Infobright DB pros

"We chose Greenplum because of the architecture in terms of clustering databases and being able to have, or at least utilize the resources that are sitting on a database."

"We use VMware RabbitMQ to transfer information from one point to another."

"After we implemented Greenplum, the loads were reduced to less than nine hours."

"Scalability is simple because it's an MPP database; if you need more processing power or you need more storage, you just add a few more nodes in the cluster, and it works on common commodity hardware, so you can use any type of server without needing proprietary hardware, making it fairly flexible."

"It's super easy to deploy and it also supports different languages and analytics."

"Loading batch data has really improved the efficiency of our organization."

"The most valuable feature is it’s robustness."

"In general, I think this is a very good platform, particularly as it's open source."

Cons

"There still are issues with data replication - Infobright is currently for one server (unless you buy the Infobright appliance)."

"There was no scalability at all. Infobright didn't permit any changes in tables."

"When running a complex subquery, the system hangs without giving the user any response."

"We didn’t purchase the Enterprise Edition because it was too expensive for a product that wasn’t going to replace our main DWH database (Oracle), but was, somehow, only an addition for it."

"MPP, distributed processing!!! And better integration with Hadoop."

"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."

"After all the re-work to our product to remove as much reliance on Infobright, and the extra hardware costs we had to absorb, there was definitely a negative return on investment."

"On the contrary, we have switched back to the MS SSAS Tabular Model, because of pricing policy."

"More stability in terms of query result."

"We found some issues with larger tables that have daily data appended, where after a while this seems to create lag in the query speed."

"Every so often, I need to clear out the queue during development."

"If it had a failure queue with robust delivery and recovery built-in with the same power, that would be great."

"Some integration with other platforms like design tools, and ETL development tools, that will enable some advanced functionality (like fully down processing, etc.) would be helpful in future releases."

"We had deployment issues after installing new patches."

"Difficult to integrate with automated test and CICD Moving beyond basic configurations can be challenging Not clear how to implement durable subscriber connections Not clear how a Rabbit service restart allows subscriber auto re-connect Service cluster failover depends on shared disk infrastructure."

"We had several de-clustering problems."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

"It is an open-source product."

"The product is available for free use since it is an open-source technology."

"are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."

"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."

"The price is pretty good."

"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."

"Since the tool is an open-source product, there is no need to pay anything."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

22%

Construction Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	52

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu GemFire?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is that it is a bit expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Tanzu GemFire?

In terms of weak points in VMware Tanzu Data Solutions, pricing is always the root cause of people not wanting to renew licenses or do any upgrades.

See all answers

Comparisons

MySQL vs Infobright DB

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs Infobright DB

Compared 7% of the time

SQL Server vs Infobright DB

Compared 4% of the time

SAP IQ vs Infobright DB

Compared 4% of the time

SAP BW4HANA vs Infobright DB

Compared 4% of the time

More Infobright DB Competitors

Teradata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

ActiveMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Nutanix Database Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 2% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB

October 2026

Download Infobright DB product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

October 2026

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

Infobright

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

Infobright DB is an established column-oriented database management system known for its analytical prowess in storing and managing large volumes of data efficiently.

Designed to handle intense data workloads, Infobright DB supports data warehousing and business intelligence operations. It is favored for its efficient use of storage and processing capabilities, making it an ideal choice for companies analyzing massive datasets. Infobright DB's analytic algorithms and data compression techniques make it suitable for enterprises seeking to process queries rapidly.

What are the essential features of Infobright DB?

Columnar Storage: Optimizes read performance by storing data in columns.
Data Compression: Reduces storage needs with advanced compression techniques.
Query Performance: Enhances speed through automatic query optimization.
Scalability: Handles terabytes of data without compromising performance.
Self-Management: Minimizes administrative tasks with automated maintenance.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating Infobright DB?

Cost Efficiency: Lower storage costs due to high data compression.
Improved Analytics: Faster data insights lead to better decision-making.
Resource Optimization: Requires fewer resources for maintenance and scaling.
Operational Simplicity: Ease of integration with existing systems.

Infobright DB is prevalent in industries like finance and telecommunications, providing robust data analysis and reporting capabilities. Its ability to manage large datasets efficiently makes it suitable for sectors needing real-time analytics and deep data insights.

IgniteTech

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

REZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, Bango

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

October 2026

Free Report: Infobright DB vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Infobright DB vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infobright DB vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors and best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.