Intercept X Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams comparison

Sophos and Malwarebytes are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Sophos is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.3, while Malwarebytes is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.3. Sophos holds a 1.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to Malwarebytes’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Sophos users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Malwarebytes users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 15, 2026

Malwarebytes Teams and Intercept X Endpoint are competitors in the endpoint protection category. Intercept X Endpoint has the upper hand in advanced machine learning features, while Malwarebytes excels in user-friendly setup and cloud management.

Features: Malwarebytes Teams is appreciated for its ease of use, effective threat detection capacities, and straightforward cloud management. Intercept X Endpoint offers advanced machine learning, deep learning capabilities, and centralized management, enhancing threat analysis and response.

Room for Improvement: Malwarebytes Teams could improve its user interface to reduce false positives and enhance reporting functions. It also needs better AI integration and platform compatibility. Intercept X Endpoint can enhance processing efficiency and integration with third-party tools, as users report high resource consumption during scans and a complex interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions offer flexible deployment options. Malwarebytes Teams is easier to deploy with accessible customer service, while Intercept X Endpoint might require more technical support for complex environments. Overall user satisfaction with customer support is reported for both products.

Pricing and ROI: Malwarebytes Teams offers competitive pricing, though perceived as expensive in some regions. It provides value through ease of use and effective protection. Intercept X Endpoint, with a premium price, is justified by advanced features and accessibility compared to alternatives. Both products offer strong ROI, preventing costly breaches, with perceptions of value depending on business needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Intercept X Endpoint vs. Malwarebytes Teams Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Intercept X Endpoint vs. Malwarebytes Teams

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.7%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Intercept X Endpoint is 1.7%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Malwarebytes Teams is 1.7%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.7%
Intercept X Endpoint	1.7%
Malwarebytes Teams	1.7%
Other	92.9%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Abhijit Mukherji

IT Head at Dee Development

Has struggled to detect major threats but has offered basic protection over time

Intercept X Endpoint could learn from CrowdStrike in terms of overall performance and filtering because performance is most important, especially these days as Windows is getting buggier and buggier, which puts a huge load on the PC, and even with the most advanced CPUs and everything in place, it still lags in performance in so many places, thanks to Windows' clumsy design of these collaboration suites that make it extremely heavy on PC's resources. The interface of Intercept X Endpoint is quite old-fashioned. The Sophos interfaces, including for Intercept X Endpoint, are quite bad actually; to be very honest, even in UTM boxes, they are not great at all. You can hardly see a very small portion of windows while it's creating the firewall rules, and we have been complaining about this for quite some time, but there hasn't been any improvement on those grounds. Intercept X Endpoint's anti-ransomware capabilities failed us during a bad attack, and just because of our own backup policies, we could restore our normal operations; otherwise, if we had to depend on this solution, we would have been long dead because the infection was so bad, it couldn't even detect the infection. Intercept X Endpoint cannot handle zero-day attacks; in my experience, last year, we had this major issue with a malware attack, and it happened just because of our backup policies that we were able to recover without any support from Sophos, which just told us they would charge us some 1 Crore in rupees. Intercept X Endpoint should improve their implementation; things will never be perfect for the new world. This new world is always facing new kinds of attacks and new ways to compromise the system. They need to learn fast, implement fast, and sometimes redesigning the solution is the solution—not just patchwork. There was a time we used to love Sophos because of its fresh design and innovative thought. In my experience, when technical companies are led by MBA professionals, they lose their shine on the technical part and become more dependent on target sales; it turns into a marketing-centric operation that loses the technical focus completely.

Read full review

reviewer2594097

Chief Executive Officer at a wholesaler/distributor with 11-50 employees

Exceptional malware protection with regular updates and behavior-based detection

There are no built-in backups or integrated backup options, which could be an opportunity. The free version is effective, however, the paid version is pricey compared to it. Other customers have mentioned issues with false positives. It lacks enterprise-level management and more enterprise functionality. CrowdStrike and SentinelOne are much more enterprise-grade solutions. Malwarebytes has limited integration with cybersecurity tools and lacks enterprise integrations because it is not an enterprise product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Since they've done their most recent update, the ease to isolate endpoints is valuable. If we find one where there is a virus on it, we can easily isolate it. We don't even have to contact the user. We don't have to manually take them off the network. We can easily isolate them."

"We have found in our test Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks to be a very good tool."

"Palo Alto is the best security solution in the market."

"Cortex XDR's most valuable feature is its intelligence-based dashboards."

"The best feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is that it collects logs from different sections such as the endpoint, the network, and the cloud, making it easy to investigate alerts, collect some of the investigation packages related to the infected machines, and provide live response."

"I generally believe that Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is probably the best in the market right now."

"Traps has drastically reduced our endpoint attack surface via advanced detection capabilities, sandboxing of never before seen programs, and by drastically limiting where executables can launch in the first place."

"We can visualize and control the activities in the environment from anywhere."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Solution for endpoint detection and response, with good stability and scalability, and users also benefit from email protection and data loss prevention."

"That's what the Intercept X is designed to do."

