JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs NGINX Plus comparison

Red Hat and F5 are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Red Hat is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.5, while F5 is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8. Red Hat holds a 6.2% mindshare in AIS, compared to F5’s 9.3% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of F5 users who would recommend it.

JBoss Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 9 JBoss Enterprise Application Platform reviews

1,081 Views
1,081 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

NGINX Plus

Read 32 NGINX Plus reviews

3,866 Views
1,546 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

JBoss Enterprise Applicatio...

NGINX Plus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and NGINX Plus are competing in the enterprise-level application deployment and management category. NGINX Plus often has the upper hand due to its advanced feature set, appealing to those prioritizing features over cost.

Features: JBoss offers high availability, clustering, and integration with Red Hat services, with strong emphasis on a full Java EE stack. NGINX Plus provides load balancing, content caching, and excels in edge computing with high performance and scalability, making it versatile for varied application architectures.

Room for Improvement: JBoss could improve in catering to non-Java environments, enhancing configuration flexibility, and reducing deployment complexity for broader appeal. NGINX Plus may need to streamline its configuration process, enhance documentation for less experienced users, and improve user interface for configuration management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JBoss benefits from comprehensive documentation and Red Hat's established support network, making it generally easier for Java-centric enterprises. NGINX Plus, while more straightforward for web server experts, may require a learning curve due to its numerous configurations, but its deployability is beneficial for scalability.

Pricing and ROI: JBoss's setup cost is favorable for enterprises invested in Red Hat environments, providing good ROI for Java-centric projects. NGINX Plus offers flexible pricing with competitive ROI, especially for users utilizing its high-performance capabilities and broad integration options. The distinct aspect is JBoss's focus on enterprise Java applications versus NGINX's appeal for a versatile application delivery platform.

To learn more, read our detailed JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. NGINX Plus Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. NGINX Plus

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JBoss Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NGINX Plus

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is 6.2%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NGINX Plus is 9.3%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NGINX Plus	9.3%
JBoss Enterprise Application Platform	6.2%
Other	84.5%

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Karthikeyan Raman

CIO at Clayfin

Lightweight clustering has improved banking channels and delivers faster, reliable deployments

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform's best features include that it was very simple to install and enabling clustering between two instances was simpler than compared to WebSphere or WebLogic. Clustering became very much easier, and setup was very straightforward. I used other products such as WebSphere and WebLogic, and I saw JBoss Enterprise Application Platform as a very lightweight container rather than a heavy container. The startup time was much faster compared to other application servers, and debugging was reliable. We did not see the application going into a hang state. It never happened in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform. Other application servers typically degrade over time, and the application resources can become hung. The memory utilization and the heap garbage collection that was running was very efficient, so the resource utilization was better. The robust security model of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform contributed positively to our data integrity and compliance in our development processes, and it was very good.

Read full review

Michael Olayemi

Senior Software Engineer at Checkit

Enables public access and secure configurations through reverse proxy

The primary valuable feature of NGINX for me is its ability to provide a reverse proxy. I have found that this feature supports our local server, and I am able to connect through our DNS system, making it accessible publicly. Additionally, the integration with SSL certificates and the configuration capabilities make it a valuable solution for my use case. Without NGINX, users would not be able to access our application, which means there is positive ROI from using NGINX as it is crucial for the functioning of my organization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance."

"The deployment and initial setup is easy, it is easier than the previous version."

"It's convenient and barebone."

"JBoss Enterprise Application Platform works very well."

"Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."

"The solution is quite stable."

"Its technical support is excellent."

"The robust security model of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform contributed positively to our data integrity and compliance in our development processes, and it was very good."

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform pros

"The web proxy and the database proxy are excellent."

"NGINX Plus also has NGINX App Protect. It's a separate module, which is inspired by the F5 apps."

"NGINX works much better than HAProxy in our current hardware and architecture for HTTP/HTTPS load balancing. "

"The flexibility of its modules allow it to be scalable."

"-"

"The product is lightweight and fast."

"I receive very good support."

"It's lightweight software that can handle heavy loads efficiently."

More NGINX Plus pros

Cons

"A graphic user interface can be added."

"In my opinion, there are areas that could be improved with JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, such as the management console."

