Qlik Replicate vs SharePlex comparison

Qlik and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.5, while Quest Software is ranked #46. Qlik holds a 1.3% mindshare in DI, compared to Quest Software’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Qlik Replicate

Read 18 Qlik Replicate reviews

4,804 Views
3,651 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePlex

Read 5 SharePlex reviews

3,177 Views
2,065 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qlik Replicate

SharePlex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

SharePlex and Qlik Replicate are both competitors in the data replication and integration market. Qlik Replicate seems to have the upper hand due to its superior features, making it a preferred choice for many despite the higher cost.

Features:SharePlex offers reliable database replication, efficient change data capture, and minimal downtime for smoother operations. Its simplicity and scalability make it a strong choice for businesses focusing on performance and reliability. Qlik Replicate, meanwhile, provides diverse data management tasks with robust integrations, real-time processing, and a user-friendly interface, granting extensive flexibility and control.

Room for Improvement:SharePlex could enhance its feature range and integration capabilities to match broader market needs. Its user interface could also benefit from more intuitive design to reduce the learning curve. Lastly, improving real-time data processing features would add competitive value. Qlik Replicate could streamline its deployment complexity and optimize performance to reduce initial setup costs. Enhancing AI capabilities and expanding on current CDC functions may strengthen its market position.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:SharePlex is praised for its straightforward deployment and strong support services, which ensure smooth implementation. Qlik Replicate's deployment can be complex due to its extensive features but is supported by effective support strategies, offering users comprehensive service support.

Pricing and ROI:SharePlex provides a cost-effective solution, focusing on delivering a solid ROI through competitive pricing, making it attractive for budget-conscious strategies. Qlik Replicate tends to have higher setup costs due to its expansive features but aims to justify this with the potential for higher ROI in complex data processing environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Replicate vs. SharePlex Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate vs. SharePlex

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Replicate

Ranking in Data Integration

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SharePlex

Ranking in Data Integration

46th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Replicate is 1.3%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePlex is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qlik Replicate	1.3%
SharePlex	1.1%
Other	97.6%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Shraddha Waghulde

Solution Architect at Predoole Analytics

Real-time data synchronization faces challenges with monitoring and affordability

The user-friendly interface in Qlik Replicate simplifies configuration and management of replication tasks because it is based on GUI, and users don't have to write any scripts. It is entirely drag and drop functionality. Even with zero knowledge of scripting, users can effectively use Qlik Replicate. The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature. As soon as data is entered into the source, it gets captured at target locations. This occurs in near real-time, with replication happening within seconds at the target location. Additionally, whatever operations are performed at the source, whether adding data, deleting data, or updating anything, it gets replicated at target locations. It functions as data injection from source to target, ensuring all operations performed on the source system are replicated on target systems.

Read full review

Kristopher Wells

Oracle DBA at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

It reduces the downtime and migration time exponentially

I would rate SharePlex's high availability, and disaster recovery features highly. It works as advertised in terms of rapid fill-over and switch-over opportunities. It reduces the migration time for a multi-terabyte database to an hour or less because it performs real-time replication. SharePlex reduces downtime and migration time exponentially. Something that could take 12 to 24 hours is cut down to one to two hours. By the time you start to migrate, the only remaining replication is a slight difference in data from the point when SharePlex has shut down, and the application has to also switch over to the new database. It allowed the company to replicate data more transparently. Some of the business executives probably don't even know it's there. It works 100 percent of the time, with little downtime or problems. It provides what is needed. There's little concern about whether or not it functions. It's allowed the company to achieve its objectives with its clients, reducing and minimizing downtime for substantial migrations and upgrades. It can reduce hardware and storage costs, but my company doesn't utilize it with high-availability architecture.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Low-priced reporting and analytics solution, with good scalability and stability. It has on-premises and cloud versions that are cohesive and can integrate well."

"Its capability to replicate the data without impacting the source databases performance-wise is the most useful aspect."

"Qlik Replicate's ability to correctly map and replicate data, especially when converting complex fields like packed decimal fields into integers, stands out."

"Support has been great."

"It's very user-friendly when it comes to settings and configuration. It also offers very detailed logging about warnings and errors."

"It enables us to transform data at the latest stage rather than in ETL loads, so it's more ELT which is one of the advantages. It is also in near real-time, which brings significant advantage for our embedded analytics approach."

"We use Qlik Replicate to change data capture of databases in production environments."

"The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data applications."

More Qlik Replicate pros

"I like SharePlex's Compare and Repair tool."

"The synchronization, data backup, and data transfer are all valuable features of the solution."

"Try it out in your production and you won't be disappointed."

"The core replication and its performance. Performance is crucial, and SharePlex is by far the fastest. The way it handles replication to multiple targets along with basic filtering, as well as from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

"Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."

"SharePlex has been a good fit for us because it was not as expensive compared to GoldenGate, it was stable compared to AWS DMS, and it was a good product for what we were looking for and within our budget too."

"There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target."

"It works 100 percent of the time, with little downtime or problems."

More SharePlex pros

Cons

"The solution's flexibility to work with APIs should also be improved since it is very weak in working with APIs."

"When you remote into it the Qlik Replicate UI a lot of times it just freezes. We set up the EC2, to allow them to go to the server and click on the Replicate icon, it just opens up and just sits there. At that point, we have to go into the EC2 and then reboot the server. This should be fixed, it is frustrating."