"The most valuable feature of Intercept X its ability to stay ahead of the infection. By the time the ransomware spreads to the next machine in line, the data has already been encrypted on that workstation. It didn't matter what the ransomware did because could go in and get it back."

"This is the best solution that we use and need."

"Sophos does this exceptionally well."

"There are additional security features in Sophos Intercept X as well as proxy rules and settings that help us in minimizing the sites that our agents can go to, even after their work hours."

"It's a complete antivirus solution that has everything in it."

"If they are looking for something that is simple and reliable, then this is a good choice."

More Intercept X Endpoint pros

"The solution is very good at scanning; it's a good product, it does the job, it offers good protection, and I haven't come across any issues so far which I need to escalate."

"I was very satisfied with Malwarebytes in terms of its antivirus abilities."

"I like the solution's ability to detect potentially unwanted programs. For some reason, it seems superior to other solutions, or at least in comparison to McAfee."

"From our experience, it provides 100% visibility and detects hundreds of infections."

"The most valuable features of Malwarebytes are the agents, user experience, efficiency of the findings, and MDR features."

"The solution has helped to increase staff productivity by ten percent."

"Being able to cloud manage it from just a cloud login is valuable. We can get to it from anywhere, which is really helpful. The fact that we can remediate from the cloud console is one of our favorite features."

"Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience."

More Malwarebytes Teams pros

Cons

"When it comes to core analysis, and security analysis, Cortex needs to provide more information."

"The solution should force customers to integrate with network traffic to see the full benefits of XDR."

"They have the worst support, as a company, that I have ever worked with, as they are difficult to get a hold of and keep on the phone. They don't know what they are talking about when you get them on the phone. They don't like to respond to messages when you send them to them. They like to "research problems" for weeks on end, then pass you off to somebody else."

"The playbooks could be improved to include more functionalities or actions."

"It'll help if customization was easier."

"It's not an ideal choice for smaller businesses, as you need a minimum of 200 endpoints to even use the solution at all."

"The solution lacks real-time, on-demand antivirus."

"I recommend adding a data loss prevention (DLP) solution to Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"Integration with firewall solutions could be better."

"The initial setup can be a bit challenging."

"What I think Sophos can improve is with the data-loss feature, especially when it comes to using USB sticks and USB hard disks."

"Intercept X needs more reporting and device management features, so I can get messages from PCs that let me know if I need to do something with them."

"The support on offer isn't ideal. In terms of the support on offer, for example, if there was a zero-day kind of attack or something, the turnaround time that Sophos offers is not acceptable."

"The integration has room for improvement, especially with Mac OS."

"From the management side, we receive detailed information. Sophos has many features, such as Threat Hunting but that comes with the XDR version of the solution. There's Sophos Intercept X and then there's Sophos Intercept X with XDR technology. We bought the XDR and then now the MTR, Managed Threat Response version available too. They have different packages for clients which gives them different options to pick from. If Sophos could combine more features into one package it would be beneficial."

"The support needs improvement."

More Intercept X Endpoint cons

"Its price can also be improved. It is really expensive."

"The product is a little bit more expensive than the other brands."

"Malwarebytes is too simplistic. From a SOC IR perspective, it doesn't give you very much data around it. It doesn't tie things or provide SHA-1 and SHA-256 detection information, which makes it hard to do an additional investigation."

"The product update capability needs to be improved."

"We have noticed that when the solution is doing the scanning, all the scanning activities make the device heavier. It slows down your machine."

"Notifications are lacking."

"The free version is effective, however, the paid version is pricey compared to it."

"Requires increased efficiency in terms of detecting false positives."

More Malwarebytes Teams cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"It has a yearly renewal."

"This is an expensive solution."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"I don't recall what the cost was, but it wasn't really that expensive."

"It is "expensive" and flexible."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Intercept X for endpoints is around $35 per user per year. The server version is $95 per server per year."

"When you start going to the EDR technologies and the MTR, it is a little bit expensive. It's a very good technology, and obviously, you're going to pay for it, but the pricing could do a little bit of work."

"Licensing fees are paid monthly."

"The solution offers both a three-year license and an annual license. I would rate the product's pricing a one out of ten."

"The pricing is quite expensive compared to the rest. I would rate the pricing a four out of ten; one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"You are able to purchase more licenses for the number of devices or servers that you require. There are many other features available but our license does not include them, such as XDR, which is endpoint detection and response. We have not explored the new features as of yet but plan to in the coming future."

"There is a license required to use this solution."

"Customers need to pay for a license for Intercept X Endpoint based on the number of users and servers they have. The pricing is considered normal and not overly expensive."

More Intercept X Endpoint pricing and cost advice

"I would say that it's affordable. It costs much less than Sentinel One, CrowdStrike, or anything of that nature. But, at the same time, you are getting what you pay for. So I would say it's one of the best when you're comparing traditional NextGen AVs like Webroot that aren't the best in the bunch."

"The platform pricing is competitive with other antivirus products."

"The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."

