JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Microsoft System Center comparison

Red Hat and Microsoft are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Red Hat is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.5, while Microsoft is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.7. Red Hat holds a 5.8% mindshare in AIS, compared to Microsoft’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

JBoss Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 9 JBoss Enterprise Application Platform reviews

1,138 Views
1,138 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Microsoft System Center

Read 20 Microsoft System Center reviews

987 Views
336 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

JBoss Enterprise Applicatio...

Microsoft System Center

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and Microsoft System Center compete in enterprise solutions. Microsoft System Center has the upper hand with its advanced functionality and comprehensive management features.

Features: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform focuses on middleware capabilities with strong application development, effective clustering, and load balancing. Microsoft System Center offers automation, third-party management pack integration, and extensive system monitoring.

Room for Improvement: JBoss could enhance integration with other tools, improve support documentation, and streamline its user interface. Microsoft System Center could simplify initial setup, enhance third-party support beyond Microsoft products, and improve its scalability for large deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JBoss provides straightforward deployment and good customer support but requires expertise for optimal use. Microsoft System Center offers robust deployment support and strong customer service but involves more complexity initially.

Pricing and ROI: JBoss is cost-effective with favorable pricing and good ROI, appealing to smaller enterprises. Microsoft System Center has higher initial costs but potentially offers greater ROI for larger organizations through its expansive features.

To learn more, read our detailed JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JBoss Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft System Center

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is 5.8%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft System Center is 1.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
JBoss Enterprise Application Platform	5.8%
Microsoft System Center	1.9%
Other	92.3%

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Karthikeyan Raman

CIO at Clayfin

Lightweight clustering has improved banking channels and delivers faster, reliable deployments

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform's best features include that it was very simple to install and enabling clustering between two instances was simpler than compared to WebSphere or WebLogic. Clustering became very much easier, and setup was very straightforward. I used other products such as WebSphere and WebLogic, and I saw JBoss Enterprise Application Platform as a very lightweight container rather than a heavy container. The startup time was much faster compared to other application servers, and debugging was reliable. We did not see the application going into a hang state. It never happened in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform. Other application servers typically degrade over time, and the application resources can become hung. The memory utilization and the heap garbage collection that was running was very efficient, so the resource utilization was better. The robust security model of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform contributed positively to our data integrity and compliance in our development processes, and it was very good.

Read full review

Carl Palapal

Sr. Sys. Server & Storage Egineer / Tech .Consultant at CANAR OFFICE SYSTEMS

Provides comprehensive system management with effective deployment and integration capabilities

The advantages of Microsoft System Center are significant, and I have seen other products as well. As far as advantages are concerned, they have PXE deployment, which is good for deploying operating systems, such as Windows client systems including Windows 10 and Windows 11. Since it is a Microsoft product, all the patches are proprietary, making it easier to deploy. In Microsoft System Center, all the features are integrated already, whereas in ManageEngine, you have to license each feature individually to access those features. The automated features of Virtual Machine Manager are very useful; it automates as long as the policy that I have created is in line with the objective, especially the templates when I'm going to deploy. Regarding endpoint management, Microsoft System Center is very helpful; it has integrated endpoint protection deployment, allowing me to handle endpoint configuration, system deployment, and patch deployment, making it an all-in-one stop shop for managing and configuring end clients. The impact of using Microsoft System Center is significant; it gives me a whole picture of my environment, making it easy to get inventory details regarding applications and hardware, providing full visibility of my setup within the organization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its technical support is excellent."

"The robust security model of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform contributed positively to our data integrity and compliance in our development processes, and it was very good."

"The best feature for JBoss Enterprise Application Platform for me is high availability, and it is very strong."

"It's convenient and barebone."

"The solution is quite stable."

"The deployment and initial setup is easy, it is easier than the previous version."

"JBoss Enterprise Application Platform works very well."

"Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform pros

"The deployment and asset management features are the most valuable. These are the product's main features."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft System Center is its GUI (graphical user interface)."

"Many processes could be implemented out-of-the-box, and this helped to adopt processes in areas which we lacked."

"We like Microsoft System Center's Operations Manager. That is primarily why we use it."

