Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ivanti Security Controls vs PDQ Deploy comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Security Controls
Ranking in Patch Management
12th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PDQ Deploy
Ranking in Patch Management
27th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Ivanti Security Controls is 2.5%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PDQ Deploy is 2.4%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Ivanti Security Controls2.5%
PDQ Deploy2.4%
Other95.1%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Chethan R - PeerSpot reviewer
Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS
Has reduced hardware strain through agentless patching and improved asset visibility
This solution does not have capability of managing applications. It is only used for asset management and patch management. Regarding analytics for Ivanti Security Controls, it does not have extensive capabilities. It is a basic tool from Ivanti for scanning and deploying. It does not have analytics features such as EDR or security tools available in the market. It only has capability to check missing patches, find them, and deploy them. When it comes to reports, compliance reports or similar types of reports are not user-friendly. Expertise is required for handling these aspects. The asset management in Ivanti Security Controls needs more visibility. Additionally, it can be improved to handle in-house applications, which currently cannot be installed. It can only handle existing applications, unlike Ivanti's Endpoint Manager. It should have additional features in this area that need improvement.
Use PDQ Deploy?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
9%
Government
18%
University
13%
Healthcare Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Ivanti Security Controls?
Ivanti Security Controls is a powerful product, but it has quite a steep learning curve. There is quite a lot to learn, though it proves to be very powerful if you put in the time to learn how to u...
What is your primary use case for Ivanti Security Controls?
We are using Ivanti Security Controls for deploying Windows updates to Windows servers.
What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Security Controls?
I am currently working with Ivanti Security Controls as a customer. I think Ivanti Security Controls is an effective product for this purpose. I would give tech support for Ivanti Security Controls...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
1. Atlassian 2. Cisco 3. Dell 4. Google 5. IBM 6. Intel 7. Microsoft 8. Oracle 9. SAP 10. ServiceNow 11. VMware 12. Adobe 13. Autodesk 14. Canonical 15. Cloudflare 16. Docker 17. GitHub 18. GoDaddy 19. HubSpot 20. Intuit 21. Klarna 22. LinkedIn 23. Lyft 24. Mailchimp 25. MongoDB 26. Netflix 27. Pinterest 28. Salesforce 29. Spotify 30. Square 31. Stripe 32. Twitter
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, Vicarius and others in Patch Management. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.