"Its cost is around $60 a machine. The cost of the total solution for 250 people is about $8,500 a year. If we add EDR to it, it will bring that cost up to about $15,000. The cost for Carbon Black is about $25,000, which is $10,000 more, but you get all AI functions with it."

"The licensing is per seat, with clients being a little less expensive than servers. If we need more licenses, we can accomplish that within a day. As Malwarebytes adds new features to their product, such as DNS filtering and a patching module, they want to charge us more even though we're a premium user, which isn't ideal."

"Malwarebytes is a cost-effective product."

"The price of Malwarebytes is in the middle range compared to other vendors."

"Its licensing is annual. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

More Malwarebytes Teams pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	52

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	76
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

How does Crodwstrike Falcon compare with Sophos Intercept X?

I like that Crowdstrike Falcon allows me to easily correlate data between my firewalls. Its detection and machine lea...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos Intercept X?

Intercept X Endpoint has some impact on the budget. It is quite costly when measuring Intercept X Endpoint's protecti...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sophos Intercept X?

Intercept X Endpoint can be improved in several ways. Currently, it is only available on the cloud, and having it ava...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Malwarebytes?

My primary use case is that it's protecting me against malware.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Intercept X Endpoint

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Intercept X Endpoint

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Intercept X Endpoint

Compared 5% of the time

Sophos MDR vs Intercept X Endpoint

Compared 3% of the time

More Intercept X Endpoint Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 6% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 2% of the time

More Malwarebytes Teams Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

June 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Intercept X Endpoint

June 2026

Download Intercept X Endpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams

June 2026

Download Malwarebytes Teams product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Sophos Intercept X

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Intercept X Endpoint is known for its advanced threat detection, user-friendly interface, and centralized management, alongside powerful cloud-based capabilities that enhance security using AI and machine learning.

Intercept X Endpoint strengthens security posture through AI and machine learning, effectively countering unknown threats. It includes ransomware protection, server lockdown, application control, and synchronized security with Sophos Firewall. Appreciated for preventing data leaks, it ensures superior malware and web filtering, while offering a robust EDR component for managed detection. Highlighted for its scalability and cost-effectiveness, it serves well in endpoint protection, covering antivirus, ransomware, malware, and DLP services across PCs, servers, and mobile devices.

What are the key features of Intercept X Endpoint?

Threat Detection: Utilizes AI for advanced threat detection.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies centralized management.
Cloud-Based Capabilities: Enhances security operations and scalability.
Ransomware Protection: Guards against data encryption threats.
Server Lockdown: Restricts unauthorized server access.
Application Control: Manages application usage securely.
Synchronized Security: Integrates with Sophos Firewall for comprehensive security.

What benefits should be sought in reviews?

Effective Threat Management: Protects against emerging cyber threats.
Scalability: Caters to growing organizational demands smoothly.
Cost-Effectiveness: Provides competitive pricing for advanced features.
Advanced AI Applications: Leverages AI for superior threat mitigation.
Comprehensive Endpoint Coverage: Extends protection across multiple device types.

Intercept X Endpoint finds usage across industries by protecting endpoints against cyber threats. Deployable through Sophos Central for remote management, it suits entities lacking extensive security expertise. AI algorithms deliver advanced threat protection, making it a smart choice for organizations across different sectors. Aligning with varied technological environments enhances its acceptability, while integration with existing systems is supported.

Sophos

Malwarebytes Teams provides advanced threat protection and efficient detection and removal capabilities, featuring cloud-based management and robust endpoint security. It operates on Windows and Mac, emphasizing threat interception and the cloud-management interface.

Offering comprehensive protection, Malwarebytes Teams is recognized for its customizable and user-friendly interface. The anti-exploit feature effectively intercepts threats in Office applications, while frequent updates maintain security standards. Efficient scanning, threat response, and rollback features are highly valued, as is its ability to integrate seamlessly into diverse environments. Remote accessibility and cloud management enhance its robust endpoint protection.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes Teams?

Comprehensive Threat Protection: Advanced detection and removal for malware.
Cloud-Based Management: Manage security conveniently from the cloud.
Anti-Exploit Feature: Protects against threats in Office applications.
Efficient Scanning: Quick and effective threat detection.
Threat Response and Rollback: Swift response with rollback capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Continuous updates and strong endpoint protection.
Integration Flexibility: Works well with existing environments.
Reporting Capabilities: Offers effective reporting and monitoring.
Remote Accessibility: Manage security from any location.

Malwarebytes Teams is widely implemented in cybersecurity across industries for endpoint security. Organizations deploy it for malware detection, intrusion protection, and compliance scanning, relying on its antivirus capabilities and ransomware rollback. It serves as a secondary tool alongside primary systems to enhance security on both Windows and Mac environments, particularly valued for monitoring usage behaviors without controlling endpoints.

Malwarebytes

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Flexible Systems

Knutson Construction

Buyer's Guide

Intercept X Endpoint vs. Malwarebytes Teams

June 2026

Free Report: Intercept X Endpoint vs. Malwarebytes Teams

Find out what your peers are saying about Intercept X Endpoint vs. Malwarebytes Teams and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Intercept X Endpoint vs. Malwarebytes Teams report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.