"It's hard to find out the root cause of errors."

"This solution needs better management UI."

"Sometimes, I observe the memory usage at 100% for the server, and this issue could be improved."

"It was too expensive to license JBoss Enterprise Application Platform for each process."

"Its architecture needs improvement."

"Lacks some functional requirements."

"I would like the configuration process to be more simplified."

"One area of improvement could be that NGINX could provide a means to generate self-signed SSL certificates."

"The solution must improve its performance."

"It would be good if NGINX provided a graphical user interface."

"The center management system could be improved."

"I would like to see the Grafana integration in NGINX which is already present in HAProxy. Grafana integration will help the solution visualize all the data analytics on the dashboard which is currently not present."

"The biggest room for improvement would be to allow NGINX Core machines to cluster for memory zones in some way with a plug and play module. "

"The scaling should be built into the software rather than configured from an outside source."

More NGINX Plus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an open-source solution."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"NGINX Plus is an open-source solution with limited additional features. When you try to get additional features in the solution, then you need to pay an extra amount to NGINX Plus."

"NGINX Plus is worth it, if you need it. If you do not need the features or support, the free and open source package is more than capable. "

"You pay for each feature that you want."

"I am not so happy with their pricing policy, but this is not the worse thing in my life. I can tolerate it."

"NGINX is a free tool in Brazil. There are some companies which do support it."

"The cost is reasonable."

"There's an open-source version of NGINX that is free."

"The price is the cost to contract support with a specialized company, usually during consulting hours."

More NGINX Plus pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Media Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with JBoss Enterprise Application Platform?

I lost one opportunity for licensing to a bank that was implementing on-premises. It was too expensive to license JBoss Enterprise Application Platform for each process. The customer needed to impl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JBoss Enterprise Application Platform?

I have an application with JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and a middleware. I used JBoss Enterprise Application Platform for about eight years until 2016. I implemented a ticketing solution ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JBoss Enterprise Application Platform?

The customer needed to implement on a server with 32 processes, and the price from a local provider was approximately $64,000.

See all answers

Which is better - IIS or NGINX Plus?

IIS is a flexible, secure, and manageable web server to host anything on the web. IIS’s scalable and open architecture can handle the most demanding tasks. From media streaming to web applications,...

See all answers

What do you like most about NGINX Plus?

It performs very well. That's one of the primary reasons we use NGINX.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NGINX Plus?

Pricing is reasonable and that is fine.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 55% of the time

Microsoft System Center vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Web Server vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 7% of the time

WebLogic Suite vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Competitors

IIS vs NGINX Plus

Compared 17% of the time

Apache Web Server vs NGINX Plus

Compared 14% of the time

HAProxy vs NGINX Plus

Compared 10% of the time

NetScaler vs NGINX Plus

Compared 9% of the time

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs NGINX Plus

Compared 2% of the time

More NGINX Plus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

January 2026

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform report

Download JBoss Enterprise Application Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

NGINX Plus

January 2026

Download NGINX Plus product report

Also Known As

JBoss EAP, Red Hat EAP

NGINX

Overview

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is an open source platform for modern Java applications deployed in any environment. JBoss EAPâs architecture is modular, and cloud ready. The platform offers powerful management and automation for greater developer productivity. It is based on the open source Wildfly project (formerly known as JBoss Application Server).

Red Hat

NGINX Plus is a versatile solution that offers load balancing, caching, proxying, and API deployment capabilities. It can be deployed on private or public clouds and is ideal for building CDN solutions. The solution can also be used to secure web applications and replace web services like Apache.

NGINX has helped organizations improve functioning, reduce downtimes, and offer a DevOps-friendly solution. Its community support and documentation are highly regarded, and its configuration is more straightforward, making it a recommended choice over HAProxy.

Sample Customers

APD, Banco Azteca, Roche, Tata Sky, Frost Bank

Locaweb, AppNexus, Wix, Reliam, Montana Interactive, MuleSoft, Warpwire, Discovery Education, InkaBinka, WordPress.com, Gogo, GOV.UK, NASA

Buyer's Guide

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. NGINX Plus

December 2025

Free Report: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. NGINX Plus

Find out what your peers are saying about JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. NGINX Plus and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. NGINX Plus report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.