Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] vs SharePlex comparison

Informatica and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Additionally, 90% of Informatica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Informatica PowerExchange [...

Read 23 Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] reviews

90% willing to recommend

SharePlex

Read 5 SharePlex reviews

1,900 Views
1,311 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Informatica PowerExchange [...

SharePlex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

Informatica PowerExchange and SharePlex compete in the enterprise data management category. Based on deployment and customer service, SharePlex has the upper hand due to its efficient support and ease of deployment.

Features:Informatica PowerExchange offers extensive real-time data integration and transformation capabilities. It is valued for its native data processing abilities and robust metadata management. SharePlex excels in core data replication, with strong synchronization features and reliable data transfer across environments.

Room for Improvement:Informatica PowerExchange needs to improve its integration with external systems, enhance its real-time capabilities, and address user concerns regarding ease of use and support. SharePlex could benefit from integrating machine learning, aligning with DevOps processes, and expanding data filtering for replication.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Informatica PowerExchange offers flexibility with on-premises, hybrid, and cloud deployment but is critiqued for complex configurations and support delays. SharePlex provides a streamlined setup process and receives positive feedback for customer service, simplifying deployment across multiple environments.

Pricing and ROI:Informatica PowerExchange is noted for high costs related to licensing and additional features, delivering value through integration capabilities. SharePlex is budget-friendly compared to competitors like Oracle GoldenGate, offering good value with lower expenses. Both solutions enhance decision-making but differ in ROI speed and calculation.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Informatica PowerExchange [...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SharePlex

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (48th)

Featured Reviews

Haider-AlAmeed

Sr. IT & Data Governance and Management Consultant & Technical Lead at a government with 51-200 employees

Facilitates seamless data exchange for Middle Eastern government entities while reducing costs and simplifying integration processes

Informatica PowerExchange is important for services and common services implementations. This allows workflow communication between different entities, providing proper services. The tool's governance features include HA rules, responsibilities, and policies which are highly valued. It also reduces the number of APIs needed for new integrations by offering a unified exchange platform that facilitates easy-to-use services without the need for coding.

Read full review

Kristopher Wells

Oracle DBA at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

It reduces the downtime and migration time exponentially

I would rate SharePlex's high availability, and disaster recovery features highly. It works as advertised in terms of rapid fill-over and switch-over opportunities. It reduces the migration time for a multi-terabyte database to an hour or less because it performs real-time replication. SharePlex reduces downtime and migration time exponentially. Something that could take 12 to 24 hours is cut down to one to two hours. By the time you start to migrate, the only remaining replication is a slight difference in data from the point when SharePlex has shut down, and the application has to also switch over to the new database. It allowed the company to replicate data more transparently. Some of the business executives probably don't even know it's there. It works 100 percent of the time, with little downtime or problems. It provides what is needed. There's little concern about whether or not it functions. It's allowed the company to achieve its objectives with its clients, reducing and minimizing downtime for substantial migrations and upgrades. It can reduce hardware and storage costs, but my company doesn't utilize it with high-availability architecture.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The scalability is excellent."

"From the product feature or product capability perspective, the aspects around integration, transformation, and standardization are valuable. It's fairly easy to use. It has a GUI-based interface."

"The main benefit of PowerExchange is its native real-time capabilities. Competing tools are counting on third-party packages or Oracle to offer real-time capabilities. However, Informatica has a native ability to scan the data on the file system level and capture the changes almost instantly when I push it to the consumers. The solution has a powerful built-in replication engine."

"Mainstream integration and real-time integration are the best features."

"The user interface and user experience are perfectly all right."

"It is easy to integrate the solution with other tools."

"The agentless RCDC enablement through PowerExchange is a great idea and has worked very well so far."

"I rate Informatica PowerExchange a ten out of ten."

More Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] pros

"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent."

"Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."

"There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target."

"I like SharePlex's Compare and Repair tool."

"The core replication and its performance. Performance is crucial, and SharePlex is by far the fastest. The way it handles replication to multiple targets along with basic filtering, as well as from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

Cons

"The solution could be made more user-friendly. The configurations are also quite difficult."

"The one place where it could be improved is definitely pricing. That's a very big problem. It depends product to product, but pricing is an issue."

"The major shortcoming of PowerExchange is high availability and failover. None of the versions we've used to date have had the out-of-the-box ability to enable failover and high-availability requirements. This is a significant challenge and risk."

"I have minimal exposure to PowerExchange at this point."

"It would be helpful to have more metadata provided, which is useful for engaging more users in data exchange."

"V10.2 is very stable, but we are still struggling to make V10.5 stable. We found services that were down, and PowerExchange stopped working."

"Informatica is very expensive in all aspects, so the pricing is something that could be improved."

"They should make it quick and easy for use of citizen data integration or for people or integrators developing at the customer side. They could be development teams within the business team. For them, the product owners can consider making it a little bit more seamless and a little bit more democratized."

More Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] cons

"The reporting features need improvement. It would be very good for users to have a clear understanding of the status of replication."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement."

