Symantec Endpoint Security and Intercept X Endpoint compete in the endpoint protection category. Intercept X Endpoint appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and higher user satisfaction.
Features: Symantec Endpoint Security users highlight its strong antivirus capabilities, firewall, and device management features. Intercept X Endpoint is praised for its deep learning technology, anti-exploit measures, and root cause analysis features.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest that Symantec Endpoint Security could improve its malware detection rates and simplify its configuration options. Users note that Intercept X Endpoint needs more intuitive logging and improved reporting functions. Symantec requires more critical updates to stay competitive.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Endpoint Security deployment is straightforward but time-consuming, with decent customer service. Intercept X Endpoint has a faster, easier deployment process and users report higher satisfaction with their support services.
Pricing and ROI: Symantec Endpoint Security's pricing is competitive but includes higher setup costs, with good ROI. Intercept X Endpoint, despite higher initial costs, is considered worth the investment due to its advanced features and better ROI as perceived by users.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
I have seen a return on investment with Intercept X Endpoint.
Symantec Endpoint Security filled gaps in our toolset, particularly with the ability to control network firewall on hosts remotely, which was greatly appreciated.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
Technical support from Sophos is rated as nine out of ten, which represents high quality.
There are issues with onboarding technical engineers to resolve problems, which causes delays.
When you are in real deep trouble, you just want to get out of it; you don't need so many jargons.
In some cases, it rates as high as ten out of ten, while in others, it can be as low as eight.
There is no support in the German language, which is a problem for many public tenders.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
The customer support is scalable because if we take licenses for fifty machines and later purchase one hundred fifty more, we can increase our licensing with the support team.
The tool's scalability is good, and I would rate it an eight out of ten.
Intercept X Endpoint's scalability is good.
Symantec Endpoint Security is quite scalable, and it is very important for large clients.
The scalability of the servers is good, as it requires computational powers.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
In terms of stability, I would rate Intercept X Endpoint an eight out of ten.
To improve Intercept X Endpoint performance, upgrades in RAM and other system features are needed.
I have encountered issues where I had to uninstall and reinstall the product on end users' computers to view the logs again.
Previously, we used to have multiple servers such as GUP servers and numerous servers for pushing updates, but we reduced it and transitioned almost 30,000 devices to CrowdStrike, which was easy to manage.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
There should be a profile where I can see what files Sophos is scanning.
Intercept X Endpoint's anti-ransomware capabilities failed us during a bad attack, and just because of our own backup policies, we could restore our normal operations.
Intercept X Endpoint sometimes slows down machines due to high CPU utilization and significant RAM consumption during scanning.
Device management is not very good and I am not enabling it in my organization due to security reasons.
I would like to see improvements in the scanning part of the solution, specifically to enhance the CPU and hard disk usage during scanning and updates to prevent disruption during work hours.
It is cumbersome to use, particularly in handling firewall management.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
It is quite costly when measuring Intercept X Endpoint's protective capabilities against zero-day attacks.
The setup costs and licensing for Sophos Intercept X Endpoint are good.
The pricing of Intercept X Endpoint is a bit high.
It seems to be half the cost or more affordable than other solutions.
The pricing is very low compared to other companies like SentinelOne and others.
I rate the pricing, setup cost, and licensing around nine out of ten.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
The stronger the AI/ML in an endpoint, the better the protection against unknown threats.
Intercept X Endpoint is the only endpoint security product I know that provides content filtering and application controls.
Intercept X Endpoint offers multiple features, including the Threat Analysis Center, remote run ransomware protection, and CryptoGuard.
Symantec Endpoint Security offers great features such as reporting capabilities with a customized dashboard that pulls in EDR timelines, threat maps, and compliance metrics into one view.
Symantec Endpoint Security offers many valuable features, such as file explosion, application learning, DLP, injection detection, and EDR solutions for traffic control.
The incident response capabilities allow me to resolve authentication and support issues promptly, ensuring the system operates without downtime.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.6% |
| Symantec Endpoint Security | 3.4% |
| Intercept X Endpoint | 1.7% |
| Other | 91.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 45 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 48 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 75 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 69 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 63 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Intercept X Endpoint is known for its advanced threat detection, user-friendly interface, and centralized management, alongside powerful cloud-based capabilities that enhance security using AI and machine learning.
Intercept X Endpoint strengthens security posture through AI and machine learning, effectively countering unknown threats. It includes ransomware protection, server lockdown, application control, and synchronized security with Sophos Firewall. Appreciated for preventing data leaks, it ensures superior malware and web filtering, while offering a robust EDR component for managed detection. Highlighted for its scalability and cost-effectiveness, it serves well in endpoint protection, covering antivirus, ransomware, malware, and DLP services across PCs, servers, and mobile devices.
What are the key features of Intercept X Endpoint?Intercept X Endpoint finds usage across industries by protecting endpoints against cyber threats. Deployable through Sophos Central for remote management, it suits entities lacking extensive security expertise. AI algorithms deliver advanced threat protection, making it a smart choice for organizations across different sectors. Aligning with varied technological environments enhances its acceptability, while integration with existing systems is supported.
Symantec Endpoint Security is a comprehensive protection tool designed for antimalware and antivirus defense. Providing centralized management and smooth deployment, it effectively secures environments from small businesses to extensive networks.
Symantec Endpoint Security serves organizations by offering robust protection with features like rapid deployment and centralized management, critical for securing workstations and servers. While appreciated for efficient resource utilization and stable operation, some users report issues with virus detection and cumbersome updates. Pricing is often considered high. It is a popular choice among IT consultants, academic institutions, and service providers for its ability to manage broad and varied security needs efficiently.
What are the key features of Symantec Endpoint Security?In industries like academia and IT consulting, Symantec Endpoint Security fulfills specific needs for robust endpoint protection. Its centralized management and application control make it suitable for educational institutions managing large network systems, while service providers benefit from its flexible deployment options.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