"System Center helps to create the basis for ITIL alignment."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it helps us manage our company's application pool, license pool, application update pool, and OS updates."

"The installation process is easy."

"It can generate KPIs and management reports with monthly presentations on activities and updating the environment (success and failure)."

More Microsoft System Center pros

Cons

"It was too expensive to license JBoss Enterprise Application Platform for each process."

"In my opinion, there are areas that could be improved with JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, such as the management console."

"Sometimes, I observe the memory usage at 100% for the server, and this issue could be improved."

"It's hard to find out the root cause of errors."

"A graphic user interface can be added."

"Its architecture needs improvement."

"Lacks some functional requirements."

"This solution needs better management UI."

"The multi-tenancy support needs to be improved. We need to have the ability to manage several different environments from one central point of administration."

"We have some bugs but it's stable. It doesn't break every day. It works. Like other applications, it has a lot of bugs but they're manageable."

"In Microsoft System Center, it is difficult to follow the steps to create dataflows at times."

"Microsoft System Center should be easier to manage. However, it is complex to deploy, so people hesitate to use it. Though it has many features, such as licensing, asset tracking, and software deployment, we mainly use it for Windows updates. It protects many screens and integrates with databases, but it's complex compared to other solutions. Many now use cloud-based products or other tools like Automox to deploy updates and manage vulnerabilities."

"System Center hasn't updated to keep up with the industry. It needs improvements in the user interface, ease of use, and overall product functionality, particularly the cloud-monitoring features. It needs more capabilities to monitor AWS and Azure infrastructure."

"For me, the tool's UI seems to be too old."

"The solution's dashboard needs improvement."

"The disadvantage of Microsoft System Center is related to the many integrated services; if one service is failing, then all features will be affected."

More Microsoft System Center cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an open-source solution."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"It's rolled into our enterprise subscription. The entire subscription is around $25,000 a year, however, that covers all the products that we use."

"Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly."

"We maximized our license investment."

"I know that sometimes there is some reduction in the prices of Microsoft System Center because of the costs of Microsoft SQL Server, which can be advantageous."

"Microsoft System Center is quite expensive."

"I rate the product price as five to six on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is cheap and ten means it is expensive."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with JBoss Enterprise Application Platform?

I lost one opportunity for licensing to a bank that was implementing on-premises. It was too expensive to license JBoss Enterprise Application Platform for each process. The customer needed to impl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JBoss Enterprise Application Platform?

I have an application with JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and a middleware. I used JBoss Enterprise Application Platform for about eight years until 2016. I implemented a ticketing solution ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JBoss Enterprise Application Platform?

The customer needed to implement on a server with 32 processes, and the price from a local provider was approximately $64,000.

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft System Center?

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft System Center?

Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft System Center?

The disadvantage of Microsoft System Center is related to the many integrated services; if one service is failing, then all features will be affected. For example, with site configuration, when one...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 47% of the time

NGINX Plus vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Apache Web Server vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 7% of the time

WebLogic Suite vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 7% of the time

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Competitors

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 18% of the time

IBM BPM vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 13% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 13% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 9% of the time

More Microsoft System Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

January 2026

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform report

Download JBoss Enterprise Application Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft System Center

January 2026

Download Microsoft System Center product report

Also Known As

JBoss EAP, Red Hat EAP

MS System Center

Overview

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is an open source platform for modern Java applications deployed in any environment. JBoss EAPâs architecture is modular, and cloud ready. The platform offers powerful management and automation for greater developer productivity. It is based on the open source Wildfly project (formerly known as JBoss Application Server).

Red Hat

System Center helps customers realize the benefits of the Microsoft Cloud Platform by delivering unified management. Experience fast time-to-value with out-of-the-box monitoring, provisioning, configuration, automation, protection and self-service.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

APD, Banco Azteca, Roche, Tata Sky, Frost Bank

Kassen_rztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein, Magyar Telekom Nyrt., Adeka, QualCare, Aeriandi, UniCredit Bank d.d., Mostar, Allianz Australia Ltd., Grupo Familia

Buyer's Guide

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center

February 2026

Free Report: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center

Find out what your peers are saying about JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.