"Some features on the graphical user interface are clunky."

"Support response times could be improved as there are sometimes delays in receiving replies to support cases."

"Support-wise, this solution is in need of improvement."

"The disadvantage is people are not going for this license because it is not marketed properly."

"It would be better if the solution’s pricing were more obvious."

"This product could be improved by providing more insight regarding errors. One of our customers that uses Qlik Replicate has had an issue. We tried to debug it, but we could not trace the error message. The infrastructure site should give us more insight about errors. Qlik Replicate is not a business solution, it's an IT solution. The reporting tools and bug site should be improved."

More Qlik Replicate cons

"The reporting features need improvement. It would be very good for users to have a clear understanding of the status of replication."

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement."

"The reporting features need improvement."

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities. Often, if we want to improve the performance of posting, we have to bump up a parameter. That means we need to stop the process, come up with a figure that we want to bump the parameter up to, and then start SharePlex. Machine learning and AI capabilities for these kinds of improvement would tremendously help boost productivity for us."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."

"Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."

"Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."

"It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets."

"It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?

In terms of handling diverse data sources, Qlik Replicate does exhibit certain shortcomings.Other areas of Qlik Replicate that could be improved include its ability to serve as a single point tool,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?

My usual use cases for Qlik Replicate involve my previous organization and my current organization. I can provide my current experience. As an Australian energy provider, we have a lot of operation...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Qlik Replicate?

The usefulness of the self-service interface of Qlik Replicate lies in its ability for users to independently access fresh data from the data lake or downstream SQL systems or ODS systems without n...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 7% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 5% of the time

Qlik Compose vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 4% of the time

Fivetran vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 4% of the time

More Qlik Replicate Competitors

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs SharePlex

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

Dataddo vs SharePlex

Compared 3% of the time

More SharePlex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate

June 2026

Download Qlik Replicate product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePlex

May 2026

Download SharePlex product report

Also Known As

Replicate, Qlik Replicate

Dell SharePlex, SharePlex

Overview

Qlik Replicate offers log-based change data capture, supporting real-time data updates without affecting source databases. It manages schema changes automatically and ensures seamless data distribution. The platform is user-friendly, enables late-stage transformation, and supports incremental replication and real-time analytics.

Qlik Replicate is known for efficiently capturing data changes with minimal impact on source databases. Its log-based change data capture capabilities ensure quick propagation of updates in real-time while automatically handling schema changes, facilitating ease in data management. The system's seamless integration across endpoints and a user-friendly interface make it an invaluable tool for incremental replication and real-time analytics. Despite some challenges like UI freezing, complex licensing, and error handling, it is instrumental in enhancing business growth and operational efficiency. Users continuously seek improvements in error insights, data compression, and expanded API integration to better serve diverse data sources and platforms.

What are the key features of Qlik Replicate?

Log-Based Change Data Capture: Captures data changes in real-time without heavy loads.
Automatic Schema Handling: Manages schema changes seamlessly.
Platform Integration: Integrates well with platforms like AWS and Snowflake.
User-Friendly Interface: Offers a simple and intuitive interface.
Real-Time Analytics: Enables immediate data insights for business growth.

What benefits should users expect from Qlik Replicate?

Improved Data Accessibility: Enhances access to data for decision-making.
Automation in Data Modeling: Automates repetitive tasks, saving time.
Efficient Change Data Capture: Reduces downtime and increases efficiency.
Streamlined Data Pipelines: Facilitates smoother data transfers.

Qlik Replicate is used across industries such as energy, banking, and semiconductors to modernize analytics environments and streamline data flows. It excels in data migration from systems like SAP HANA and Oracle to environments like AWS, significantly reducing downtime and boosting analytics capabilities. Organizations report advantages such as enhanced data accessibility and automated data modeling, which facilitates efficient change data capture and operational effectiveness.

Qlik

SharePlex delivers robust database replication and migration capabilities, emphasizing performance, synchronization, and data integrity management. Supporting high availability and real-time data syncing, it serves organizations handling vast transaction volumes, especially in IoT data processing.

SharePlex offers reliable data transfer and efficient multi-target replication. Its features like Compare and Repair utilities assist in maintaining data consistency. With PEP fostering scalability for large transactions, it caters to businesses aiming to cut down migration windows and minimize outages. Users employ SharePlex in real-time syncing and failover scenarios across data centers, crucial for handling extensive transaction data during migrations or upgrades.

What are SharePlex's key features?

Core Replication: Ensures reliable data synchronization across multiple targets.
Data Integrity Management: Maintains accuracy during reading and writing processes.
Compare and Repair Utilities: Facilitate data consistency checks and fixes.
PEP: Enhances performance for large transaction volumes.

Why consider SharePlex for your database needs?

Scalability: Supports large-scale transactions with efficiency.
Minimized Downtime: Provides continuous data availability during operations.
Business Continuity: Enables seamless failover and data center transitions.
Real-time Syncing: Supports time-sensitive data processing requirements.

Organizations in sectors like finance and telecommunications implement SharePlex to maintain uninterrupted operations and ensure quick recovery times. By facilitating database migrations to cloud platforms like AWS, they achieve reduced downtime and enhanced operational efficiency, catering to the rigorous demands of data-driven industries.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare

Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate vs. SharePlex

June 2026

Free Report: Qlik Replicate vs. SharePlex

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Replicate vs. SharePlex and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Replicate vs. SharePlex report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.