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities. Often, if we want to improve the performance of posting, we have to bump up a parameter. That means we need to stop the process, come up with a figure that we want to bump the parameter up to, and then start SharePlex. Machine learning and AI capabilities for these kinds of improvement would tremendously help boost productivity for us."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a need to pay towards the licensing cost of the product. It is an expensive product."

"It's expensive. In fact, nobody would buy any product of Informatica if the price was the only consideration. It costs money, and it doesn't come cheap, but it provides value for money in many ways."

"Many users don't prefer to use the product, considering the high costs attached to the licensing part of the solution."

"The product is not very expensive."

"The cost of PowerExchange is reasonable. It does not rely on complicated formulas or unrealistic equations. The pricing model is straightforward. There is one component, and real-time integration is included. Some other solutions require purchasing additional modules or third-party plugins for this capability."

"An annual package license fee is required."

"There are licensing and connector costs. Basically, Informatica is pay-as-you-use."

"It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."

"It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Informatica PowerExchange?

The product’s flexibility is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Informatica PowerExchange?

Informatica PowerExchange is considered cost-efficient due to reduced number of APIs needed, enabling re-utilization of existing channels, cutting down on development and training costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Informatica PowerExchange?

It would be helpful to have more metadata provided, which is useful for engaging more users in data exchange. The addition of data quality dashboards or measures would also help in profiling data t...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Informatica PowerCenter vs Informatica PowerExchange [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Informatica PowerExchange [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Informatica PowerExchange [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Informatica PowerExchange [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

ODBC Drivers vs Informatica PowerExchange [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] Competitors

Oracle GoldenGate vs SharePlex

Compared 24% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs SharePlex

Compared 11% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SharePlex

Compared 9% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs SharePlex

Compared 9% of the time

Fivetran vs SharePlex

Compared 9% of the time

More SharePlex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Informatica PowerExchange [EOL]

January 2026

Download Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePlex

January 2026

Download SharePlex product report

Also Known As

PowerExchange, Connectors

Dell SharePlex, SharePlex

Overview

Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] offers advanced data integration capabilities, emphasizing data transformation, real-time integration, and connectivity to diverse data sources, ensuring seamless access and management of big data in complex environments.

Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] is a robust tool for managing data integration and transformation processes. It supports connectivity to numerous sources, enabling real-time data capture and transformation. With native connectors and APIs, it allows seamless integration, ensuring data mapping across data formats. While strong at data handling and integration, improvements in pricing, real-time processing, and enhanced technical support are necessary. Expanded cloud integration and improved high availability will further bolster its efficiency in managing extensive datasets, supporting ETL, and integrating systems like SAP.

What are the most important features of Informatica PowerExchange?

Data Transformation: Facilitates complex data mappings across formats.
Diverse Connectivity: Connects to multiple data sources, including non-native systems.
Real-Time Integration: Offers real-time data capture and processing capabilities.
Pushdown Optimization: Enhances performance by leveraging native database capabilities.
Change Data Capture: Supports incremental data updates, improving data freshness.

What benefits should be considered?

Scalability: Handles big data volumes efficiently, allowing for future growth.
Workflow Communication: Governance features streamline workflows and reduce API dependence.
Integration Flexibility: Supports integration with SAP and Hana, improving data management.
Fast Updates: Provides timely updates to integrated systems, enhancing decision-making.

Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] is implemented widely in sectors requiring robust data integration solutions. It serves industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, facilitating the creation of data warehouses and lakes. Used for ETL processes and operational analytics, it integrates systems like Hadoop, Oracle, and legacy environments, driving efficient communication and information sharing.

Informatica

SharePlex delivers robust database replication and migration capabilities, emphasizing performance, synchronization, and data integrity management. Supporting high availability and real-time data syncing, it serves organizations handling vast transaction volumes, especially in IoT data processing.

SharePlex offers reliable data transfer and efficient multi-target replication. Its features like Compare and Repair utilities assist in maintaining data consistency. With PEP fostering scalability for large transactions, it caters to businesses aiming to cut down migration windows and minimize outages. Users employ SharePlex in real-time syncing and failover scenarios across data centers, crucial for handling extensive transaction data during migrations or upgrades.

What are SharePlex's key features?

Core Replication: Ensures reliable data synchronization across multiple targets.
Data Integrity Management: Maintains accuracy during reading and writing processes.
Compare and Repair Utilities: Facilitate data consistency checks and fixes.
PEP: Enhances performance for large transaction volumes.

Why consider SharePlex for your database needs?

Scalability: Supports large-scale transactions with efficiency.
Minimized Downtime: Provides continuous data availability during operations.
Business Continuity: Enables seamless failover and data center transitions.
Real-time Syncing: Supports time-sensitive data processing requirements.

Organizations in sectors like finance and telecommunications implement SharePlex to maintain uninterrupted operations and ensure quick recovery times. By facilitating database migrations to cloud platforms like AWS, they achieve reduced downtime and enhanced operational efficiency, catering to the rigorous demands of data-driven industries.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

ACH Food, BNSF Railway Company, Illinois State University

Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, IBM and others in Data Integration. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.